Collaboration or Resistance, part 1: Our brand new shiny fascist state
https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/07/collaboration-or-resistance-part-1-our-brand-new-shiny-fascist-state/

"Umberto Eco had a different notion, he wrote Eternal Fascism. Every generation has its own battle against fascism. He was in one generation that had their own.

We're in another one. What people do not want to accept is this. They do not want to accept it happens again and again. We who do not want it to happen, we need to fight it again and again.

The problem is people will say "you are an alarmist because you are talking about Mussolini and Hitler and camps, this is something we've left behind."

Eco's view, which I think is what is happening now, is there comes a moment in your generation's lifetime in which it's your turn to fight it. Because it is happening again.

People who lived during Italian fascism said "we didn't know it was Italian fascism, it was just the way things were, the government was like that."

People who now choose to go along, they’ll say the same. Even if there was a Greater Reset, we just stayed at home..." Robin Monotti

Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRLXNa3bqQk

I believe the parallel I made between what is going on and Italian Fascism still stands, and specifically when you consider the parallel between Italy's Racial (& Ethnic Minority) Laws and the discrimination being applied to non toxic injected nationals of many countries today. The title of the 1938 Italian newspaper is "Laws for the Defense of the Race". The "Manifesto of Race" (Italian: "Manifesto della razza"), sometimes known as the Charter of Race or Racial Manifesto, was a manifesto published on the 14th of July 1938 which prepared the enactment, in October 1938, of the Racial Laws in the Kingdom of Italy. The racial laws stripped ethnic and religious minorities, especially the Jews, of Italian citizenship and governmental and professional positions. The manifesto demonstrated the enormous influence Adolf Hitler had over Benito Mussolini since Italy had become allied with Nazi Germany.

Italian Racial Laws Chronology

"In 1935 the so-called “Nuremberg Laws” defined the exclusion of German Jews from the Reich citizenship, and prohibited them to marry people of “German or German-related blood.”

Between August and December 1938 Italy adopted a series of legislative provisions that deprived Italian Jews of their civil rights and came to be known as the “Racial Laws”. The racial policies of the Fascist government had begun in 1937 with the Royal Decree 880 that prohibited the “acquisition of concubines and the marriage of Italian citizens with subjects of the Italian colonies”. A year later the policy concentrated mainly on foreign and Italian Jews.

July 1938 – Giornale d’Italia anonymously publishes the Manifesto of Racist Scientists. A month later the document is made public by the Minister of Popular Culture, Dino Alfieri, and underwritten by ten academicians in the fields of medicine, science and the humanities. Figures in all fields adhere to the manifesto.

September-December 1938 Promulgation of the Racial Laws. The Fascist government issues a series of provisions regulating, with separate bills, the exclusion of foreign and Italian Jews from the school, the academia, politics, finances, professional world, and all sectors of public and private life.
Italian citizens of the Jewish religion were no longer allowed to attend school and marry non-Jew, to be drafted in the Army, to own or administrate firms, to own or administrate land and real estate over a certain value, to hire non-Jewish employes, to be hired in the public administration, by political parties, banks, insurance companies, newspapers, publishing houses, artistic, research, and educational institutions. The public agencies in charge of census and demographic records become part of the government task-force for the “defense of race”.

February 1939 -Introduction of a bill that adds new limitations to the ability of Jews to own real-estate and commercial activities.

July 1939-Introduction of rulings that severely limit the rights and mobility of Italian Jews in terms of family law, estate law, and use of last name.

July 1940 – New taxes are imposed on Jewish professionals.

February 1941 – The State agency that regulates the seizing of Jewish properties receive authorization to liquidate them.

April 1942 – The use of theatrical and musical materials authored by Jews is prohibited.

October 1942 – New limitations are imposed and enforced on Jewish citizens residing in Libya.

November 30, 1943 – The police issues the order to arrest Jews residing in Italy and territories under Italian control.

January 1944 – New rulings are issued to seize and liquidate Jewish assets."

https://primolevicenter.org/events/the-italian-racial-laws/

⬆️ Remember: it happens slowly in small steps, and ALWAYS begins with someone saying "it's the SCIENCE".

