In March 1975, at an international neo-fascist meeting in Lyon attended by Amaudruz and representatives of Ordine Nuovo, Avanguardia Nazionale, and Lotta di Popolo, a discussion about the tangible measures to be taken in response to a recent crackdown on right-wing ultras by the Italian authorities took place.
Later, Amaudruz and Pierre Clementi both denied that this meeting was sponsored by the New European Order (NOE/ENO), whether the parent body or its French branch, claiming instead that France was represented by members of the radical Peuple et Nation organization. But the members of the latter group, which published a "national revolutionary" monthly bulletin and were purportedly linked to pro-UstaΕ‘a Croat exile organizations, the West German Aktion Oder Neisse (AKON), and the World Union of National Socialists (WUNS), may also have been joined at the conference by adherents of the "national populist" wing of the New European Order.
Later, Amaudruz and Pierre Clementi both denied that this meeting was sponsored by the New European Order (NOE/ENO), whether the parent body or its French branch, claiming instead that France was represented by members of the radical Peuple et Nation organization. But the members of the latter group, which published a "national revolutionary" monthly bulletin and were purportedly linked to pro-UstaΕ‘a Croat exile organizations, the West German Aktion Oder Neisse (AKON), and the World Union of National Socialists (WUNS), may also have been joined at the conference by adherents of the "national populist" wing of the New European Order.
β€22π₯3
From the New European Orderβs point of view, "social justice" meant permitting each individual to develop his capacities fullyβas long as these were subordinated to and applied in the interests of the "racial community." The achievement of this goal mandated the formation of new societal elites based upon talent and service to that community rather than ascriptive social status or wealth, the preservation of private property in so far as it was acquired legitimately and not at the expense of the needs of the community, the joint participation of workers and managers in the management of economic production, the provision of jobs to every European who was willing and able to work, the maintenance of healthy working conditions, and the elevation of the cultural standards of every productive member of the community.
Although these tenets reflected the general fascist ideal of creating a harmonious and mutually beneficial form of organic class collaboration, one which in theory curbed both capitalist abuses and worker agitation, they were infused throughout with National Socialist racial themes. These latter were exemplified by RenΓ© Binetβs emphasis on the organization of an authoritarian party that would serve as the "vanguard or general staff" of the race, the systematic inculcation of racist and socialist values, and the above-noted measures designed to preserve or restore racial purity and health.
The ultimate goal was the creation of a "racist and socialist society" throughout Europe which would be capable of successfully waging the never-ending struggle with other races. It was this racial struggle, rather than the Marxist class struggle or the egocentric individualism promoted by capitalism, which was truly decisive. As Gaston-Armand Amaudruz put it, the "highest imperative is that of the race...not the current corrupt and degenerate race, but [the race] which we carry in our hearts and will forge in the course of struggle".
Although these tenets reflected the general fascist ideal of creating a harmonious and mutually beneficial form of organic class collaboration, one which in theory curbed both capitalist abuses and worker agitation, they were infused throughout with National Socialist racial themes. These latter were exemplified by RenΓ© Binetβs emphasis on the organization of an authoritarian party that would serve as the "vanguard or general staff" of the race, the systematic inculcation of racist and socialist values, and the above-noted measures designed to preserve or restore racial purity and health.
The ultimate goal was the creation of a "racist and socialist society" throughout Europe which would be capable of successfully waging the never-ending struggle with other races. It was this racial struggle, rather than the Marxist class struggle or the egocentric individualism promoted by capitalism, which was truly decisive. As Gaston-Armand Amaudruz put it, the "highest imperative is that of the race...not the current corrupt and degenerate race, but [the race] which we carry in our hearts and will forge in the course of struggle".
π11
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Generation Remigration @nsvnationaal. March 27, 2025, Gent, Flanders, the enemy is within, GET ACTIVE. Reconquer Europe!
π₯14β‘2
SEE YOU ON SATURDAY, MAY 10, 2025 IN PARIS!
π’ The march originally commemorated the death of SΓ©bastien Deyzieu of the Εuvre franΓ§aise group, who died on May 9, 1994 after falling from a roof while trying to escape from the police two days earlier, but has become a much larger affair as many nationalists from a broad selection of European nations join in the demonstration to honor the fallen brothers of their own nation's causes. Last year's manifestation gathered some 800 nationalists. π΄
"This movement, for the most part nationalist-revolutionary and anti-capitalist, has been restructuring for some years now," said Jean-Yves Camus.
