🪆🌎 A conservative foreign policy presupposes reliance on manipulation rather than forceful pressure.
Since this approach is inevitably associated with limited resources, first we must ask the question of their distribution in specific situations.
However, under the pressure of those powers that behave in a revolutionary way, the conductor of a conservative strategy will increasingly face situations that will require him to use force to prevent revolutionary change, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Timofei Bordachev, who took part in the 18th Annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.
🔗 Origins and Challenges of Putin’s Conservative Strategy
#VALDAI2021
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Since this approach is inevitably associated with limited resources, first we must ask the question of their distribution in specific situations.
However, under the pressure of those powers that behave in a revolutionary way, the conductor of a conservative strategy will increasingly face situations that will require him to use force to prevent revolutionary change, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Timofei Bordachev, who took part in the 18th Annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.
🔗 Origins and Challenges of Putin’s Conservative Strategy
#VALDAI2021
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
🌏 The rapidly changing situation the Central Asian region and throughout the world as a whole is making its own adjustments to the agenda of regional and national development.
With all the diversity among states in the Central Asian region, the basic and historical principles of their state identity are based on a balance between secularism and spirituality. There, the secular state is balanced by spiritual principles, and they remain consistent in their approach.
It should be understood that the countries of Central Asia have been able to mobilise internal resources to counter various manifestations of extremism and separatism, despite the prevailing opinion in the expert community that the region is located along the so-called “geostrategic fault line” of the world.
Strengthening cooperation and political trust between the countries of Central Asia are making it a more independent, predictable and stable region, with respect to world politics, writes Ulugbek Khasanov, Head of Regional Security & Conflicts Study Lab., University of World Economics & Diplomacy (Uzbekistan).
🔗 New Regionalism in Central Asia
#Global_Governance #CentralAsia #Uzbekistan
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
With all the diversity among states in the Central Asian region, the basic and historical principles of their state identity are based on a balance between secularism and spirituality. There, the secular state is balanced by spiritual principles, and they remain consistent in their approach.
It should be understood that the countries of Central Asia have been able to mobilise internal resources to counter various manifestations of extremism and separatism, despite the prevailing opinion in the expert community that the region is located along the so-called “geostrategic fault line” of the world.
Strengthening cooperation and political trust between the countries of Central Asia are making it a more independent, predictable and stable region, with respect to world politics, writes Ulugbek Khasanov, Head of Regional Security & Conflicts Study Lab., University of World Economics & Diplomacy (Uzbekistan).
🔗 New Regionalism in Central Asia
#Global_Governance #CentralAsia #Uzbekistan
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
New Regionalism in Central Asia
In the modern world, many countries, due to the devaluation of the stabilising mechanisms of the international system, strive to pursue a pragmatic policy based primarily on their own interests. The realistic and objective perception of such interests is…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎥 How have attitudes in the US and the EU changed towards Euro-Atlantic security issues in the 21st century compared to the Cold War period? How are responsibilities now shared among the allies?
👉 Anatol Lieven, Senior Fellow, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft (USA), gave his analyses. He took part in the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.
#VALDAI2021 #Europe #EU #ColdWar
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
👉 Anatol Lieven, Senior Fellow, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft (USA), gave his analyses. He took part in the 18th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club.
#VALDAI2021 #Europe #EU #ColdWar
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
🌎 There is a very deep intellectual tradition of viewing the West as a deteriorating and doomed community.
It’s enough to recall Nietzsche's "God Is Dead", Spengler's "Decline of the West", and the discussion about the "Decay of the West" in Russian political philosophy to observe powerful arguments in favour of the death of the capitalist West, both in Marxism and in the modern concepts of neo-Marxists about the "future demise of the capitalist world system".
The conceptual scheme of the waning of the West fits well with the media coverage. The collapse of the Western coalition in Afghanistan, protests and even riots in the United States and Europe, political intrigues between the closest allies, and the erosion of the cultural code against the background of migration flows, and much, much more.
It would seem that there is nothing to doubt. The proud and selfish giant is about to fall to pieces. And in place of the world order he created, a still incomprehensible, but completely different world will arise.
The transition will be painful and turbulent. But the old world with a dominant West will no longer be possible. It could indeed be so. However, this option should still be considered only as one among a number of possible scenarios, writes Ivan Timofeev, Programme Director of the Valdai Discussion Club.
