Eric Clapton after COVID vaccination: 'I should never have gone near the needle' - Frontline News
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontline-news/eric-clapton-after-covid-vaccination-i-should-never-have-gone-near-the-needle

⬆️ Is this the future we want? Looks like Build Back A Lot Lot Worse to me..

I do not think turning the West into the above overnight is culturally sustainable. It can only happen under the fear cover of a perpetual pandemic emergency state with the sword of Damocles of an imminent lockdown at any time if people do not follow more perverse orders of ever more control. The threat of lockdown needs to be as unpredictable as say the threat of terrorism. Fear needs to be always present. Remove the fear element and it all falls apart and reveals itself as the imposition of an entirely different culture onto ours, which is what this ultimately is.

A STRAW MAN FALSE BINARY OPPOSITION is presented where there are only two possible outcomes. The two only possibilities given are either getting severe Covid19 or getting one of these first generation spike protein inducing injections. This is a false binary, there are in fact more options than this, namely

-Not encountering the virus due to herd immunity protection

-Immune system defeating the virus even before infection: asymptomatic suppression of the virus

-Early treatment to full recovery before the severe phase of disease which then gives long term safe natural immunity

-Look at what happened on the Diamond Princess cruise ship BEFORE HERD IMMUNITY, only 712 people out of 3,711 became infected. That is 20% only who got infected.

-For around 70% of the 20% of people who actually got infected in the Diamond Princess cruise ship, average age 68 and with 48% of people with underlying conditions, the infection was either mild or asymptomatic. The condition of patients during hospitalization was mild (41.3%) and severe (26.9%), and 31.7% had NO clinical findings during the entire period.

-Diamond Princess example shows the infection was severe for only around 5% of people on the cruise ship.

Therefore the proposition that someone is condemned to severe Covid19 if they do not submit to vaccination is demonstrably false. In actual numbers it is a very small proportion of people who get severe Covid19.

Now that we know a lot of treatment options which work, those people can be simply and effectively treated to recovery. Some of the many treatment options under point 3 of the Monotti Protocol here:

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/

Robin, an important statement (COVID Vaccines Should Not Be Required to Return to Campus, States the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons - AAPS
https://aapsonline.org/covid-vaccines-should-not-be-required-to-return-to-campus-states-the-association-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons/). Same group have been highly effective in developing & publicising a treatment protocol for ambulatory covid19 ➡️ https://aapsonline.org/CovidPatientTreatmentGuide.pdf
Best wishes
Mike

COVID Vaccines Should Not Be Required to Return to Campus, States the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
https://aapsonline.org/covid-vaccines-should-not-be-required-to-return-to-campus-states-the-association-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons/

A Bill That Removes Fauci from His Position Is About to Hit Congress: The bill, which has little chance of passage in the Democrat-controlled House, seeks to impose a retroactive 12-year term limit on the job Fauci has held since 1984, which would effectively force his retirement.
https://www.westernjournal.com/bill-removes-fauci-position-hit-congress/

My video warning my fellow humans of the dangers of the spike protein induced by the vaccines lasted 10 days on Youtube and clocked 30,000 views or more. These are my souvenirs for trying to be a responsible member of society:

Community guidelines: do not do anything to safeguard the community from the oligarchy.

A referee blowing the whistle? Really? When did I agree to play by these rules of their game?

Community guidelines: do not do anything to safeguard the community from the oligarchy.

Policy: "Medical misinformation"
Orwellian.

Here is what it was about with backups that some of you kindly did:

"Do you understand what this means——we are are injecting viral genetic code for the spike protein into innocent people and It gets into almost every cell In the body."

DR ZEV ZELENKO

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QlsUVf2pKUZN/

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/salk-institute-warning-robin-monotti-graziadei_DuK7KkpWhib6N4E.html

Note that since I released this video Salk added the words "safely encoded" in their article in their also newly added description of the vaccine spike protein. VAERS numbers indicate this theoretical description does not correspond to the full and complete reality of the situation. Original Salk text was this: "Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that they also play a key role in the disease itself" https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/

