This is just one of the many analyses from FP2 that I uploaded to my analyses repository, to which all the page supporters have access too! ππ
It is also one of those that I will discuss in my βQuali and Race Previewβ article coming out tomorrowπ
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/spanish-gp-analyses-repository
It is also one of those that I will discuss in my βQuali and Race Previewβ article coming out tomorrowπ
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/spanish-gp-analyses-repository
Buy Me a Coffee
Spanish GP - Analyses Repository β Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
π2π₯2
Hamilton was quicker than SAI/NOR only in Turn 12; still, his lap was quicker overall!
He was pretty close to the fastest driver everywhereβ‘οΈNo clear weakness for Mercedes
π΄Ferrari: great efficiency (dragπ½, downforceπΌ) in FP2β‘οΈExcellent Sector 1
π NOR mighty in Sector 2
He was pretty close to the fastest driver everywhereβ‘οΈNo clear weakness for Mercedes
π΄Ferrari: great efficiency (dragπ½, downforceπΌ) in FP2β‘οΈExcellent Sector 1
π NOR mighty in Sector 2
β€10π2π₯2
π‘FP3 MAIN POINTS:
- Ferrari quickest in all sectors (LEC S1+S2, SAI S3).
- 324km/h Ferrari, 322 Merc and RedBull, 321 McL.
- NOR next best in the fast S1 and the slow S3. HAM competitive in S2, where Aston struggled.
- Ferrari lifted the most in high-speed corners, RedBull the least.
- Ferrari quickest in all sectors (LEC S1+S2, SAI S3).
- 324km/h Ferrari, 322 Merc and RedBull, 321 McL.
- NOR next best in the fast S1 and the slow S3. HAM competitive in S2, where Aston struggled.
- Ferrari lifted the most in high-speed corners, RedBull the least.
π13π₯4
π Spanish GP Quali!
π NOR improved all his sectors in his last lap, delivering when it mattered!
π΅ VER in the game again.
β«οΈ Solid performance by Merc, as in Canada.
π΄ The updated Ferrari lost P3-P4 by just 0.030s.
π£ Both alpines in Q3 on a representative track.
YOUR prediction? π€
π NOR improved all his sectors in his last lap, delivering when it mattered!
π΅ VER in the game again.
β«οΈ Solid performance by Merc, as in Canada.
π΄ The updated Ferrari lost P3-P4 by just 0.030s.
π£ Both alpines in Q3 on a representative track.
YOUR prediction? π€
π10β€6π₯3π1π€1
π‘Turn 14 reveals Ferrari's weakness (which is RedBull's strength)
πFerrari has less downforce than the othersβ‘οΈLEC lifted significantly (72% throttle, 267km/h)
HAM and NOR only needed a tiny lift... but VER remained full throttle! His superior downforce reveals a race-focused setupπ
Ferrari was also the only car to lift in T9: due to the fuel load and tyre wear present in the race, LEC and SAI could be farther from the others compared to qualifying (while VER could be even stronger!)
πFerrari has less downforce than the othersβ‘οΈLEC lifted significantly (72% throttle, 267km/h)
HAM and NOR only needed a tiny lift... but VER remained full throttle! His superior downforce reveals a race-focused setupπ
Ferrari was also the only car to lift in T9: due to the fuel load and tyre wear present in the race, LEC and SAI could be farther from the others compared to qualifying (while VER could be even stronger!)
π4π2π₯1
Formula Data Analysis
π‘Turn 14 reveals Ferrari's weakness (which is RedBull's strength) πFerrari has less downforce than the othersβ‘οΈLEC lifted significantly (72% throttle, 267km/h) HAM and NOR only needed a tiny lift... but VER remained full throttle! His superior downforceβ¦
You might be wondering why VER had a 1km/h higher minimum cornering speed than HAM, who had to lift a bit.
The reason is that HAM reached the corner with a 3km/h higher speed (less drag or stronger ERS deployment, or both), and only lost part of his advantage there.
VER exited the corner way better, though (4km/h advantage on corner exit).
The reason is that HAM reached the corner with a 3km/h higher speed (less drag or stronger ERS deployment, or both), and only lost part of his advantage there.
VER exited the corner way better, though (4km/h advantage on corner exit).
π₯4π2
FP3 Long Runs π
Verstappen 'sand-bagged' massively: almost 3s/lap slower than Russell on average!
- Lifted much more in the high-speed corners (more fuel and farther from limits).
- Top speed was low (lower engine mode).
RUS was quickest, but LEC's pace improved throughout the stint.
Hamilton had a trend similar to RUS; he was simply slower: lower top speed yet had to lift moreβ‘οΈMore fuel, less power.
Verstappen 'sand-bagged' massively: almost 3s/lap slower than Russell on average!
- Lifted much more in the high-speed corners (more fuel and farther from limits).
- Top speed was low (lower engine mode).
RUS was quickest, but LEC's pace improved throughout the stint.
Hamilton had a trend similar to RUS; he was simply slower: lower top speed yet had to lift moreβ‘οΈMore fuel, less power.
π2π₯°2
Formula Data Analysis
FP3 Long Runs π Verstappen 'sand-bagged' massively: almost 3s/lap slower than Russell on average! - Lifted much more in the high-speed corners (more fuel and farther from limits). - Top speed was low (lower engine mode). RUS was quickest, but LEC's paceβ¦
FP2 Long Runs, too
π4
In the last stint, VER used more throttle in the high-speed corners... yet he was slower there! How?! π€
More loaded wingβ‘οΈMore dragβ‘οΈLower entry speed! Lifting less was not enough to compensate for this, but he did exit with the same speed as NOR. β±
His top speed was lower, too. π
Norris was pushing 100% to try to catch him: McL's tyre wear and empty-tank pace was unmatched.