🔗 Decline of the West? Pros and Cons
#West #worldorder
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
It’s enough to recall Nietzsche's "God Is Dead", Spengler's "Decline of the West", and the discussion about the "Decay of the West" in Russian political philosophy to observe powerful arguments in favour of the death of the capitalist West, both in Marxism and in the modern concepts of neo-Marxists about the "future demise of the capitalist world system".
The conceptual scheme of the waning of the West fits well with the media coverage. The collapse of the Western coalition in Afghanistan, protests and even riots in the United States and Europe, political intrigues between the closest allies, and the erosion of the cultural code against the background of migration flows, and much, much more.
It would seem that there is nothing to doubt. The proud and selfish giant is about to fall to pieces. And in place of the world order he created, a still incomprehensible, but completely different world will arise.
The transition will be painful and turbulent. But the old world with a dominant West will no longer be possible. It could indeed be so. However, this option should still be considered only as one among a number of possible scenarios, writes Ivan Timofeev, Programme Director of the Valdai Discussion Club.
🔗 Decline of the West? Pros and Cons
#West #worldorder
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
Decline of the West? Pros and Cons
For a long time, there’s been a consensus among Russian international experts regarding the thesis that the collective West is nearing extinction. It can be considered one of the basic premises of Russian foreign policy doctrine.
🌳🌐 While environmental social and governance criteria remain context dependent and cannot be universally applied, it is key to balance these factors with real world market realities through a technology agnostic approach, writes Valdai Club expert Christof Van Agt.
🔗 Real World Change on Climate Will Rely on Free Markets, Dialogue, and Solidarity
#climatechange #greeneconomy #VALDAI2021
📷 ©Reuters
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
🔗 Real World Change on Climate Will Rely on Free Markets, Dialogue, and Solidarity
#climatechange #greeneconomy #VALDAI2021
📷 ©Reuters
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
🧩🌐 The world ceased to be unipolar by the mid-2010s, when Western scenarios of "humanitarian intervention" (Yugoslavia, Libya) no longer worked, but it is too early to talk about true multipolarity, writes Denis Degterev, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia.
#multipolarity #worldorder
🔗 From "Anti-Maidans" to the Collective Non-West
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
#multipolarity #worldorder
🔗 From "Anti-Maidans" to the Collective Non-West
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
From "Anti-Maidans" to the Collective Non-West
The world ceased to be unipolar by the mid-2010s, when Western scenarios of "humanitarian intervention" (Yugoslavia, Libya) no longer worked, but it is too early to talk about true multipolarity ...
💬🌐 Joe Biden's widely announced Summit for Democracy is scheduled for the end of the year. It is not difficult to assume that China and Russia will become the main targets for criticism there.
Therefore, an attempt to carry out counterplay in this field looks quite natural. It also reveals the broader context of the creation and consolidation of a kind of united front of China and Russia in the face of growing pressure from the United States. This united front can be called anti-Western or, if you will, anti-imperialist, although the terms are debatable.
If such a united front is taken as a given of modern world politics, then it is logical that China and Russia should form their own coordinated value and ideological narrative, including the issues of democracy (why not), in spite of the implicit paradox of this approach. In addition, the recent failure of the United States to promote democracy in Afghanistan provides additional evidence for this.
The plus for Russia and China is that they do not ask the presidents of other countries questions about how their elections were held, how they observe freedom of speech and how they treat their domestic political opponents. This means non-interference in internal affairs: a principle that has not yet been erased from the UN Charter and international law.
❓ How do the values of democracy affect the sovereignty of states and what are the limits of sovereignty in the context of a global value policy?
❓ Can non-Western (and actively criticised by the West) countries conduct a discourse on democracy?
👉 Oleg Barabanov, Programme Director of the Valdai Club, writes about this.
🔗 Non-Western Democracy and Its Interpretation
#Morality_and_Law #democracy #West #China #Russia
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Therefore, an attempt to carry out counterplay in this field looks quite natural. It also reveals the broader context of the creation and consolidation of a kind of united front of China and Russia in the face of growing pressure from the United States. This united front can be called anti-Western or, if you will, anti-imperialist, although the terms are debatable.