Italian newspapers.
1938: Ministers approve laws for the defense of the race
2021: Hunt for the non vaccinated, they are over 17 million

It's the same discrimination, the only difference is the target group: jews and ethnic minorities yesterday, those who refuse to be injected with a toxic failed "vaccine" today.

Mainstream media has always played the role of main persecutor.

The Italian 1930s magazine called "The Defense of the Race"

Please note that the first word under the title of the Italian 1930s magazine "The Defense of the Race" is: SCIENCE

Italian newspaper today:

"No vaccine, no salary"

1938: Italian citizens of the Jewish religion were no longer allowed to attend school and marry non-Jew, to be drafted in the Army, to own or administrate firms, to own or administrate land, to be hired in the public administration, by political parties, banks, insurance companies, newspapers, publishing houses, artistic, research, and educational institutions.

What if he wrote a "good bye" letter to his parents (and email it to both in case one parent tries to prevent the other from seeing it) and moved in with you or your daughter temporarily?
It might be more impactful than a shouting match as all they'll be left with as they think about throwing their son out and trying to understand why he defied them would be some solid, simple facts that explain his actions. Maybe a short statement something like
"It is against the Nuremberg code to coerce anyone to have a medical intervention, let alone an experimental one.
Is it unreasonable to even ask to be tested to see if I have existing immunity before risking this jab?
Please see below for a summary of the evidenced reasons I do not believe our govt has our best interests at heart and why I believe the jab is harmful, having killed more in 6 months than ALL other jabs combined over 31 years:

"THE SIX COVID LIES"

LIE 1
There are no effective treatments for Covid-19

TRUTH
It is the most treatable respiratory virus ever


LIE 2
This is a new virus so there's no immunity to it and it's exceptionally virulent/lethal

TRUTH
All virus's have antecedents (predecessors) thus, around 50% of the population have T-memory to SARS CoV-2 because they've previously been infected by related virus's.
The IFR (lethality) is only slightly worse than flu.


LIE 3
PCR reliably identifies people with clinically important infection with Covid-19

TRUTH
A positive test does not confirm that you are infected or infectious.
The test is fundamentally flawed.


LIE 4
Masks are protective.
They are a vital tool for stopping the spread of Covid-19.

TRUTH
It has been thoroughly examined and it is clear that masks have no impact whatsoever on respiratory virus transmission.


LIE 5
People who have a positive PCR test are a respiratory health threat to others, even if they have no symptoms.

TRUTH
There is zero need to "Act like you have the virus".
Asymptomatic = Healthy


LIE 6
Lockdowns slow the rate of transmission of respiratory virus's - especially Covid-19

TRUTH
Lockdowns do not work. Over 30 peer reviewed journal articles show this.
The measures kill more than they save.

NOTE
All of the above statements were made by Pfizers' former Chief Scientist and Vice President of Respiratory and Allergy of 16 years and are widely supported by a large number of leading scientists and doctors worldwide.


SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

1 - Effective treatments
American Journal of Therapeutics:
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

50 studies on Nobel Prize winning Ivermectin - used safely for decades:
https://ivmmeta.com

2 - Prior Immunity
SARS-COV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z

Heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x

3 - PCR Test
10 fundamental flaws with the PCR protocol:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report

4 - Mask Wearing
‘We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.’
‘Universal Masking in hospitals in the covid-19 era’ – New
England Journal of Medicine 2020:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

5 - Asymptomatic Spread
Of 10 million participants in this study, no infectious cases were found among 300 asymptomatic cases of Covid-19:
https://bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4695

6 - Lockdowns
Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13484"

EXCLUSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT FROM ERIC CLAPTON

Following the PM’s announcement on Monday the 19th of July 2021 I feel honour bound to make an announcement of my own:
I wish to say that I will not perform on any stage where there is a discriminated audience present. Unless there is provision made for all people to attend, I reserve the right to cancel the show. Eric Clapton.

https://youtu.be/DirL4RI1448

Oh the irony of those who rightly keep on saying not to trust mainstream media and then go questioning announcements made on this channel because it's not confirmed by mainstream media or Google..

Yesterday I took a few children to London Zoo in Regent's Park. They are still insisting on face masks in enclosures where there are monkeys "because the monkeys are not vaccinated".

