“Deeds, not words! Do not say what needs to be done, but do it.”

Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

Today community members of @Nationalist13 met up for a day of comradery. It was a good, productive day.

If you're a European man in Southern/Southwestern, Ontario Canada, or surrounding area who is passionate about Folk-Family-Future, you can reach out to us at [email protected]

@Nationalist13

DEFEND EUROPE

“Against jihadists, Islamists and other ‘cultural enrichers,’ we recall the old European tradition of ‘Reconquista.’”

Today we remember the beginning of a new era, to make ourselves a promise: we will not die without posterity. Europe will rise again. The fascist example is what will allow Europe's revenge. It is what will make us savor victory for a long time after a long period of obscenity and that will bring every man of value back to occupy the hierarchical position that best suits his spiritual race, in compliance with divine and natural law, which Fascism recognized and defended, but not as a mere priest of ashes, but as an active warrior who places the columns of the building in which his own destiny will reside. A destiny of struggle, of glory, of victory, a destiny made for men who smile in misfortune and who even when brought to their knees by the adversity of events continue to fight

M U S E

The audience is diverse and includes many young men in military attire and students, but also some older people with astute faces. Judging from the heated discussions, the majority of them are regular visitors at Cossack House. Andrey Voloshin, a philosopher affiliated with the Azov movement, speaks about the hobbies of Venner when he was young (such as hunting and weapons) and his involvement in the Algerian war, which fascinated him because it was “similar to a hunt”. He mentions Venner’s early experiences with political and street activism and the uncanny smile crosses his face. When he explains how Venner, together with a friend, beat up “four niggers”, who were hanging out with a white girl, his smile turns into a laugh.

Nina Boichenko, «Inside Ukraine’s ideological renewal»

🤬CULTURAL OFFENCE😤

☝️In my opinion, that abominable testimony of a period of decay in the Piazza della Signoria in Florence is a deliberate counter-aesthetically disruptive breach of style, purposefully placed in one of the most outstanding cultural cities in Europe, with the intention of hideous, culturally alien coercion to sacrifice the traditional artful harmony in favour of a manipulative re-education of taste which destroys the peculiarity of the Occidental cultural heritage.👈

❗️Those responsible should be brought to justice for coercion by cultural offence!

👉 t.iss.one/rossmueller_dissident – Join The Channel & Support Freedom, Identity, Future!

@Keith_Woods and @JoelDavis_x have been engaged in an online debate over the issue of National Socialism and its relevance in the modern world. @MarkACollett is joined by Joel Davis as he makes his case and answers questions about the efficacy of his political plans.

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett/Can-National-Socialism-be-Resurrected

Marco Cassini
DESTRA SOCIALE
Introduction to the “third way”, between identity, community and alternative to the system

Overcoming the banal dichotomies of the electoral swamp, this book offers an innovative and revolutionary point of view.

Drawing inspiration from our roots and rethinking the spirit of our time, the “social right” becomes a political response to the pitfalls of the future: a vision of the world – epic, ethical and aesthetic – founded on the verticality of existence, on the respect for identities and traditions, on the need to reinvigorate community experience and on participation as a vital alternative to market domination.

A doctrinal and pragmatic response to the failures of the dominant ideologies, to address the contradictions of our time through the free perspective of a “third way” that today – in light of the deadly fusion between liberalism and post-communism – is more necessary than ever.

www.passaggioalbosco.it

“Britain would be in a far better state today had we taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality…. but oh no Britain’s warped mindset values weird notions of international morality rather than looking after its own people.”

Ian Gribbin

Remigration is the only ticket to make Europe European again!

👉🏻 Get yours now here and join us in that fight on Saturday the 17th of May in Milano, 🇮🇹

Let’s make history together ✈️ !

——

💪🏻 Support Resum25 here

“This is not a struggle against the Russian nation or against Slavdom … The struggle is for a new Europe where the Russian nation will also find a better future.”

General Ferdinand Čatloš, 1941.

Ventotene is not my Europe
👉🏻 Italica arte grafica

Bronson - Black flag
👉🏻 shorturl.at/foJg8

“Ni droite, Ni gauche, Français!” Mainstream populism and the future of Left/Right politics
by Marta Lorimer

Drawing on the experience of the Front National, this article seeks to investigate how the incorporation of far-right discourse in mainstream politics leads to the emergence of new divisions in politics. In particular, it argues that by promoting the emergence of new dimensions in the political space, the ongoing rise and mainstreaming of far-right political discourse presents a direct challenge to the traditional Left/Right distinction.

As a result, far right parties have started challenging the distinction, claiming to be ‘neither Left nor Right’ and actively proposing alternative conceptualisations of the political space that do not presuppose internal division of the electoral body.

The paper starts with the contention that far right ideology sits uncomfortably with the Left/Right distinction. At its core is the belief in the centrality of the nation and the necessity to protect it. In recent years, this has been increasingly complemented by a populist ideology, which pits ‘the people’ against ‘the (global) elite’. Both concepts of the ‘Nation’ and the ‘People’ push forward a monist understanding of unity and cohesiveness which denies the existence of political divisions, including that of Left and Right. The most relevant of these distinctions is the division between ‘patriots’ versus ‘globalists’, which allows parties to tap both into nationalist sentiments and broader opposition to globalisation and the mechanisms of change it engenders. Importantly, this division, which could be dubbed as being between a ‘local/closed’ and a ‘global/open’ level cannot be ‘absorbed’ by the traditional Left/Right dimension and acquires a life of its own, forming the basis of a programme set to attract constituencies on both sides.

The paper will conclude by suggesting that while Left and Right as ‘representations collectives’ may not have not been replaced but rather complemented by this division between a local/closed and a global/open level, the rise and mainstreaming of far right discourse will lead an increasing number of actors to question its explanatory power.