Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Pandemic Aftermath Week 29 Update
Cancers turned the seasonal corner early - back to 7-sigma excess.
If you were going to spin a fraudulent 'cancer has not increased' claim, then 12 weeks ago was the time to do it. Too late now.
MMWR and Wonder data agree at 4.2% excess.
@EthicalSkeptic
Cancers turned the seasonal corner early - back to 7-sigma excess.
If you were going to spin a fraudulent 'cancer has not increased' claim, then 12 weeks ago was the time to do it. Too late now.
MMWR and Wonder data agree at 4.2% excess.
@EthicalSkeptic
๐ฅ49๐15โค3
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Cancer has established a novel growth rate (.60%), post vaccine inflection, triple the old one.
This is DESPITE a heavy depletion in the candidate pool for these deaths AND curation of cancer UCoD deaths by the CDC.
Cancer is a hard ship to turn. But once turned...
@EthicalSkeptic
This is DESPITE a heavy depletion in the candidate pool for these deaths AND curation of cancer UCoD deaths by the CDC.
Cancer is a hard ship to turn. But once turned...
@EthicalSkeptic
๐คฏ42๐13โค6๐ฅ3๐3
Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection | Zenodo
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genome evolution as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homologous recombinations. Furthermore, the study of 35 recombinant isolates of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2, confirmed that Omicron variants were already present in 2020. The analysis we have shown here is that the Omicron variants are formed by an entirely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology, and knowing the way how the SARS-CoV-2 variants were formed prompts a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic."
https://zenodo.org/record/8216373
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genome evolution as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homologous recombinations. Furthermore, the study of 35 recombinant isolates of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2, confirmed that Omicron variants were already present in 2020. The analysis we have shown here is that the Omicron variants are formed by an entirely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology, and knowing the way how the SARS-CoV-2 variants were formed prompts a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic."
https://zenodo.org/record/8216373
Zenodo
Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection
Over the past three years, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has repeatedly experienced pandemics, generating various mutated variants ranging from Alpha to Omicron. In this study, we aimed to clarify the evolutionary processesโฆ
๐43๐ฅ15โค4๐1๐คฏ1
I Am A Bat Virus Maximalist
I believe there was not one but many different viruses that were all called SARSCoV2 variants.
They were all modified under Gain of Function experiments paid by you know who.
They are comparable to flu and have little incidence on excess mortality statistics. Although some of these early viruses in 2020 were more capable of leading severe symbiotic viral-bacterial infection than others, and presumably different ones were meant for different geographic locations, at least initially.
Viruses & bacteria are symbiotic, one exploits the other. Severe infections are almost always bacterial, that's why bacteriostatics, antibiotics, and also prebiotics & probiotics work to reduce them.
The word pandemic was hi-jacked, if this was a pandemic then we have been in a pandemic since the emergence of homo sapiens.
Otherwise, this was not a pandemic as excess mortality can be attributed to medical malpractice instead: unnecessary intubations, withdrawal of food, hydration, and treatment, lack of contact with family members, and overdoses of palliative drugs such as midazolam, morphine and others such as remdesivir, and now excess mortality can be attributed to vaccines.
@RobinMG
References:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/12/22/why-this-new-virus-testing-makes-no-sense/
I believe there was not one but many different viruses that were all called SARSCoV2 variants.
They were all modified under Gain of Function experiments paid by you know who.
They are comparable to flu and have little incidence on excess mortality statistics. Although some of these early viruses in 2020 were more capable of leading severe symbiotic viral-bacterial infection than others, and presumably different ones were meant for different geographic locations, at least initially.
Viruses & bacteria are symbiotic, one exploits the other. Severe infections are almost always bacterial, that's why bacteriostatics, antibiotics, and also prebiotics & probiotics work to reduce them.
The word pandemic was hi-jacked, if this was a pandemic then we have been in a pandemic since the emergence of homo sapiens.
Otherwise, this was not a pandemic as excess mortality can be attributed to medical malpractice instead: unnecessary intubations, withdrawal of food, hydration, and treatment, lack of contact with family members, and overdoses of palliative drugs such as midazolam, morphine and others such as remdesivir, and now excess mortality can be attributed to vaccines.
@RobinMG
References:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/12/22/why-this-new-virus-testing-makes-no-sense/
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection | Zenodo
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genomeโฆ
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genomeโฆ
๐55โค16๐ค9๐ฏ9๐ฅ7
BAT VIRUS GOF MAXIMALISM
Horseshoe bat with Shi Zhengli and Wuhan colleague. Gain of function experiments in Wuhan have been going on for YEARS, labs inaugurated in 2015 then new Wuhan lab inaugurated by French politicians in 2017. It's just that 2020 was an election year so they called it/released a few more then.
