How much performance was Russell's 'missing mass' worth? ๐ค
No more than 2.2s, but at least 0.4s, depending on whether it was missing since the start (e.g. wrong ballast), or due to high tyre wear.
- First case: he would have gained around half a tenth per lap, on all 44 laps: worth 2.2s over the race distance.
- Second case: he did 16 laps more on Hards than HAM, so we assume he lost that additional 1.5kg in the last 16 laps. If that case, his pace advantage would have grown from null on Lap 26 up to 0.05s on Lap 44: the time gained would have been far less (just 0.4s).
All else being equal, HAM would have caught him 3 laps sooner (Lap 38 instead of 41) in the first case, and 1 lap sooner (Lap 40) in the second case.
No more than 2.2s, but at least 0.4s, depending on whether it was missing since the start (e.g. wrong ballast), or due to high tyre wear.
- First case: he would have gained around half a tenth per lap, on all 44 laps: worth 2.2s over the race distance.
- Second case: he did 16 laps more on Hards than HAM, so we assume he lost that additional 1.5kg in the last 16 laps. If that case, his pace advantage would have grown from null on Lap 26 up to 0.05s on Lap 44: the time gained would have been far less (just 0.4s).
All else being equal, HAM would have caught him 3 laps sooner (Lap 38 instead of 41) in the first case, and 1 lap sooner (Lap 40) in the second case.
โค8๐ค3๐2โ1
Stroll strongly complained about his straight-line speed, yet he set the highest top speed in the race๐ค
The reason?
When in free air his top speed was low indeed. As he couldn't overtake, he got a powerful tow while using DRS, reaching 356km/h.
Ocon's low-drag wing worked: he was fastest on average, and never below 317km/h at the end of Kemmel.๐
LEC was the only driver who didn't use DRS: that's why his best speed was 'just' 326km/h.๐ก
Made via @JMP_software
The reason?
When in free air his top speed was low indeed. As he couldn't overtake, he got a powerful tow while using DRS, reaching 356km/h.
Ocon's low-drag wing worked: he was fastest on average, and never below 317km/h at the end of Kemmel.๐
LEC was the only driver who didn't use DRS: that's why his best speed was 'just' 326km/h.๐ก
Made via @JMP_software
๐4๐ฅ1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
In FP2, Verstappen tested a (budget-friendly) lower-drag wing, but he went back to the more loaded one for the GP.๐ก
RedBull sawed the DRS plane to reduce its drag: this is an inefficient solution, used to save the money needed to design an entirely new wing. ๐ฐ
The top speed gain was:
- Moderate (4km/h) when the DRS was closedรฉ
- Very modest (2km/h) when the DRS was active, as the upper plane's drag is minimal in these conditions anyway!
VER lost 5km/h to PER in the fast Pohoun corner, where he was quicker on most laps on the same setup: the downforce loss was deemed excessive, and they used the more loaded option for the race. ๐ซ
Maybe we'll see it again in Monza!
(Values from two long-run laps very close in laptime; Photo by @lukemotorsport)
RedBull sawed the DRS plane to reduce its drag: this is an inefficient solution, used to save the money needed to design an entirely new wing. ๐ฐ
The top speed gain was:
- Moderate (4km/h) when the DRS was closedรฉ
- Very modest (2km/h) when the DRS was active, as the upper plane's drag is minimal in these conditions anyway!
VER lost 5km/h to PER in the fast Pohoun corner, where he was quicker on most laps on the same setup: the downforce loss was deemed excessive, and they used the more loaded option for the race. ๐ซ
Maybe we'll see it again in Monza!
(Values from two long-run laps very close in laptime; Photo by @lukemotorsport)
๐8๐ฅ2๐1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐ฅ1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐1๐ฅ1
Russell's excellent 34-lap stint would have earned him a sure podium if not for the missing 1.5kg.
RUS's second stint was quicker than HAM's: the former was running less fuel on average, but also much more worn-out tyres.
Look how RUS started pushing again as HAM caught him!