If such a united front is taken as a given of modern world politics, then it is logical that China and Russia should form their own coordinated value and ideological narrative, including the issues of democracy (why not), in spite of the implicit paradox of this approach. In addition, the recent failure of the United States to promote democracy in Afghanistan provides additional evidence for this.
The plus for Russia and China is that they do not ask the presidents of other countries questions about how their elections were held, how they observe freedom of speech and how they treat their domestic political opponents. This means non-interference in internal affairs: a principle that has not yet been erased from the UN Charter and international law.
❓ How do the values of democracy affect the sovereignty of states and what are the limits of sovereignty in the context of a global value policy?
❓ Can non-Western (and actively criticised by the West) countries conduct a discourse on democracy?
👉 Oleg Barabanov, Programme Director of the Valdai Club, writes about this.
🔗 Non-Western Democracy and Its Interpretation
#Morality_and_Law #democracy #West #China #Russia
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
Non-Western Democracy and Its Interpretation
The issues of democracy and its interpretation are now among the most acute in international relations. They are closely related to the issue of values and value policy. The key disagreement revolves around whether or not the perception of democracy should…
📆 ANNOUNCEMENT: On November 9, at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law".
Sanctions pressure on Venezuela has been going on for over 15 years. The humanitarian situation in the country is constantly deteriorating. The UN has repeatedly drawn attention to the inconsistency of unilateral sanctions with the norms of international law. Sanctions not only contribute to the deterioration of a nation’s economy, but also violate fundamental human rights.
The change of power in the United States did not lead to a weakening of restrictions against Caracas. Representatives of the United States, Canada and the EU announced a possible revision of the sanctions policy; however, so far the situation has not changed.
🎙Speaker:
🇻🇪 Felix Plasencia, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Venezuela.
Moderator:
🚩 Oleg Barabanov, Programme Director of the Valdai Discussion Club
Working languages: Russian, Spanish.
ℹ️ Information for the media: In order to get accredited for the event, please fill out the form on our website or call +7 926 930 77 63.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
🔗 Valdai Club Meets Witn Foreign Minister of Venezuela
#valdaiclub #Venezuela
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Sanctions pressure on Venezuela has been going on for over 15 years. The humanitarian situation in the country is constantly deteriorating. The UN has repeatedly drawn attention to the inconsistency of unilateral sanctions with the norms of international law. Sanctions not only contribute to the deterioration of a nation’s economy, but also violate fundamental human rights.
The change of power in the United States did not lead to a weakening of restrictions against Caracas. Representatives of the United States, Canada and the EU announced a possible revision of the sanctions policy; however, so far the situation has not changed.
🎙Speaker:
🇻🇪 Felix Plasencia, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Venezuela.
Moderator:
🚩 Oleg Barabanov, Programme Director of the Valdai Discussion Club
Working languages: Russian, Spanish.
ℹ️ Information for the media: In order to get accredited for the event, please fill out the form on our website or call +7 926 930 77 63.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
🔗 Valdai Club Meets Witn Foreign Minister of Venezuela
#valdaiclub #Venezuela
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
Valdai Club Meets Witn Foreign Minister of Venezuela
On November 9, at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law".
Valdai Discussion Club pinned «📆 ANNOUNCEMENT: On November 9, at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law". Sanctions…»
📆 ANNOUNCEMENT: On November 10, at 15:00 Moscow time (GMT+3), the Valdai Club will host an expert discussion, titled “AUKUS: A New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific?”
In September 2021, the United States, Britain and Australia entered into a trilateral defence cooperation agreement – AUKUS. The main tasks for this cooperation were named: strengthening stability in the Indo-Pacific, developing Australia's military potential and jointly combating new challenges to regional security. However, there is a reason to believe that the new agreement could undermine rather than strengthen security in the Indo-Pacific. Although officially the new alliance does not have an anti-Chinese orientation, it is obvious that its creation will lead to an increase in the presence of the participating countries in a part of the world that has traditionally been the sphere of influence of Beijing, and will become an attempt to contain China, and possibly the beginning of a new Cold War with a large-scale arms race.
A number of states, including Russia, have expressed concern that the new format for cooperation could potentially lead to a violation of the nonproliferation regime. AUKUS assumes that the nuclear powers – the United States and Britain – will transfer to Australia the technology for building nuclear submarines with conventional weapons, which could become a dangerous precedent and open a new way for the creation of nuclear weapons by a non-nuclear power. Also, this agreement has led to the termination of a multibillion-dollar contract between Australia and France for the construction of submarines. Paris considered this step a betrayal – the French ambassadors were recalled from Washington and Canberra.