They simply called different viruses "variants".
The "variants" were real viruses, yet they were not the products of natural selection, but gain of function experiments, therefore they could lead to new infections.
Covid was the name attributed to any coronavirus infection, some of which attributable to gain of function viruses, others not. In some cases, especially statistical, it was also influenza, but it was not only illness from influenza infection.
In fact, what we called influenza before 2020 was also coronavirus infections, GOF too, so it's the other way round too.
@RobinMG
NEW STUDY CONFIRMING PRE-EXISTENCE OF "VARIANTS":
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29495
Horseshoe bat with Shi Zhengli and Wuhan colleague. Gain of function experiments in Wuhan have been going on for YEARS, labs inaugurated in 2015 then new Wuhan lab inaugurated by French politicians in 2017. It's just that 2020 was an election year so they called it/released a few more then.
They simply called different viruses "variants".
The "variants" were real viruses, yet they were not the products of natural selection, but gain of function experiments, therefore they could lead to new infections.
Covid was the name attributed to any coronavirus infection, some of which attributable to gain of function viruses, others not. In some cases, especially statistical, it was also influenza, but it was not only illness from influenza infection.
In fact, what we called influenza before 2020 was also coronavirus infections, GOF too, so it's the other way round too.
@RobinMG
NEW STUDY CONFIRMING PRE-EXISTENCE OF "VARIANTS":
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29495
๐49โค10๐7๐คฌ4๐คฏ3
Scientist admits the 'overwhelming consensus' on the climate change crisis is 'manufactured'
โI was adopted by the environmental advocacy groups and the alarmists and I was treated like a rock star,โ Curry recounts.
โFlown all over the place to meet with politicians.โ
But then some researchers pointed out gaps in her research โ years with low levels of hurricanes.
โLike a good scientist, I investigated,โ says Curry..
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
โI was adopted by the environmental advocacy groups and the alarmists and I was treated like a rock star,โ Curry recounts.
โFlown all over the place to meet with politicians.โ
But then some researchers pointed out gaps in her research โ years with low levels of hurricanes.
โLike a good scientist, I investigated,โ says Curry..
https://nypost.com/2023/08/09/climate-scientist-admits-the-overwhelming-consensus-is-manufactured/
New York Post
Scientist admits the 'overwhelming consensus' on the climate change...
Climate scientist Judith Curry says climate change is a "manufactured consensus."
๐107๐ฏ60โค23๐3
https://youtu.be/PMN00XcjYrU
People often ask who are the perpetrators. I donโt know. Theyโll be the wealthiest people across the world.
Some of the actors in preparation of a depopulation plan are clear to see and Henry Kissinger is one of them.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: if youโve not read his report to the President in around 1974, declassified in the 1980s, you can read his Malthusian arguments. Theyโre not convincing unless your objective is to remain effectively in charge of what happens in the world, in which case it becomes easy to be persuaded.
People often ask who are the perpetrators. I donโt know. Theyโll be the wealthiest people across the world.
Some of the actors in preparation of a depopulation plan are clear to see and Henry Kissinger is one of them.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: if youโve not read his report to the President in around 1974, declassified in the 1980s, you can read his Malthusian arguments. Theyโre not convincing unless your objective is to remain effectively in charge of what happens in the world, in which case it becomes easy to be persuaded.
๐114โค10๐ฅ3๐ญ2๐คฃ1
Karen Kingston poisoned?
https://rumble.com/v35xb3i-karen-kingston-has-been-poisoned-and-calls-out-robert-malone-and-others..html
https://rumble.com/v35xb3i-karen-kingston-has-been-poisoned-and-calls-out-robert-malone-and-others..html
๐ฑ89๐ค19๐ฏ16โค12๐6๐คฏ3๐2๐ฅ1
Forwarded from River of Freedom film
๐ฅ AUCKLAND PREMIERE TICKETS ON SALE NOW 9am ๐ฅ
Donโt hesitate to grab yours now, because the interest in this event is HUGE... Grab your $20 ticket today! Buy one for a friend!!
(Ticket cost is $20+booking fee)
https://www.ticketmaster.co.nz/event/24005F0777950A1A
Donโt hesitate to grab yours now, because the interest in this event is HUGE... Grab your $20 ticket today! Buy one for a friend!!
(Ticket cost is $20+booking fee)
https://www.ticketmaster.co.nz/event/24005F0777950A1A
๐36โค5
THE THREE RULES OF GROUPTHINK
1. ILLUSION
A group of people come to share a belief that is not based in reality: an illusion.
2. CONSENSUS
As the belief does not match external reality, the group of people resort to hanging onto the only thing they have, a consensus between them that the illusion is reality. From this point, the illusion's main justification becomes this "consensus".
