🇪🇪 Hitler’s ascension to power was greeted with enthusiasm. The Veterans were practically alone in viewing the ‘National Revolution’ in Germany in a positive manner. Võitlus interpreted it as “definite affirmation that in the near future European peoples will one after another rapidly free themselves from the obsolete system of government which sustains political corruption, disorder, and avarice.” Hitler’s success in Germany was seen as significant for Estonia in the sense that it was “symptomatic for our near future: with the collapse of the power of the political parties, a genuine people’s government will come to power.”

#Russia #SmolenskCenter #FutureOfRussia #Interview 🔥 🇷🇺

The future of Russia 🇷🇺: an interview you cannot miss❗️

As we mark another anniversary of the invasion of Ukraine 🇺🇦 the question of Russia's future looms larger than ever. What lies ahead for this vast nation at the heart of global tensions?

🗓 On 3rd March 2025 at 15:30 CET, Kultura Europa together with Les Lansquenets brings you an exclusive online interview that dives into these pressing questions.

🎙 Featuring 🎙:

➡️ Gabriele Adinolfi & Giancarlo Ferrara

➡️ In dialogue with Vadim Sidorov, Russian dissident and Deputy of the Smolensk Center.

This is more than just a talk; it’s a deep dive into the political, social, and cultural crossroads Russia faces today. Don’t miss this opportunity to hear unique perspectives from Russian dissident, who is working on these subjects from many years.

Share this post❗️Be with us❗️See you on 03.03.2025❗️

🔴Les Lansquenets🔴

Fascism is a combination of fascio and fasces — a group of dedicated individuals committed to building a strong “totalitarian” state in the name of the primacy of the nation. Mussolini made it entirely clear that he intended “to destroy the old Italy of decadent liberalism and democracy and give birth to a young, virile, new Italy.” Having abandoned the idea of social revolution, he fully embraced the notion of national revolution aimed at upending the international status quo. 

This was behind the notion propagated by the fascists that Italy was a “proletarian nation” — a relatively backward country subordinate to the great European “plutocratic” nations (most notably Great Britain), which prevented Italy from realizing its economic potential and status as a great power. The ensuing conflict was one between the core and periphery. This notion was later adopted by Latin American economists, such as Raul Prebisch, the first secretary-general of the UN Conference on Trade and Development, to explain Latin America’s relative “backwardness.” Thus, it is hardly surprising that prominent Latin American populist leaders such as Juan Perón and, to a limited degree, Jorge Eliécer Gaitán were impressed by fascism, even if the latter considered Mussolini a “ridiculous” figure.

Mussolini’s goal was for Italy to catch up economically and militarily and to turn the country into a major world power. This was reflected in fascist economic policy, centered upon central planning, heavy regulation and protectionism. Given fascism’s ideational roots, it was hardly surprising that it was profoundly hostile to economic individualism, laissez-faire liberalism and capitalism, even if Mussolini was forced to make compromises on the economic front.

In general, fascist economic policy was pure socialism, as was its promotion of social welfare. As Sheri Berman puts it, fascism in the 1930s “spoke to the social and psychological needs of citizens to be protected from the ravages of capitalism at a time when other political actors were offering little help.” Fascism proposed a “national socialist” solution to the hardship experienced by ordinary citizens — a solution that was hardly original. The French Boulangist deputy and prominent writer Maurice Barrès had advanced a similar program as early as the 1890s in an attempt to appeal to working-class voters in his electoral district, the town of Nancy in Lorraine.

https://www.fairobserver.com/region/europe/history-fascism-benito-mussolini-italian-world-history-italy-latest-news-64928/

“National rather than international, men rather than masses, socialism rather than capitalism.”

Max Wundt

“Europe is not a geographical but a blood-wise determined concept”

Adolf Hitler

Visegrad backstabbing Ukraine for Israel

Ukraine is probably the most anti Israel country in Europe, along with Ireland, but the dissident right fags will always spin the truth

“Unité française et unité allemande” (in Socialisme fasciste) indicates that Drieu la Rochelle was in principle willing, or at least he found it amusing to imagine and assert that he was willing, to pay almost any price so that European unification could be accomplished. If “linguistic imperialism is the limit of Germany, the Alps of Germany,” then Germany should be allowed, should even be encouraged to establish its borders in this fashion, for the Anschluss itself could be considered a positive step in the direction of not only German but also European unification: “I am for the Anschluss and, if need be, for the suppression of Belgium and Switzerland. After that, we will see more clearly in Europe. ... And Europe will not be far from being made”.

🇧🇬🏴 Our comrades translated a speech that was given at this year's Lukov March - enjoy!

It is understandable that in its early days socialism turned to the State, even the theoretically democratic but actually bourgeois State, to obtain from it a minimum of aid and protection. But socialism was impregnated by the same spirit as the capitalism against which it was rising up. It too bathed in the democratic atmosphere of the nineteenth century and never grasped clearly the idea of what the true State had to be, namely a strong State, capable of instigating the revolution.
This new function of the State has only been realized and understood, and the new State has only been constructed, by the first European revolutions, and first and foremost by Germany. [...] The great novelty of the German State, the Third Reich, is that it succeeded in being both authoritarian and popular, so that it no longer expressed class interests, and offered something much better than a compromise between the interests of rival classes, or a precarious and constantly challenged balance between antagonistic forces. That was precisely the dangerous stage which our democracy had reached, leading to a visible paralysis of public institutions, a lack of authority, the breakdown of the State.

Marcel Déat, The State and the Revolution, L’Æuvre, 1/3, Nov. 1943.

Nationalist black bloc Berlin 22.02.25

🇩🇪🏴 Free, Social, National !