“We can give several definitions of revolutionary nationalism, all valid and yet competing. Arguably, it is the European counterpart of the national liberation movements in the Third World. It is a component of a larger political entity which is the Conservative Revolution, and it is a ‘centrist’ current which rejects the notions of Right and Left in favour of the ideological unity of the people. A French author, Fabrice Bouthillon, has explained this in a recent article: ‘It’s an attempt to revive what had been undone by the French Revolution, and which multiplied across Europe after 1789: these attempts at a compromise between the Right and the Left that constitute centrism. … There are two types of centrism, either by subtraction or by the addition of extremes.’ It is precisely the model of the latter which is in fact radical centrism, and combining the extreme Left and extreme Right is revolutionary nationalism.”

Christian Bouchet

The “Split Vote” Myth and Political Tribalism

The notion that small parties “split the vote” is a common refrain, particularly from supporters of Reform UK, who argue that parties like UKIP, the Heritage Party, or the Populist Party dilute the anti-Labour vote. Yet, this assumes ideological alignment across these groups, which is far from reality.

Reform UK’s platform—global free trade, Atlanticism, free-market economics, libertarianism, and consumerism—differs sharply from the protectionist, socially conservative, or ecologically focused stances of other parties. To conflate them is to oversimplify the broad spectrum of voter preferences, where “syncretic” mixtures of left and right are more common than in the previous century.

This tribalism extends beyond Reform UK. Tories have long warned that voting for Reform or UKIP risks letting Labour in.

https://thirdway.info/2025/06/08/reforming-the-vote-the-novel-case-for-negative-voting-to-deliver-electoral-change/

"Hitler was a German in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. This is Australia in 1967, but the basic philosophy of National Socialism can be applied to any country at any time."

Ted Cawthron

Gym XIV is expanding. And we’re bringing the fight.

Join us in our new facility on the wild west coast of Sweden this August!
A full-throttle day of iron, grit, and unshakable brotherhood.
We train. We build. We resist.

Steel, Sun and the sea.
No comfort. No compromise.
Fascism awaits.
Its time for a real West Coast riot.

To participate: @ContactXIV

XIV 🏴‍☠️

DVX
by Alexander Slavros

Why is it that we still give due recognition to people like Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, Oswald Mosley, José Antonio Primo de Rivera and etc., yet Mussolini gets dismissed on no other grounds than “he wasn’t Hitler”? Mussolini should be rightfully recognized in the pantheon of our Champions for what he had contributed to our Struggle, and for his true value to Italy and her people.

Note that in writing this article I will foremost be relying on the analysis of Italian Fascism and its rise to power provided by Nikolay Ustryalov, with some additional points taken from Julius Evola.

Fascists regarded their ascent to power as “a revolution, which is at the same time a restoration,” which sounds awfully familiar to the ideals of the German Conservative Revolutionaries, whose ideas were in a certain sense a prelude to National Socialism. Italian Fascism too sought the establishment of the European Imperium, which they, according to Ustryalov, called the “United Fascist States of Europe.”

“What is that I hear? That note of urgency, of indignation, of spiritual hunger? Yes, it’s Beethoven! It’s the sound of European man once more reaching for something beyond his grasp. We must leave this trim, finite room and go to confront the infinite.”

Kenneth Clark

🇸🇾 "We were racialists, admiring Nazism, reading its books and the source of its thought, particularly Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Fichte's Addresses to the German Nation, H. S. Chamberlain's Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, and Darré's The Race. We were the first to think of translating Mein Kampf. Whoever has lived during this period in Damascus will appreciate the inclination of the Arab people to Nazism, for Nazism was the power which could serve as its champion, and he who is defeated will by nature love the victor."

Syrian Prime Minister Sami al-Jundi

The head of the French Interior Ministry has announced increased security for churches due to the terrorist threat and the rise in crime against Christians.

On the eve of the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, which Catholics celebrate on 15 August, Bruno Retaillot asked to ensure the safety of the faithful. The hatred of predominantly Muslims towards Europeans, he believes, is due to ‘the situation in the Middle East’.

In the first six months of 2025, the country's authorities recorded 401 offences against Christians - 13% more than in the same period last year, when there were 354 such incidents.

