⬆️ Key aspects of Henderson et al rule book article on dealing with epidemics archived above. In 2020-2021 all the rules have been broken and we have been told to do the opposite of what we know works. All measures advocated by Western governments apart from Sweden and a few US States are not only wrong, they have been proven to make epidemics worse and destroy the economic and social fabric of society. It is no longer tenable to believe this was and is not intentional. We are living in one of the darkest chapters in the history of humanity.

THE CONCLUSION: AN OVVERIDING PRINCIPLE IN DEALING WITH ALL EPIDEMICS:
"Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted."
https://archive.is/mXej0

THE #MONOTTIPROTOCOL
HOW TO END THE PANDEMIC
1 Stop testing asymptomatics, PCR & lateral flow protocols confirmed by international scientists without conflicts of interest, not WHO or SAGE
2 Take vitamin D in winter minimum 2,000 IUs
3 Early treatment kits in pharmacies

WHO document. No comment on why we are doing what is says we should not be doing under any pandemic or epidemic circumstances.

⚠️WEAR A MASK ➡️ NEBULIZE THE VIRUS ➡️ END LIVES⚠️
Droplets vs Aerosols:
"Droplets are larger (>5 μm) rapidly drop to the ground by force of gravity.
Aerosols are smaller (≤5 μm) rapidly evaporate, leaving behind droplet nuclei that are small enough & light enough to remain suspended in the air for hours (analogous to pollen).
On average, 64% of the viral genome copies were associated with fine particles smaller than 2.5 μm, which can remain suspended in the air for hours.
1 Masks break up larger aerosols into smaller aerosols: the nebulization effect
2 Smaller particles float in air for longest, larger particles drop
3 Smaller particles get deeper into the lungs, leading to more severe infection & higher mortality
4 Reduce oxygen & increase CO2
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1349997185006497793.html

IVERMECTIN: "The patient’s son, Michael Smentkiewicz, said hospital officials had told him and his sister, Michelle Kulbacki, on Dec. 31 that their mother’s chance of survival – as an 80-year-old Covid-19 patient on a ventilator – was about 20%.
He said doctors at the hospital also told the family that Smentkiewicz would probably be on a ventilator in the Intensive Care Unit for at least a month.

“We did a lot of our own research, we read about Ivermectin ... The results sounded very promising, and we decided we had to try something different,” Michael Smentkiewicz said. “We pressured the doctor in the ICU to give it to her. He finally agreed.”
On Jan. 2, Smentkiewicz was given her first dose of Ivermectin, and according to court papers filed by her family, she made “a complete turnaround.”
“In less than 48 hours, my mother was taken off the ventilator, transferred out of the Intensive Care Unit, sitting up on her own and communicating,” Kulbacki said in a court affidavit.
But after her mother was transferred to another hospital wing away from the ICU, doctors in that unit refused to give her any more doses of the drug, and her condition quickly declined, the family said in court papers.

“We were astounded when they refused to give her any more doses,” Michael Smentkiewicz said. “That’s why I called Ralph Lorigo and we took the hospital to court.”
Kaleida Health, which operates the hospital, opposed the family’s request in court. Lorigo said Kaleida attorney Michael J. Roach argued to Judge Nowak that doctors – and not the courts – should be making decisions about medical care.
On Jan. 8, Nowak ordered the hospital to “immediately administer the drug Ivermectin” to Smentkiewicz, court papers show.
“But the judge also told us verbally that Judith’s family doctor would have to write a prescription for Ivermectin, which he did,” Lorigo said. “In 46 years as an attorney, I’ve never seen another case where a family had to get a court order to continue a treatment that had already been started by a hospital.”

Michael P. Hughes, spokesman and chief of staff for Kaleida Health, said the health care company is "aware of this family’s position," but he declined to discuss details because of federal privacy laws and because the case has become "a legal matter."
Roach, the hospital attorney, declined to comment, telling a reporter to call Hughes.
Michael Smentkiewicz said Thursday that his mother’s condition has improved again since the Ivermectin treatments resumed.
“She called me (Wednesday) night. Her voice was raspy, but it was so exciting to hear her voice,” he said. “She is sitting up in bed. She’s off the ventilator, but she has a canula in her nose, providing supplemental oxygen.”
He added that a doctor from the hospital told him Thursday that his mother appears to have "turned the corner" in her fight against the virus.
https://buffalonews.com/news/local/after-judge-orders-hospital-to-use-experimental-covid-19-treatment-woman-recovers/article_a9eb315c-5694-11eb-aac5-53b541448755.html

IVERMECTIN: "100% of the 15 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated reduction of 74%, RR 0.26 [0.15-0.47].

• The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 33 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 9 billion (p = 0.00000000012)."
https://c19ivermectin.com/caivm.html

"IVERMECTIN reduces the risk of death from COVID-19 - A rapid review and meta-analysis in support of the recommendation of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance"
https://www.e-bmc.co.uk

Masks increase mortality because breathing through them nebulizes aerosols into smaller ones which bypass mucosal immunity & reach all the way into the alveoli, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Masks increase mortality because breathing through them nebulizes aerosols into smaller ones which bypass mucosal immunity & reach all the way into the alveoli, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). "The size of droplets smaller than 120 µm cannot be reliably measured..note the decrease of large and the increase of smaller particles numbers for the neck gaiter. We attribute this to the breakup of large droplets into several smaller ones when passing through the material. "Aerosols..within the most breathable size range between 0.5 & 5 μm, can carry SARS-CoV-2 deep to the terminal alveoli..if this transmission pathway does exist, it would bypass the mucociliary clearance & incubation period of the virus in the upper airways
https://t.co/08qchqI7ag
The filtration material itself of N95's average pore size ~0.3−0.5 μm does not block finer aerosol laden with virions penetration, not to mention surgical masks. For example, see Balazy et al. (2006).

Controversial British President of EcoHealth Alliance & "WHO inspector' Peter Daszak caught on camera revealing coronavirus manipulation in Wuhan before pandemic in a Gain of Function "research" attempt to make a vaccine: ⬇️
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4104828

How face masks increase infections, by a genome scientist, former research & development lead at the human genome project at MIT
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1320032362550464516.html

How face masks increase infections, by a genome scientist, former research & development lead at the human genome project at MIT (archived page if twitter deletes it)
https://archive.is/3xM7r

Masks increase the severity of infection, I explain exactly why and how here, using the latest medical & scientific research ⬇️
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1349997185006497793.html

Masks increase the severity of infection, I explain exactly why and how here, using the latest medical & scientific research ⬇️
(archived page if twitter deletes it)
https://archive.is/WxACY

Not BREAKING NEWS!

Did you know that when you breath through your nose filtration of particles is to 0.5 microns? As good as many masks.

The virus is 0.12 microns. Not much can stop it.

#HoldTheLine

https://t.co/4AGcZKvU4O

From Graham Hutchinson @GRHutchinson