I complained and quoted my human rights and was told I still could not see the monkeys as I am over 11 years old and it's the instructions from the top. I said "only following orders" was used in the Nuremberg Trials too.

The children went in without me. At all the next enclosures, the children told me to become wise and tell them about my exemption, so I did and got in at all the other enclosures.

What people do not seem to understand is that it's already demeaning to have to quote an exemption in the first place. It's almost as if you are made to pre-emptively apologize for a crime you did not commit.

As I was waiting for them I wrote a review on Tripadvisor quoting the mask incident.

Guess what? Tripadvisor refused to publish my review quoting some random excuse. All in it together. Robin.

📣🌍📣🌍📣🌍📣🌍📣🌍📣

WORLD WIDE RALLY FOR FREEDOM
LONDON 1PM 24TH JULY

WE ARE DELIGHTED (AND HONOURED) to announce that DR VERNON COLEMAN will be appearing LIVE FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER in London!

We are also being joined by:

David Icke
Gareth Icke
Kate Shemirani
Mark Steele
Dr Reiner Fuellmich*
Terry Calladine

…AND MORE TO BE ANNOUNCED!

(*On the Big Screen)

This day is a day for the people, for those who have been fighting for our freedoms, for family, children and elderly and those less able to march. This is a day for ALL! This will be a static rally to demonstrate and show we do not consent, we will not comply and we will continue to defy.

We need to keep our spirits high and re-energise to keep fighting, so in London on the 24th July 2021, at 1pm, please join us and our amazing speakers for a day of high vibes!

Announcements will be made here:
t.iss.one/londonofficialworldwiderally

#wewillALLbethere

This Italian 2015 news program reports on a chimeric coronavirus made in a Chinese lab which is able to lead to a non fatal pneumonia in humans due to a modified protein.

https://youtu.be/uwyU5P5AuMk

Folks,
I wish I’d shared this earlier, but you know how hectic things are.
I was asked by former U.K. policeman & courageous campaigner, Mark Sexton, to draft a letter to a police force underwriting his allegations of malfeasance by among others figures in public life.
This is that letter.
I’ve not heard back from the police, but then again, I didn’t expect to.
I was merely putting it on the record.
Please don’t criticise reference to “the virus”. It’s just too complicated to explain to anyone, let alone lay people, the controversy around the existential question. The key point that survives & remains my focus, is that we’re being systematically lied to in ways that increase avoidable deaths, terrifying many & meanwhile destroy the economy, civil society & people’s lives.
Let’s align on that & never fight with each other.
We’re none of us here for any other reason than we’re mad as hell & not going to take it any more 😡
And that in our many ways, we’re sincerely trying to alert others.
Best wishes
Mike

June 29th, 2021.
Kent, U.K.

To: Superintendent Pete Hill [email protected]
Cc: Chief Constable Debbie Tedds[email protected]
 
Full support of the statements by Mark Sexton of ongoing misconduct & misfeasance in public office by members of the UK government.
 
Dear Superintendent Hill,
My name is Dr Mike Yeadon. I am qualified in biochemistry, toxicology and pharmacology, with a BSc degree and research-based PhD. I have been a professional research scientist for over 30 years, working to executive level in both ‘big pharma’ as well as biotech. I left Pfizer UK a decade ago as vice president of worldwide respiratory R&D and have since been founder and CEO of Ziarco, a biotech subsequently acquired by Novartis. I have also consulted widely to over 30 start up biotech companies, mostly in the US. I claim to be at least as highly qualified as any of the advisors to UK government in their SAGE committee and specifically a scientific peer of Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Advisor, alongside whom I worked 30 years ago. 
 
I am writing to you within my expert and professional capacity to fully support the assertions and allegations Mark Sexton is making, relating to Misconduct and Misfeasance in public office against members of the governments of the United Kingdom. 
 
Though I recognise this will be hard to accept, every single one of the central narrative points that SAGE repeatedly asserts about this virus is untrue. Further, because they and I were educated in the same UK university system over similar time periods and will have taken the same foundational courses, they know what I know. Knowingly telling untruths is lying. That is what senior advisors to government and then government ministers have been doing for at least 15 months, with obviously malign intent. 
 
