Forwarded from Santa Barbara World Wide Demonstration
Get Pumped! Speaker line up confirmed. It's going to be a great day. Can't wait to see you all there.
Forwarded from Santa Barbara World Wide Demonstration
After our speakers stick around for some live Music ! RedFish will be on from 2-4.
Forwarded from 🌎World Wide Rally for Freedom Official 🌎 March 28th
We will stand together for the third time as one big family on July 24th, 2021 🌎❤️
For freedom & human rights
WE WILL WIN!
#wewillALLbethere
t.iss.one/worldwidedemonstration
For freedom & human rights
WE WILL WIN!
#wewillALLbethere
t.iss.one/worldwidedemonstration
CALIFORNIA ACTION ALERT!
Call Now to Oppose AB-1184
Please call and email the California Senate Health Committee asap to oppose AB-1184, a bill that would require a parent's health insurance provider to pay for so-called "sensitive services" for minors without parent knowledge! The Senate Health Committee is scheduled to consider advancing the bill tomorrow, Wednesday, July 7, so your call/email is urgent.
“Sensitive services” "means all health care services related to mental or behavioral health, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence," among other things.
This is another attempt to transfer parental rights to the state and endanger our children.
Committee Members to call/email:
Senator Richard Pan (Chair) 916-651-4006
Senator Melissa A. Melendez (Vice Chair) 916-651-4028
Senator Susan Talamantes Eggman 916-651-4005
Senator Lena A. Gonzalez 916-651-4033
Senator Shannon Grove 916-651-4016
Senator Melissa Hurtado 916-651-4014
Senator Connie M. Leyva 916-651-4020
Senator Monique Limón 916-651-4019
Senator Richard D. Roth 916-651-4031
Senator Susan Rubio 916-651-4022
Senator Scott D. Wiener 916-651-4011
Please call and email today!
Call Now to Oppose AB-1184
Please call and email the California Senate Health Committee asap to oppose AB-1184, a bill that would require a parent's health insurance provider to pay for so-called "sensitive services" for minors without parent knowledge! The Senate Health Committee is scheduled to consider advancing the bill tomorrow, Wednesday, July 7, so your call/email is urgent.
“Sensitive services” "means all health care services related to mental or behavioral health, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence," among other things.
This is another attempt to transfer parental rights to the state and endanger our children.
Committee Members to call/email:
Senator Richard Pan (Chair) 916-651-4006
Senator Melissa A. Melendez (Vice Chair) 916-651-4028
Senator Susan Talamantes Eggman 916-651-4005
Senator Lena A. Gonzalez 916-651-4033
Senator Shannon Grove 916-651-4016
Senator Melissa Hurtado 916-651-4014
Senator Connie M. Leyva 916-651-4020
Senator Monique Limón 916-651-4019
Senator Richard D. Roth 916-651-4031
Senator Susan Rubio 916-651-4022
Senator Scott D. Wiener 916-651-4011
Please call and email today!
Forwarded from The Informed Mama (Denise Aguilar)
With the news of door to door visits starting already, it is even more important to know your rights. Please check read through the list from KrisAnne Hall. Extremely smart lady who just happens to be a great lawyer too. (krisannehall . com) (libertyfirst.legal)
Your Power to Trespass
By KrisAnne Hall,
If a government agent or assignee comes to your property, it will be important to those who wish to protect their privacy and property to KNOW THEIR RIGHTS.
• You do not have to answer ANY QUESTIONS or make ANY STATEMENTS to ANY GOVERNMENT AGENT or assignee. (5th Amendment of the US Constitution and corresponding section of your State Constitution)
• Simply asking an agent to identify themselves does not waive your Rights.
• You have the Right to be free from any government agent or assignee entering your property, your home, or your business without a properly obtained warrant. (4th and 5th Amendments of the US Constitution and corresponding sections of your State Constitution.)
• Simply demanding a copy of that warrant does not waive your Rights.
