Italy's leading wire service ANSA whose members and owners are 36 leading news organizations in Italy, reports a study from the University of Padova which found that taking vitamin D reduces deaths and ICU admissions by 80%. This was evident to me since April 2020 when I first started making this link, and is possibly what got me suspended from twitter: if vitamin D and other basic antiviral and antibiotic treatments work, there is no need for fear, for lockdowns, for masks, or for vaccines.
https://www.ansa.it/canale_saluteebenessere/notizie/medicina/2021/01/19/covid-calo-morti-con-trattamento-con-vitamina-d_a154b4af-8076-454e-a803-bd767c48e352.html

At least they admit that PCR tests can be adjusted. Therefore they can be made to give either more or less positive results and all this can be centrally coordinated by government scientific officers:
"Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if *manual adjustment* of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information."
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

I recommend watching and sharing The New Normal documentary by Happen Network posted further up this page. I recognize a number of clips that I had also shared on Twitter on it. Well worth the 53 minutes in terms of once again clarifying what is really going on.

"most particles (87%) with influenza viral RNA were found to be smaller than 1 μm.

Further developments enabled detection of so-called fine versus coarse particles (ie, ≤5 μm vs >5 μm).

 Influenza viral RNA was detected in the exhaled breath of 34 (92%) of 37 adults.

 The fine particles contained 8·8-times (95% CI 4·1–19·0) more viral copies than did the coarse ones. Respiratory viruses have been found in both coughs (82% of participants) and exhaled breath (81% of participants).

Similarly, influenza virus was found in similar amounts in coughs (53% of participants) and breath (42% of participants).

Human rhinovirus was collected more frequently in exhaled breath than in cough aerosols using a filter method.

Findings from two studies with comparable particle size data showed that influenza virus in exhaled breath is contained in smaller particles than influenza virus in cough (figure 3).

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30323-4/fulltext

This shows that coughing is not the issue. Normal breathing exhales viruses. The aerosols are so small masks will not stop them. The solution is ventilation not face masks.

Further, breathing through masks nebulize aerosols into finer ones which persist for longer in the air. Masks are therefore entirely counterproductive: in an enclosed space they will increase the amount of virus floating in the air compared to no mask, where some of the larger aerosols will instead fall to the ground due to gravity.

Humidity is another factor, the more humid the air the quicker droplets will increase in size and fall to the ground.

Which means the safest environment is a well ventilated one where people do not wear any masks, and breathe in through their nose, and out through the mouth as that will make droplets fall to the ground quicker.

Masks: bad on all counts
Ventilation: good on all counts, as long as it replaces air with fresh air rather than it re-circulates it
Humidity: good on all counts

⚠️"There is no evidence to support the concept that most respiratory infections are associated with primarily large droplet transmission. In fact, small particle aerosols are the rule, rather than the exception, contrary to current guidelines"⚠️ 🚫😷
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30323-4/fulltext

Watch The FLCCC Alliance— On a mission to Save Thousands & Slow the Pandemic
https://vimeo.com/502407293

SIGNAL was created and funded by a CIA spinoff. It is a government operation. Please inform anyone opposing government that they are joining a government messaging app.
https://yasha.substack.com/p/signal-is-a-government-op-85e

VITAMIN D LETTER FROM SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS:
*It has been shown that 3875 IU (97mcg) daily is required for 97.5% of people to reach 20ng/ml, and 6200 IU (155mcg) for 30ng/ml,4 intakes far above all national guidelines*"
https://vitamind4all.org/letter.html

Are vaccine roll outs clinical trials? "There is nothing wrong with clinical trials, “but clinical trials (human trials) must get Helsinki committee’s approval, & from the people on whom the trial is being conducted while giving them the right to refuse.”

https://jewishbusinessnews.com/2021/01/18/helsinki-committee-israel-government-pfizer-lead-illegal-experiment-on-humans-report/

"Before this very publication, virologists were neither treated like superstars, nor were they considered icons or half-gods. In 2009, Drosten almost succeeded in installing the false premise virology could supersede holistic medical sciences as discussed in this thread."
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1352238574389891072.html

WHO's latest guidance on PCR testing accepts what I have been warning about:
1 PCR test protocols can be manually adjusted to increase or decrease positive "cases": ct thresholds
2 A case needs symptoms
3 Bayes Theorem and problem of asymptomatic testing