❓What could be China ’s response to the creation of a new defence alliance?
❓How will the new agreement affect the relations between the United States, its European allies and Australia?
❓Could Australia become a nuclear power in the future?
❓How should Russia react to the emergence of AUKUS?
These and other questions will be answered by the participants in the discussion.
👥 Speakers:
🇦🇺 Salvatore Babones, Associate Professor of Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Sydney
🇬🇧 Andrew Futter, Professor of International Politics, University of Leicester, UK
🇷🇺 Vasily Kashin, Deputy Director at the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics
🇧🇪 Sim Tack, co-founder and chief military analyst at Force Analysis
Moderator:
🚩 Fyodor Lukyanov, Research Director of the Valdai Discussion Club.
Working languages: Russian, English.
ℹ️ Information for the media: In order to get accredited for the event, fill out the form on our website or call +79269307763.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
🔗 Valdai Club to Discuss a New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific
#valdaiclub #AUKUS
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
In September 2021, the United States, Britain and Australia entered into a trilateral defence cooperation agreement – AUKUS. The main tasks for this cooperation were named: strengthening stability in the Indo-Pacific, developing Australia's military potential and jointly combating new challenges to regional security. However, there is a reason to believe that the new agreement could undermine rather than strengthen security in the Indo-Pacific. Although officially the new alliance does not have an anti-Chinese orientation, it is obvious that its creation will lead to an increase in the presence of the participating countries in a part of the world that has traditionally been the sphere of influence of Beijing, and will become an attempt to contain China, and possibly the beginning of a new Cold War with a large-scale arms race.
A number of states, including Russia, have expressed concern that the new format for cooperation could potentially lead to a violation of the nonproliferation regime. AUKUS assumes that the nuclear powers – the United States and Britain – will transfer to Australia the technology for building nuclear submarines with conventional weapons, which could become a dangerous precedent and open a new way for the creation of nuclear weapons by a non-nuclear power. Also, this agreement has led to the termination of a multibillion-dollar contract between Australia and France for the construction of submarines. Paris considered this step a betrayal – the French ambassadors were recalled from Washington and Canberra.
❓What could be China ’s response to the creation of a new defence alliance?
❓How will the new agreement affect the relations between the United States, its European allies and Australia?
❓Could Australia become a nuclear power in the future?
❓How should Russia react to the emergence of AUKUS?
These and other questions will be answered by the participants in the discussion.
👥 Speakers:
🇦🇺 Salvatore Babones, Associate Professor of Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Sydney
🇬🇧 Andrew Futter, Professor of International Politics, University of Leicester, UK
🇷🇺 Vasily Kashin, Deputy Director at the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics
🇧🇪 Sim Tack, co-founder and chief military analyst at Force Analysis
Moderator:
🚩 Fyodor Lukyanov, Research Director of the Valdai Discussion Club.
Working languages: Russian, English.
ℹ️ Information for the media: In order to get accredited for the event, fill out the form on our website or call +79269307763.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
🔗 Valdai Club to Discuss a New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific
#valdaiclub #AUKUS
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
Valdai Club to Discuss a New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific
On November 10, at 15:00 Moscow time (GMT+3), the Valdai Club will host an expert discussion, titled “AUKUS: A New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific?”
👑 We live on the ruins of two empires — the Russian Empire and the USSR, writes Valdai Club expert Alexei Miller.
November 2, 2021, marked 300 years since the day when Peter I proclaimed himself emperor, and Russia — an empire. In the same years, the concept of “nation” entered the Russian language and began its varied adventures. In Peter the Great’s time, the word “nation” was used almost as a synonym for empire, as a designation for sovereign polity. In this sense, there was no tension between these concepts.
we can say that in the next 300 years, the concepts of empire and nation had a very complex relationship and were used to discuss several important topics for Russia, which in many ways remain relevant today. First, this concerns the topic of relations between Russia and Europe.
In Europe, Peter’s Russia was viewed as a “barbarian at the gates” or as an “apprentice”. Russian elites easily agreed with the status of a student until they realised that they were going to be kept in this status forever, with the Europeans always being “mentors”. Then they began to listen with interest to arguments about the “decline of Europe”.