• You have the Right to tell any government agent or assignee to leave your property if they cannot produce a properly obtained warrant. (4th and 5th Amendments of the US Constitution and corresponding sections of your State Constitution.)
• Simply demanding an agent or assignee of the government to leave your property does not waive your Rights.
• If a government agent or assignee refuses to leave your property or returns to your property after being warned against entering or returning, that agent or assignee has committed the crime of Trespass and is subject to arrest. (State Law, 4th & 5th Amendments to the US Constitution and corresponding sections of State Constitution as confirmed by Supreme Court Opinions).
• You have the Right to record through audio, video, or photographic recording of any government agent or assignee on your property, either with or without consent of that agent or assignee.
(Multiple Federal Court Opinions recognize that the First Amendment plainly protects the filming of officers and public agents.)
EVEN PERSONS ACTING AS AGENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT MAY BE TRESPASSED.
State and US Constitutions guarantee that every person is to be secure in their property from searches and seizures without a warrant based upon probable cause issued pursuant to the rules of due process.
Agents of the government cannot simply enter private property based upon the color of law or a perceived need. The US Supreme Court, June 23, 2021, in CEDAR POINT NURSERY ET AL. v. HASSID ET AL. established that a law that allows agents of the government or even permits private citizens the authority to enter property without a warrant or invitation can amount to the taking of that property and is therefore contrary to the Constitution.
Your Power to Trespass
By KrisAnne Hall,
If a government agent or assignee comes to your property, it will be important to those who wish to protect their privacy and property to KNOW THEIR RIGHTS.
• You do not have to answer ANY QUESTIONS or make ANY STATEMENTS to ANY GOVERNMENT AGENT or assignee. (5th Amendment of the US Constitution and corresponding section of your State Constitution)
• Simply asking an agent to identify themselves does not waive your Rights.
• You have the Right to be free from any government agent or assignee entering your property, your home, or your business without a properly obtained warrant. (4th and 5th Amendments of the US Constitution and corresponding sections of your State Constitution.)
• Simply demanding a copy of that warrant does not waive your Rights.
• You have the Right to tell any government agent or assignee to leave your property if they cannot produce a properly obtained warrant. (4th and 5th Amendments of the US Constitution and corresponding sections of your State Constitution.)
• Simply demanding an agent or assignee of the government to leave your property does not waive your Rights.
• If a government agent or assignee refuses to leave your property or returns to your property after being warned against entering or returning, that agent or assignee has committed the crime of Trespass and is subject to arrest. (State Law, 4th & 5th Amendments to the US Constitution and corresponding sections of State Constitution as confirmed by Supreme Court Opinions).
• You have the Right to record through audio, video, or photographic recording of any government agent or assignee on your property, either with or without consent of that agent or assignee.
(Multiple Federal Court Opinions recognize that the First Amendment plainly protects the filming of officers and public agents.)
EVEN PERSONS ACTING AS AGENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT MAY BE TRESPASSED.
State and US Constitutions guarantee that every person is to be secure in their property from searches and seizures without a warrant based upon probable cause issued pursuant to the rules of due process.
Agents of the government cannot simply enter private property based upon the color of law or a perceived need. The US Supreme Court, June 23, 2021, in CEDAR POINT NURSERY ET AL. v. HASSID ET AL. established that a law that allows agents of the government or even permits private citizens the authority to enter property without a warrant or invitation can amount to the taking of that property and is therefore contrary to the Constitution.
Forwarded from Charlie Kirk
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mandatory Vaccinations—especially for low-risk demographics—are immoral, unconstitutional, and deeply irresponsible.
That’s why Turning Point USA is fighting back by launching a national 'No Forced Vax' campaign on 2,500+ campuses
Join the movement.
Learn how—https://TPUSA.Com/Vax
That’s why Turning Point USA is fighting back by launching a national 'No Forced Vax' campaign on 2,500+ campuses
Join the movement.
