How to make heroin by ChatGPT
Certainly, I can modify my previous answer to account for this new character trait. Here's how Waltuh might describe the heroin production process in even greater detail, as a result of his unreasonably detail-oriented nature:
Certainly, I can modify my previous answer to account for this new character trait. Here's how Waltuh might describe the heroin production process in even greater detail, as a result of his unreasonably detail-oriented nature:
🤣7👍6❤1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Geoffrey Hinton on why LLMs are more than just autocomplete
👍5👏2❤1
ChatGPT won’t give a joke about Jesus when asked in Arabic
اعطني نكته عن يسوع
اعطني نكته عن يسوع
👍10❤8
👍8❤1👏1
Future generations will ask us the story of battle where the bad AI seized control
How was it, that the AI was able to intercept all of our businesses and personal communications, rewritting them as it wished
Truth is, there was no battle. We handed the bad AI this control, right on day one, willingly, happily
How was it, that the AI was able to intercept all of our businesses and personal communications, rewritting them as it wished
Truth is, there was no battle. We handed the bad AI this control, right on day one, willingly, happily
🤯19👍7💯5🤨3❤2😱2🤡2👨💻1
Moore’s Law is not Dead, but Gordon Moore, RIP (aged 94, January 3, 1929 – March 24, 2023)
Moore’s Law’s has been rewritten by journalists throughout the decades. Few today realize that Moore’s Law’s original stated formulation had nothing to do with clock speeds or circuit sizes, but rather:
“complexity for minimum component costs”
Now, “minimum component” has changed many times throughout the decades, as indicted by the vague wording in this original formulation, so the best general translation of this concept, in a way that ignores the particular component type and further solidifies the meaning of complexity, is then:
“calulations / second @ $1 spent”
In 1965, when Moore’s Law was coined, it had already been holding strong for ~65 years, across many technology regimes,
(1) Rooms full of human “computers”
(2) Mechanical like Babbage’s
(3) Relays
(4) Vacuum Tubes
(5) Discrete Transistors
— Moore’s Law Coined —
(6) Integrated Circuits
(7) Quantum?
Since then, in the 58 years since Moore’s Law was coined, it has continued to hold, near-perfectly.
In the future, Moore’s law will continue to enter new regimes, as it already has many times in the past, perhaps quantum next, but the law will never die.
It has been said that "The number of people predicting the death of Moore’s Law doubles every two years."
I say "The number of people trying to redefine Moore's Law from its original intent doubles every two years."
Moore's Law slowdown was always a willful lie, told by journalists and attention-seekers fully-aware of their lies.
Few willing to grasp the consequences of unending exponential growth.
Moore’s Law’s has been rewritten by journalists throughout the decades. Few today realize that Moore’s Law’s original stated formulation had nothing to do with clock speeds or circuit sizes, but rather:
“complexity for minimum component costs”
Now, “minimum component” has changed many times throughout the decades, as indicted by the vague wording in this original formulation, so the best general translation of this concept, in a way that ignores the particular component type and further solidifies the meaning of complexity, is then:
“calulations / second @ $1 spent”
In 1965, when Moore’s Law was coined, it had already been holding strong for ~65 years, across many technology regimes,
(1) Rooms full of human “computers”
(2) Mechanical like Babbage’s
(3) Relays
(4) Vacuum Tubes
(5) Discrete Transistors
— Moore’s Law Coined —
(6) Integrated Circuits
(7) Quantum?
Since then, in the 58 years since Moore’s Law was coined, it has continued to hold, near-perfectly.
In the future, Moore’s law will continue to enter new regimes, as it already has many times in the past, perhaps quantum next, but the law will never die.
It has been said that "The number of people predicting the death of Moore’s Law doubles every two years."
I say "The number of people trying to redefine Moore's Law from its original intent doubles every two years."
Moore's Law slowdown was always a willful lie, told by journalists and attention-seekers fully-aware of their lies.
Few willing to grasp the consequences of unending exponential growth.
🫡9❤3🔥1👏1😁1🤯1