In 2026, F1 cars:
- Will get 0.2m shorter and 0.1m narrowerโก๏ธ30kg lighter (still 16kg heavier than in โ21).
- Active aero: Z-mode vs X-mode (more downforce and drag).
- DRS replaced by a โpush to passโ buttonโก๏ธincreased power after 290km/h.
- More powerful ERS.
๐ or ๐?
- Will get 0.2m shorter and 0.1m narrowerโก๏ธ30kg lighter (still 16kg heavier than in โ21).
- Active aero: Z-mode vs X-mode (more downforce and drag).
- DRS replaced by a โpush to passโ buttonโก๏ธincreased power after 290km/h.
- More powerful ERS.
๐ or ๐?
๐19๐9๐ค8
Formula Data Analysis
In 2026, F1 cars: - Will get 0.2m shorter and 0.1m narrowerโก๏ธ30kg lighter (still 16kg heavier than in โ21). - Active aero: Z-mode vs X-mode (more downforce and drag). - DRS replaced by a โpush to passโ buttonโก๏ธincreased power after 290km/h. - More powerfulโฆ
Additionally, the carโs downforce is expected to drop by ~30%; drag should be reduced too.
This, combined with the carโs lower average engine power, should produce worse laptimes compared to now, but should hopefully aid overtaking and make the sport more sustainable.
This, combined with the carโs lower average engine power, should produce worse laptimes compared to now, but should hopefully aid overtaking and make the sport more sustainable.
๐คฎ13๐7๐ค7๐1
Rear Wings - Canadian GP
๐กThe track's long straights call for medium-low load, but the rain will make more loaded wings more beneficial.
๐งRain will hit on Friday and Saturday, but not necessarily on Sunday: F1 teams have a bet to make!
Mercedes' has a unique wing design.
๐ธ @AlbertFabrega
๐กThe track's long straights call for medium-low load, but the rain will make more loaded wings more beneficial.
๐งRain will hit on Friday and Saturday, but not necessarily on Sunday: F1 teams have a bet to make!
Mercedes' has a unique wing design.
๐ธ @AlbertFabrega
๐6๐4โค3
Formula Data Analysis
In 2026, F1 cars: - Will get 0.2m shorter and 0.1m narrowerโก๏ธ30kg lighter (still 16kg heavier than in โ21). - Active aero: Z-mode vs X-mode (more downforce and drag). - DRS replaced by a โpush to passโ buttonโก๏ธincreased power after 290km/h. - More powerfulโฆ
The โ26 #F1 rules will make it HARDER to overtake in tracks like Monaco๐ก
โManual Override Modeโ will replace the DRS:
- Electric power for the attacking driver: 350kw.
- It will decrease linearly over 290km/h for the defending one.๐
But most cars donโt reach 290km/h in Monaco!โ ๏ธ
This problem is not unique to Monaco: it also applies to โconventionalโ, high-downforce race tracks.
Hungary, for example: in the fastest lap of the race, VER only reached 301km/h on the main straight: he remained over 290km/h for less than 3s.
The FIA MUST make the speed threshold track-specific.
โManual Override Modeโ will replace the DRS:
- Electric power for the attacking driver: 350kw.
- It will decrease linearly over 290km/h for the defending one.๐
But most cars donโt reach 290km/h in Monaco!โ ๏ธ
This problem is not unique to Monaco: it also applies to โconventionalโ, high-downforce race tracks.
Hungary, for example: in the fastest lap of the race, VER only reached 301km/h on the main straight: he remained over 290km/h for less than 3s.
The FIA MUST make the speed threshold track-specific.
๐ค7๐2๐ฅ2
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
๐ฅ1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.iss.one/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
๐ฅ1
FP3 ANALYSIS ๐
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
๐5โค3
Formula Data Analysis
FP3 ANALYSIS ๐ 1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid. 2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull. 3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated theโฆ
This time I tried to condense the information of several analyses into a single tweet: let me know if you enjoyed it, and I will do that again in the future!
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
Buy Me a Coffee
Canadian GP - Analyses Repository โ Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
๐3
BEST QUALIFYING SECTORS๐
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhereโ ๏ธ
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhereโ ๏ธ
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
๐5๐3๐ฅ1
How much was Russell's slipstream (from ALB) worth?๐ก
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
โค5๐1๐ค1
LONG RUNS FROM F1 FP3 (M tyres):
๐ดSainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
๐ No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappenโs pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
๐ดSainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
๐ No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappenโs pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
๐6๐2๐ค1
Comments on Canadian GP!
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrariโs worst result since Aus โ23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RICโs P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?๐ค
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrariโs worst result since Aus โ23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RICโs P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?๐ค
โค9๐4๐1
Formula Data Analysis
RACE PACE Canadian GP: ๐ NOR had the best pace, but๐กVER was just 0.03s/lap behind: a McL victory was in the cards. ๐ขAfter passing ALO, HAM's pace was clearly better: he matched VER since the restart. If only he qualified P6... ๐ดDriving on HARD slicks underโฆ
This version of the plot includes only the drivers who covered over 90% of the laps, for which the comparison is more representative (same track conditions and average fuel levels).
๐9
Formula Data Analysis
Leclerc's engine problem was even bigger than it sounded like: Fastest Lap with the problem: L23 1:26.623: 306km/h with DRS. Fastest lap after solving it: L39 1:26.012: 308km/h... without DRS. It was like running with negative DRS, plus a loss of acceleration.
Leclercโs paradox:
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
๐คก11๐5๐ข4โค1๐จ1