They know perfectly well that the lethality of this virus is, at most, slightly worse for the very old and frail than in seasonal influenza, but LESS dangerous than flu for the working age population. 
 
In contrast to their claims that everyone is vulnerable, the clinical immunology clearly shows that around half the population already had protective immunity because they had previously been exposed to related viruses. SARS-CoV-2 is related to four, endemic coronaviruses which together cause around one fifth of what we call common colds. 
 
They also are well aware that the PCR test is being misused by running excessive numbers of amplification cycles and not defining and subtracting the false positive rate. As a result, they are dialling up meaningless ‘cases’ to order & lying to the public about the true prevalence of the virus.
 
They pretended that masks have any protective value yet there is extensive, published research showing no impact whatsoever on transmission of respiratory viruses. 
 
Further, the magical thinking that permits those with no symptoms whatsoever to infect others is absurd and also a lie, as previously confirmed on video by Dr Fauci of the USA and Dr Kerkouve of the WHO.

Asymptomatic transmission if it ever occurs is 100-fold lower than from those with symptoms. 
 
Pretending that those who have recovered from infection might not be immune is another absurd lie. If we didn’t develop immunity, we would not recover. Immunity have been repeatedly shown to be very good and long-lived (probably lasting for years to decades). 
 
Numerous people have conspired to pretend that there are no safe and effective treatments, whereas there are several such medicines (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, ivermectin, fluvoxamine, budesonide, etc).
 
Among the worst deceptions is the lie that ‘lockdowns’ prevent transmission of the virus, whereas all it has done is to destroy the economy and civil society as well as INCREASE deaths by denial of healthcare as well as worsen depression. Dozens of peer reviewed journal articles clearly show NO effect of lockdown. We’ve known this, for certain, since June 2020. Note the lockdowns since, which are a fraud. Lockdown could never have worked because infections occur only when a symptomatic person comes into contact with a susceptible person. Symptomatic people are UNWELL and are not generally walking around to be encountered. Instead, transmission mostly occurred in institutions like hospitals and care homes.
 
An additional, persistent lie is that variants are dangerous and will escape immunity. It is certain that the most-different variant is no more than 0.3% different from the Wuhan virus. Our immune systems easily detect related viruses which differ by at least 20% and this has been shown experimentally with variants of this virus. 
 
You may find much more detail on these allegations in an article I wrote last year (Lock down sceptics, 20/09/20) and my understanding has advanced substantially since. I have given very many, long-form interviews on this field, for example here: https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-219-in-harms-way/
 
So you can imagine my serious concern when I realised that novel, gene-based vaccines were being developed at speed. On December 1, 2020, with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg of Germany, I wrote to the European Medicines Agency, firmly demanding that they delayed their emergency approval. 
You can find a copy of that petition at this link: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf
 
Our concerns included inadequate safety testing of new technology agents and the criminal pretence that there was an emergency with no medicines thus warranting ‘emergency use authorisation’. Of course, that’s what they did, contrary to law. We also pointed out the risk of acute allergic reactions which might be life threatening (these were observed on the first day of public dosing) and potential impacts on fertility. 
 
With others, I have subsequently written open letters to the EMA several times, first warning of the risk of blood clots (a life threatening risk built into all the covid-19 vaccines by design choice), having selected spike protein as the immunogen. Biologists have known for over a decade that coronavirus spike proteins are pro-coagulant. These letters can be found at this link: https://doctors4covidethics.org/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-vaccine-safety-concerns/
 
What is happening to those injected with these experimental vaccines is truly terrible. The premise of vaccines, of which I’ve been a lifelong supporter, being of the pharmaceutical industry, is that a healthy person becomes protected against a future hazard and experiences nothing more than mild side effects while the vaccine confers immunity upon the recipient.

In this case, hundreds if thousands of people have experienced grave side effects, mostly to do with interruptions to blood flow anywhere in their body and over 1,300 people have died shortly after vaccination, almost certainty caused directly by vaccination (through fatal thromboembolic events, such as brain blood clots, deep vein thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation). 
 
