This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TOMORROW Friday 27th August
Launch of Eric Clapton's new single:
THIS HAS GOTTA STOP
2pm
t.iss.one/robinmg
Launch of Eric Clapton's new single:
THIS HAS GOTTA STOP
2pm
t.iss.one/robinmg
Forwarded from F W
From Ehden's channel
VITAMINS TO "TREAT" THE SPIKE PROTEIN (AND THE SARS_CoV_2)
In "Unravelling Vitamins as Wonder Molecules for Covid-19 Management via Structure-based Virtual Screening" (Pandya et al, 2021) has done an interesting analysis on the binding capacity of different vitamins to the SARS_CoV_2 elements.
As you can see from the chart above, D3 and B9 (Folic acid) shows the best capacity to bind to the spike protein, and B12 is "is an efficient nutraceutical for almost all the nCoV-2 drug targets including the host protease furin"
If you needed yet another reason to take Vitamins... HERE IT IS!!!
Source:
https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-144177/v1_stamped.pdf
VITAMINS TO "TREAT" THE SPIKE PROTEIN (AND THE SARS_CoV_2)
In "Unravelling Vitamins as Wonder Molecules for Covid-19 Management via Structure-based Virtual Screening" (Pandya et al, 2021) has done an interesting analysis on the binding capacity of different vitamins to the SARS_CoV_2 elements.
As you can see from the chart above, D3 and B9 (Folic acid) shows the best capacity to bind to the spike protein, and B12 is "is an efficient nutraceutical for almost all the nCoV-2 drug targets including the host protease furin"
If you needed yet another reason to take Vitamins... HERE IT IS!!!
Source:
https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-144177/v1_stamped.pdf
"The UK government just reported the following data, tucked away in their report on variants of concern:
Less than a third of delta variant deaths are in the unvaccinated.
Let me say that another way - two-thirds of Delta deaths in the UK are in the jabbed.
To be specific:
From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths (yes, the dreaded Delta has not taken that much life).
Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. 79 had received one shot. Only 253 were unvaccinated.
The report is in here:
https://chriswaldburger.substack.com/p/bombshell-uk-data-destroys-entire
Less than a third of delta variant deaths are in the unvaccinated.
Let me say that another way - two-thirds of Delta deaths in the UK are in the jabbed.
To be specific:
From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths (yes, the dreaded Delta has not taken that much life).
Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. 79 had received one shot. Only 253 were unvaccinated.
The report is in here:
https://chriswaldburger.substack.com/p/bombshell-uk-data-destroys-entire
Chris Waldburger
BOMBSHELL UK data destroys entire premise for vaccine push
The media can read just as well as me (maybe), but somehow it is left to me to report this.
Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
Published just yesterday:
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
EXTRACT:
This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1
#covid19 #breakthrough_infections #natural_immunity #vaccine_failure
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
EXTRACT:
This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1
#covid19 #breakthrough_infections #natural_immunity #vaccine_failure
medRxiv
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
Background Reports of waning vaccine-induced immunity against COVID-19 have begun to surface. With that, the comparable long-term protection conferred by previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear.
Methods We conducted a retrospective observational…
Methods We conducted a retrospective observational…
DE-MEDICALIZE THE POLITICAL DEBATES:
Here in Telegram, we have been reading and sharing a great deal of published medical research that goes against what is sold to us as "the science" by government officials. It is always interesting, and often difficult to understand (Epitopes? Exosomes? ACE2 receptors...why, how many are there? Is there an ACE1 receptor? What?)
The debate has been far too medicalized so far, and for obvious reasons, and in part because it is inevitable. But critical analysis does not have to remain stuck there. We hear, too often because it has become a casual expression—it's taken for granted—that "during the pandemic, we had to do X," or speaking of job losses and businesses ruined, "because of Covid". Covid might be able to do some things, but it has zero power over employment, finance, distribution, consumption, production, public administration, and so on. The "pandemic" is an arbitrary and abstract concept that owes its use to a unilateral, monopolistic control over its definition exercised by the WHO, which before the 2009 "pandemic" altered its definition by removing "severity of illness" and emphasizing spread/infectiousness.
