Paul Offit wrote a Substack article in response to the RFK Jr. Rogan interview. I was not impressed. Not one bit. Here's the counterpoint to what he wrote that everyone should know.

Here's a private email between JLW and MK. Quoted with permission. I thought you'd find it enlightening to see how science works.

I made a handy list for trolls seeking to prove that I am spreading misinformation.

I hoped that he would, but I was wrong. He's happy to take softball questions from journalists, but he refuses to questioned by qualified scientists on his beliefs.

The Oath and Prescription for Freedom

They ignore it, of course. Because that's what good scientists do.

Debates will settle nothing. If we want to settle important scientific issues like "can vaccines trigger autism?" we need to have both sides jointly design a scientific study to settle the question.

The trolls hate my Twitter polls because these polls invariably confirm what I claim. Are they right to claim these polls have no scientific value? No, and here's why.

Doctors all know what Grand Rounds is. But whether vaccines cause autism is a topic they refuse to allow anyone to question. That is NOT how science works. No topic should be banned.

I think it was an epic fail. Tell me what you think.

The COVID vaccines have killed massive numbers of people and the government covered it up. The paper, published as a pre-print, shows 74% of deaths post-vax due to the vax.

Even the CDC admits that vaccines can cause serious brain injury and death. Is it any surprise that vaccines can cause sudden infant deaths too?

When the first Cleveland Clinic study first came out, it showed the more vaccines you got, the more likely you were to be infected. The authors wrote a second paper showing this was not an artifact.

He once said "healthy infants could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once." It's time to walk the talk. Take just one dose of each vaccine on the CDC childhood schedule in one sitting.

Can "Science" recover from Covid?

Howard seems to have forgotten about Morning Report where scientists engage in vigorous verbal debate. Now he demands all discussions be in writing. OK. I'm good with that.

He will only debate things he's written articles about. OK, let's start with his article which makes the ridiculous claim that "The vaccine ...[is] far safer than the virus for children."

The Madsen 2002 study in Denmark is the most widely cited paper used to "prove" that vaccines do NOT cause autism. It's seriously flawed.

The other side absolutely hates it when you confront them with higher quality evidence that they can't refute. They stop responding to you at that point.

An honest government would make the public health data public. You can do this without violating anyone's privacy. But no state or federal government will do this.

Paul Offit wrote a Substack article in response to the RFK Jr. Rogan interview. I was not impressed. Not one bit. Here's the counterpoint to what he wrote that everyone should know.