I appealed the tweet but don't think I will receive a fair trial. Spread the news and ask people on twitter to join me here with link t.iss.one/robinmg or Gab at gab.com/robinmonotti
If you would like to contact me here my Telegram username is @Robin_MG. Any life saving research will be shared on this channel.
I-MASK+ Protocols: "Our life-saving MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19 (available in several languages), created in March 2020, is intended for hospitalized patients, the recently developed I-MASK+ Prophylaxis & Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19 (this page) is designed for use as a prophylaxis and in early outpatient treatment, for those who test positive for COVID-19. The protocols complement each other, and both are physiologic-based combination treatment regimens developed by leaders in critical care medicine. All the component medicines are FDA-approved, inexpensive, readily available and have been used for decades with well-established safety profiles."
https://covid19criticalcare.com/i-mask-prophylaxis-treatment-protocol/
https://covid19criticalcare.com/i-mask-prophylaxis-treatment-protocol/
Independent Medical Alliance
Treatment Protocols - Independent Medical Alliance
The protocols and treatment guidelines on this page represent our recommended approaches based on the best and most recent literature and research. The information is provided as guidance to healthcare providers worldwide and should only be used by medical…
Micronutrients for Viral Infections – Reference Bibliography – From the International Society of Orthomolecular Medicine
https://www.hans.org/micronutrients-for-viral-infections-reference-bibliography-from-the-international-society-of-orthomolecular-medicine/
https://www.hans.org/micronutrients-for-viral-infections-reference-bibliography-from-the-international-society-of-orthomolecular-medicine/
INTERNATIONAL ALERT MESSAGE
OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS TO GOVERNMENTS
AND CITIZENS OF THE WORLD :
STOP to : terror, madness, manipulation, dictatorship, lies and the biggest health scam of the 21th century
We say : STOP to all crazy and disproportionate measures that have been taken since the beginning to fight SARS-CoV-2 (lockdown, blocking the economy and education, social distancing, wearing of masks for all, etc.) because they are totally unjustified, are not based on any scientific evidence and violate the basic principles
of evidence-based medicine. However, we of course support reasonable measures
such as recommendations of washing hands, sneezing or coughing in elbow, using a
disposable tissue, etc.
OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS TO GOVERNMENTS
AND CITIZENS OF THE WORLD :
STOP to : terror, madness, manipulation, dictatorship, lies and the biggest health scam of the 21th century
We say : STOP to all crazy and disproportionate measures that have been taken since the beginning to fight SARS-CoV-2 (lockdown, blocking the economy and education, social distancing, wearing of masks for all, etc.) because they are totally unjustified, are not based on any scientific evidence and violate the basic principles
of evidence-based medicine. However, we of course support reasonable measures
such as recommendations of washing hands, sneezing or coughing in elbow, using a
disposable tissue, etc.
"It is not the first time that humanity faces a new virus : it experienced H2N2 in 1957,
H3N2 in 1968, SARS-CoV in 2003, H5N1 in 2004, H1N1 in 2009, MERS-CoV in
2012 and faces the seasonal flu virus every year. However, none of the measures
taken for SARS-CoV-2 has been taken for these viruses. We are told :
-"But, SARS-CoV-2 is very contagious" and we answer : IT'S ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
This claim is, moreover, rejected by internationally renowned experts1
. A simple
comparison with the other viruses shows that the contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2 is
moderate2,3
. It’s diseases like measles that can be described as very contagious. For
example, a person with measles can infect up to 20 people while a person infected
with this coronavirus only contaminates 2 or 3, that is : 10 times less than measles.'