I repeat my well-evidenced demand for an immediate cessation of the vaccine program and in particular, on no account should these be administered to children. Children are simply not as risk from this virus. Furthermore, they are poor at transmitting it to others. There is literally no medical case whatsoever for vaccinating children, yet it is certain that many will be injured, some seriously (issues surfacing in recent days include heart inflammation, myocarditis, which often leads to premature heart failure and death in later life).
I am also VERY concerned that the entire point of this fraud is to coerce people onto a vaccine passport database, a tool of extreme control.
I am aware and in touch with Dr Tess Lawrie who has recently expressed her serious concerns as have many doctors and scientists around the world but they are being silenced and blocked by media and social media outlets. 
 
I offer my full support to assist the police with their criminal investigation and I have included my contact details. 
 
I really hope you take action is response to Mr Sexton’s allegations, to which I am adding mine. Your children and mine are the reason I am putting myself in harms way. This crime will cease when enough good people take their courage in their hands and join me and Mr Sexton.
 
Sincere best wishes,
- Mike - 
 
Dr Michael Yeadon

This, I’m afraid to say, is THE most disturbing development in months.
I’ve no idea why former stalwarts who regarded “the shots” as superfluous for most, are now almost all singing from the establishment hymn sheet & encouraging their viewers to get vaccinated.
Mike

https://apple.news/AwygeFhl0TQeeKl-hD97BZw

Suddenly, Conservatives Care About Vaccines
A number of leaders on the right suddenly urged their audiences to get vaccinated in the past day. Why now?
Updated at 8:06 p.m. ET on July 20, 2021.
Conservatives are not necessarily vaccine-hesitant, to paraphrase John Stuart Mill, but most vaccine-hesitant Americans are conservatives. Resistance to vaccines has been concentrated among Republican voters, and led by GOP politicians and various leading lights in conservative media.
And that makes the past day or so one of the stranger stretches in recent pandemic politics.
“Just like we’ve been saying, please take COVID seriously. Enough people have died. We don’t need any more deaths. Research like crazy. Talk to your doctor,” Fox News’s Sean Hannity said last night. “It absolutely makes sense for many Americans to get vaccinated.”
Hannity’s “just like we’ve been saying” is doing a lot of work. He reportedly called the pandemic a “hoax” early on, and his colleague Tucker Carlson continues to cast doubt on vaccines, including on yesterday’s program. But Hannity is not alone now. His statement comes as several other major conservatives are speaking up too.
Steve Doocy, one of the anchors of the network’s popular morning show Fox & Friends, has been advocating for vaccines, and tangling with co-hosts over it. “If you have the chance, get the shot,” he said yesterday. “It will save your life.”
[David A. Graham: It’s not vaccine hesitancy. It’s COVID-19 denialism.]
Ben Shapiro of The Daily Wire, who has been a vocal proponent of vaccination all along, also told his followers today on Twitter, “Get vaxxed. I did. My wife did. My parents did.” Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy, a confidant of Donald Trump, today published a column praising the current president: “Six months into his administration, President Joe Biden should be applauded for making a huge dent in the COVID pandemic.” House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, who had conspicuously declined to get a shot, offering dubious excuses, announced today that he finally got vaccinated this weekend.
These exhortations have often come in the service of political arguments. In the same breath as his plea for seriousness, Hannity suggested that people who have been infected do not need to be inoculated, misconstruing a scientific study. Shapiro made his point in the midst of a case against lockdowns and mask mandates. Meanwhile, plenty of other major right-wing figures remain quiet or worse.
Nonetheless: The shift in tone among these high-profile voices is sharp and sudden enough to merit notice. A few conservatives have long been outspoken in favor of vaccinations. A group of Republican members of Congress who are medical doctors produced a pro-jab PSA this spring, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has been as fiery about COVID-19 precautions as he is about anything. He warned again today, “These shots need to get in everybody’s arm as rapidly as possible or we are going to be back in a situation in the fall, that we don’t yearn for, that we were in last year.”
Fox News, in particular, has been a hive of vaccine skepticism, though. Carlson, the network’s leading personality, was initially a lonely voice in taking the pandemic seriously, but has since become a merchant of doubt. This editorial tack comes even though owner Rupert Murdoch was quick to get his own shot in December. Fox has also reportedly encouraged, though not mandated, employees to disclose their vaccination status, even as Carlson has likened vaccine passports to Jim Crow laws on air.
Why the shift is happening now, and so abruptly, is not clear.