Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
π₯1
FP3 ANALYSIS π
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
π5β€3
Formula Data Analysis
FP3 ANALYSIS π 1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid. 2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull. 3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated theβ¦
This time I tried to condense the information of several analyses into a single tweet: let me know if you enjoyed it, and I will do that again in the future!
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
Buy Me a Coffee
Canadian GP - Analyses Repository β Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
π3
BEST QUALIFYING SECTORSπ
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhereβ οΈ
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhereβ οΈ
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
π5π3π₯1
How much was Russell's slipstream (from ALB) worth?π‘
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
β€5π1π€1
LONG RUNS FROM F1 FP3 (M tyres):
π΄Sainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
π No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappenβs pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
π΄Sainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
π No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappenβs pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
π6π2π€1
Comments on Canadian GP!
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrariβs worst result since Aus β23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RICβs P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?π€
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrariβs worst result since Aus β23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RICβs P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?π€
β€9π4π1
Formula Data Analysis
RACE PACE Canadian GP: π NOR had the best pace, butπ‘VER was just 0.03s/lap behind: a McL victory was in the cards. π’After passing ALO, HAM's pace was clearly better: he matched VER since the restart. If only he qualified P6... π΄Driving on HARD slicks underβ¦
This version of the plot includes only the drivers who covered over 90% of the laps, for which the comparison is more representative (same track conditions and average fuel levels).
π9
Formula Data Analysis
Leclerc's engine problem was even bigger than it sounded like: Fastest Lap with the problem: L23 1:26.623: 306km/h with DRS. Fastest lap after solving it: L39 1:26.012: 308km/h... without DRS. It was like running with negative DRS, plus a loss of acceleration.
Leclercβs paradox:
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
π€‘11π5π’4β€1π¨1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π2π₯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Visualizing the airflow around Mercedes' sidepods! π (Collab with @justf1car πΈ)
Mercedes introduced a zero-pod design in 2022, but had to switch to a more conventional one mid-2023.
They progressively mitigated the car's high drag, but the gain in downforce wasn't as apparent.
Example:
Best Mercedes Quali lap - Saudi Arabia
2022: 323km/h top speed, 232km/h in T9
2023: 329km/h top speed, 229km/h in T9
2024: 332km/h top speed, 228km/h in T9
A zero-pod design is expected to produce MORE drag, as the sidepod does not shield the rear tyres from the incoming airflow.
Enjoyed the post? Follow @justf1car for the best F1 animations, and @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! π€© π
Mercedes introduced a zero-pod design in 2022, but had to switch to a more conventional one mid-2023.
They progressively mitigated the car's high drag, but the gain in downforce wasn't as apparent.
Example:
Best Mercedes Quali lap - Saudi Arabia
2022: 323km/h top speed, 232km/h in T9
2023: 329km/h top speed, 229km/h in T9
2024: 332km/h top speed, 228km/h in T9
A zero-pod design is expected to produce MORE drag, as the sidepod does not shield the rear tyres from the incoming airflow.
Enjoyed the post? Follow @justf1car for the best F1 animations, and @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! π€© π
π₯11β€3π3