H3N2 in 1968, SARS-CoV in 2003, H5N1 in 2004, H1N1 in 2009, MERS-CoV in
2012 and faces the seasonal flu virus every year. However, none of the measures
taken for SARS-CoV-2 has been taken for these viruses. We are told :
-"But, SARS-CoV-2 is very contagious" and we answer : IT'S ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
This claim is, moreover, rejected by internationally renowned experts1
. A simple
comparison with the other viruses shows that the contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2 is
moderate2,3
. It’s diseases like measles that can be described as very contagious. For
example, a person with measles can infect up to 20 people while a person infected
with this coronavirus only contaminates 2 or 3, that is : 10 times less than measles.'
""But, it is a new virus" and we answer : H1N1 and the other viruses that we
mentioned were also new viruses. Yet : we did not put countries into lockdown, we
did not block the global economy, we did not paralyze the education system, we did
not social distancing and we did not tell the healthy people to wear masks. In
addition, some experts say that it is possible that this virus was already circulating
before but we did not realize it"
mentioned were also new viruses. Yet : we did not put countries into lockdown, we
did not block the global economy, we did not paralyze the education system, we did
not social distancing and we did not tell the healthy people to wear masks. In
addition, some experts say that it is possible that this virus was already circulating
before but we did not realize it"
"But, we don't have a vaccine" and we answer : at the start of H1N1, we also had no vaccine, as at the time of SARS-CoV. Yet : we did not put countries into lockdown, we did not block the global economy, we did not paralyze the education system, we did not social distancing and we did not tell the healthy people to wear masks."
"But, this virus is much more deadly" and we answer : IT'S ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
Because, compared to the flu for example, and if we take into account the period
between 01 November and 31 March, there was worldwide -when those measures
have been taken- : 860,000 cases and 40,000 deaths while the flu in the same
period of 5 months infects, on average 420 million people and kills 270,000. In
addition, the case fatality rate announced by the WHO (3,4%) was greatly
overestimated and was rejected from the beginning by eminent experts in
epidemiology5
. But even if we take this case fatality rate, we can see that this
coronavirus is three times less lethal than that of 2003 (10%) and ten times less
lethal than that of 2012 (35%).
Because, compared to the flu for example, and if we take into account the period
between 01 November and 31 March, there was worldwide -when those measures
have been taken- : 860,000 cases and 40,000 deaths while the flu in the same
period of 5 months infects, on average 420 million people and kills 270,000. In
addition, the case fatality rate announced by the WHO (3,4%) was greatly
overestimated and was rejected from the beginning by eminent experts in
epidemiology5
. But even if we take this case fatality rate, we can see that this
coronavirus is three times less lethal than that of 2003 (10%) and ten times less
lethal than that of 2012 (35%).
"But, COVID-19 is a serious illness" and we answer : IT'S ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
SARS-CoV-2 is a benign virus for the general population as it causes 85% of benign
forms, 99% of those infected recover, it does not constitute a danger for pregnant
women and children (unlike the flu), it spreads less faster than the flu and 90% of
those who die are elderly people (who must, of course, be protected like other
populations at risk). This is why experts have called "delirium" the claim that it is a
serious illness and said, on August 19, that "it is not worse than the flu".
SARS-CoV-2 is a benign virus for the general population as it causes 85% of benign
forms, 99% of those infected recover, it does not constitute a danger for pregnant
women and children (unlike the flu), it spreads less faster than the flu and 90% of
those who die are elderly people (who must, of course, be protected like other
populations at risk). This is why experts have called "delirium" the claim that it is a
serious illness and said, on August 19, that "it is not worse than the flu".
"But, there are asymptomatic people" and we answer : 77% of infected people are
asymptomatic in influenza too and they can also transmit the virus. Yet : healthy
people are not told every year to wear masks and no social distancing is done
despite the fact that the flu infects 1 billion people and kills 650,000."
asymptomatic in influenza too and they can also transmit the virus. Yet : healthy
people are not told every year to wear masks and no social distancing is done
despite the fact that the flu infects 1 billion people and kills 650,000."
