Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
BAKU PREVIEW
π It requires an EXTREME aerodynamic compromise:
- 'Monaco-like' Sectors 1 and 2 β‘οΈ Maximum downforce needed.
- Sector 3 consists of the longest full-throttle section on the calendar β‘οΈ Minimal drag required.
Consequently, medium- and low-load wings can both work. π
Ferrari won both Monaco and Monza: I expect them to perform well in Baku, which is a combination of both!
What's YOUR prediction? π€
πΈ: @pirellisport221
π It requires an EXTREME aerodynamic compromise:
- 'Monaco-like' Sectors 1 and 2 β‘οΈ Maximum downforce needed.
- Sector 3 consists of the longest full-throttle section on the calendar β‘οΈ Minimal drag required.
Consequently, medium- and low-load wings can both work. π
Ferrari won both Monaco and Monza: I expect them to perform well in Baku, which is a combination of both!
What's YOUR prediction? π€
πΈ: @pirellisport221
π₯10π2β€1β1
Azerbaijan GP - Wing Thrusday!
McLaren is running the most loaded rear wing.
RedBull, Ferrari, Aston are sacrificing a bit of downforce to gain straight line speed on Bakuβs super-long main straight.
Mercedes, Williams, Racing Bulls did it too, but to a higher degree.
Alpineβs wing is non-existentβ¦ the same as in Monza! π³
Honestly I cannot see how they can use it in Baku, I expect them to switch to a more loaded one throughout the weekend.
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
McLaren is running the most loaded rear wing.
RedBull, Ferrari, Aston are sacrificing a bit of downforce to gain straight line speed on Bakuβs super-long main straight.
Mercedes, Williams, Racing Bulls did it too, but to a higher degree.
Alpineβs wing is non-existentβ¦ the same as in Monza! π³
Honestly I cannot see how they can use it in Baku, I expect them to switch to a more loaded one throughout the weekend.
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
β€7π7π1
TOP SPEEDS - FP1
(Considering each team's quickest lap)
Aston 345km/h
Williams 343
...
Sauber 340
Red Bull 339
McL/Ferrari/Mercedes/RacingBulls/Alpine 337
...
Haas 334
Aston's top speed is 3km/h higher than their top speed in Monza FP1!
The DRS zone has been extended this year π
(Considering each team's quickest lap)
Aston 345km/h
Williams 343
...
Sauber 340
Red Bull 339
McL/Ferrari/Mercedes/RacingBulls/Alpine 337
...
Haas 334
Aston's top speed is 3km/h higher than their top speed in Monza FP1!
The DRS zone has been extended this year π
π6π₯3π€2β€1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
β€1
π FP2 DATA HIGHLIGHTS
Big top-speed differences, excellent π΄Ferrari cornering and Red Bull traction... and HUGE sandbagging from π NOR and π΅VER on the main straight! π(ERS turned way down ).
π₯LEC [Soft]
π₯PER +0.006s [Soft]
π₯HAM +0.066s [Soft]
1) BEST SECTORS:
- LEC quickest overall thanks to an excellent S1. McL struggled here.
- Red Bull unmatched in S2.
- Aston's excellent top speed made STR quickest in Sector 3... where NOR (the only driver on Mediums) and VER were SLOWEST!
Big top-speed differences, excellent π΄Ferrari cornering and Red Bull traction... and HUGE sandbagging from π NOR and π΅VER on the main straight! π(ERS turned way down ).
π₯LEC [Soft]
π₯PER +0.006s [Soft]
π₯HAM +0.066s [Soft]
1) BEST SECTORS:
- LEC quickest overall thanks to an excellent S1. McL struggled here.
- Red Bull unmatched in S2.
- Aston's excellent top speed made STR quickest in Sector 3... where NOR (the only driver on Mediums) and VER were SLOWEST!
β€8π1
Formula Data Analysis
π FP2 DATA HIGHLIGHTS Big top-speed differences, excellent π΄Ferrari cornering and Red Bull traction... and HUGE sandbagging from π NOR and π΅VER on the main straight! π(ERS turned way down ). π₯LEC [Soft] π₯PER +0.006s [Soft] π₯HAM +0.066s [Soft] 1) BEST SECTORS:β¦
2) TOP SPEEDS:
- Large difference between fastest (Aston, 345km/h) and slowest (Alpine, 336) cars.
- Big differences between teammates, too:
PIA 342km/h vs NOR 335;
PER 341 vs VER 337.
3) MINISECTORS:
- PER had excellent traction: check the exit of T2, T4, T12, and T16.
- LEC's cornering in Sectors 1 and 2 was unmatched.
- HAM gained in T13-T15 and out of the last corner (but LEC/PER were quicker at the end of the straight).
- Large difference between fastest (Aston, 345km/h) and slowest (Alpine, 336) cars.
- Big differences between teammates, too:
PIA 342km/h vs NOR 335;
PER 341 vs VER 337.
3) MINISECTORS:
- PER had excellent traction: check the exit of T2, T4, T12, and T16.
- LEC's cornering in Sectors 1 and 2 was unmatched.
- HAM gained in T13-T15 and out of the last corner (but LEC/PER were quicker at the end of the straight).
