Is FOX the only MSM on our side? Also Sky News Australia I am told. Maybe some of the Daily Telegraph in the UK, and Talk Radio to an extent. Drop your political colours, these are our biggest allies in this battle.

Some thoughts on psychology, why do people get so angry when you tell them they have been lied to? Is it because the media has painted this picture of unresponsible lunatics for anyone who can see through the lies? Some people refuse to see the truth because accepting it implies dropping everything and beginning to fight, and they just want a quiet cocooned life in the matrix. Others operate on a hierarchical ladder: nobody should contradict those in positions of power, everyone who does is an enemy of our hierarchical order and should be put back in their box. However we must fiercely defend our right to our own opinion, and not water it down. It's simpy not possible that it's a coincidence that every single measure they have proposed, INCLUDING the vaccines, are increasing rather than reducing the deaths in the age categories of people who would never have died of Covid19. I am getting witness reports that in India they are injecting people with Remdesivir rather than giving them a proper treatment, and that seems to be another factor for all these unecessary deaths apart from vaccine adverse events and vaccine enhanced disease between the two shots. It's clear people are getting infected when they go to hospitals to get their shots. MERS, SARS and SARSCoV2 are all hospital viruses, that's where they spread from, not outdoors, outdoors you get vitamin D which saves you. The black fungus I am told is a hospital disease, apparently linked to contaminated water that oxygen is passed through. Once your immune system is destroyed by experimental vaccinations, especially in those with pre-existing immunity, and then they are injected with vast amounts of a drug with no long safety history in quantities injected randomly in the population in India like Remdesivir, other pathogens easily take over. Can this be yet another coincidence? India had comparatively no problems when some regions were using the Ziverdo kits. Then vaccines and Remdesivir come along and people start dying and media goes into fear overdrive pushing for more injections of Remdesivir and of vaccines, more people panic and get injected, more get ill and die. Does it really take that much thinking to figure this one out?

According to this NEJM study

829 completed pregnancies.
700 got vaccine in 3rd trimester
129 got vaccine before 3rd trimester

Out of 829 pregnancies only 129 of patients got the vaccine before the 3rd

Let us compare statistics of 1st and 2nd trimester pregnancies

So 104 spontaneous abortions (loss of pregnancies before 20 weeks) happened in 129 women who got vaccinated before the 3rd trimester

That means 81% of pregnant women who got vaccinated before the 3rd trimester had spontaneous abortions

The national average is 10-26% spontaneous abortions off all pregnancies

I suggest that vaccination with covid-19 vaccines before the 3rd trimester increases the rate of spontaneous abortion by a factor 4-8x

The calculation above was prepared by Dr Zelenko who is vastly more knowledgeable on pregnancy numbers than I am.

This is the original document saved from the gov.uk publishing service.

In this versions it states:

“Pregnancy
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.”

They have since changed the guidance without any explanation

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941452/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf

Covidian Man by @Cityzenkane

I have just talked to a psychologist who has explained to me what he thinks they are trying to do, and what we can do to counter their strategy. He believes that the fearmongering is designed to "lock" people in a fear mode to an extent that even when restrictions are lifted, a good % of people will still be locked into the restrictions mentally through an internalised fear. It effectively becomes a mental lockdown. He thinks every new "wave" they are trying to effectively sequester people mentally this way. If every "wave" (and there's another one coming every December in my view) they manage to mentally sequester a section of the population, their numbers grow and ours diminish. Now that restrictions are being lifted, there is a possibility for us to come together with people who have been locked in fear, but if they don't come out of fear, they are locked into the "dark side". Think of an "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" where we can reverse the snatching of the bodies by facilitating the plant people to return to normality rather than consolidate the opposing camps narrative. We need to tend a hand to these people and reassure them there is nothing to worry about in terms of their fear of death from Covid19. If we gain a % of them away from the fear, we stop this process of the other side gaining numbers at every wave, which he thinks is their plan. The fear waves are designed as recruiting times for their troops of fear. We need to unlock this fear to let them come to the light side, rather than antagonize them. So when we encounter them, the fearful yet not antagonistic, in physical life when more of it returns to society, we need to tend a hand rather than give them a cold shower of reality too quickly. This is also why today they were still insisting for people to work from home and I had a go at the "Department of Health" and called out their strategy on twitter. If we "unlock" the ones we can take the fear mode out of, we are preventing them from always increasing their numbers at every wave. I am happy to antagonise the people doing this to us, but I will try to help the unlocking process of those who are simply very afraid. In this same way I will try to not respond to provocations when I see that the person from whom it comes is simply still very locked into fear and they are themselves victims. This is just to say that the summer strategy should be to help unlock the fearful that we encounter in physical life, it's difficult to do that on twitter and facebook, we need the period of lifted restrictions to do that. They separated us in lockdowns according to him also because like that the divisions of fearful and not fearful would not be bridged. Now we need to carefullly assess with whom we can still build bridges, as mentioned, some people have started reaching out already in good faith, now is the time to tend a hand to them in the period before they lock us up again, which I think will be in December. I thought this is an important strategic point: we need to offer the humanity the other side has not got to the people who are simply still very afraid for no rational reason: they are simply very traumatised a lot of them. This psychologist has a lot of them as his patients that is why he is in a position to tell me all of this. I think it's important to think about this.