For me the problem is primarily political, and of political strategies that invoke "public health" and "the science"--and I agree, when they do so then the burden is on them to prove their case scientifically...and a case cannot be proven when you automatically shut down, banish, and censor any opposition in order to "win" an argument. Censorship, a political act, in fact defeats any of their claims to be following "the science," particularly when they censor scientists.
@ZERO_ANTHROPOLOGY
Here in Telegram, we have been reading and sharing a great deal of published medical research that goes against what is sold to us as "the science" by government officials. It is always interesting, and often difficult to understand (Epitopes? Exosomes? ACE2 receptors...why, how many are there? Is there an ACE1 receptor? What?)
The debate has been far too medicalized so far, and for obvious reasons, and in part because it is inevitable. But critical analysis does not have to remain stuck there. We hear, too often because it has become a casual expression—it's taken for granted—that "during the pandemic, we had to do X," or speaking of job losses and businesses ruined, "because of Covid". Covid might be able to do some things, but it has zero power over employment, finance, distribution, consumption, production, public administration, and so on. The "pandemic" is an arbitrary and abstract concept that owes its use to a unilateral, monopolistic control over its definition exercised by the WHO, which before the 2009 "pandemic" altered its definition by removing "severity of illness" and emphasizing spread/infectiousness.
For me the problem is primarily political, and of political strategies that invoke "public health" and "the science"--and I agree, when they do so then the burden is on them to prove their case scientifically...and a case cannot be proven when you automatically shut down, banish, and censor any opposition in order to "win" an argument. Censorship, a political act, in fact defeats any of their claims to be following "the science," particularly when they censor scientists.
@ZERO_ANTHROPOLOGY
DISMANTLING THE MASS PSYCHOSIS: ADDRESSING THE MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS HEAD ON
The current "vaccination" mass psychosis, like all of those that came before, rests on the fallacy of THE GREATER GOOD.
There is nothing new here, the fallacy of "the greater good" is always invoked in order to cement a mass psychosis on a population in order to then commit atrocities. If you look at the justification of all the greatest crimes against humanity in history, it is always "the greater good".
Why is "the greater good" a fallacy? Because it always rests on unproven top down predetermined conclusions that require a sacrifice to be made by others, it lays a claim on others and their right to come to an entirely different conclusion on what is and is not "the greater good".
It is precisely to limit the arrogance of those claiming they can determine the "greater good" for others to the point of locking them up or performing medical experiments on them without free and informed consent (see the Nuremberg doctors trials) that we codified and clearly wrote down what our human rights are with regards to medical interventions.
As Dr Mike Yeadon pointed out yesterday, we have enough data on adverse reactions to conclude that mass injections of the young who are at no risk of death or complications from Covid19 will lead to hundreds of deaths. There is no scientific or medical doubt on this. Therefore to go along with this is not only PREMEDITATED MURDER it is also a MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS of Biblical proportions.
That the "vaccines" are complete failures is beyond reasonable doubt. This is proved beyond doubt by the simple push for "boosters".
To commit or participate in any form of premeditated murder is a criminal offense, there is no greater good justification which will stand in a criminal court for the simple reason that it is already acknowledged that these injections do not prevent infection or transmission, and the young are at zero risk of death from Covid19, unless they are already very ill from something else.
A premeditated murder committed against the young is also known as a MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS.
Can a massacre of the innocents ever be for "the greater good", or is this a mass psychosis being used to get people to close their eyes to one of the greatest premeditated murders of all time?
The current "vaccination" mass psychosis, like all of those that came before, rests on the fallacy of THE GREATER GOOD.
There is nothing new here, the fallacy of "the greater good" is always invoked in order to cement a mass psychosis on a population in order to then commit atrocities. If you look at the justification of all the greatest crimes against humanity in history, it is always "the greater good".
Why is "the greater good" a fallacy? Because it always rests on unproven top down predetermined conclusions that require a sacrifice to be made by others, it lays a claim on others and their right to come to an entirely different conclusion on what is and is not "the greater good".
It is precisely to limit the arrogance of those claiming they can determine the "greater good" for others to the point of locking them up or performing medical experiments on them without free and informed consent (see the Nuremberg doctors trials) that we codified and clearly wrote down what our human rights are with regards to medical interventions.