Learn how—https://TPUSA.Com/Vax
Forwarded from NVIC.org
How To Challenge A School Board in 3-5 Minutes
https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/how-to-challenge-a-school-board-in-3-5-minutes/
https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/how-to-challenge-a-school-board-in-3-5-minutes/
coreysdigs.com
How To Challenge A School Board in 3-5 Minutes – coreysdigs.com
It's time to challenge school boards and get mask mandates, required jabs, gender agenda, sexualization, and critical race theory removed!
Forwarded from The Informed Mama (Denise Aguilar)
Official guidance doesn’t come out until Monday.
Dr. Tomás Aragón, director of the California Department of Public Health and state public health officer, said the state was "carefully reviewing the CDC guidance" and would release state K-12 school guidance on Monday.
Email, email, email!
Sample letter from the Let Them Breathe group.
PLEASE END MASK MANDATES FOR KIDS
Dear Dr. Aragon,
I am writing on behalf of my child to ask that the CDPH follow recent and accurate scientific data and allow our students to return to school without unnecessary policies like mandatory masking, excessive quarantining, and ineffective routine asymptomatic testing. All of these policies have kept hundreds of thousands of California students from attending and fully participating in classroom instruction this year without any known benefit, and they will continue to deny millions more children their constitutional right to a free (and meaningful) public education this coming school year if they are not immediately rescinded.
The CDPH must stop looking at public health from the singular lens of eliminating COVID-19 cases and weigh the consequences of public health restrictions on healthy innocent children who have suffered immensely as a result of harmful school closures and other needless restrictions.
There is now significant evidence that children do not need to wear masks. It is widely accepted that children are at drastically lower risk from COVID-19 than adults and have a lower chance of being infected by and transmitting the virus to others. The CDC confirms that child deaths from COVID-19 are significantly below that of a typical season of influenza, and recent studies in the UK confirm that long-term symptoms post-infection are also exceedingly rare in children. Data from schools across the US and Europe which did not implement mask requirements show infection rates as low as those which did. Despite the belief that the spread of COVID-19 is being driven by asymptomatic carriers, data continues to show that people who are asymptomatic have a significantly lower viral load and rarely transmit the virus to others.
With teachers, staff and other adults all having had the opportunity to be fully vaccinated, the perceived risk of children spreading the virus to adults has been removed. Therefore, there is no public health justification for forcing children to wear masks in school. When balanced against the physical, mental and emotional harm that is now becoming evident, it is clear that masks do more harm than good. Studies have found that masks cause anxiety and depressive feelings, and impair a child’s social development and ability to communicate.
Over a year of data shows how unlikely it is for children to spread the virus to others so there is also no reason to quarantine healthy students who come into close contact with an individual who has tested positive for COVID-19 unless they develop symptoms. Removing students for as much as 10 days from their optimal learning environment far exceeds median incubation periods for the virus and has not shown to be effective in identifying positive cases or reducing transmission. Quarantining entire classrooms, because of perceived close contacts of dozens of children is similarly unproven and unnecessary, often costing entire classrooms of children multiple school days of lost learning.
The use of the overly-sensitive and inaccurate PCR test must come to an end. Not only is the PCR test sensitive enough to pick up ten molecules of virus when a contagious individual has billions, the PCR test is incapable of timely determining where an individual is in the cycle of an infection. The PCR test is essentially worthless to stop the spread of COVID-19 and only operates to excessively exclude students from the classroom who may have been infected up to 4-5 weeks prior to their positive PCR test. It is estimated that 60-70% of the time a patient tests positive through PCR, they are post-infectious and forced to isolate for no reason.
Dr. Tomás Aragón, director of the California Department of Public Health and state public health officer, said the state was "carefully reviewing the CDC guidance" and would release state K-12 school guidance on Monday.
Email, email, email!
Sample letter from the Let Them Breathe group.
PLEASE END MASK MANDATES FOR KIDS
Dear Dr. Aragon,
I am writing on behalf of my child to ask that the CDPH follow recent and accurate scientific data and allow our students to return to school without unnecessary policies like mandatory masking, excessive quarantining, and ineffective routine asymptomatic testing. All of these policies have kept hundreds of thousands of California students from attending and fully participating in classroom instruction this year without any known benefit, and they will continue to deny millions more children their constitutional right to a free (and meaningful) public education this coming school year if they are not immediately rescinded.
