🤬CULTURAL OFFENCE😤

☝️In my opinion, that abominable testimony of a period of decay in the Piazza della Signoria in Florence is a deliberate counter-aesthetically disruptive breach of style, purposefully placed in one of the most outstanding cultural cities in Europe, with the intention of hideous, culturally alien coercion to sacrifice the traditional artful harmony in favour of a manipulative re-education of taste which destroys the peculiarity of the Occidental cultural heritage.👈

❗️Those responsible should be brought to justice for coercion by cultural offence!

👉 t.iss.one/rossmueller_dissident – Join The Channel & Support Freedom, Identity, Future!

@Keith_Woods and @JoelDavis_x have been engaged in an online debate over the issue of National Socialism and its relevance in the modern world. @MarkACollett is joined by Joel Davis as he makes his case and answers questions about the efficacy of his political plans.

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett/Can-National-Socialism-be-Resurrected

Marco Cassini
DESTRA SOCIALE
Introduction to the “third way”, between identity, community and alternative to the system

Overcoming the banal dichotomies of the electoral swamp, this book offers an innovative and revolutionary point of view.

Drawing inspiration from our roots and rethinking the spirit of our time, the “social right” becomes a political response to the pitfalls of the future: a vision of the world – epic, ethical and aesthetic – founded on the verticality of existence, on the respect for identities and traditions, on the need to reinvigorate community experience and on participation as a vital alternative to market domination.

A doctrinal and pragmatic response to the failures of the dominant ideologies, to address the contradictions of our time through the free perspective of a “third way” that today – in light of the deadly fusion between liberalism and post-communism – is more necessary than ever.

www.passaggioalbosco.it

“Britain would be in a far better state today had we taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality…. but oh no Britain’s warped mindset values weird notions of international morality rather than looking after its own people.”

Ian Gribbin

Remigration is the only ticket to make Europe European again!

👉🏻 Get yours now here and join us in that fight on Saturday the 17th of May in Milano, 🇮🇹

Let’s make history together ✈️ !

——

💪🏻 Support Resum25 here

“This is not a struggle against the Russian nation or against Slavdom … The struggle is for a new Europe where the Russian nation will also find a better future.”

General Ferdinand Čatloš, 1941.

Ventotene is not my Europe
👉🏻 Italica arte grafica

Bronson - Black flag
👉🏻 shorturl.at/foJg8

“Ni droite, Ni gauche, Français!” Mainstream populism and the future of Left/Right politics
by Marta Lorimer

Drawing on the experience of the Front National, this article seeks to investigate how the incorporation of far-right discourse in mainstream politics leads to the emergence of new divisions in politics. In particular, it argues that by promoting the emergence of new dimensions in the political space, the ongoing rise and mainstreaming of far-right political discourse presents a direct challenge to the traditional Left/Right distinction.

As a result, far right parties have started challenging the distinction, claiming to be ‘neither Left nor Right’ and actively proposing alternative conceptualisations of the political space that do not presuppose internal division of the electoral body.

The paper starts with the contention that far right ideology sits uncomfortably with the Left/Right distinction. At its core is the belief in the centrality of the nation and the necessity to protect it. In recent years, this has been increasingly complemented by a populist ideology, which pits ‘the people’ against ‘the (global) elite’. Both concepts of the ‘Nation’ and the ‘People’ push forward a monist understanding of unity and cohesiveness which denies the existence of political divisions, including that of Left and Right. The most relevant of these distinctions is the division between ‘patriots’ versus ‘globalists’, which allows parties to tap both into nationalist sentiments and broader opposition to globalisation and the mechanisms of change it engenders. Importantly, this division, which could be dubbed as being between a ‘local/closed’ and a ‘global/open’ level cannot be ‘absorbed’ by the traditional Left/Right dimension and acquires a life of its own, forming the basis of a programme set to attract constituencies on both sides.

The paper will conclude by suggesting that while Left and Right as ‘representations collectives’ may not have not been replaced but rather complemented by this division between a local/closed and a global/open level, the rise and mainstreaming of far right discourse will lead an increasing number of actors to question its explanatory power.

Brendan Simms on how Hitler's dispute with the Strasserists had nothing to do with economics, as many subversives trying to misrepresent Hitler as a defender of capitalism claim.

The dispute was on what is now called 'Third Worldism' - the idea that Germany should ally itself with non-White nationalists against European (particularly Anglo-Saxon) imperialism.

Hitler did not moralfag against Aryan superiority or colonialism, and neither should you.

From Bombs to Books, and Back Again? Mapping Strategies of Right-Wing Revolutionary Resistance
by Jacob Aasland Ravndal

This article begins by outlining four post-WWII strategies of right-wing revolutionary resistance: vanguardism; the cell system; leaderless resistance; and metapolitics. Next, the article argues that metapolitics became a preferred strategy for many right-wing revolutionaries during the 2000s and early 2010s, and proposes three conditions that may help explain this metapolitical turn: limited opportunities for armed resistance; a subcultural style shift; and new opportunities for promoting alternative worldviews online.

The end of the Cold War and the dismantling of authoritarian regimes in Western Europe changed the strategic context for the European revolutionary right. This change of operating environment influenced the motives, target selection, and mobilization opportunities of today’s activists.

Bjarne Karlsen, a policeman in Stavanger, and first leader of the GSSN in Rogaland county, came to the conclusion in 1944 that he was a member of the Germanic SS Norway and not the Hird because to him ‘European unity’ was needed to withstand the ‘Jews and all other racial aliens who with all means seek to destroy the Germanic tribes.’ The pan-European SS was, as he saw it, an organisation promoting a European community transcending ‘artificial’ borders.