@comitedu9mai
π’ The march originally commemorated the death of SΓ©bastien Deyzieu of the Εuvre franΓ§aise group, who died on May 9, 1994 after falling from a roof while trying to escape from the police two days earlier, but has become a much larger affair as many nationalists from a broad selection of European nations join in the demonstration to honor the fallen brothers of their own nation's causes. Last year's manifestation gathered some 800 nationalists. π΄
"This movement, for the most part nationalist-revolutionary and anti-capitalist, has been restructuring for some years now," said Jean-Yves Camus.
@comitedu9mai
π₯18
Hitlerβs anti-capitalism is different from Marxist anti-capitalism. The former sees in the capitalist regime not only a specific system of economic relations, but also the Jew, adding a racist concept to the strict economic concept. The anti-Jewish idea and the anti-capitalist idea are almost one and the same for National Socialism. And, as we have said, the German objectifies his particular problem in Germany, and his socialist concern constantly pursues an ordering process for the benefit of the entire race.
Ramiro Ledesma Ramos, Discurso a las juventudes de EspaΓ±a
Ramiro Ledesma Ramos, Discurso a las juventudes de EspaΓ±a
β‘20
We are living at a time when the countries of the world are uniting to form world empires. In the struggle for supremacy now being waged the smaller States have no prospect of continuing to live alone. Even Europe, with its impotence and divisions, is in danger of being crushed by the great powers which have grown up on either side. This danger has been averted thanks to the intervention of Germany, and with Germany as its pivot Europe is fast becoming the fifth great power in the world.
Vidkun Quisling
Vidkun Quisling
β‘26
Since 2006, the network Zentropa serves as a transnational forum to convene CasaPound, French figures of the Nouvelle Droite and other European nationalist projects. It has an autonomous branch in Serbia, which identifies its ideology as βrevolutionary nationalistβ. They want to spread this idea in mainstream society and aim to create a popular nationalist state through revolution.
π23
Omladina 451 is a relatively new collective of the Serbian nationalist scene, which presents itself as the βrevolutionary nationalist organization of Serbian youthβ. Faced with, as they argue, the devastation of the Serbian nation, the demographic destruction of the Serbian people, and the dictatorship of democratic monotony, their goal is to create a new nationalist vanguard.
t.iss.one/omladina451
t.iss.one/omladina451
β‘31
The βrevolutionary traditionalismβ of Franco Freda (improperly called βNazi-Maoismβ by the Italian press) also resonated in Spain. The French Peopleβs Fight Organization announced, after a similar statement by the Italian Lotta di Popolo, that with their arrival on the peninsula, the European Revolutionary Liaison Committee should see the βundergroundβ birth of a Lucha del Pueblo section, built by members of PENS and Movimiento Social EspaΓ±ol. The operation collapsed, as the Spaniards preferred to work with the Avanguardia Nazionale militants.
Nicolas Lebourg
Nicolas Lebourg
π₯11
Finally, the Spanish nationalist-revolutionary movement emerged through two distinct dynamics, which together formed the basis of the whole history of the Spanish New Right movement. The first is the founding in 1976 of the Authentic Assemblies of National-Syndicalist Offensive (Falange EspaΓ±ola de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional Sindicalista AutΓ©ntica), inspired by the original fascist movement. The second came from a CEDADE split, which in 1978 gave way to the National Revolutionary Youth (Juventud Nacional Revolucionaria).
Nicolas Lebourg
Nicolas Lebourg
π12π₯1
πOviedo
In the face of the deindustrialization to which we Asturians are being subjected, we Falangists demand REINDUSTRIALIZATION.
https://x.com/fe_asturias/status/1903749248346194081?s=46
In the face of the deindustrialization to which we Asturians are being subjected, we Falangists demand REINDUSTRIALIZATION.
https://x.com/fe_asturias/status/1903749248346194081?s=46
β€16β‘2
The vast gulf between the
conservative leaders of the MSI, who sought to organize an "international" under their own direction, and the radical youths, who sought, without success, to produce a manifesto which would rally their foreign counterparts and simultaneously satisfy both the "socialist" leftist and the aristocratic and philo-Nazi rightist factions, is described by Mario Giovana, Le nuove camicie nere.
conservative leaders of the MSI, who sought to organize an "international" under their own direction, and the radical youths, who sought, without success, to produce a manifesto which would rally their foreign counterparts and simultaneously satisfy both the "socialist" leftist and the aristocratic and philo-Nazi rightist factions, is described by Mario Giovana, Le nuove camicie nere.