The CDPH must stop looking at public health from the singular lens of eliminating COVID-19 cases and weigh the consequences of public health restrictions on healthy innocent children who have suffered immensely as a result of harmful school closures and other needless restrictions.
There is now significant evidence that children do not need to wear masks. It is widely accepted that children are at drastically lower risk from COVID-19 than adults and have a lower chance of being infected by and transmitting the virus to others. The CDC confirms that child deaths from COVID-19 are significantly below that of a typical season of influenza, and recent studies in the UK confirm that long-term symptoms post-infection are also exceedingly rare in children. Data from schools across the US and Europe which did not implement mask requirements show infection rates as low as those which did. Despite the belief that the spread of COVID-19 is being driven by asymptomatic carriers, data continues to show that people who are asymptomatic have a significantly lower viral load and rarely transmit the virus to others.
With teachers, staff and other adults all having had the opportunity to be fully vaccinated, the perceived risk of children spreading the virus to adults has been removed. Therefore, there is no public health justification for forcing children to wear masks in school. When balanced against the physical, mental and emotional harm that is now becoming evident, it is clear that masks do more harm than good. Studies have found that masks cause anxiety and depressive feelings, and impair a child’s social development and ability to communicate.
Over a year of data shows how unlikely it is for children to spread the virus to others so there is also no reason to quarantine healthy students who come into close contact with an individual who has tested positive for COVID-19 unless they develop symptoms. Removing students for as much as 10 days from their optimal learning environment far exceeds median incubation periods for the virus and has not shown to be effective in identifying positive cases or reducing transmission. Quarantining entire classrooms, because of perceived close contacts of dozens of children is similarly unproven and unnecessary, often costing entire classrooms of children multiple school days of lost learning.
The use of the overly-sensitive and inaccurate PCR test must come to an end. Not only is the PCR test sensitive enough to pick up ten molecules of virus when a contagious individual has billions, the PCR test is incapable of timely determining where an individual is in the cycle of an infection. The PCR test is essentially worthless to stop the spread of COVID-19 and only operates to excessively exclude students from the classroom who may have been infected up to 4-5 weeks prior to their positive PCR test. It is estimated that 60-70% of the time a patient tests positive through PCR, they are post-infectious and forced to isolate for no reason.
Forwarded from The Informed Mama (Denise Aguilar)
This unnecessarily adds to the amount of time a student is forced to miss school.
California Department of Health (CDPH) must start following the current scientific data that shows that its current requirements for masks, quarantines and testing are outdated and overcautious. CDPH must also weigh the physical, mental and academic harm to students from these policies that unnecessarily deny students their fundamental right to an education. As school districts need to properly plan and implement these policies for the fall, we are asking CDPH to immediately revise these guidelines.
I am calling on state and local representatives and agencies to discontinue these harmful policies and act in the best interest of our children.
California Department of Health (CDPH) must start following the current scientific data that shows that its current requirements for masks, quarantines and testing are outdated and overcautious. CDPH must also weigh the physical, mental and academic harm to students from these policies that unnecessarily deny students their fundamental right to an education. As school districts need to properly plan and implement these policies for the fall, we are asking CDPH to immediately revise these guidelines.
I am calling on state and local representatives and agencies to discontinue these harmful policies and act in the best interest of our children.