I am sure this above happening with the vaccine spike protein was not the scientists' original intentions, or this study would not only reveal this now. However the testing of the vaccine spike was it seems on rodents rather than humans - "distribution studies. These were done two ways – by using an mRNA for luciferase (and thus looking at the resulting light emission from the various rodent regions!) and by using a radioactive label (which is a more sensitive technique). The great majority of the radioactivty stays in and around the injection site. In the first hours, there’s also some circulating in the plasma. But almost all of that ended up in the liver, and no other tissue was much over 1% of the total" - and it acknowledges this: "Some of the vaccine dose is going to make it into the bloodstream, of course." In some cases this can be enough for significant damage. It is clearly not in the majority of cases but this should not be experimented on people who statistically have a very low chance of death from Covid19. Theory rarely matches reality when it comes to experiments and we need to take on board the significant numbers of VAERS and ask whether anybody not at significant risk of death should be exposed to them given there is also an unknown antibody-dependent enhancement risk which would only surface next December at the latest.
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/05/04/spike-protein-behavior

THE MONOTTI PROTOCOL
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/

Robin Monotti Graziadei
TELEGRAM CHANNEL: t.iss.one/robinmg

The first duty of every school is to safeguard the interests of the children, not the profits of government cronies. When these kids are adults I hope they will demand & expect an apology from all teachers who listened to government rather than caring for the children's interests

UK: Schools profit from terrorising children: Schools are being paid from public money according to "the number of test results recorded on the school or college’s individual account on the Test & Trace Log Results Website"
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/covid-testing-dfe-confirms-arrangements-for-extra-school-funding/

Robin,
There’s a dispute going on where a troll is claiming that there’s very significant level of reinfection.
This as you know isn’t true.
Here’s my response.
Thanks,
Mike

Dr McCullough is right to say reinfection with this specific virus is very rare.
Immunology is a core strength for me as a highly experienced life sciences R&D leader.

It’s important to distinguish between presence of PCR positive swab & clinical illness.

The former is to be expected. Vaccines rarely prevent low level infection, which is needed to alert our immune systems to a relevant threat & trigger immune memory to defend us against clinical illness. Immunity detects early & responds effectively to the presence of a virus to which we’re immune.

Everyone who has been studied is left immune if they’ve been infected. That immunity comprises multilocus protection, ranging from antibodies, both secreted & circulating, associated memory B-cells, together with highly specific memory cytotoxic T-lymphocytes as well as accompanying memory T-helper cells.

In the most closely analogous situation, SARS (2003) we’ve learned much that’s encouraging. A seminal study in 2020 showed that survivors of the far more lethal virus SARS-CoV all retained immune memory.

Those questioning whether that protection would be clinically relevant, I simply say, this is his immune memory works! If you possess circulating T-cells which respond vigorously to peptides predicted to include what are termed epitopes from the virus, that means you do have your own clones of immune cells highly specific to that part of the viruses molecular identity. These responses are absent in those never exposed to other coronaviruses.

Once you have this immune memory, the default expectation is that this will be robust & durable.
What was even more remarkable was these same donors (previously infected by SARS in 2003) ALSO demonstrate “cross-protection” (or cross-immunity) to the related SARS-CoV-2.

To be clear, this wasn’t faintly a surprise to immunologists. The two viruses are almost 80% identical so s much as 20% different.
I’m not talking about “phenotype”, or clinical profile. I’m talking about the matter of immune recognition.
In relation to that, the 80% commonality between these two viruses is more than adequate for our immune systems recognise one if already immune to the other.

So, bottom lines:
1) from a theoretical perspective, even mild or asymptomatic infection leaves the individual immune. They may get clinically irrelevant infection, but they won’t get ill. This makes PCR an EVEN less appropriate test to use, as a positive test will be misinterpreted.

2) empirical/ experimental evidence support the theoretical expectations.

Consider that a low fraction of the population has compromised immunity. It might be expected that immunocompromised individuals would be far more susceptible to reinfection. But the number of claimed reinfections is FAR lower even than the prevalence of immunocompromised people.

Reinfection is an irrelevance, at a population level. This is because each of us develops, as our immune memory, a “personal repertoire”, a collection of molecular snapshots of the virus. In the extraordinarily unlikely event that a persons immune defences were breached, it would not threaten others, with different combinations of molecular snapshots of the virus. Isn’t immunity truly amazing? 😎

Do not permit yourself to be frightened by the lies.

Thanks,
Dr Mike Yeadon

"The womb lining is part of the immune system - in fact there are immune cells in almost every part of the body.

Immune cells play a role in building up, maintaining and breaking down the lining of the uterus - which thickens to prepare for a pregnancy, and then sheds in the form of a period if the egg is not fertilised.

After vaccination, lots of chemical signals which have the potential to affect immune cells are circulating round the body. This could cause the womb lining to shed, and lead to spotting or earlier periods, Dr Male explained."

Covid vaccine: Period changes could be a short-term side effect - BBC News
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56901353.amp