Made via @JMP_software
RUS's second stint was quicker than HAM's: the former was running less fuel on average, but also much more worn-out tyres.
Look how RUS started pushing again as HAM caught him!
Made via @JMP_software
๐7๐ฅ1
QUALIFYING GAPS EVOLUTION (Only Start-To-End Dry Sessions)
Red Bull's pace slumped after VER's 7 consecutive poles at the season start*: in the dry, it was only quickest in Austria since! ๐
After Monaco, Ferrari went from 2nd to 4th quickest on average. โ ๏ธ
McL was just the 5th fastest car in Bahrain! ๐ณ
*Notice that LEC set the best time in Bahrain.
Red Bull's pace slumped after VER's 7 consecutive poles at the season start*: in the dry, it was only quickest in Austria since! ๐
After Monaco, Ferrari went from 2nd to 4th quickest on average. โ ๏ธ
McL was just the 5th fastest car in Bahrain! ๐ณ
*Notice that LEC set the best time in Bahrain.
๐2๐ฅ1๐คจ1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
๐ฅ1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
๐ฅ1
Did you know that F1 cars produce incredibly HIGH drag? A Bugatti Veyron has a 60-100km/h higher top speed using the same power! ๐ค
F1 top speeds vary between 301km/h (High-downforce trim, no DRS) to 342km/h (Low-drag trim + DRS)*. In contrast, a Veyron has a 407km/h top speed ๐ณ
Drag is higher for the F1 car, but how much?
The POWER required increases with the CUBE of speed:
-Monza + DRS: (407/342)^3= 1.69 (69% more drag)
-Hungary, no DRS:(407/301)^3= 2.47 (147% more drag)
So it can easily be over twice that of a supercar. The Bugatti would only need 404hp [1000hp*(301/407)^3] to reach 301km/h, vs the RB19's ~1000hp!
F1 top speeds vary between 301km/h (High-downforce trim, no DRS) to 342km/h (Low-drag trim + DRS)*. In contrast, a Veyron has a 407km/h top speed ๐ณ
Drag is higher for the F1 car, but how much?
The POWER required increases with the CUBE of speed:
-Monza + DRS: (407/342)^3= 1.69 (69% more drag)
-Hungary, no DRS:(407/301)^3= 2.47 (147% more drag)
So it can easily be over twice that of a supercar. The Bugatti would only need 404hp [1000hp*(301/407)^3] to reach 301km/h, vs the RB19's ~1000hp!
๐ฅ8โค2๐1๐คฏ1
Formula Data Analysis
Did you know that F1 cars produce incredibly HIGH drag? A Bugatti Veyron has a 60-100km/h higher top speed using the same power! ๐ค F1 top speeds vary between 301km/h (High-downforce trim, no DRS) to 342km/h (Low-drag trim + DRS)*. In contrast, a Veyron hasโฆ
"So why is drag so high, if F1 teams spend millions to minimise it?" Because the laptime is the focus, and not the top speed: adding downforce will inevitably produce significant drag, but the overall effect will still be incredibly beneficial to laptime.
Comment with the name of your car: I will choose a few and tell you how it compares to an F1 car!
*Top speeds are evaluated at sea level, on the straights where the car approximately reaches its terminal speed (the one it would get on an endless straight). Gear ratios don't impact it, due to the PU's almost constant power above 10500rpm.
Comment with the name of your car: I will choose a few and tell you how it compares to an F1 car!
*Top speeds are evaluated at sea level, on the straights where the car approximately reaches its terminal speed (the one it would get on an endless straight). Gear ratios don't impact it, due to the PU's almost constant power above 10500rpm.