🔗 The 300th Anniversary of the Russian Empire
#Morality_and_Law #RussianEmpire #history
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
November 2, 2021, marked 300 years since the day when Peter I proclaimed himself emperor, and Russia — an empire. In the same years, the concept of “nation” entered the Russian language and began its varied adventures. In Peter the Great’s time, the word “nation” was used almost as a synonym for empire, as a designation for sovereign polity. In this sense, there was no tension between these concepts.
we can say that in the next 300 years, the concepts of empire and nation had a very complex relationship and were used to discuss several important topics for Russia, which in many ways remain relevant today. First, this concerns the topic of relations between Russia and Europe.
In Europe, Peter’s Russia was viewed as a “barbarian at the gates” or as an “apprentice”. Russian elites easily agreed with the status of a student until they realised that they were going to be kept in this status forever, with the Europeans always being “mentors”. Then they began to listen with interest to arguments about the “decline of Europe”.
🔗 The 300th Anniversary of the Russian Empire
#Morality_and_Law #RussianEmpire #history
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
The 300th Anniversary of the Russian Empire
We live on the ruins of two empires — the Russian Empire and the USSR, writes Valdai Club expert Alexei Miller. We have inherited, as the pillars of our collective identity, an unyielding desire to preserve our sovereignty and great power status. From the…
🇦🇲🇦🇿🇷🇺 A year ago, on November 9, 2020, thanks to the peacekeeping intervention of Russia, the Second Karabakh War ended.
The armed conflict in the South Caucasus did not lead to significant changes in Russia’s foreign policy considerations regarding the countries that took part in it. Unlike the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine and the preceding coup in Kiev, when the Ukrainian state actually lost its sovereignty, both Transcaucasian powers retained the ability to make foreign policy decisions relatively independently.
Of course, there has been some strengthening of cooperation between Baku and Ankara, and now the Azerbaijani authorities are forced to listen more closely to the interests of their Turkish partners. However, in the aftermath of the conflict, Azerbaijan did not become a base for the potential deployment of forces hostile to Russia in the event of possible war.
As for Armenia, the strengthening of Russian influence there also did not lead, as one could have feared, to a disproportionate increase in Russia’s obligations towards this country or the loss of its sovereignty.
The arrival of Russian peacekeeping forces in the South Caucasus has created conditions for a more active diplomatic involvement of Moscow in regional affairs, which also reduces the likelihood that Azerbaijan or Armenia will be significantly influenced by foreign powers with potentially hostile intentions regarding Russia’s basic interests and values.
In the event that Russia’s neighbours, as a result of interaction with each other, do not lose their sovereignty in a way that benefits the United States or China, any changes in the balance of power between them have no fundamental significance for Moscow, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Timofei Bordachev.
🔗 The Second Karabakh War: Lessons for Russia's Neighbours
#Global_Governance #NagornoKarabakh #geopolitics
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
The armed conflict in the South Caucasus did not lead to significant changes in Russia’s foreign policy considerations regarding the countries that took part in it. Unlike the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine and the preceding coup in Kiev, when the Ukrainian state actually lost its sovereignty, both Transcaucasian powers retained the ability to make foreign policy decisions relatively independently.
Of course, there has been some strengthening of cooperation between Baku and Ankara, and now the Azerbaijani authorities are forced to listen more closely to the interests of their Turkish partners. However, in the aftermath of the conflict, Azerbaijan did not become a base for the potential deployment of forces hostile to Russia in the event of possible war.
As for Armenia, the strengthening of Russian influence there also did not lead, as one could have feared, to a disproportionate increase in Russia’s obligations towards this country or the loss of its sovereignty.
The arrival of Russian peacekeeping forces in the South Caucasus has created conditions for a more active diplomatic involvement of Moscow in regional affairs, which also reduces the likelihood that Azerbaijan or Armenia will be significantly influenced by foreign powers with potentially hostile intentions regarding Russia’s basic interests and values.
In the event that Russia’s neighbours, as a result of interaction with each other, do not lose their sovereignty in a way that benefits the United States or China, any changes in the balance of power between them have no fundamental significance for Moscow, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Timofei Bordachev.