As Dr Mike Yeadon pointed out yesterday, we have enough data on adverse reactions to conclude that mass injections of the young who are at no risk of death or complications from Covid19 will lead to hundreds of deaths. There is no scientific or medical doubt on this. Therefore to go along with this is not only PREMEDITATED MURDER it is also a MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS of Biblical proportions.
That the "vaccines" are complete failures is beyond reasonable doubt. This is proved beyond doubt by the simple push for "boosters".
To commit or participate in any form of premeditated murder is a criminal offense, there is no greater good justification which will stand in a criminal court for the simple reason that it is already acknowledged that these injections do not prevent infection or transmission, and the young are at zero risk of death from Covid19, unless they are already very ill from something else.
A premeditated murder committed against the young is also known as a MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS.
Can a massacre of the innocents ever be for "the greater good", or is this a mass psychosis being used to get people to close their eyes to one of the greatest premeditated murders of all time?
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Video of Eric Clapton's new song "This has gotta stop" premieres at 2pm BST
Latest UK adverse events and fatalities following the Covid-19 injections.
Includes adverse events input by the MHRA to 18th August 2021 and released to the public on 27th August 2021.
Total UK deaths reported and input by the MHRA now totals 1,609 with over 1.2 million injuries now reported by over 350,000 people
Link to MHRA data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Includes adverse events input by the MHRA to 18th August 2021 and released to the public on 27th August 2021.
Total UK deaths reported and input by the MHRA now totals 1,609 with over 1.2 million injuries now reported by over 350,000 people
Link to MHRA data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Latest UK adverse events and fatalities following the Covid-19 injections by health system.
Includes adverse events input by the MHRA to 18th August 2021 and released to the public on 27th August 2021.
Total UK deaths reported and input by the MHRA total 1,609 with over 1.2 million injuries now reported by over 350,000 people
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Includes adverse events input by the MHRA to 18th August 2021 and released to the public on 27th August 2021.
Total UK deaths reported and input by the MHRA total 1,609 with over 1.2 million injuries now reported by over 350,000 people
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK MHRA reports following the Covid-19 injections detailing all deaths and injuries, reported, accepted and input by the MHRA to 18th August 2021 (released to the public on 27th August 2021)
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 👇👇
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 👇👇
GOV.UK
Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines adverse reactions
A report covering adverse reactions to approved COVID-19 vaccines
COVID-19_Moderna_Vaccine_Analysis_Print_18.08.2021.pdf
455.4 KB
MHRA Reports on Covid 19 Injection Injuries to 18th Aug (released 27 Aug)
Table shows a subset of total injuries and fatalities by category of injury following the Covid-19 injections as reported to and input by the MHRA to 18th August 2021.
On average each report specifies over 3.3 different injuries for each person
Note: The number of any adverse events for a specific manufacturers injection will be determined by factors such as the number of injections administered of that type in that geography, the age groups that a specific injection type is being administered to and the number of people who have received a second dose of that specific injection Lower numbers do not therefore mean the injection is “safer” or less likely to cause a particular condition.
Link to the data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
On average each report specifies over 3.3 different injuries for each person
Note: The number of any adverse events for a specific manufacturers injection will be determined by factors such as the number of injections administered of that type in that geography, the age groups that a specific injection type is being administered to and the number of people who have received a second dose of that specific injection Lower numbers do not therefore mean the injection is “safer” or less likely to cause a particular condition.
Link to the data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
This 2015 piece, in retrospect, shows how the perpetrators conditioned us to accept Ferguson’s nonsense “models”
Funnily enough, Ferguson’s predictions back then were spectacularly wrong, deliberately frightening people with his exaggerated pseudo scientific bull.
Four years later he did it again, pretending that the 2009 swine flu was an existential threat. Everyone was offered a hastily-developed vaccine. Unfortunately there were severe unwanted effects & in Sweden, which had followed WHO guidelines & vaccinated their children, just under 1000 of whom developed a life changing adverse event called NARCOLEPSY.
Irreversible.
Ferguson literally gets nothing right, but he’s an plausible liar. Why is he not dismissed? Because he’s bringing in tens of millions in grants, the great majority of it coming from Bill Gates.
Gates also funded at Imperial a unit, with Ferguson sitting on its board, who’s =1 objective is to predict pandemics.
You won’t now be surprised to learn that very many countries use Ferguson’s models to underwrite any “measures”.
