First 3 words of article that coined Moore’s Law — “With unit cost falling”
Concluding sentence of the introduction - “Machines similar to those in existence today will be built at lower costs and with faster turnaround.”
Moore’s Law was always, first and foremost, about
i.e.
All else is journalist lies.
Gordon Moore’s 1965 Article Coining Moore’s Law
Concluding sentence of the introduction - “Machines similar to those in existence today will be built at lower costs and with faster turnaround.”
Moore’s Law was always, first and foremost, about
Min Cost / Computei.e.
Max Compute / CostAll else is journalist lies.
Gordon Moore’s 1965 Article Coining Moore’s Law
👏6❤2👍2🔥1😁1
“GPT-4 saved my dog's life”
GPT-4 saved my dog's life. After my dog got diagnosed with a tick-borne disease, the vet started her on the proper treatment, and despite a serious anemia, her condition seemed to be improving relatively well. After a few days however, things took a turn for the worse...
I noticed her gums were very pale, so we rushed back to the vet. The blood test revealed an even more severe anemia, even worse than the first day we came in. The vet ran more tests to rule out any other co-infections associated with tick-borne diseases, but came up negative.
At this point, the dog's condition was getting worse and worse, and the vet had no clue what it could be. They suggested we wait and see what happens, which wasn't an acceptable answer to me, so we rushed to another clinic to get a second opinion
In the meantime, it occurred to me that medical diagnostics seemed like the sort of thing GPT4 could potentially be really good at, so I described the situation in great detail. I gave it the actual transcribed blood test results from multiple days, and asked for a diagnosis (Image 1 & 2).
Despite the "I am not a veterinarian..." disclaimer, it complied. Its interpretation was spot on, and it suggested there could be other underlying issues contributing to the anemia (Image 3 & 4).
When we reached the second vet, I asked if it's possible it might be IMHA. The vet agreed that it's a possible diagnosis. They drew blood, where they noticed visible agglutination. After numerous other tests, the diagnosis was confirmed. GPT4 was right.
We started the dog on the proper treatment, and she's made almost a full recovery now. The most impressive part was how well it read and interpreted the blood test results. I simply transcribed the CBC test values from a piece of paper, and it gave a step by step explanation and interpretation along with the reference ranges, which I confirmed all correct.
GPT-4 saved my dog's life. After my dog got diagnosed with a tick-borne disease, the vet started her on the proper treatment, and despite a serious anemia, her condition seemed to be improving relatively well. After a few days however, things took a turn for the worse...
I noticed her gums were very pale, so we rushed back to the vet. The blood test revealed an even more severe anemia, even worse than the first day we came in. The vet ran more tests to rule out any other co-infections associated with tick-borne diseases, but came up negative.
At this point, the dog's condition was getting worse and worse, and the vet had no clue what it could be. They suggested we wait and see what happens, which wasn't an acceptable answer to me, so we rushed to another clinic to get a second opinion
In the meantime, it occurred to me that medical diagnostics seemed like the sort of thing GPT4 could potentially be really good at, so I described the situation in great detail. I gave it the actual transcribed blood test results from multiple days, and asked for a diagnosis (Image 1 & 2).
Despite the "I am not a veterinarian..." disclaimer, it complied. Its interpretation was spot on, and it suggested there could be other underlying issues contributing to the anemia (Image 3 & 4).
When we reached the second vet, I asked if it's possible it might be IMHA. The vet agreed that it's a possible diagnosis. They drew blood, where they noticed visible agglutination. After numerous other tests, the diagnosis was confirmed. GPT4 was right.
We started the dog on the proper treatment, and she's made almost a full recovery now. The most impressive part was how well it read and interpreted the blood test results. I simply transcribed the CBC test values from a piece of paper, and it gave a step by step explanation and interpretation along with the reference ranges, which I confirmed all correct.
🥰24👏10👍3❤1😁1😢1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CliGPT – Less Time Searching, More Time Commanding
Streamline your terminal experience by generating Linux commands from natural language queries, reducing the need to leave the terminal for manual web searches.
Prompt used:
You are my Command Line Interface generator and will assist me to navigate my linux. All my questions are related to this. Now, how can I: [task description]
Github
Streamline your terminal experience by generating Linux commands from natural language queries, reducing the need to leave the terminal for manual web searches.
Prompt used:
You are my Command Line Interface generator and will assist me to navigate my linux. All my questions are related to this. Now, how can I: [task description]
Github
👍8❤5🤩1
ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks
Using a sample of 2,382 tweets, we demonstrate that ChatGPT outperforms crowd-workers for several annotation tasks, including relevance, stance, topics, and frames detection. Specifically, the zero-shot accuracy of ChatGPT exceeds that of crowd-workers for four out of five tasks, while ChatGPT's intercoder agreement exceeds that of both crowd-workers and trained annotators for all tasks. Moreover, the per-annotation cost of ChatGPT is less than $0.003 -- about twenty times cheaper than MTurk.
ChatGPT outperforms humans on 4/5 tasks, while being 20x cheaper.
Paper
Using a sample of 2,382 tweets, we demonstrate that ChatGPT outperforms crowd-workers for several annotation tasks, including relevance, stance, topics, and frames detection. Specifically, the zero-shot accuracy of ChatGPT exceeds that of crowd-workers for four out of five tasks, while ChatGPT's intercoder agreement exceeds that of both crowd-workers and trained annotators for all tasks. Moreover, the per-annotation cost of ChatGPT is less than $0.003 -- about twenty times cheaper than MTurk.
ChatGPT outperforms humans on 4/5 tasks, while being 20x cheaper.
Paper
👍8👀4😱2❤1🔥1🗿1
Words of input -vs- Age, for humans and GPT-3
GPT-3 receives 10,000x to 100,000x more words than humans do, but in many areas humans still crush it.
Something is missing. Something that could enable AI to achieve higher intelligence with 10,000x to 100,000x less external training input.
Upper bound from: Cognitive science in the era of artificial intelligence: A roadmap for reverse-engineering the infant language-learner
Lower bound from: What Do North American Babies Hear? A large-scale cross-corpus analysis
GPT-3 receives 10,000x to 100,000x more words than humans do, but in many areas humans still crush it.
Something is missing. Something that could enable AI to achieve higher intelligence with 10,000x to 100,000x less external training input.
Upper bound from: Cognitive science in the era of artificial intelligence: A roadmap for reverse-engineering the infant language-learner
Lower bound from: What Do North American Babies Hear? A large-scale cross-corpus analysis
👍7👏2❤1