Nation Europa | Share news

The Strasserists: “Third Way,” European Solidarism

The Strasserists, grouped around Otto Strasser, constituted a supplementary component of neo-nationalism after 1945. After the collapse of the Third Reich, Otto Strasser, then in Canadian exile, sent Rundbriefe für Deutschlands Erneuerung (Circulars for German Renewal) to his sympathizers in mass quantities. These circulars mentioned German unification on the basis of a “European third way,” centered around a solidarism that dismissed both Western liberal capitalism and Soviet style socialism. This solidarism would abolish class distinction, by forming a new leading elite. German unity, as seen by Strasser, implied armed neutralism, the future military nucleus of an independent Europe that should become an equal, if not superior, political power to the USA and USSR. This Europe would ally with the Third World, as Third World countries would furnish raw materials to the “European Federation” during its gestation.

In order to support and spread this program, the West German Strasserists founded the DSU (Deutsche Soziale Union) in 1954. Many national-revolutionary militants made their first commitments there, notably Henning Eichberg between 1956 and 1959. This passage implied an abandonment of the neo-Strasserists’ statism and centralism and an adherence to populist democracy, which the AUD championed.

https://institutenr.org/2017/07/27/neo-nationalism-and-the-neue-rechte-in-west-germany-from-1946-to-1988-robert-steuckers-vouloir-n4546-1988/

The Independent Workers' Party (German Socialists) proclaimed its 10 point 'Action Program' in 1962. Directly translated, these points are as follows:

1. A new form of economic organisation!

2. Collectivization of all large private and state-owned business!

3. Management of firms in the hands of the workers!

4. Equal distribution of dividends!

5. A unionized form of management!

6. Simpler trade between intermediaries!

7. Introduction of an index currency by a...

8. Bank without interest gain!

9. Creation of a central insurance equalization bank...

10. For all socialized large companies and small private entrepreneurs!

The UAP saw itself as "the only German workers' party in the social revolutionary spirit of Lassalle and the national revolutionary spirit of Strasser."

There is simply no disputing the fact that Socialism is an integral part of the Nationalist creed. To separate the very essence of the social sphere from the concept of the nation, is to ignore the basic fact that it is the People who actually comprise the nation itself.

Without people there can be no nation, and without a nation there can be no people. On the other hand, it is quite certain that we have absolutely nothing in common with the intellectually-bankrupt legions of the modern Left, but then, neither do we owe any allegiance to those on the Right. Many so-called Nationalists are content to describe themselves as being “right of centre”, or even on the “Far Right”, but it must be stated quite categorically that true Nationalism has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Right-wing politics. To simplify, a Right-winger is no more “Nationalist” than his counterpart on the Left. Both Communism and Capitalism are two heads of the same beast.

But rather than take a leaf out of the existing books and attempt to form some kind of a ridiculous halfway ideology, Revolutionary Nationalists remain unconcerned with philosophical materialism altogether and reject the middle and both ends of the system in its entirety. We Revolutionary Nationalists oppose the Reactionaries and the Reds alike, because we are genuine Social Nationalists.

https://www.amerika.org/texts/social-nationalism-the-strasser-brothers-troy-southgate/

🏛️ THE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY OF OUR YOUTH

German Nationalists and European Union
by Kurt P. Tauber

If the traditional conservative revolutionary and national socialist search for strength through unity is to have any hope for success, then it must necessarily extend to units other than the nineteenth-century nation-state. It is in response to this need that the nationalist forces in post-war Germany have developed the conception of a Nation Europa. The post-war nationalist in the face of the super-Powers, East and West, cannot expect safety from any one European nation. Strength, in the mid-twentieth century lies only in continental Powers. Hence, the importance to the nationalist of a continental Nation Europe.
The internationalism of much post-war nationalist thought represents a nationalist and romantic Pan-Europe ideal which had long animated conservative revolutionary circles. Part of this Pan-European romanticism found its way into the SS and has been preserved since 1945 in the organizational efforts of SS veterans inside and outside Germany.

Islam was the mortal enemy of Europe before ever Capitalism or Communism was born. Islam will still be the mortal enemy of Europe after Capitalism and Communism are dead. Only when the last mullah, as well as the last banker and the last Bolshevik has faded into history will our Race be safe.

Vanguard, no. 14, November–December 1987. As Vanguard, no. 22, September 1988 warned:

Europe must realize that the biggest threat to its survival doesn’t come from the white Russians to the East or from the mainly white Americans to the West. It comes from the rising
brown tide of Islam to the South.