β€10β2
Formula Data Analysis
2) TOP SPEEDS: - Large difference between fastest (Aston, 345km/h) and slowest (Alpine, 336) cars. - Big differences between teammates, too: PIA 342km/h vs NOR 335; PER 341 vs VER 337. 3) MINISECTORS: - PER had excellent traction: check the exit of T2, T4β¦
Enjoyed this summary? π
Then become a page supporter to access:
- All the weekendβs analyses (80+)
- The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs
- My two webinars on βF1 Telemetry analysisβ (Beginner and Intermediate level)
Thanks for your support! π€©
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
Then become a page supporter to access:
- All the weekendβs analyses (80+)
- The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs
- My two webinars on βF1 Telemetry analysisβ (Beginner and Intermediate level)
Thanks for your support! π€©
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
Buy Me a Coffee
Membership | Formula Data Analysis
Hi! Thank you for wanting to support my projectI've always been fascinated with data - and cars!For three years, I supervised the design, production and racing of a Formula Car ποΈ, and then I sta
β€3π1
PRACTICE 2 - LONG RUNS:
Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great.
π₯RUS
π₯SAI +0.588s
π₯PER +0.670s
4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s
5οΈβ£VER +0.893s
6οΈβ£NOR +0.906s
7οΈβ£ALO +3.060s
Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great.
π₯RUS
π₯SAI +0.588s
π₯PER +0.670s
4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s
5οΈβ£VER +0.893s
6οΈβ£NOR +0.906s
7οΈβ£ALO +3.060s
π9
Formula Data Analysis
PRACTICE 2 - LONG RUNS: Russell was quickest: his gap to SAI was over half a second. The Hards (which RUS used) could be a better racing tyre... but no doubt that Mercedes' pace is looking great. π₯RUS π₯SAI +0.588s π₯PER +0.670s 4οΈβ£PIA +0.730s 5οΈβ£VER +0.893sβ¦
All the teams (Alonsoβs long run was the slowest on the grid).
π7
PERFORMANCE IN QUALIFYING
β¬ οΈ Worse / Better β‘οΈ
β¬οΈ Lower / Higher top speed β¬οΈ
π΄'King of Baku' Charles Leclerc got his 4th pole in a row despite a modest top speed (same for Mercedes, Williams, and Haas).
π McL had the lowest one! Proof that grip is more important than straight-line speed in Baku qualifying, but they could struggle to attack/defend tomorrow.
π΅RedBull can be aggressive, exploiting their +3km/h top speed advantage vs Ferrari and Mercedes and +6km/h over McLaren.
What's your prediction for the race? π€
β¬ οΈ Worse / Better β‘οΈ
β¬οΈ Lower / Higher top speed β¬οΈ
π΄'King of Baku' Charles Leclerc got his 4th pole in a row despite a modest top speed (same for Mercedes, Williams, and Haas).
π McL had the lowest one! Proof that grip is more important than straight-line speed in Baku qualifying, but they could struggle to attack/defend tomorrow.
π΅RedBull can be aggressive, exploiting their +3km/h top speed advantage vs Ferrari and Mercedes and +6km/h over McLaren.
What's your prediction for the race? π€
π₯10β€1
Norris reached consistently higher top speeds (~4km/h more) than Piastri in qualifying: this should aid his recovery drive!
PIA's top speed was the worst on the grid!
His additional downforce, however, could help with tyre wear.
(Laps with a tow were excluded.)
Made via @JMP_software
PIA's top speed was the worst on the grid!
His additional downforce, however, could help with tyre wear.
(Laps with a tow were excluded.)
Made via @JMP_software
π4
Piastri surprised Leclerc under braking getting a well-deserved win! π
McLβs excellent T16 exit and less loaded DRS plane made him gain up to the middle of the straight. π
SAI-PER crash helped McL get a sizeable lead in the WCC. π₯
10 points for Williams. π₯
BEA: first in history to drive 2 races with 2 teams getting points in both! π(Keeping a 7-times WDC behind for many laps).
Whatβs YOUR opinion? π€
McLβs excellent T16 exit and less loaded DRS plane made him gain up to the middle of the straight. π
SAI-PER crash helped McL get a sizeable lead in the WCC. π₯
10 points for Williams. π₯
BEA: first in history to drive 2 races with 2 teams getting points in both! π(Keeping a 7-times WDC behind for many laps).
Whatβs YOUR opinion? π€
β€21π5π₯3
π‘McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing"
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? π€
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted, @multiviewer
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? π€
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted, @multiviewer
β€11π2π1π€£1π¨1
Formula Data Analysis
π‘McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing" - Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull - McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage. Theβ¦
X (formerly Twitter)
Formula Data Analysis (@FDataAnalysis) on X
The legality of the βmini-DRSβ seemingly depends on whether it would revert to the βfully-closedβ position in case of failure
McLaren nullified its 1.74s/lap race pace gap in one year, gaining more than anyone! π
Solid improvement by Haas, Williams, and Mercedes. π
RedBull lost all its 2023 advantage (0.54s/lap vs Ferrari). π
The field got much closer: 4 teams within 0.22s/lap! (1.02s/lap last year).
Made via @JMP_software
Solid improvement by Haas, Williams, and Mercedes. π
RedBull lost all its 2023 advantage (0.54s/lap vs Ferrari). π
The field got much closer: 4 teams within 0.22s/lap! (1.02s/lap last year).
Made via @JMP_software
π14β€1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