🔗 The Second Karabakh War: Lessons for Russia's Neighbours
#Global_Governance #NagornoKarabakh #geopolitics
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
The Second Karabakh War: Lessons for Russia's Neighbours
In the event that Russia’s neighbours, as a result of interaction with each other, do not lose their sovereignty in a way that benefits the United States or China, any changes in the balance of power between them have no fundamental significance for Moscow…
⏰ TODAY at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia @plasenciafelixr will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law".
Working languages: Russian, Spanish.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
📷 ©2021 Ariana Cubillos/AP
Working languages: Russian, Spanish.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
📷 ©2021 Ariana Cubillos/AP
UPD: The livestream is over. The video of the discussion will be available soon via the same link. Stay tuned!
🎥 LIVE (in Spanish): at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law".
Working languages: Russian, Spanish.
🔗 LIVE: Valdai Club Meets Witn Foreign Minister of Venezuela (In Spanish)
#valdaiclub #Venezuela
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
🎥 LIVE (in Spanish): at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law".
Working languages: Russian, Spanish.
🔗 LIVE: Valdai Club Meets Witn Foreign Minister of Venezuela (In Spanish)
#valdaiclub #Venezuela
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
LIVE: Valdai Club Meets Witn Foreign Minister of Venezuela (In Spanish)
On November 9, at 12:00 noon Moscow time (GMT+3), a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled “Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law”.
Valdai Discussion Club pinned «UPD: The livestream is over. The video of the discussion will be available soon via the same link. Stay tuned! 🎥 LIVE (in Spanish): at 12:00 noon, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia will take place at the Valdai Club on the topic,…»
Valdai Discussion Club pinned «📆 ANNOUNCEMENT: On November 10, at 15:00 Moscow time (GMT+3), the Valdai Club will host an expert discussion, titled “AUKUS: A New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific?” In September 2021, the United States, Britain and Australia entered into a trilateral defence…»
📷 Today, on November 9, a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia took place at the Valdai Club on the topic, titled "Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law".
👉 Photo gallery of the meeting is available on our Instagram.
🎞 The video of the discussion will be available via this link soon.
Stay tuned!
👉 Photo gallery of the meeting is available on our Instagram.
🎞 The video of the discussion will be available via this link soon.
Stay tuned!
🇪🇺🌏 Can we expect the European Union to contribute to safeguarding regional security in Central Asia now that Afghanistan is back in the hands of the Taliban?
One thing is for sure, it is in the interest of the EU to have a stable, secure and prosperous Central Asia. As security concerns eminating from the crisis in Afghanistan have multiplied over night following the Taliban’s return to power, the region has made a dramatic resurfacing on the EU’s radar. In particular, the situation has set off alarm bells across European capitals about the possibility of a new refugee crisis emerging, as many Afghans are desperate to leave the country and go to Europe, writes Fabienne Bossuyt, Assistant Professor at Ghent University (Belgium) and professorial fellow at UNU-CRIS.
🔗 European Strategic Autonomy in Action? The EU’s Role as a Security Actor in Central Asia in the Wake of the US Withdrawal from Afghanistan
#Global_Governance #EU #Europe #CentralAsia #Afghanistan
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
One thing is for sure, it is in the interest of the EU to have a stable, secure and prosperous Central Asia. As security concerns eminating from the crisis in Afghanistan have multiplied over night following the Taliban’s return to power, the region has made a dramatic resurfacing on the EU’s radar. In particular, the situation has set off alarm bells across European capitals about the possibility of a new refugee crisis emerging, as many Afghans are desperate to leave the country and go to Europe, writes Fabienne Bossuyt, Assistant Professor at Ghent University (Belgium) and professorial fellow at UNU-CRIS.
🔗 European Strategic Autonomy in Action? The EU’s Role as a Security Actor in Central Asia in the Wake of the US Withdrawal from Afghanistan
#Global_Governance #EU #Europe #CentralAsia #Afghanistan
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
European Strategic Autonomy in Action? The EU’s Role as a Security Actor in Central Asia in the Wake of the US Withdrawal from…
Can we expect the European Union to contribute to safeguarding regional security in Central Asia now that Afghanistan is back in the hands of the Taliban? One thing is for sure, it is in the interest of the EU to have a stable, secure and prosperous Central…
⏰ TODAY at 15:00 Moscow time (GMT+3), the Valdai Club will host an expert discussion, titled “AUKUS: A New Cold War in the Indo-Pacific?”
