Thoughts on Austrian GP Sprint Qualifying! π
- This weekend is looking like another VER-McL close fight!π₯
- Mercedes was 3rd fastest, Ferrari 4th fastest (and LEC cannot catch a break)!
- Both Alpines in SQ3, 5th fastest team in front of Aston again: brilliant improvement! π
- This weekend is looking like another VER-McL close fight!π₯
- Mercedes was 3rd fastest, Ferrari 4th fastest (and LEC cannot catch a break)!
- Both Alpines in SQ3, 5th fastest team in front of Aston again: brilliant improvement! π
π6π2β€1
Who had the best top speed on Austrian GP's 3 straights? π
π΅RedBull's slowest straight was still better than π McL's fastest: clear drag advantage.
π’Mercedes andπ΄Ferrari were matched on every straight!
π£Top speed is now Alpine's main issue (grip has improved significantly)!
[Considering each team's best lap]
π΅RedBull's slowest straight was still better than π McL's fastest: clear drag advantage.
π’Mercedes andπ΄Ferrari were matched on every straight!
π£Top speed is now Alpine's main issue (grip has improved significantly)!
[Considering each team's best lap]
π7
RedBull's aerodynamic efficiency was unmatched:
π‘VER was quickest at the end of all straights (Lowest Drag) and quickest in all the (non-full-throttle) high-speed corners! (high downforce)
π NOR exploited McL's great traction.
π’RUS was never the quickest outside of Sector 2.
Verstappen will start the sprint with 2 McLarens behind him!
How do you expect it to end?
π‘VER was quickest at the end of all straights (Lowest Drag) and quickest in all the (non-full-throttle) high-speed corners! (high downforce)
π NOR exploited McL's great traction.
π’RUS was never the quickest outside of Sector 2.
Verstappen will start the sprint with 2 McLarens behind him!
How do you expect it to end?
β€7π4
Thoughts on Austrian GP Sprint! π
- Another close VER-McL fight! But VER gained an edge lap after lap.
- Blistering Ferrari start, but not enough pace to beat Mercedes. LEC asked to lift and coast to manage brake temp (tomorrow 49 more laps and full tankβ¦).
- Tough sprint for ALO.
Whatβs YOUR opinion?π€ (This track rarely disappoints, imho!)
- Another close VER-McL fight! But VER gained an edge lap after lap.
- Blistering Ferrari start, but not enough pace to beat Mercedes. LEC asked to lift and coast to manage brake temp (tomorrow 49 more laps and full tankβ¦).
- Tough sprint for ALO.
Whatβs YOUR opinion?π€ (This track rarely disappoints, imho!)
π11β€1
RACE PACE - Austrian GP Sprint
McL quickest at the start, but their pace vs VER progressively deteriorated:
π₯π‘VER
π₯π PIA: +0.13s/lap
π₯π NOR: +0.20s/lap
π’Mercedes: 0.08-0.09s/lap quicker than π΄Ferrari.
βͺοΈSolid pace and wear by MAG!π
Williams and Sauber slowest by far.
Teams can change the setup after the Sprint, and the higher fuel load in the Race might influence the running order!
McL quickest at the start, but their pace vs VER progressively deteriorated:
π₯π‘VER
π₯π PIA: +0.13s/lap
π₯π NOR: +0.20s/lap
π’Mercedes: 0.08-0.09s/lap quicker than π΄Ferrari.
βͺοΈSolid pace and wear by MAG!π
Williams and Sauber slowest by far.
Teams can change the setup after the Sprint, and the higher fuel load in the Race might influence the running order!
π€8β€2π2
Austrian GP SUMMARY
- RUS won again after almost 2 years! 37 points for Merc.
- βAggressiveβ NOR-VER fight ended in the worst way possibleβ οΈ
- Opposite to the Sprint, McLβs pace improved through the session: PIA P2.
- LEC hopeless after L1 contact.
- Haas: 12 points, and HUL beat PER!β‘οΈOvertook Alpine in WCC.
Whatβs your take on the crash and the preceding and following penalties?π€
- RUS won again after almost 2 years! 37 points for Merc.
- βAggressiveβ NOR-VER fight ended in the worst way possibleβ οΈ
- Opposite to the Sprint, McLβs pace improved through the session: PIA P2.
