FP2 DATA HIGHLIGHTS
Norris was quickest despite the lowest top speed (high drag); still 1.179s away from '23 pole. BOT's sectors were impressive, but he couldn't combine them in a single lap
1) Top Speeds:
Haas is a rocket: 322km/h, +4km/h over the next fastest car (Ferrari).
Mercedes 314, RedBull 313, Alpine 311, McL 309: once again, Alpine and McL have a low top speed (high drag, and inferior engine too for Alpine).
RedBull had less mid-straight acceleration than McL, but a higher top speedโก๏ธSlightly lower engine mode and drag for RedBull.
Norris was quickest despite the lowest top speed (high drag); still 1.179s away from '23 pole. BOT's sectors were impressive, but he couldn't combine them in a single lap
1) Top Speeds:
Haas is a rocket: 322km/h, +4km/h over the next fastest car (Ferrari).
Mercedes 314, RedBull 313, Alpine 311, McL 309: once again, Alpine and McL have a low top speed (high drag, and inferior engine too for Alpine).
RedBull had less mid-straight acceleration than McL, but a higher top speedโก๏ธSlightly lower engine mode and drag for RedBull.
๐4๐ฅ1
Formula Data Analysis
FP2 DATA HIGHLIGHTS Norris was quickest despite the lowest top speed (high drag); still 1.179s away from '23 pole. BOT's sectors were impressive, but he couldn't combine them in a single lap 1) Top Speeds: Haas is a rocket: 322km/h, +4km/h over the nextโฆ
2) Fastest Sectors:
- McL was fastest in S1 (even though it includes the main straight): traction out of T1 was excellent. SAI was close, then ALO. Mercedes struggled.
- S2 (Long succession of medium-speed corners) was dominated by the 2 RedBulls (Updated for VER, previous spec for PER). NOR was 2nd quickest; Ferrari struggled significantly (insufficient downforce?).
- Perez, with the non-updated RedBull, was quickest in S3 (consisting of two 180deg corners).
- McL was fastest in S1 (even though it includes the main straight): traction out of T1 was excellent. SAI was close, then ALO. Mercedes struggled.
- S2 (Long succession of medium-speed corners) was dominated by the 2 RedBulls (Updated for VER, previous spec for PER). NOR was 2nd quickest; Ferrari struggled significantly (insufficient downforce?).
- Perez, with the non-updated RedBull, was quickest in S3 (consisting of two 180deg corners).
๐8
Formula Data Analysis
2) Fastest Sectors: - McL was fastest in S1 (even though it includes the main straight): traction out of T1 was excellent. SAI was close, then ALO. Mercedes struggled. - S2 (Long succession of medium-speed corners) was dominated by the 2 RedBulls (Updatedโฆ
Become a page supporter to access:
- All the weekendโs analyses (80+);
- The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs;
- My two webinars on โF1 Telemetry analysisโ (Beginner and Intermediate level).
And thanks for your support! ๐คฉ๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
- All the weekendโs analyses (80+);
- The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs;
- My two webinars on โF1 Telemetry analysisโ (Beginner and Intermediate level).
And thanks for your support! ๐คฉ๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
Buy Me a Coffee
Membership | Formula Data Analysis
Hi! Thank you for wanting to support my projectI've always been fascinated with data - and cars!For three years, I supervised the design, production and racing of a Formula Car ๐๏ธ, and then I sta
๐3
VER (New engine cover) vs PER (Old one):
Fastest laps from FP3:
Top speed: 317km/h for both
Min. speed @ T4: 246km/h VER, 239 PER
Min. speed @ T11: 237km/h VER, 226 PER
The new engine cover seems to provide a sizeable downforce gain, at the expense of apparently no drag.
Fastest laps from FP3:
Top speed: 317km/h for both
Min. speed @ T4: 246km/h VER, 239 PER
Min. speed @ T11: 237km/h VER, 226 PER
The new engine cover seems to provide a sizeable downforce gain, at the expense of apparently no drag.
๐6โค1๐ฅ1
Formula Data Analysis
VER (New engine cover) vs PER (Old one): Fastest laps from FP3: Top speed: 317km/h for both Min. speed @ T4: 246km/h VER, 239 PER Min. speed @ T11: 237km/h VER, 226 PER The new engine cover seems to provide a sizeable downforce gain, at the expense of apparentlyโฆ
The difference in cornering speed was minimal in the slow corners, and very significant in the fast ones.