❓What could be China ’s response to the creation of a new defence alliance?
❓How will the new agreement affect the relations between the United States, its European allies and Australia?
❓Could Australia become a nuclear power in the future?
❓How should Russia react to the emergence of AUKUS?
These and other questions will be answered by the participants in the discussion.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
📷 ©2021 Andrew Harnik / AP
❓What could be China ’s response to the creation of a new defence alliance?
❓How will the new agreement affect the relations between the United States, its European allies and Australia?
❓Could Australia become a nuclear power in the future?
❓How should Russia react to the emergence of AUKUS?
These and other questions will be answered by the participants in the discussion.
A link to the live broadcast of the discussion will be posted on all online platforms used by the Valdai Club: on the website, on Facebook, Vkontakte, Instagram, and Telegram.
📷 ©2021 Andrew Harnik / AP
🇻🇪🇷🇺 Russia and Venezuela: On the Same Side of the Sanctions Barricades
On November 9, the Valdai Club held a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia on the topic “Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law”.
Opening the event, Oleg Barabanov, Programme Director of the Valdai Discussion Club, noted that Russia and Venezuela are on the same side of the barricades in world politics. He pointed to the coinciding positions of the two countries on a number of multilateral issues and their development of bilateral cooperation.
Foreign Minister Plasencia began his speech with a brief excursion into the history of the liberation of Latin America from Spanish colonialism and with a story about the Bolivarian project, which meant the unification of all the former Spanish colonies into a single state. “This project was not based on the principles of hegemony and expansion, but on the principles of integration,” he stressed, calling this a key contradiction between the Bolivarian vision of the world and the United States’ vision of the world, which was laid out in the Monroe Doctrine.
Venezuela’s integration projects, aimed at developing cooperation and preventing the exploitation of the weak by the strong, cause concern and aggression in Washington. After Venezuela’s return to Bolivarian philosophy, Washington began to view the republic as a threat to US interests. A separate negative reaction from the United States, according to Plasencia, has been elicited by the foreign policy of Venezuela, in particular the good relations of the Bolivarian Republic with Russia, China and Iran and its desire for multilateral cooperation. As a result, the United States is trying to reduce its resource base and impose sanctions aimed at limiting access to high-tech industrial goods for the servicing of the petrochemical and oil industries.
🔗 Russia and Venezuela: On the Same Side of the Sanctions Barricades
#Venezuela #Russia #UnitedStates #sanctions
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
On November 9, the Valdai Club held a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia on the topic “Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law”.
Opening the event, Oleg Barabanov, Programme Director of the Valdai Discussion Club, noted that Russia and Venezuela are on the same side of the barricades in world politics. He pointed to the coinciding positions of the two countries on a number of multilateral issues and their development of bilateral cooperation.
Foreign Minister Plasencia began his speech with a brief excursion into the history of the liberation of Latin America from Spanish colonialism and with a story about the Bolivarian project, which meant the unification of all the former Spanish colonies into a single state. “This project was not based on the principles of hegemony and expansion, but on the principles of integration,” he stressed, calling this a key contradiction between the Bolivarian vision of the world and the United States’ vision of the world, which was laid out in the Monroe Doctrine.
Venezuela’s integration projects, aimed at developing cooperation and preventing the exploitation of the weak by the strong, cause concern and aggression in Washington. After Venezuela’s return to Bolivarian philosophy, Washington began to view the republic as a threat to US interests. A separate negative reaction from the United States, according to Plasencia, has been elicited by the foreign policy of Venezuela, in particular the good relations of the Bolivarian Republic with Russia, China and Iran and its desire for multilateral cooperation. As a result, the United States is trying to reduce its resource base and impose sanctions aimed at limiting access to high-tech industrial goods for the servicing of the petrochemical and oil industries.
🔗 Russia and Venezuela: On the Same Side of the Sanctions Barricades
#Venezuela #Russia #UnitedStates #sanctions
@valdai_club — The Valdai Discussion Club
Valdai Club
Russia and Venezuela: On the Same Side of the Sanctions Barricades
On November 9, the Valdai Club held a meeting with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia on the topic “Venezuela: Geopolitics of Unilateral Sanctions and Violations of International Law”.