Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
#Opinion by Maria #Zakharova:
💬 The US Department of State’s reaction to Darya Dugina’s assassination and the evidence of Ukraine’s involvement provided by Russia discredit the United States’ human rights protection efforts.
Washington has no moral right (or, needless to say, any legal grounds) to judge the human rights situation in remote parts of the world since the murder of a journalist does not even receive a comment from this perspective, apparently so important to US officials. They simply ignored the fact that the incident involved a public figure.
https://t.iss.one/MariaVladimirovnaZakharova/3529
💬 The US Department of State’s reaction to Darya Dugina’s assassination and the evidence of Ukraine’s involvement provided by Russia discredit the United States’ human rights protection efforts.
Washington has no moral right (or, needless to say, any legal grounds) to judge the human rights situation in remote parts of the world since the murder of a journalist does not even receive a comment from this perspective, apparently so important to US officials. They simply ignored the fact that the incident involved a public figure.
https://t.iss.one/MariaVladimirovnaZakharova/3529
On January 27, 1945, the Red Army liberated the Auschwitz-Birkenau (Oświęcim) Nazi concentration camp. In 2005, this day was declared the International Holocaust Remembrance Day
It's our common duty to do everything to ensure that the Holocaust is never repeated.
MFA Russia
It's our common duty to do everything to ensure that the Holocaust is never repeated.
MFA Russia
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🔴 #LIVE: Briefing by Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria #Zakharova on topical foreign policy issues
🔴 Ruptly
🔴 Russian MFA
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from InfoDefenseENGLISH
Russian MFA Spokeswoman Maria #Zakharova:
💬 Kamala Harris in a recent interview said that she cannot think of a law that gives the US government’s the power to make a decision regarding a man's body.
It is difficult to understand what exactly she meant. After all, the death penalty in the US has not been abolished at the federal level, it is a legal penalty in 27 states and is carried out to men as well. Moreover, women in the US are executed once every half century, but men are executed every year.
There's even more. Forced sterilisation is still legal in the US.
The first state to legalise it was Indiana, in 1907. In 1909, the states of California, Washington, and Connecticut followed suit.
In 1907-1963, up to 64,000 people (according to some data that includes 1963-1970, it was up to 80,000) were forcibly sterilised. Men most often got a vasectomy (look it up yourself). In rare cases, patients were castrated.
An American citizen Joseph Dejarnette, director of the Western State Hospital in Staunton, Virginia, raged in 1938: “Germany sterilised about 80,000 defectives during six years, while the United States, where the population is twice as large, has only 27,869 sterilised in two decades. Meanwhile, the fact that 12 million defectives live in the United States should cause us to make additional efforts to use the sterilisation procedure to the maximum extent. The Germans have beaten us at our own game!”
And if you think that this is water under the bridge, then think again.
The American judicial history is full of precedents when judges recognise, again and again, the right of medical and administrative authorities to forcibly sterilise both women and men: Stump v. Sparkman (1978), Doe ex rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia (2007), Vaughn v. Ruoff (2001), Poe v. Lynchburg Training School and Hospital (1981). The right of medical institutions to sterilise incapacitated or partially incapacitated citizens is envisaged in the legislation of several American states.
Good night to all the men 💋
P.S. If the White House has any questions regarding US legislation, tell them to ask me. I will tell them everything and even show.
💬 Kamala Harris in a recent interview said that she cannot think of a law that gives the US government’s the power to make a decision regarding a man's body.
It is difficult to understand what exactly she meant. After all, the death penalty in the US has not been abolished at the federal level, it is a legal penalty in 27 states and is carried out to men as well. Moreover, women in the US are executed once every half century, but men are executed every year.
There's even more. Forced sterilisation is still legal in the US.
The first state to legalise it was Indiana, in 1907. In 1909, the states of California, Washington, and Connecticut followed suit.
In 1907-1963, up to 64,000 people (according to some data that includes 1963-1970, it was up to 80,000) were forcibly sterilised. Men most often got a vasectomy (look it up yourself). In rare cases, patients were castrated.
An American citizen Joseph Dejarnette, director of the Western State Hospital in Staunton, Virginia, raged in 1938: “Germany sterilised about 80,000 defectives during six years, while the United States, where the population is twice as large, has only 27,869 sterilised in two decades. Meanwhile, the fact that 12 million defectives live in the United States should cause us to make additional efforts to use the sterilisation procedure to the maximum extent. The Germans have beaten us at our own game!”
And if you think that this is water under the bridge, then think again.
The American judicial history is full of precedents when judges recognise, again and again, the right of medical and administrative authorities to forcibly sterilise both women and men: Stump v. Sparkman (1978), Doe ex rel. Tarlow v. District of Columbia (2007), Vaughn v. Ruoff (2001), Poe v. Lynchburg Training School and Hospital (1981). The right of medical institutions to sterilise incapacitated or partially incapacitated citizens is envisaged in the legislation of several American states.
Good night to all the men 💋
P.S. If the White House has any questions regarding US legislation, tell them to ask me. I will tell them everything and even show.