3. INTOLERANCE
Any external person to the groupthink with a different view needs to be silenced because the "consensus" becomes the only defence of the illusion. Therefore the groupthink group resorts to censorship, intimidation, and "cancelling" all critical opinions.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689875616156270592
1. ILLUSION
A group of people come to share a belief that is not based in reality: an illusion.
2. CONSENSUS
As the belief does not match external reality, the group of people resort to hanging onto the only thing they have, a consensus between them that the illusion is reality. From this point, the illusion's main justification becomes this "consensus".
3. INTOLERANCE
Any external person to the groupthink with a different view needs to be silenced because the "consensus" becomes the only defence of the illusion. Therefore the groupthink group resorts to censorship, intimidation, and "cancelling" all critical opinions.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689875616156270592
๐139๐ฏ72โค24๐ฅ7๐6
Big Pharma Harms Patients for Profit but Doctors Must Also Share the Blame
"Only 11% of 3,000 health interventions have good evidence to support them, with 80% of new drugs copies of old ones and 153 million euros a day being lost through corruption in health systems.
In his book Bad Pharma, Ben Goldacre has eloquently drawn attention to how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients, and is rightly calling for the industry to publish all their trial data. But many of the corporate crimes committed by the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't happen if an influential minority of doctors weren't complicit or wilfully blind to these misdemeanours. Leading clinicians often compromise medical ethics and integrity by lending their name to ghost written articles published in academic journals that may support the approved use of a drug for unlicensed conditions, either for financial gain or greater kudos amongst peers.
Peter Gotzsche, director of the Nordic Cochrane centre says " the consequences of these crimes are huge, including the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people and many billions in losses for our national economies every year."
Dr Aseem Malhotra (2013)
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-aseem-malhotra/big-pharma-harms-patients_b_2871035.html
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689888573439307776
"Only 11% of 3,000 health interventions have good evidence to support them, with 80% of new drugs copies of old ones and 153 million euros a day being lost through corruption in health systems.
In his book Bad Pharma, Ben Goldacre has eloquently drawn attention to how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients, and is rightly calling for the industry to publish all their trial data. But many of the corporate crimes committed by the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't happen if an influential minority of doctors weren't complicit or wilfully blind to these misdemeanours. Leading clinicians often compromise medical ethics and integrity by lending their name to ghost written articles published in academic journals that may support the approved use of a drug for unlicensed conditions, either for financial gain or greater kudos amongst peers.
Peter Gotzsche, director of the Nordic Cochrane centre says " the consequences of these crimes are huge, including the unnecessary deaths of thousands of people and many billions in losses for our national economies every year."
Dr Aseem Malhotra (2013)
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-aseem-malhotra/big-pharma-harms-patients_b_2871035.html
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689888573439307776
HuffPost UK
Big Pharma Harms Patients for Profit but Doctors Must Also Share the Blame
I believe I speak for the overwhelming majority of doctors in the NHS when I say I went into medicine to practice evidence based, not corporate-influenced medicine.
๐คฌ80๐42๐ฅ13โค11๐ฏ6๐2๐1
The Climate Crisis Frenzy Is a Mass Hysteria Movement
"Once an infected group is in a state of mass hysteria, the government can โimpose measures on the rest of the population, inflicting almost unrestricted harm,โ including abrogating and trampling on civil liberties, all of it justified by assertions that itโs necessary to prevent a catastrophe.
The authors describe how the federal government used lockdowns and social distancing to create greater Covid hysteria, decrease psychological resistance and impose penalties for non-compliance. The governmentโs actions, combined with news agencies and social media, promoted massive negative news campaigns that further deteriorated psychic health by intentionally scaring already anxious populations.
The authors conclude that government elimination of information that questions, challenges or competes with its preferred narrative โ combined with false or negative information spread by news and social media โ makes society more prone to developing mass hysteria."
wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08/10/theโฆ
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689894419321819136
"Once an infected group is in a state of mass hysteria, the government can โimpose measures on the rest of the population, inflicting almost unrestricted harm,โ including abrogating and trampling on civil liberties, all of it justified by assertions that itโs necessary to prevent a catastrophe.
The authors describe how the federal government used lockdowns and social distancing to create greater Covid hysteria, decrease psychological resistance and impose penalties for non-compliance. The governmentโs actions, combined with news agencies and social media, promoted massive negative news campaigns that further deteriorated psychic health by intentionally scaring already anxious populations.
The authors conclude that government elimination of information that questions, challenges or competes with its preferred narrative โ combined with false or negative information spread by news and social media โ makes society more prone to developing mass hysteria."
wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08/10/theโฆ
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689894419321819136
Watts Up With That?