π9π₯2
βApart from popular and democratic sources, we have a whole series of manifestations of fascism to which, despite and beyond its assumption of power, one can and must ascribe a βleftistβ character. Despite their leftist vocabulary, however, these actions have always had βrightistβ results.β
Luigi Salvatorelli, Nazionalfascismo (1923; reprint, Turin: Einaudi, 1977).
Luigi Salvatorelli, Nazionalfascismo (1923; reprint, Turin: Einaudi, 1977).
β‘7
βA clear conception of the authority of the state, of the responsibility of the powers and above all of social justice is necessary. This requires a profound reform, a genuine revolution. This constructive and peaceful revolution must have as a result the disappearance of the wage-earner under the capitalist form, the end of the class struggle with all its manifestations.β
A Frenchman, βDestino dellβEuropa ed avvenire del mondo,β Nazionalismo Sociale 1, no. 7 (September-October 1951).
A Frenchman, βDestino dellβEuropa ed avvenire del mondo,β Nazionalismo Sociale 1, no. 7 (September-October 1951).
β‘20π2
The revolution of the Sorelians, by contrast, developed into a national revolution. Only at the end of his life, when all his works had been written and he looked at the world around him with a deep sense of despair, did Sorel publish in September 1919 his famous epilogue to the fourth edition of RΓ©flexions sur la violence. His hatred for the bourgeoisie and for democracy was so great that he even greeted with shouts of joy the revolution taking place in Russia, which was a rebellion led by professional revolutionaries such as he had disdained all his life. At the same time, he did not disown the use that the Fascists made of his name.
Zeev Sternhell, The Birth of Fascist Ideology
Zeev Sternhell, The Birth of Fascist Ideology
π16
π¬πππππππ πΊππππππππ
The labor movement interests us only to the degree that it is the bearer of a new culture. If the proletariat trails along in demagogy or egoism, it no longer has any attraction for those who seek the means by which the world is transformed. Hubert Lagardelleβ¦
That is why so many Sorelians, like many other people of the Left both before and after the war, slid into fascism. When these leftists of all shapes and colors came to the conclusion that the working class had definitely beaten a retreat, they did not follow it into this attitude. Their socialism remained revolutionary when that of the proletariat had ceased to be so. Having to choose between the proletariat and revolution, they chose revolution; having to choose between a proletarian but moderate socialism and a nonproletarian but revolutionary and national socialism, they opted for the nonproletarian revolution, the national revolution.
Thus, it was quite natural that a synthesis would arise between this new socialism, which discovered the nation as a revolutionary agent, and the nationalist movement, which also rebelled against the old world of conservatives, against the aristocrats and the bourgeois, and against social injustices and which believed that the nation would never be complete until it had integrated the proletariat. A socialism for the whole collectivity and a nationalism that, severed from conservatism, proclaimed itself as being by definition the messenger of unity and unanimity thus came together to form an unprecedented weapon of war against the bourgeois order and liberal democracy.
That was the nature of the synthesis that produced fascism.
Zeev Sternhell, The Birth of Fascist Ideology
Thus, it was quite natural that a synthesis would arise between this new socialism, which discovered the nation as a revolutionary agent, and the nationalist movement, which also rebelled against the old world of conservatives, against the aristocrats and the bourgeois, and against social injustices and which believed that the nation would never be complete until it had integrated the proletariat. A socialism for the whole collectivity and a nationalism that, severed from conservatism, proclaimed itself as being by definition the messenger of unity and unanimity thus came together to form an unprecedented weapon of war against the bourgeois order and liberal democracy.
That was the nature of the synthesis that produced fascism.
Zeev Sternhell, The Birth of Fascist Ideology
β€13