We are being played with everything

This is what Tinder will look like in winter in EU:

Freezing women chasing after Russians who can afford electricity, heat and hot water.

No way anyone is getting near the intake/exhaust of those engine during taxi. Another psyop.

Nothing new

psyop as everything else, everything!

Never forget the heartless words they forced their puppet to spew while shattering lives: "Biden to Miners: Learn to Code!"

"House Democrats and Secretary McMahon Discuss Education: Local Control vs. Federal Oversight"

House Democrats held a press briefing to discuss their meeting with Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, focusing on U.S. education policy. McMahon advocated for localized education, emphasizing control by teachers, parents, and school boards, with continued federal funding for existing programs. She stressed bipartisan collaboration and the importance of educating future generations. Democrats appreciated the dialogue but expressed concerns that states might struggle to maintain programs if more control is devolved to them. The discussion was collegial, highlighting a shared focus on children’s education despite differing views on federal versus local roles.

Below are the key points from the press briefing:

1. Meeting Overview: House Democrats met with Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to discuss education policy and held a press briefing to share insights.
2. McMahon’s Stance: McMahon supports localized education, where teachers, parents, and school boards design curricula, believing it’s the most effective approach.
3. Federal Funding: She confirmed that existing federal education programs will continue to receive funding.
4. Bipartisan Tone: McMahon emphasized working with Congress across party lines and welcomed the open, collegial discussion with Democrats.
5. Focus on Children: Both sides agreed education is a non-partisan issue critical for future generations (e.g., engineers, doctors, plumbers).
6. Democratic Concern: Democrats worried that devolving control to states might hinder their ability to protect key programs and services.
7. Positive Dialogue: The briefing reflected a constructive exchange, with gratitude expressed for McMahon’s engagement, despite differing views.

"Why did the Democrats and four Republicans flip on Trump’s Canada tariffs?

Because the Deep State blackmailed them with photos of Susan Collins eating lobster with Trudeau, Mitch McConnell sipping bourbon with Mounties, and Rand Paul preaching free markets in a maple syrup dungeon—turns out even the Senate can’t resist a good conspiracy twist!"😂

"Senate's Symbolic Stand: A 51-48 Vote Against Trump's Canada Tariffs"

The Senate Vote
Vote Breakdown: The Senate has 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats (including independents who caucus with Democrats). With all 47 Democrats voting in favor, the resolution needed at least four Republican votes to reach a majority. The defection of Collins, Murkowski, Paul, and McConnell provided the necessary margin, resulting in a 51-48 victory.

Republican Motivations:
Susan Collins: Representing Maine, a state economically intertwined with Canada (e.g., paper mills and lobster industries), she argued the tariffs would hurt local jobs and families.

Lisa Murkowski: From Alaska, another border state reliant on Canadian trade, she echoed concerns about economic damage to her constituents.

Rand Paul: A libertarian-leaning senator, he has long opposed tariffs on principle, favoring free markets, and co-sponsored the resolution.

Mitch McConnell: The former Senate Majority Leader’s vote was surprising given his past alignment with Trump, but it may reflect Kentucky’s economic interests (e.g., bourbon and auto industries) or a strategic shift in his stance.

Trump had publicly pressured these senators to oppose the measure, calling it a Democratic ploy to undermine him, but their votes suggest a mix of constituent pressure, ideological differences, and skepticism about the tariffs’ rationale.

In short, while the Senate’s 51-48 vote highlights bipartisan concern over Trump’s tariffs on Canada, the House’s inaction ensures the policy persists, making this a symbolic rather than substantive defeat for the administration.

On April 2, 2025, the U.S. Senate passed a measure 51-48 to end Trump’s tariffs on Canada, with four Republicans—Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, and Mitch McConnell—joining all 47 Democrats. The tariffs, tied to a national emergency declaration over fentanyl trafficking, faced criticism for lacking evidence and harming trade. However, the Republican-led House won’t take up the measure, so the tariffs remain in place despite the Senate’s symbolic rebuke of Trump’s policy.

