PRE-SYMPTOMATIC VIRAL LOAD PEAK: "Although modelling studies estimated potential viral load peak before symptom onset, we did not identify any study that confirms pre-symptomatic viral load peak"

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(20)30172-5/fulltext

VITAMIN D boosted T-CELLS, not 🚫🔒lockdowns, not 🚫👥social distancing, not 🚫😷face masks really are the superstars in fighting #COVID19

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563/rr-6

"Current UK guidelines recommend 400 IU of vitamin D per day whereas 6,000-10,000 IU per day is required to maintain blood levels of 40ng/ml, widely accepted as being the level required to support immunity, optimal health, reduction in all-cause mortality"
https://t.co/9QzyuuQmfT

"When a T cell is exposed to a foreign pathogen, it extends a signalling device or 'antenna' known as a vitamin D receptor, with which it searches for vitamin D,", and if there is an inadequate vitamin D level, "they won't even begin to mobilize." In other words, adequate vitamin D is critically important for the activation of T-cells from their inactive naïve state. The question of whether T-cells might also need a continuing supply of vitamin D to prevent the T-cell exhaustion and apoptosis observed in some serious COVID-19 cases [9] deserves further research.
High levels of vitamin D are also critical for first line immune defences including physical mucosal defences, human antiviral production, modulating cytokines, reducing blood clotting and a whole host of other important immune system functions [10]. The obese, diabetics and people of BAME origin are far more deficient in vitamin D and men have lower levels than women [10].
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563/rr-6

"Our pilot study demonstrated that administration of a high dose of Calcifediol or 25-hydroxyvitamin D, a main metabolite of vitamin D endocrine system, significantly reduced ICU treatment of patients requiring hospitalization due to proven COVID-19"
https://t.co/r3ooJL99On

CALL FOR EVIDENCE:"The Joint Committee on Human Rights is examining the impact of lockdown restrictions on human rights"
https://committees.parliament.uk/call-for-evidence/326/the-governments-response-to-covid19-human-rights-implications-of-long-lockdown/

Swedish study by KI researcher @ludvigsson shows severe #COVID19 in #children is rare - even with open schools. The findings also show no increased risk of severe COVID-19 in teachers. Published as a letter to the editor in @NEJM. https://t.co/yTtRLsVuYI https://t.co/Y3eldii53X

Evidence based scientific research: "Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including LOCKDOWN, DID NOT APPEAR TO BE LINKED WITH DEATH RATE."
https://t.co/5N06jgA0Bg

Correlations have been shown between the historic prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 mortality per million by country. This has been shown for European countries
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201912#RSOS201912F7

How much Vitamin D should you be taking in Covid season?

When they moved the goalposts from mortality numbers to case numbers it was evident there was a coordinated manipulation of the masses. Case numbers are a meaningless statistic. We don't care how many people test positive to a fraudulent protocol, if they all gain immunity & live.

Update to what is happening on twitter: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1347818247152873472.html

As well as vitamin D & zinc, zinc ionophores are essential to bring zinc to your cells where zinc stops viral replication. Quercetin& Epigallocatechin are zinc ionophores. Here is a list of quercetin and epigallocatechin rich foods:

The #MonottiProtocol is not epidemiology, it's philosophy of medicine. The principle of the #MonottiProtocol is to place the onus back on personal responsibility for personal immunity. I do not offer medical prescriptions but an invitation to look back at one's own body and what we can all do to boost our own immunity, & leave others alone.
THE #MONOTTIPROTOCOL
HOW TO END THE PANDEMIC
1 Stop testing asymptomatics, PCR & lateral flow protocols confirmed by international scientists without conflicts of interest, not WHO or SAGE
2 Take vitamin D in winter minimum 2,000 IUs
3 Early treatment kits in pharmacies

ITALY: LUCCA: Civil disobedience to lockdown curfews, mandatory social distancing & mask wearing.

The lockdown explained: It's simple and old fashioned straight-forward class war: tech-pharma-banking oligarchy against the middle classes, which they fear as they can still finance an anti-oligarchy movement. Therefore the middle classes need to be either bankrupted via lockdowns or financially controlled via digital government currency: cash killed. Vaccine passports will be used as further control tools, namely integrated with government digital currency wallets. To achieve this, the oligarchy pretends to be suddenly interested in "saving lives". Farcical to believe any of it.

The 3 vitamin D related tests:
-Vitamin D (minimum 40ng/ml)
-PTH- parathyroid hormone
-1, 25 hydroxy vitamin D
The third one would take a bit longer to come back but the first two quite quick.

More data from Pfizer’s and Moderna’s covid-19 vaccine trials are now available, but Peter Doshi still has concerns about the meaningfulness of the reported efficacy results. He shares them in #BMJOpinion
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data/

THE #MONOTTIPROTOCOL
HOW TO END THE PANDEMIC
1 Stop testing asymptomatics, PCR & lateral flow protocols confirmed by international scientists without conflicts of interest, not WHO or SAGE
2 Take vitamin D in winter minimum 2,000 IUs (see letter from scientists above, this is a minimum figure, for many it should be 4,000 IUs, for some even 6,000 IUs or more)
3 Early treatment kits in pharmacies

"“The chancellor sees the complete closing down of the account of an elected president as problematic,” Steffen Seibert, her chief spokesman, said at a regular news conference in Berlin. Rights like the freedom of speech “can be interfered with, but by law and within the framework defined by the legislature -- not according to a corporate decision.”
The German leader’s stance was echoed by French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire, who said that the state and not “the digital oligarchy” is responsible for regulations, calling big tech “one of the threats” to democracy.
Europe is increasingly pushing back against the growing influence of big technology companies. The European Union is currently in the process of setting up regulation that could give the bloc power to split up platforms if they don’t comply with rules."
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2021-01-11/merkel-sees-closing-trump-s-social-media-accounts-problematic

I am not sure the percentage of adverse events is precise but I agree that using the word "vaccine" for mRNA manipulation which is not designed to prevent either infection or transmission, but simply to reduce one of many symptoms, is not correct: "David Martin from January 5, 2021 Focus on Fauci event

" Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine."

"This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards.[1] And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission.

And that is not what this is. They (Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other treatments are there?”

The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site.

And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology - it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.

So, we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say, “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick.

80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.

When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check.