The data refers to Lap 63 (the last lap before both drivers increased their laptimes), but this trend is observed throughout the last stint.
More loaded wingβ‘οΈMore dragβ‘οΈLower entry speed! Lifting less was not enough to compensate for this, but he did exit with the same speed as NOR. β±
His top speed was lower, too. π
Norris was pushing 100% to try to catch him: McL's tyre wear and empty-tank pace was unmatched.
The data refers to Lap 63 (the last lap before both drivers increased their laptimes), but this trend is observed throughout the last stint.
π9π€4π1
Which team has the longest (or shortest) gear ratios?π€
I've estimated them to compare them! π‘
Mercedes: shortest gear ratios from gear V onwards
Red Bull Racing: longest gears from IV onwards
Gear ratios are fixed for the season: same PU, yet different ratios for McL and Merc.
As F1 Engines have a very flat power curve (due to the mandated flow limit), gear ratios from II to VII are chosen based mainly on corner-exit drivability.
For a given engine, a longer VIII gear suggests that the team expects less drag.
Made via @JMP_software
I've estimated them to compare them! π‘
Mercedes: shortest gear ratios from gear V onwards
Red Bull Racing: longest gears from IV onwards
Gear ratios are fixed for the season: same PU, yet different ratios for McL and Merc.
As F1 Engines have a very flat power curve (due to the mandated flow limit), gear ratios from II to VII are chosen based mainly on corner-exit drivability.
For a given engine, a longer VIII gear suggests that the team expects less drag.
Made via @JMP_software
π4β€2π₯1
Ready for the first βHigh-altitudeβ track of 2024? π
700m above sea level β‘οΈ 7% lower air density β‘οΈ ~7% less drag and downforce!
Teams will try to claw back that downforce loss through medium-load wings (despite the long straights: power is crucial).
The lower air density will make having high drag slightly less penalizing, and having high downforce even more important: teams with higher drag (Alpine, possibly McL) should gain from that, while Haasβ low drag will be less useful there.
Alpineβs lower engine power might hurt them on the frequent straights.
Softest compounds (C3-C5)
πΈ: @pirellisport
700m above sea level β‘οΈ 7% lower air density β‘οΈ ~7% less drag and downforce!
Teams will try to claw back that downforce loss through medium-load wings (despite the long straights: power is crucial).
The lower air density will make having high drag slightly less penalizing, and having high downforce even more important: teams with higher drag (Alpine, possibly McL) should gain from that, while Haasβ low drag will be less useful there.
Alpineβs lower engine power might hurt them on the frequent straights.
Softest compounds (C3-C5)
πΈ: @pirellisport
π8β‘2β€2π₯°1
Formula Data Analysis
Ready for the first βHigh-altitudeβ track of 2024? π 700m above sea level β‘οΈ 7% lower air density β‘οΈ ~7% less drag and downforce! Teams will try to claw back that downforce loss through medium-load wings (despite the long straights: power is crucial). Theβ¦
Who will prevail in your opinion: RedBull or McL? How will Ferrari and Mercedes perform? π€
π1π₯1
In Spain, the teams with the LOWEST average top speeds in qualifying (McL and RedBull, despite their tows) had the BEST performanceπ‘
Ferrari: highest top speed, but suffered in the high-speed corners due to lower downforceβ οΈ
NOR's tow was worth 2km/h, VER's 4km/h
Ferrari seems determined to run a less loaded wing in Austria, too (2nd image): let's see if it will work better here! π
Made via @JMP_software
Ferrari: highest top speed, but suffered in the high-speed corners due to lower downforceβ οΈ
NOR's tow was worth 2km/h, VER's 4km/h
Ferrari seems determined to run a less loaded wing in Austria, too (2nd image): let's see if it will work better here! π
Made via @JMP_software
π5π₯1π€1
Formula Data Analysis
In Spain, the teams with the LOWEST average top speeds in qualifying (McL and RedBull, despite their tows) had the BEST performanceπ‘ Ferrari: highest top speed, but suffered in the high-speed corners due to lower downforceβ οΈ NOR's tow was worth 2km/h, VER'sβ¦
Whatβs your prediction for the Austrian GP: will Ferrari fight for the top again or will their performance be disappointing again? And what about the other teams?π€
πFP1 FULL ANALYSIS
1) SECTORS
McL quickest in the stop-go S1 and S2, but struggled in S3 (which requires downforce). VER DOMINATED there: +0.2 vs SAI (2nd fastest). Alpine fast there again!
2) TOP SPEEDS
Highest: Astonπ
Average for RBR, Ferrari, and McL
Lowest: Mercπ
3) GRIP
- VER had worse braking compared to Ferrari and McL but could take the right-hand side corners much quicker than McL
2h until qualifying: what's your prediction?π€
1) SECTORS
McL quickest in the stop-go S1 and S2, but struggled in S3 (which requires downforce). VER DOMINATED there: +0.2 vs SAI (2nd fastest). Alpine fast there again!
2) TOP SPEEDS
Highest: Astonπ
Average for RBR, Ferrari, and McL
Lowest: Mercπ
3) GRIP
- VER had worse braking compared to Ferrari and McL but could take the right-hand side corners much quicker than McL
2h until qualifying: what's your prediction?π€
π4β€3