- LEC hopeless after L1 contact.
- Haas: 12 points, and HUL beat PER!β‘οΈOvertook Alpine in WCC.
Whatβs your take on the crash and the preceding and following penalties?π€
π8π₯6β€2
Formula Data Analysis
Austrian GP SUMMARY - RUS won again after almost 2 years! 37 points for Merc. - βAggressiveβ NOR-VER fight ended in the worst way possibleβ οΈ - Opposite to the Sprint, McLβs pace improved through the session: PIA P2. - LEC hopeless after L1 contact. - Haas:β¦
Tyre degradation was extremely high today, even taking into account the fact that Pirelli brought their softest compounds here (C3-C5).
Despite that, the Medium was actually a better tyre than the Hard, as the latter had similar durability at the expense of grip.
Despite that, the Medium was actually a better tyre than the Hard, as the latter had similar durability at the expense of grip.
π6π1
Austrian GP RACE PACE (Up to L64)
VER 0.05s/lap quicker than NOR, but lost more time in the pits.
Team pace (s/lap, faster driver on 2 stops)
π₯RBR
π₯McL +0.05
π₯Merc +0.30
4οΈβ£Ferrari +0.35
5οΈβ£Haas +0.97 (βΌοΈ)
6οΈβ£RacingBulls +1.09
7οΈβ£Alpine +1.10
8οΈβ£Williams +1.27
9οΈβ£Aston +1.28 (βΌοΈ)
πSauber +1.45
VER 0.05s/lap quicker than NOR, but lost more time in the pits.
Team pace (s/lap, faster driver on 2 stops)
π₯RBR
π₯McL +0.05
π₯Merc +0.30
4οΈβ£Ferrari +0.35
5οΈβ£Haas +0.97 (βΌοΈ)
6οΈβ£RacingBulls +1.09
7οΈβ£Alpine +1.10
8οΈβ£Williams +1.27
9οΈβ£Aston +1.28 (βΌοΈ)
πSauber +1.45
π13π€3β€2
SPEED TRAP (QUALIFYING)
πHaas: best top speed on the two main straightsβ‘οΈIn the race, it was easier for them to attack and defend .
πMcLaren and (even more so) Alpine suffered from high drag: no wonder NOR struggled to attack VER (and OCO/GAS had trouble overtaking)!
Made via @JMP_software
πHaas: best top speed on the two main straightsβ‘οΈIn the race, it was easier for them to attack and defend .
πMcLaren and (even more so) Alpine suffered from high drag: no wonder NOR struggled to attack VER (and OCO/GAS had trouble overtaking)!
Made via @JMP_software
π8π₯1π€1
β οΈ Verstappen complained about 'clipping', and he was right: he had a consistent top-speed deficit to Norris (the opposite than in qualifying), which grew larger in the 2nd stint.
πͺ«His ERS deployment reduced towards the end of the straight, limiting his top speed.
πNorris' pace improved significantly throughout the race, allowing him to attack the leader in the last stint.
πͺ«His ERS deployment reduced towards the end of the straight, limiting his top speed.
πNorris' pace improved significantly throughout the race, allowing him to attack the leader in the last stint.
π10β€3π±1
Silverstone: probably the most demanding track for the tyres! π
- Extremely high wear (despite the hardest C1-C3 compounds).
- Cornering grip is crucial for performance here!
Most will use medium-load wings.
McL's downforce and RedBull's efficiency will be handy.β
Who's your bet?π€
- Extremely high wear (despite the hardest C1-C3 compounds).
- Cornering grip is crucial for performance here!
Most will use medium-load wings.
McL's downforce and RedBull's efficiency will be handy.β
Who's your bet?π€
π₯5β4β€2π2
Remember when Charles Leclerc
got on the podium of the British GP in the underpowered SF1000? π
Ferrari gambled by using a very unloaded rear wing, producing two benefits:
- Much less dragβ‘οΈExcellent top speed.π
- Less stress on the carcassβ‘οΈImproved tyre wear! π
HAM's won by driving on 3 wheels after his front left failed.π₯
got on the podium of the British GP in the underpowered SF1000? π
Ferrari gambled by using a very unloaded rear wing, producing two benefits:
- Much less dragβ‘οΈExcellent top speed.π
- Less stress on the carcassβ‘οΈImproved tyre wear! π
HAM's won by driving on 3 wheels after his front left failed.π₯
β€7π4π1π₯1
Formula Data Analysis
Remember when Charles Leclerc got on the podium of the British GP in the underpowered SF1000? π Ferrari gambled by using a very unloaded rear wing, producing two benefits: - Much less dragβ‘οΈExcellent top speed.π - Less stress on the carcassβ‘οΈImproved tyreβ¦
The effect of downforce on tyre degradation is interesting:
Most of the time, adding downforce REDUCES the degradation, as the tyres slide less which prevents spikes in temperature and friction power from being generated.