๐7โค1
Formula Data Analysis
Did you know that F1 cars produce incredibly HIGH drag? A Bugatti Veyron has a 60-100km/h higher top speed using the same power! ๐ค F1 top speeds vary between 301km/h (High-downforce trim, no DRS) to 342km/h (Low-drag trim + DRS)*. In contrast, a Veyron hasโฆ
More about drag by @FDataAnalysis :
'Which has a more slippery shape: a road car of a F1 car?'
https://reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/comments/1dim0tm/which_has_a_more_slippery_shape_a_road_car_of_a/
Drag Reduction | A Tech Discussion Post
https://reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/comments/166ilv3/drag_reduction_a_tech_discussion_post/
Which Parts of a F1 Car Produce the Most Drag?
https://reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/comments/1464xbj/which_parts_of_a_f1_car_produce_the_most_drag/
'Which has a more slippery shape: a road car of a F1 car?'
https://reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/comments/1dim0tm/which_has_a_more_slippery_shape_a_road_car_of_a/
Drag Reduction | A Tech Discussion Post
https://reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/comments/166ilv3/drag_reduction_a_tech_discussion_post/
Which Parts of a F1 Car Produce the Most Drag?
https://reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/comments/1464xbj/which_parts_of_a_f1_car_produce_the_most_drag/
Reddit
From the F1DataAnalysis community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the F1DataAnalysis community
๐3
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
CONSTRUCTORS STANDINGS AFTER 14 GPs:
๐ McL more than TRIPLED their 2023 points: a 251pts gain!
๐ต Red Bull lost the most points (175): +468 vs McL in 2023, but only +42 now. McL can win the WCC, especially if PER continues to underperform.
๐ดFerrari's season has been better so far, but their trajectory is concerning (the car got progressively better in 2023, and progressively worse this year).
โซ๏ธMercedes achieved similar points in 2023 (but won 3 of the past 4 races, vs no wins in 2023).
๐ขAston's demise has been spectacular: only 73pts so far after challenging VER at the start of last year.
Who will win the WCC between Red Bull and McLaren?
Will Mercedes win several other races this year?
Can Ferrari and Aston set an end to their struggles? ๐ค
๐ McL more than TRIPLED their 2023 points: a 251pts gain!
๐ต Red Bull lost the most points (175): +468 vs McL in 2023, but only +42 now. McL can win the WCC, especially if PER continues to underperform.
๐ดFerrari's season has been better so far, but their trajectory is concerning (the car got progressively better in 2023, and progressively worse this year).
โซ๏ธMercedes achieved similar points in 2023 (but won 3 of the past 4 races, vs no wins in 2023).
๐ขAston's demise has been spectacular: only 73pts so far after challenging VER at the start of last year.
Who will win the WCC between Red Bull and McLaren?
Will Mercedes win several other races this year?
Can Ferrari and Aston set an end to their struggles? ๐ค
๐ฅ11๐ญ4๐1
๐ดFerrari has scored less than half the points per GP post-Monaco compared to the season start โ ๏ธ
31.5 pts/GP up to Monaco (roughly a 2nd + 3rd/4th place, Sprints excluded).
15.5 pts/GP after that (roughly a 5th + 7th place).
It went from a solid WCC contender to 4th fastest car. ๐
31.5 pts/GP up to Monaco (roughly a 2nd + 3rd/4th place, Sprints excluded).
15.5 pts/GP after that (roughly a 5th + 7th place).
It went from a solid WCC contender to 4th fastest car. ๐
๐3๐จ2๐ฅด1
Formula Data Analysis
๐ดFerrari has scored less than half the points per GP post-Monaco compared to the season start โ ๏ธ 31.5 pts/GP up to Monaco (roughly a 2nd + 3rd/4th place, Sprints excluded). 15.5 pts/GP after that (roughly a 5th + 7th place). It went from a solid WCC contenderโฆ
Considering RedBullโs clear decline in form starting from Monaco, Ferrari could have been probably on par with them by now, had their upgrades been more successful.
๐ข3๐ค2
Formula Data Analysis
Considering RedBullโs clear decline in form starting from Monaco, Ferrari could have been probably on par with them by now, had their upgrades been more successful.
In the past few years, the team didnโt strike me like lazy at all (theyโve introduced many revolutionary cars, like the SF70 and F1-75, and brought countless updates), but they seem not to have a clear and effective development plan most of the time.
๐6๐1๐1