THE GLOVES ARE OFF
Rand Paul versus Anthony Fauci
https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1392138108855070728?s=19

THE GLOVES ARE OFF
PAUL versus FAUCI
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4962333/senator-paul-dr-fauci-clash-research-funding-wuhan-lab

"In order to suppress any revolt in advance, it is not necessary to take violent action. Hitler-like methods are outdated. It is enough to create a collective conditioning so powerful that the very idea of revolt will no longer even occur to men.

The ideal would be to format individuals from birth by limiting their innate biological abilities. Then, the conditioning would be continued by drastically reducing education to a form of job training.

An uneducated individual has only a limited horizon of thought and the more his thought is limited to mediocre concerns, the less he can revolt. We must ensure that access to knowledge becomes increasingly difficult and elitist.

That the gap between the people and science widens, that the information intended for the general public is anaesthetized of any content with subversive character.
Especially not philosophy.

Here again, we must use persuasion and not direct violence: we will massively broadcast, via television, entertainment that always flatters the emotional or the instinctive.

We will occupy the minds with what is futile and playful. It is good to prevent the mind from thinking with incessant chatter and music. Sexuality will be put at the forefront of human interests. As a social tranquilizer, there is nothing better.
In general, it will be done in such a way as to banish seriousness from existence, to make a mockery of everything of high value, to maintain a constant apology for lightness; so that the euphoria of publicity will become the standard of human happiness and the model of freedom.

The conditioning will thus produce such an integration of itself, that the only fear - which it will be necessary to maintain - will be that of being excluded from the system and thus of not being able to reach the necessary conditions of happiness.

Mass man, thus produced, must be treated as what he is: a calf, and he must be watched as a herd must be.

Everything that allows his lucidity to be put to sleep is socially good, everything that threatens to awaken it must be ridiculed, stifled, fought. Any doctrine that challenges the system must first be designated as subversive and terrorist and those who support it must then be treated as such. "

Günther Anders, "The Obsolescence of Man", 1956

France's National Assembly votes against Vaccine Passports with a small margin, but it's only the first reading in #France.

The deputies rejected article 1 by 108 votes against 103.

They're going to push for a *second reading* at the Assembly.

Let's hope they maintain the slim margin, the digital brown envelopes will start circulating to reverse this, but if France votes against it's a serious setback for the EU's Green Certificate.
https://jbjvrxsnhcyjg2k47mmbnjzirq-ac5fdsxevxq4s5y-m-20minutes-fr.translate.goog/amp/a/3040059

Caught my daughter doing her assigned homework on the topic of "Greta Thunberg". Feel bad telling her the truth..will wait a bit longer..her brother who is two years older knows..
cory morningstar is not for small children in today's school curriculum?

Spain could waive Covid tests for Britons from May 20

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/international-travel-holidays-abroad-green-list-portugal-tests/

It looks like European disunity may not help a uniform application of the Green Certificate as different countries start competing for the tourism market. Spain one of the first to give a green light it seems. Pity about those mandatory masks.

When they show you graphs of Indian Covid19 cases and deaths, remember this:

September 2019 "Only 22% of the registered deaths in the country are medically certified, with the proportion dipping below 10% even in some states generally regarded as developed.
Among those medically certified, diseases of the circulatory system are not only the biggest killers but the fastest growing."

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/only-22-deaths-in-india-medically-certified-below-10-in-some-states/articleshow/70968981.cms

PANDA-The-Declaration-for-the-Protection-of-Children-and-Young-People.pdf

"“Experience has shown that communities faced
with epidemics or other adverse events respond
best and with the least anxiety when the normal
social functioning of the community is least
disrupted.” (Inglesby et al., 2006)