However, adding too much downforce can increase the degradation, if the driver uses the additional grip to corner at a higher speed (therefore producing higher tyre forces, which induce more wear).
In general, tyre wear is improved by:
1) High downforce, but not to the point of inducing excessive tyre forces.
2) Making the driver not push 100% in the fast corners, which greatly reduces the sliding for a minimal performance loss.
Most of the time, adding downforce REDUCES the degradation, as the tyres slide less which prevents spikes in temperature and friction power from being generated.
However, adding too much downforce can increase the degradation, if the driver uses the additional grip to corner at a higher speed (therefore producing higher tyre forces, which induce more wear).
In general, tyre wear is improved by:
1) High downforce, but not to the point of inducing excessive tyre forces.
2) Making the driver not push 100% in the fast corners, which greatly reduces the sliding for a minimal performance loss.
β€7π6β4π1
Did you know you can find all my previous tech discussions and explanations (e.g. 'Which parts of an F1 car produce the most drag' and 'What is an Inerter?') neatly organised in my Subreddit?π€©
π Here is the link to it: new discussions are welcomed!
https://www.reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/
π Here is the link to it: new discussions are welcomed!
https://www.reddit.com/r/F1DataAnalysis/
π₯5β€1π1
π‘REAR WINGS
Teams must strike a good balance between:
- cornering gripπ (more wing load),
- straight-line performance π(less wing load).
This is my attempt at making sense of each team's choice!
Differences, while minor, become clear when comparing Aston and Sauber.
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
Teams must strike a good balance between:
- cornering gripπ (more wing load),
- straight-line performance π(less wing load).
This is my attempt at making sense of each team's choice!
Differences, while minor, become clear when comparing Aston and Sauber.
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega
π7
Finally a good shot of RedBull's new vertical inlet! π (Introduced in Spain)
RB20's launch puzzled everyone about the possible shape of their inlets.
After understanding their concept better in the first races, they've found the confidence to make its design more complex.π
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega ; @autosport
RB20's launch puzzled everyone about the possible shape of their inlets.
After understanding their concept better in the first races, they've found the confidence to make its design more complex.π
πΈ: @AlbertFabrega ; @autosport
β€6π4π₯2
NUMBER OF PERFORMANCE UPGRADES for #BritishGP
(not track-specific)
-Haas: 7π
-RedBull, Aston: 2
-Mercedes, Sauber, RacingBulls: 1
-Ferrari, McL, Williams, Alpine: 0
π Ferrari is working to understand the bouncing problems induced by their Barcellona package.
(not track-specific)
-Haas: 7π
-RedBull, Aston: 2
-Mercedes, Sauber, RacingBulls: 1
-Ferrari, McL, Williams, Alpine: 0
π Ferrari is working to understand the bouncing problems induced by their Barcellona package.
π6π₯2
The updated Ferrari struggled significantly more in the fast corners (bouncing?) than the old oneβ οΈ
βͺοΈSAI: Imola-spec
π΄LEC: Spain-spec
LEC couldn't use VIII gear through Copse, as he had to lift more!
His gain in the slower sections might be due to his softer tyre
The bouncing can be limited by raising the car, but that would remove precious downforce from it!
A tricky issue, similar to the one Mercedes experienced with the 'tractor' W13
βͺοΈSAI: Imola-spec
π΄LEC: Spain-spec
LEC couldn't use VIII gear through Copse, as he had to lift more!
His gain in the slower sections might be due to his softer tyre
The bouncing can be limited by raising the car, but that would remove precious downforce from it!
A tricky issue, similar to the one Mercedes experienced with the 'tractor' W13
π€10π3π1