Gavin Newsom - govapps.gov.ca.gov/gov40mail/
Dr. Mark Ghaly - [email protected]
Dr. Naomi Bardach - [email protected]
Dr. Thomas Aragon -
[email protected]
Tony Thurmond -
[email protected]
Dr. Mark Ghaly - [email protected]
Dr. Naomi Bardach - [email protected]
Dr. Thomas Aragon -
[email protected]
Tony Thurmond -
[email protected]
Stand Up Santa Barbara pinned «Gavin Newsom - govapps.gov.ca.gov/gov40mail/ Dr. Mark Ghaly - [email protected] Dr. Naomi Bardach - [email protected] Dr. Thomas Aragon - [email protected] Tony Thurmond - [email protected]»
https://www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb/documents/agendaJul132021.pdf
On Tuesday, July 13(this week) OSHA will be holding a Sub Committee hearing for Covid-19 prevention from 10am to 1pm. Agenda Item 2B is “Outbreak Data Briefing”
This is the same board who’s Chairman, David Thomas, stammered “...I just want to add that um I’m vaccinated. The vaccine, as far as I know works and hasn’t, nobody's died from it and uh I think that uh just want to make the statement that um if you haven’t been vaccinated I wish that you would seriously consider it. Because I think it’s probably the most important thing you can do for yourself in these circumstances you know regarding the mask, regarding everything else, the controls once you’re vaccinated. I just think you’ve uh it, it uh alleviates all that anxiety and uh suffering that people go through not knowing...”
This statement was made in ignorance or maliciousness. VAERS in the United States has reported over 9000 deaths with hundreds of thousands more adverse reactions. The United Kingdom’s system has reported over 16,000 deaths. VAERS numbers are low because it requires doctors to take the time out of their day to report. This is harder than it sounds as they
miss a lot and tend to report only the most obvious reactions.
How can this one board make the health decisions for millions with this false assumption from Chairman David Thomas?
If you wish to speak you can email prior or call in the same day. If you email they will confirm your request and call when your time is close so you do not have to wait on the phone.
Note: Public comment is limited to 30 mins TOTAL.
Public Comment is limited to items within the purview of the subcommittee. If you wish to comment on agenda items you may submit a request to be added to the public comment queue.
Provide the following information*:
1) name or alias
2) affiliation (if any)
3) comment topic - 2D “Public Comment”
4) phone number (if not attending via Webex).
*Information requested is voluntary and not required to address the Subcommittee.
In advance of the meeting: Email the requested information to [email protected].
During the meeting: Email the requested information to [email protected] or dial 916-274-5721 to be placed in the queue.
On Tuesday, July 13(this week) OSHA will be holding a Sub Committee hearing for Covid-19 prevention from 10am to 1pm. Agenda Item 2B is “Outbreak Data Briefing”
This is the same board who’s Chairman, David Thomas, stammered “...I just want to add that um I’m vaccinated. The vaccine, as far as I know works and hasn’t, nobody's died from it and uh I think that uh just want to make the statement that um if you haven’t been vaccinated I wish that you would seriously consider it. Because I think it’s probably the most important thing you can do for yourself in these circumstances you know regarding the mask, regarding everything else, the controls once you’re vaccinated. I just think you’ve uh it, it uh alleviates all that anxiety and uh suffering that people go through not knowing...”
This statement was made in ignorance or maliciousness. VAERS in the United States has reported over 9000 deaths with hundreds of thousands more adverse reactions. The United Kingdom’s system has reported over 16,000 deaths. VAERS numbers are low because it requires doctors to take the time out of their day to report. This is harder than it sounds as they
miss a lot and tend to report only the most obvious reactions.
How can this one board make the health decisions for millions with this false assumption from Chairman David Thomas?
If you wish to speak you can email prior or call in the same day. If you email they will confirm your request and call when your time is close so you do not have to wait on the phone.
Note: Public comment is limited to 30 mins TOTAL.
Public Comment is limited to items within the purview of the subcommittee. If you wish to comment on agenda items you may submit a request to be added to the public comment queue.
Provide the following information*:
1) name or alias
2) affiliation (if any)
3) comment topic - 2D “Public Comment”
4) phone number (if not attending via Webex).
*Information requested is voluntary and not required to address the Subcommittee.
In advance of the meeting: Email the requested information to [email protected].
During the meeting: Email the requested information to [email protected] or dial 916-274-5721 to be placed in the queue.