"But, this virus leads to saturation of hospitals" and we answer : IT'S ABSOLUTELY
FALSE. Saturation affects only a few hospitals, but people are made to believe that
the entire hospital system is saturated or that saturation is imminent when there are
thousands of hospitals in certain countries. Is it reasonable and true to attribute, for
example, to 1,000 or 2,000 hospitals a situation which concerns only 4 or 5
hospitals? Furthermore, it is not surprising that some hospitals were saturated
because they were situated in clusters (like Lombardy in Italy or New York in the
USA). It should not be forgotten that hospitals in many countries have been
overwhelmed (including intensive care units) during previous influenza epidemics9
and at the time, we were even talking about : "tsunami" of patients in hospitals, "saturated hospitals", tents erected outside the hospitals, "war zones", "collapsed
hospitals" and a "state of emergency". And yet : we did not put countries into
lockdown, we did not block the global economy, we did not paralyze the education
system, we did not social distancing and we did not tell the healthy people to wear
masks."
Read the whole document here:
https://covidinfos.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/EN-international-alert-message.pdf
FALSE. Saturation affects only a few hospitals, but people are made to believe that
the entire hospital system is saturated or that saturation is imminent when there are
thousands of hospitals in certain countries. Is it reasonable and true to attribute, for
example, to 1,000 or 2,000 hospitals a situation which concerns only 4 or 5
hospitals? Furthermore, it is not surprising that some hospitals were saturated
because they were situated in clusters (like Lombardy in Italy or New York in the
USA). It should not be forgotten that hospitals in many countries have been
overwhelmed (including intensive care units) during previous influenza epidemics9
and at the time, we were even talking about : "tsunami" of patients in hospitals, "saturated hospitals", tents erected outside the hospitals, "war zones", "collapsed
hospitals" and a "state of emergency". And yet : we did not put countries into
lockdown, we did not block the global economy, we did not paralyze the education
system, we did not social distancing and we did not tell the healthy people to wear
masks."
Read the whole document here:
https://covidinfos.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/EN-international-alert-message.pdf
Orthomolecular Medicine. Video
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pjzdOMjVb2o&feature=youtu.be
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pjzdOMjVb2o&feature=youtu.be
"Government actions such as border closures, full lockdowns, and a high rate of COVID-19 testing were not associated with statistically significant reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext
Forwarded from BIG PICTURE with James Patrick (Planet Lockdown)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trailer to the upcoming film. Please share
If I have been tech-succesful I have now added a comment button to posts on this channel which goes to my discussion group. Comments show up in a thread of their own, but will also land in the discussion group to keep everyone in the loop.
Italy's leading wire service ANSA whose members and owners are 36 leading news organizations in Italy, reports a study from the University of Padova which found that taking vitamin D reduces deaths and ICU admissions by 80%. This was evident to me since April 2020 when I first started making this link, and is possibly what got me suspended from twitter: if vitamin D and other basic antiviral and antibiotic treatments work, there is no need for fear, for lockdowns, for masks, or for vaccines.
https://www.ansa.it/canale_saluteebenessere/notizie/medicina/2021/01/19/covid-calo-morti-con-trattamento-con-vitamina-d_a154b4af-8076-454e-a803-bd767c48e352.html
https://www.ansa.it/canale_saluteebenessere/notizie/medicina/2021/01/19/covid-calo-morti-con-trattamento-con-vitamina-d_a154b4af-8076-454e-a803-bd767c48e352.html
ANSA.it
Covid: calo morti con trattamento con vitamina D
Il trattamento con la vitamina D in pazienti con comorbidità fa diminuire i decessi e i trasferimenti in terapia intensiva. (ANSA)
At least they admit that PCR tests can be adjusted. Therefore they can be made to give either more or less positive results and all this can be centrally coordinated by government scientific officers:
"Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if *manual adjustment* of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information."
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05
"Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if *manual adjustment* of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information."
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05
World Health Organization
WHO Information Notice for Users 2020/05
Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Date: 13 January 2021 WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 2 Target…