Ferguson isn’t qualified to construct models of infectious disease transmission nor to be advising people on vaccination. You might think he surely is, because he holds a professorship. But no. He’s a mathematician & his PhD was in theoretical physics. Given his track record is worse than a monkey with a dartboard please don’t entrust your life to anything he says.
Many thanks
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7787-flu-pandemic-lethal-yet-preventable/
Funnily enough, Ferguson’s predictions back then were spectacularly wrong, deliberately frightening people with his exaggerated pseudo scientific bull.
Four years later he did it again, pretending that the 2009 swine flu was an existential threat. Everyone was offered a hastily-developed vaccine. Unfortunately there were severe unwanted effects & in Sweden, which had followed WHO guidelines & vaccinated their children, just under 1000 of whom developed a life changing adverse event called NARCOLEPSY.
Irreversible.
Ferguson literally gets nothing right, but he’s an plausible liar. Why is he not dismissed? Because he’s bringing in tens of millions in grants, the great majority of it coming from Bill Gates.
Gates also funded at Imperial a unit, with Ferguson sitting on its board, who’s =1 objective is to predict pandemics.
You won’t now be surprised to learn that very many countries use Ferguson’s models to underwrite any “measures”.
Ferguson isn’t qualified to construct models of infectious disease transmission nor to be advising people on vaccination. You might think he surely is, because he holds a professorship. But no. He’s a mathematician & his PhD was in theoretical physics. Given his track record is worse than a monkey with a dartboard please don’t entrust your life to anything he says.
Many thanks
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7787-flu-pandemic-lethal-yet-preventable/
New Scientist
Flu pandemic: Lethal yet preventable
If Asian bird flu mutates into a form that spreads easily between humans, an outbreak in just 40 people would be enough to cause a global pandemic
Meet Janet Woodcock the head of the FDA. She's the one who presided over one of the worst regulatory agency failures in U.S. history. She had a big part in America's opioid crisis including approving Opana without adequate evidence of safety or long-term efficacy, approving Zohydro despite a vote of 11-2 against approval by a scientific advisory committee, and approving promotion of OxyContin for children as young as 11 years old.
And now she approved the Pfizer V regardless that the placebo control group was given the V months ago, the safety trials skipped important steps and there is no long term safety data.
And now she approved the Pfizer V regardless that the placebo control group was given the V months ago, the safety trials skipped important steps and there is no long term safety data.
🤬1
Forwarded from Zweite Deutsche Welle
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WORLD PREMIERE
ERIC CLAPTON'S NEW SINGLE:
“THIS HAS GOTTA STOP”
Eric Clapton released a new single today entitled “This Has Gotta Stop” from Bushbranch/Surfdog Records.
The song was written by Clapton, produced by his longtime producing partner Simon Climie and is performed by Clapton, Sonny Emery on drums, Nathan East on bass, Sharon White on background vocals along with Nick Ingman as the strings arranger and conductor and Perry Montague-Mason as strings leader.
Enjoy & share this great new song from Slowhand! - @robinmg
https://youtu.be/dNt4NIQ7FTA
ERIC CLAPTON'S NEW SINGLE:
“THIS HAS GOTTA STOP”
Eric Clapton released a new single today entitled “This Has Gotta Stop” from Bushbranch/Surfdog Records.
The song was written by Clapton, produced by his longtime producing partner Simon Climie and is performed by Clapton, Sonny Emery on drums, Nathan East on bass, Sharon White on background vocals along with Nick Ingman as the strings arranger and conductor and Perry Montague-Mason as strings leader.
Enjoy & share this great new song from Slowhand! - @robinmg
https://youtu.be/dNt4NIQ7FTA
YouTube
Eric Clapton - This Has Gotta Stop (Official Music Video)
"This Has Gotta Stop" is available everywhere!
https://orcd.co/thishasgottastop
Eric’s new single entitled “This Has Gotta Stop” from Bushbranch/Surfdog. The song was written by Clapton, produced by his longtime producing partner Simon Climie and is performed…
https://orcd.co/thishasgottastop
Eric’s new single entitled “This Has Gotta Stop” from Bushbranch/Surfdog. The song was written by Clapton, produced by his longtime producing partner Simon Climie and is performed…