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

The bizarre invention of the LOCKDOWN, high up there with the WMD in Iraq and the incubator babies in Kuwait in terms of outrageous fabrications to destroy countries:
"What’s truly surprising is just how recent the theory behind lockdown and forced distancing actually is. So far as anyone can tell, the intellectual machinery that made this mess was invented 14 years ago, and not by epidemiologists but by computer-simulation modelers. It was adopted not by experienced doctors – they warned ferociously against it – but by politicians. 
Let’s start with the phrase social distancing, which has mutated into forced human separation. The first I had heard it was in the 2011 movie Contagion..."
https://www.aier.org/article/the-2006-origins-of-the-lockdown-idea/

"Damage to children's eyesight is just the latest concern of medical experts, adding to fears over mental health and obesity
A recent large study from China reports that children who were part of a prospective 5 year study have been shown to have worse vision than for the same age group in the previous year, and in particular that “home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be associated with a significant myopic shift for children aged 6 to 8 years”; all the more worrying because “younger children are in a critical period for the development of myopia.”...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education-and-careers/2021/01/21/adult-home-workers-fussed-no-health-safety-concern-children/

"The founding myth of the lockdown is almost the opposite of the truth. Science did not triumph over politics on March 23rd..the strategy which preceded the lockdown, unpopular though it now is, was based on science whereas the decision to go into lockdown was political"
1 "Chaplin finds plenty of evidence in the minutes that various different containment measures were discussed by SAGE, but at no point before March 23rd did the group recommend the quarantining of the whole population."
2 "Boris Johnson and his advisors were not following “the science” when they took the decision to lock down the country on March 23rd – they weren’t acting on any specific recommendations by SAGE. Nor can the Government claim this is one of the options that was discussed at SAGE"
3 "Snowdon says that even Neil Ferguson’s March 16th paper, predicting 510,000 Covid deaths if the Government took no measures to stop the spread of the virus and 250,000 if it stuck with its “mitigation” strategy, stopped short of recommending a full lockdown"
https://lockdownsceptics.org/?s=snowdon#was-the-government-really-following-the-science
4. 5. "Every call📱 I’m on with the PHARMA LEADERS 💉 & the LEADERS of COUNTRIES."
🇨🇳🇮🇹🇬🇧 et al. (2020).

William Henry Gates III 
as quoted by Bloomberg ⬇️
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-bill-gates-covid-vaccine/

"The founding myth of the lockdown is almost the opposite of the truth. Science did not triumph over politics on March 23rd..the strategy which preceded the lockdown, unpopular though it now is, was based on science whereas the decision to go into lockdown was political"
14 November 2019:
The Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, met the Executive President of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Martin Schwab at Palazzo Chigi.
https://t.co/Dd7RgmGrdy
#KlausSchwab went to #Rome to meet Italian PM Giuseppe #Conte on the 14th November 2019. The first case of SARSCoV2 was dated by Chinese media to the 17th November 2019.
https://t.co/cdKuAu6mvW
#Italy was the first country in the world to implement a national lockdown, even #China limited itself at city-wide or maximum regional lockdowns. Italy's scientific committee advised against a national lockdown, yet the Prime Minister over-ruled the scientific committee.
To this day it is not known who told him to over rule his own scientists.
#Italy PM #Conte set the stage for national lockdowns in the world, something that had never been done before, as it is not based on any real science or experiment. Also, the WHO advises against lockdowns. It was Giuseppe Conte who legitimized this measure, not the WHO.
On 9 March 2020, the government of Italy under Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte imposed a national lockdown, restricting the movement of the population except for necessity, work, and health circumstances.
The lockdown measures were the largest suppression of constitutional rights in the history of the Italian Republic.
Conte announced on 11 March that the lockdown would be tightened, with all commercial and retail businesses except those providing essential services, like grocery stores, food stores, and pharmacies, closed down.
The question is, who advised the Italian PM Giuseppe Conte to lockdown the entire country and close down all "non essential" retail?
The technical committee in Italy also ONLY recommended masks for those who feel ill. Who pushed for mandatory masks in public interior spaces? Group hysteria or:
"Every call📱 I’m on with the PHARMA LEADERS 💉 & the LEADERS of COUNTRIES."
🇨🇳🇮🇹🇬🇧 et al. (2020).

William Henry Gates III 
as quoted by Bloomberg ⬇️
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-bill-gates-covid-vaccine/