موضوع خرد جمعی هم واقعا جالبه. (هرچند من هنوز بهش اعتقاد ندارم)
توصیه می‌کنم این مطلب رو حداقل بخونید.
https://northstarbusiness.ir/blog/%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%B9%DB%8C/

این مطلب هم جالب بود
https://fekreno.org/articlefekreno/arfek674.htm

چطور زبان برنامه نویسی خوب طراحی کنیم
https://paulgraham.com/langdes.html

برای استخراج داده از json یه زبون query زدن هست به اسم json path،

اگه خواستید درموردش بخونید:
https://support.smartbear.com/alertsite/docs/monitors/api/endpoint/jsonpath.html

و اگر خواستید تمرین/دیباگ کنید:
https://jsonpath.com/

قانون پیشاهنگی:
هرجا رو بهتر از چیزی که واردش شدی ترک کن.
https://javacup.ir/scouting/

سایت خوب برای pdf کردن داکیومنت ها
https://www.ilovepdf.com/

برنامه کامندلاینی خوب برای انجام ساده تغییرات روی pdf
https://github.com/rrthomas/pdfjam

https://milan.cvitkovic.net/writing/things_youre_allowed_to_do/


یه لیست از ایده ها و کارهایی که میتونیم انجام بدیم تا زندگیمون راحت تر بشه
بیشتر با این ایده که یه پول کمی بده تا یه کاری رو برات انجام بدن

معرفی f sharp
https://vrgl.ir/Y9eX8

فرصت اشتباه

https://vrgl.ir/9yV7H

کدزن یا هکر؟
مشخصات هرکدوم

به طور خلاصه:
هکر کار رو انجام میده اما کدزن بلده کد تمیز ر با TDD بنویسه و از دیزاین‌پترن ها استفاده کنه.
https://medium.com/@kennethjiang/hackers-v-s-coders-c73eb3eb72e

دونالد کنوث (یا هرجور که می‌نویسیدش) که معرف حضور هست، از خفن ترین اساتید رشته کامپیوتر و کتاب معروف و عظیمش: The Art of Computer Programming که به عنوان انجیل علوم کامپیوتر شناخته میشه.

توی این صفحه در مورد بازنشستگیش نوشته.
https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/retd.html

کل صفحه‌ش رو نگاه کنید نکات خیلی جالبی داره، شاید قبلا هم لینکش رو گذاشته باشم اما تو این صفحه به طور خاص یه سری کتاب که خونده و جالب بوده رو معرفی کرده که می‌تونید کتاب‌ها رو دنبال کنید.

اما جمله‌ی طلایی "I read very slowly." رو ببینید.
نگفته من خیلی باهوشم، من خیلی خفنم، من تو نیم ساعت یه کتاب رو میخونم. گفته من خیلی آروم می‌خونم اما وقت می‌ذارم.
همون آدمیه که کتابش اینقدر جلد و صفحه داره که من و شما احتمالا نمیتونیم چاپ شده ش رو تو کوله حمل کنیم چه برسه به اینکه کامل بخونیمش.
برای خفن بودن (چون به نظرم این خفن ترین آدمه تو نسل و رشته‌ی خودش) لازم نیست ویژگی‌ خاصی داشته باشید جز اینکه تلاش کنید. با آروم خوندن هم می‌شه دونالد کنوث شد.
از طرف دیگه زندگی و کارهاش رو یکم دنبال کنید باز هم هیجان انگیزه. از سال ۱۹۷۵ ایمیل داشته با ۱۹۹۰. به مدت ۱۵ سال. احتمالا خیلیامون حتی به دنیا نیومده بودیم، خود ایمیل از ۱۹۷۱ شروع به کار کرده. اما سال ۱۹۹۰ تصمیم گرفته ازش استفاده نکنه و به همون روال پست ادامه بده.
چرا؟ به خاطر اینکه کارهای مهم دیگه داره به جز چک کردن ایمیل.
https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/email.html

https://shuvomoy.github.io/blogs/posts/Knuth-on-work-habits-and-problem-solving-and-happiness/

این مطلب جمع‌بندی نکات جالب از صجبت‌های کنوثه.