Definitely the effect of downforce, and not driver skill (even though having two Verstappens would have probably reduced the difference a bit).
Definitely the effect of downforce, and not driver skill (even though having two Verstappens would have probably reduced the difference a bit).
๐5โค2๐1
๐กQUALIFYING DATA HIGHLIGHTS๐
1) TOP SPEEDS:
McL locked out the front row despite having the lowest top speed! (-11km/h deficit to 'rocket' Haas)
Their excellent traction and mechanical grip made up for that. Drag might bite them in Spa, however...
Alpine 2nd highest top speed: a rare sight!
2) BEST SECTORS:
PIA and NOR were unmatched in the twisty sectors 2 and 3, but their low top speed held them back
in Sector 1 (where VER, SAI, and ALO were quickest).
3) CORNERING GRIP:
RedBull has a clear cornering edge: around 0.5g more than Ferrari and McL in the medium and high-speed corners.
What's your prediction for the GP? Enjoy the race (and the data)!
1) TOP SPEEDS:
McL locked out the front row despite having the lowest top speed! (-11km/h deficit to 'rocket' Haas)
Their excellent traction and mechanical grip made up for that. Drag might bite them in Spa, however...
Alpine 2nd highest top speed: a rare sight!
2) BEST SECTORS:
PIA and NOR were unmatched in the twisty sectors 2 and 3, but their low top speed held them back
in Sector 1 (where VER, SAI, and ALO were quickest).
3) CORNERING GRIP:
RedBull has a clear cornering edge: around 0.5g more than Ferrari and McL in the medium and high-speed corners.
What's your prediction for the GP? Enjoy the race (and the data)!
โค5๐1
The most dramatic Hungarian GP in YEARS! ๐ณ
๐ First McL 1-2 since Monza โ21! But managing the drivers gets harder with big points on the table
๐ต 3rd race in a row that VER hasnโt won: RBโs dominance has ended. Furious against the teamโs strategy and development
๐ด Puzzling Ferrari performance: LEC was decent on mediums, and fastest on Hards
PER just 2 places behind VER despite starting at the back: he maximized his points.
Whatโs YOUR opinion? ๐ค
๐ First McL 1-2 since Monza โ21! But managing the drivers gets harder with big points on the table
๐ต 3rd race in a row that VER hasnโt won: RBโs dominance has ended. Furious against the teamโs strategy and development
๐ด Puzzling Ferrari performance: LEC was decent on mediums, and fastest on Hards
PER just 2 places behind VER despite starting at the back: he maximized his points.
Whatโs YOUR opinion? ๐ค
โค12๐2๐1๐ข1
Norris had the quickest pace in the Hungarian GP (if laps 68-69 are removed), but PIA was just 0.04s/lap behind! McLaren has never been this strong in the V6 era!
Lewis Hamilton was the quickest non-McL driver:
HAM/LEC/VER/SAI were close in pace (but over 0.2s slower than Norris).
PER 'just' 0.23s slower than VER despite being stuck behind slower cars: solid comeback.
Lewis Hamilton was the quickest non-McL driver:
HAM/LEC/VER/SAI were close in pace (but over 0.2s slower than Norris).
PER 'just' 0.23s slower than VER despite being stuck behind slower cars: solid comeback.
๐10๐ฅ8โค3
Most teams were quicker in the #HungarianGP compared to 2023... but not RedBull! (and Sauber) โ ๏ธ
VER totally dominated last year's race: he finished over half a MINUTE in front of NOR, and almost lapped LEC. This year, instead, he finished behind the Monegasque.
Ferrari's improvement was the largest, partly because their '23 pace was terrible (remember LEC on Hards on a cold track?).
McLaren's improvement looks even more incredible: they gained 8 TENTHS per lap to RedBull despite being already the 2nd fastest car last year!
Congrats to Andrea Stella for the extraordinary development! ๐
Something has gone terribly wrong at RedBull, it seems...
Made via @JMP_software
VER totally dominated last year's race: he finished over half a MINUTE in front of NOR, and almost lapped LEC. This year, instead, he finished behind the Monegasque.