The Climate Crisis Frenzy Is a Mass Hysteria Movement
Climate fear-mongering, eco-anxiety counseling and a rocky road to Third World status
๐82๐ฏ32โค9๐1
HOW TO DISTINGUISH A CORONAVIRUS FROM A VESCICLE.
In electron microscopy, coronaviruses are often confused with clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs), normal subcellular organelles involved in intracellular transport, and present in uninfected patients.
This is how to tell the difference:
"Coronaviruses have been carefully described in electron microscopic images of thin sections. In these images of thin sections, coronaviruses appear as spherical structures containing black dots on the inside, which are cross-sections through the helical viral nucleocapsid (Figure 1).
Coronaviruses receive their outer covering by budding into cellular membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex forming a vacuole and are found in the intracisternal space.
The spikes are seen with difficulty in thin sections of infected cells, but a โfuzzโ is sometimes visible.
However, note that these spikes face the inside of the vacuole and do not touch the cytoplasm of the cell.
Complete virus particles can also be found at the cell surface, having been extruded when the vacuolar membrane fuses with the plasma membrane and exocytoses them; in this case, the spikes on the virions face the extracellular space, again, not the cytoplasm."
"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate grown in cell culture showing numerous spherical viral particles (arrows) that are in the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi complex area of the cell. Note the black dots on the interior of the particles, which are cross-sections through the viral nucleocapsid. Scale bar: 400 nm."
https://journals.lww.com/jasn/fulltext/2020/09000/caution_in_identifying_coronaviruses_by_electron.30.aspx
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689903508076556288
In electron microscopy, coronaviruses are often confused with clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs), normal subcellular organelles involved in intracellular transport, and present in uninfected patients.
This is how to tell the difference:
"Coronaviruses have been carefully described in electron microscopic images of thin sections. In these images of thin sections, coronaviruses appear as spherical structures containing black dots on the inside, which are cross-sections through the helical viral nucleocapsid (Figure 1).
Coronaviruses receive their outer covering by budding into cellular membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex forming a vacuole and are found in the intracisternal space.
The spikes are seen with difficulty in thin sections of infected cells, but a โfuzzโ is sometimes visible.
However, note that these spikes face the inside of the vacuole and do not touch the cytoplasm of the cell.
Complete virus particles can also be found at the cell surface, having been extruded when the vacuolar membrane fuses with the plasma membrane and exocytoses them; in this case, the spikes on the virions face the extracellular space, again, not the cytoplasm."
"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate grown in cell culture showing numerous spherical viral particles (arrows) that are in the cisternae of the rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi complex area of the cell. Note the black dots on the interior of the particles, which are cross-sections through the viral nucleocapsid. Scale bar: 400 nm."
https://journals.lww.com/jasn/fulltext/2020/09000/caution_in_identifying_coronaviruses_by_electron.30.aspx
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689903508076556288
Lippincottยฎ
Caution in Identifying Coronaviruses by Electron Microscopy
We are concerned about the erroneous identification of coronavirus directly in tissues by authors using electron microscopy. Several recent articles have been published that purport to have identified severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSโฆ
๐47โค16๐6๐ค6
What is the CIA psyop technique of controlling both the main narrative and the oppositional narrative while pushing the oppositional narrative to extremes to sound ridiculous and alienate the masses called?
Was it oppositional dialectic?
For example:
Official narrative:
"Viruses will kill everyone as there is no natural immunity"
Oppositional narrative:
"Viruses don't exist and never have."
Official narrative:
"Refugees deserve respect and support. All are welcome."
Oppositional narrative:
"We are being invaded by sub-human rapist hordes."
Both are clearly part of the same psyop, and both are controlled narrratives to polarize, whether people realise it or not: divide et impera.
Was it oppositional dialectic?
For example:
Official narrative:
"Viruses will kill everyone as there is no natural immunity"
Oppositional narrative:
"Viruses don't exist and never have."
Official narrative:
"Refugees deserve respect and support. All are welcome."
Oppositional narrative:
"We are being invaded by sub-human rapist hordes."
Both are clearly part of the same psyop, and both are controlled narrratives to polarize, whether people realise it or not: divide et impera.
๐119๐ฏ74๐คฃ6โค5๐ค5๐4๐4๐คฏ1๐คฉ1
They're going to come for us again, probably as early as December. If the best we've got is: "viruses don't exist", then we maybe deserve the Great Reset & CBDCs..
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689962342006579200
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1689962342006579200
Twitter
They're going to come for us again, probably as early as December. If the best we've got is: "viruses don't exist", then we maybe deserve the Great Reset & CBDCs..
๐131๐ค28๐ฑ13๐11๐คฃ9๐คจ6๐ฅ5โค4๐ข3๐ซก1