I can't do technical stuff all the time. I've found that I can write only a certain number of pages a day before running out of steam. When I reach this maximum number, I have no more ideas that day. So certainly within a 24-hour period, not all of it is going to be equally creative. Working in the garden, pulling weeds and so on, is a good respite

درمورد بازدهی محدود در روز

On unhappiness. "I mean, if you didn't worry, and if you didn't go through some spells and crises, then you'd be missing a part of life. Even though such things aren't pleasant when you're doing them, they are the defining experiences — things to be glad about in retrospect because they happened. Otherwise you might be guilty of not feeling guilty!

On the other hand I've noticed in myself that there were times when my body was telling me to be unhappy, yet I sometimes couldn't readily figure out a reason for any unhappiness. I knew that I was feeling "down," but sometimes I had to go back several months to recall anything that anybody had said to me that might still be making me feel bad. One day, when I realized how hard it was to find any reason for my current unhappiness, I thought, "Wait a minute. I bet this unhappiness is really something chemical, not actually caused by circumstances.*" I began to speculate that my body was programmed to be unhappy a certain percentage of the time, and that hormones or something were the real reason behind moments of mild depression."

درمورد ناراحت بودن

Point eight is enough. "In fact I've concluded that it's really a good thing for people not to be 100% happy. I've started to live in accordance with a philosophy that can be summed up in the phrase "Point eight is enough," meaning "0.8 is enough."

You might remember the TV show from the 70s called "Eight is Enough," about a family with eight children. That's the source of my new motto. I don't know that 0.8 is the right number, but I do believe that when I'm not feeling 100% happy, I shouldn't feel guilty or angry, or think that anything unusual is occurring. I shouldn't set 100% as the norm, without which there must be something wrong. Instead, I might just as well wait a little while, and I'll feel better. I won't make any important decisions about my life at a time when I'm feeling less than normally good.

درمورد آرمانگرایی

High minimum more important than high maximum. "I try to do a good job at whatever I'm doing, because it's more fun to do a good job than not. And when there's a choice between different things to spend time on, I try to look for things that will maximize the benefit without making me burn out.

For example, when I was working on the TeX project during the early 80s, hardly anybody saw me when I was sweeping the floor, mopping up the messes and carrying buckets of waste from the darkroom, cleaning the machines, and doing other such stuff. I did those things because I wouldn't have dared to ask graduate students to do menial tasks that were beneath them.

I know that every large project has some things that are much less fun than others; so I can get through the tedium, the sweeping or whatever else needs to be done. I just do it and get it over with, instead of wasting time figuring out how not to do it. I learned that from my parents. My mother is amazing to watch because she doesn't do anything efficiently, really: She puts about three times as much energy as necessary into everything she does. But she never spends any time wondering what to do next or how to optimize anything; she just keeps working. Her strategy, slightly simplified, is, "See something that needs to be done and do it." All day long. And at the end of the day, she's accomplished a huge amount.

Putting this another way, I think that the limiting thing — the thing that determines a person's success in life — is not so much what they do best, but what they do worst. I mean, if you rate every aspect of what someone does, considering everything that goes into a task, a high minimum is much more important than a high maximum. The TeX project was successful in large part because I quietly did things like mop the floor. The secret of any success that I've had, similarly, is that in all the projects I've worked on, the weakest link in my chain of abilities was still reasonably strong."

A person’s success in life is determined by having a high minimum, not a high maximum. If you can do something really well but there are other things at which you’re failing, the latter will hold you back. But if almost everything you do is up there, then you’ve got a good life. And so I try to learn how to get through things that others find unpleasant.

خلاصه که ضعیف ترین گره‌ی یه زنجیر مهم‌ترینه.

. "Don’t just do trendy stuff. If something is really popular, I tend to think: back off. I tell myself and my students to go with your own aesthetics, what you think is important. Don’t do what you think other people think you want to do, but what you really want to do yourself. That’s been a guiding heuristic for me all the way through."

دنبال ترندها نرید. خودتون فکر کنید و تصمیم بگیرید.