Ferrari's improvement was the largest, partly because their '23 pace was terrible (remember LEC on Hards on a cold track?).
McLaren's improvement looks even more incredible: they gained 8 TENTHS per lap to RedBull despite being already the 2nd fastest car last year!
Congrats to Andrea Stella for the extraordinary development! ๐
Something has gone terribly wrong at RedBull, it seems...
Made via @JMP_software
๐8โค7
Formula Data Analysis
Most teams were quicker in the #HungarianGP compared to 2023... but not RedBull! (and Sauber) โ ๏ธ VER totally dominated last year's race: he finished over half a MINUTE in front of NOR, and almost lapped LEC. This year, instead, he finished behind the Monegasque.โฆ
Spa should favor lower drag cars (Haas, but also Ferrari and RedBull) vs draggier ones (McL, Alpine).
While everyone was running max-downforce (Monaco spec) wings in Hungary, they will instead use low to medium-low load wings in Spa.
In spa, low overall drag and high efficiency (good downforce and modest drag) will be key.
While everyone was running max-downforce (Monaco spec) wings in Hungary, they will instead use low to medium-low load wings in Spa.
In spa, low overall drag and high efficiency (good downforce and modest drag) will be key.
๐6๐ฅ2โค1
Belgian GP Preview!
- Longest track;
- Sectors 1, 3: almost full-throttle;
- Sector 2: medium- and high-speed corners
โฌ๏ธ
Aero efficiency (low drag, still enough downforce) needed to be quick, overtake, and manage the tyres.
โช๏ธHaasโ low drag should make them quick.
๐ McLarenโs high drag might bite them, but they might trim their wings more than most other teams (as the car has high downforce).
Itโs gonna be be exciting!
Whatโs YOUR prediction?๐ค
- Longest track;
- Sectors 1, 3: almost full-throttle;
- Sector 2: medium- and high-speed corners
โฌ๏ธ
Aero efficiency (low drag, still enough downforce) needed to be quick, overtake, and manage the tyres.
โช๏ธHaasโ low drag should make them quick.
๐ McLarenโs high drag might bite them, but they might trim their wings more than most other teams (as the car has high downforce).
Itโs gonna be be exciting!
Whatโs YOUR prediction?๐ค
โค6๐5๐1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Visualizing the airflow around McLaren's sidepods! ๐ (Collab with @justf1car)
Among all teams, McLaren improved the most year after year, but also throughout each season.
Their development path has been clear, reliable, and extremely effective.
Example: Best McL Quali Lap - Hungary
Top speed / T4 min. speed / T9 min. speed
-2022: 309km/h / 236km/h / 153km/h
-2023: 312 (+3) / 248 (+12) / 157 (+4)
-2024: 313 (+1) / 247 (-1) / 166 (+9)
Among all teams, McLaren improved the most year after year, but also throughout each season.
Their development path has been clear, reliable, and extremely effective.
Example: Best McL Quali Lap - Hungary
Top speed / T4 min. speed / T9 min. speed
-2022: 309km/h / 236km/h / 153km/h
-2023: 312 (+3) / 248 (+12) / 157 (+4)
-2024: 313 (+1) / 247 (-1) / 166 (+9)
๐9โค3
Formula Data Analysis
Visualizing the airflow around McLaren's sidepods! ๐ (Collab with @justf1car) Among all teams, McLaren improved the most year after year, but also throughout each season. Their development path has been clear, reliable, and extremely effective. Example:โฆ
McL qualified P4 in 2022 already (+0.394s from pole); it further improved to P3 in 2023 (+0.085s) and to front-row lockout in 2024.
Since 2022 they gained +4km/h of top speed, +11km/h in T4 and +13km/h in T9: much more downforce while reducing drag at the same time! (Starting from a second-row-capable car).
Since 2022 they gained +4km/h of top speed, +11km/h in T4 and +13km/h in T9: much more downforce while reducing drag at the same time! (Starting from a second-row-capable car).
๐9โค5๐ฅ1
Formula Data Analysis
McL qualified P4 in 2022 already (+0.394s from pole); it further improved to P3 in 2023 (+0.085s) and to front-row lockout in 2024. Since 2022 they gained +4km/h of top speed, +11km/h in T4 and +13km/h in T9: much more downforce while reducing drag at theโฆ
Enjoyed the post?