In conclusion, the Senate’s 51-48 vote to terminate Trump’s tariffs on Canada, supported by four Republicans and all Democrats, marks a notable but ultimately ineffective challenge to the administration’s trade policy. With the House refusing to act, the tariffs persist, underscoring the limits of bipartisan opposition in a divided Congress and the continued dominance of Trump’s agenda within the Republican Party. The vote reflects economic and ideological tensions but changes little in practice.

Why This Chart Matters
This chart, as presented by Trump on April 2, 2025, illustrates his administration’s shift toward a more aggressive reciprocal tariff policy, directly comparing the trade barriers imposed by other countries with the U.S.’s retaliatory tariffs. It underscores Trump’s focus on reducing the U.S. trade deficit and addressing perceived unfair trade practices, but it also risks further economic friction with key trading partners. The “kind reciprocal” approach (halving the rates for most countries) might be an attempt to balance protectionism with diplomatic considerations, though the high rates on countries like Vietnam and China suggest a targeted approach to specific trade rivals.

X22-3609-Report

The beginning 👉 03:11

[DS] Tried To Cover Up Their Crimes By Deleting Data,Elon Recovered It,Arrests Are Coming- Ep. 3609
April 1, 2025

X22-3610-Report

The beginning 👉 03:11

[DS] Funding Is Being Cutoff WW, Elon Found The Generals Coordinating The Attacks – Ep. 3610
April 2, 2025

Below are the key points JFK Assassination

1. JFK Assassination Doubts: Scholars, including Jefferson Morley, testified on April 1, 2025, that newly reviewed unredacted files suggest Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone in assassinating JFK. Evidence, such as a blowout wound in the back of Kennedy’s head, indicates a shot from the front, which Oswald could not have fired.
2. Government Cover-Up Allegations: The narrative claims the U.S. government has concealed the truth about JFK’s assassination for 60 years, with critical information allegedly locked away by the CIA in Langley.
3. Warren Commission Rejected: The Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald acted alone is challenged by the new testimony and evidence presented to Congress.
4. Oliver Stone’s Involvement: Director Oliver Stone testified at the recent JFK assassination hearing, urging Congress to reopen the investigation and interrogate the CIA. He has long advocated for transparency, citing his 1991 film JFK and the resulting 1992 JFK Records Act.
5. JFK Records Act and Declassification Delays: The 1992 law aimed to release all JFK-related files, with full declassification mandated by October 2017 unless blocked by the president for national security reasons. However, delays occurred under Trump (despite his initial intent to release everything) and continued into the Biden administration.
6. New Push for Transparency: Trump, influenced by figures like Joe Rogan and Andy Napolitano, has renewed efforts to release all JFK files without exceptions. Congresswoman Luna is also pursuing legislative action to support this.
7. Trump Assassination Attempts: The text connects the JFK cover-up to recent assassination attempts on Trump (one nine months ago by Thomas Crooks and another by a man linked to Ukraine). It alleges government opacity, noting Crooks’ body was quickly cremated and little is known about either incident.
8. Schlesinger Memo: Researcher Jim DiGenio highlights a partially redacted memo from Schlesinger revealing the CIA’s significant influence over the State Department (47% of personnel were CIA operatives). This ties into Kennedy’s struggles with the CIA, including their role in the attempted overthrow of Charles de Gaulle.
9. Kennedy vs. CIA: The text suggests Kennedy’s firing of CIA leaders Allen Dulles, Dick Bissell, and Charles Cabell—unprecedented in U.S. history—may have contributed to his assassination.
10. Oliver Stone on Val Kilmer: Stone briefly mourns the recent passing of actor Val Kilmer, praising his role as Jim Morrison in The Doors (1991) and noting his health struggles as a Christian Scientist.
11. Broader Theme: The discussion frames these events as a fight for truth and democracy, with Stone and others praising bipartisan efforts in Congress to uncover hidden histories.

"Tornado Outbreak Devastates Northeast Arkansas: Police Car Flees as Homes and Power Lines Fall"

As of now, the threat persists, with a tornado emergency still in effect for parts of northeast Arkansas. This suggests that supercells—powerful thunderstorms capable of producing strong, long-track tornadoes—are active, likely fueled by a combination of warm, moist air from the Gulf and strong wind shear, conditions typical for such outbreaks in the region during spring. The catastrophic damage you mentioned could include EF3 or higher tornadoes, given the scale of destruction implied.