Follow @justf1car for the best F1 animations, and @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! ๐คฉ
๐
Follow @justf1car for the best F1 animations, and @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! ๐คฉ
๐
โค7๐ฅ1
REAR WINGS - Belgian GP
Low- to medium-low downforce, to be quick in the long and uphill full-throttle sections. ๐
Teams hope that their floor itself produces enough downforce to be quick in Sector 2! ๐
๐ผMost loaded: RedBull/Aston
๐ฝLeast loaded: Ferrari/McL/RacingB/Merc
๐ธ: @AlbertFabrega
Low- to medium-low downforce, to be quick in the long and uphill full-throttle sections. ๐
Teams hope that their floor itself produces enough downforce to be quick in Sector 2! ๐
๐ผMost loaded: RedBull/Aston
๐ฝLeast loaded: Ferrari/McL/RacingB/Merc
๐ธ: @AlbertFabrega
๐12๐ฅ1
It's still FP1, but VER is already looking like the clear favourite for pole (but he has a 10 places grid penalty).
Red Bull is using a much less loaded rear wing than last year: despite that, VER already took T11 full-throttle (289km/h)! ๐ณ
He was 0.53s/lap quicker than PIA despite losing ~0.3s on the main full-throttle section alone (due to a much lower engine mode). His top speed was similar to PIA, however, thanks to the RB20's lower drag.
Compared to McL, the RB20 seems to have less drag (expected) and possibly more downforce (unexpected). And VER did 1:43.37 (0.9s faster than the '22 pole) using a very detuned engine mode...
Red Bull is using a much less loaded rear wing than last year: despite that, VER already took T11 full-throttle (289km/h)! ๐ณ
He was 0.53s/lap quicker than PIA despite losing ~0.3s on the main full-throttle section alone (due to a much lower engine mode). His top speed was similar to PIA, however, thanks to the RB20's lower drag.
Compared to McL, the RB20 seems to have less drag (expected) and possibly more downforce (unexpected). And VER did 1:43.37 (0.9s faster than the '22 pole) using a very detuned engine mode...
๐6๐ฅ3๐2โค1
LONG RUNS (FP2)
McLaren was quickest on both compounds:
-By 0.231s/lap on Mediums (NOR vs SAI)
-By 1.042s/lap (!) on Softs (PIA vs LEC)
McLaren's high-ish drag might hold them down a bit in qualifying, but their high downforce will make them the car to beat in the race!
๐ฅMcL
๐ฅFerrari
๐ฅRedBull (probably higher fuel / lower engine mode)
4๏ธโฃMercedes
5๏ธโฃAston
What's YOUR prediction? ๐ค
McLaren was quickest on both compounds:
-By 0.231s/lap on Mediums (NOR vs SAI)
-By 1.042s/lap (!) on Softs (PIA vs LEC)
McLaren's high-ish drag might hold them down a bit in qualifying, but their high downforce will make them the car to beat in the race!
๐ฅMcL
๐ฅFerrari
๐ฅRedBull (probably higher fuel / lower engine mode)
4๏ธโฃMercedes
5๏ธโฃAston
What's YOUR prediction? ๐ค
๐9๐2
Formula Data Analysis
LONG RUNS (FP2) McLaren was quickest on both compounds: -By 0.231s/lap on Mediums (NOR vs SAI) -By 1.042s/lap (!) on Softs (PIA vs LEC) McLaren's high-ish drag might hold them down a bit in qualifying, but their high downforce will make them the car to beatโฆ
Become a page supporter to access:
-All the weekendโs analyses (80+)
-The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs
-My two webinars on โF1 Telemetry analysisโ (Beginner and Intermediate level)
And thanks for your support!๐คฉ๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
-All the weekendโs analyses (80+)
-The in-depth quali and race preview and post-race articles for all GPs
-My two webinars on โF1 Telemetry analysisโ (Beginner and Intermediate level)
And thanks for your support!๐คฉ๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/membership
Buy Me a Coffee
Membership | Formula Data Analysis
Hi! Thank you for wanting to support my projectI've always been fascinated with data - and cars!For three years, I supervised the design, production and racing of a Formula Car ๐๏ธ, and then I sta
๐ฅ2