https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2021/10/30/the-club-of-rome-the-cia-depopulation-program-at-faucis-fort-detrick/
If people have discretionary energy and time, there’s plenty of meat on these bones, even if not every paragraph comes with “receipts” that you can check. Enough of them do connect to events and people that do tie back to real events to make the overall thrust difficult to refute.
That thrust being that for many decades before 2020, there was an intention to create circumstances where an public health emergency condition would come about & the authorities would respond with “vaccines”.
The persistent problem in the background is clear. It’s merely an assertion & no evidence is ever offered to prove it. That problem is that planet Earth is overloaded with people and civilisation would collapse early in the 21st century, unless the population was substantially curtailed.
I can’t help but review all these remarks and activities as other than starting from the unsupported conclusion and working backwards towards setting up a depopulation plan.
The article begins with a now elderly Club of Rome disciple trying to explain that the depopulation plan was necessary but that he hoped it would be “civilised and equitable”.
Towards the end, we see the second President Bush signing off on legislation in the Rose Garden that would morph into “medical countermeasures to protect America”.
With the benefit of hindsight, see if you agree or not with my take on this, a surely incredibly sombre objective: the players look like they’re enjoying themselves hugely. There is something approaching glee on the face of Fauci, Bright and others, in the setting up of conditions where very large numbers of innocent people can be killed.
I’m left, as always, with a clear impression of very long term planning for a depopulation plan, but with no real reason to do it. Many people say that, reluctantly, they just about understand the rationale. They “know” deep inside themselves that there are too many of us & that our activities are destroying the planet. If either of these two things were true, we would indeed have been facing a major problem. But the reason many people assert that they “know” we’re beyond the carrying capacity of Earth & that we’re destroying the environment is because these people have told us so. That it. There’s otherwise no evidence for either assertion.
The started with the concluding intention & set about creating the PR to justify it, while in parallel bringing into being the means.
Best wishes
Mike
If people have discretionary energy and time, there’s plenty of meat on these bones, even if not every paragraph comes with “receipts” that you can check. Enough of them do connect to events and people that do tie back to real events to make the overall thrust difficult to refute.
That thrust being that for many decades before 2020, there was an intention to create circumstances where an public health emergency condition would come about & the authorities would respond with “vaccines”.
The persistent problem in the background is clear. It’s merely an assertion & no evidence is ever offered to prove it. That problem is that planet Earth is overloaded with people and civilisation would collapse early in the 21st century, unless the population was substantially curtailed.
I can’t help but review all these remarks and activities as other than starting from the unsupported conclusion and working backwards towards setting up a depopulation plan.
The article begins with a now elderly Club of Rome disciple trying to explain that the depopulation plan was necessary but that he hoped it would be “civilised and equitable”.
Towards the end, we see the second President Bush signing off on legislation in the Rose Garden that would morph into “medical countermeasures to protect America”.
With the benefit of hindsight, see if you agree or not with my take on this, a surely incredibly sombre objective: the players look like they’re enjoying themselves hugely. There is something approaching glee on the face of Fauci, Bright and others, in the setting up of conditions where very large numbers of innocent people can be killed.
I’m left, as always, with a clear impression of very long term planning for a depopulation plan, but with no real reason to do it. Many people say that, reluctantly, they just about understand the rationale. They “know” deep inside themselves that there are too many of us & that our activities are destroying the planet. If either of these two things were true, we would indeed have been facing a major problem. But the reason many people assert that they “know” we’re beyond the carrying capacity of Earth & that we’re destroying the environment is because these people have told us so. That it. There’s otherwise no evidence for either assertion.
The started with the concluding intention & set about creating the PR to justify it, while in parallel bringing into being the means.
Best wishes
Mike
www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca
The Kissinger, Club of Rome & The CIA Population Control Program at Fauci’s Fort Detrick
This segment is part of the larger story about how Transhumanists are bringing about their Singularity utilizing 5G, Graphene Oxide, mRNA technology.. and your FEAR. I encourage you to take “GQD Pa
👍80❤24👏11🤣1
The Global 2000 Report to the President (1).pdf
727.4 KB
The Global 2000 Report to the President (1).pdf
👍11❤1
"BOLD & IMAGINATIVE STEPS TOWARDS REDUCED FERTILITY"
The Global 2000 Report to the President was a 1980 report commissioned by President Jimmy Carter. It claimed with no evidence that world population growth would have dramatic consequences by the year 2000 if no changes in public policy were made. Physicist Gerald O. Barney was the study director.
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29478
The Global 2000 Report to the President was a 1980 report commissioned by President Jimmy Carter. It claimed with no evidence that world population growth would have dramatic consequences by the year 2000 if no changes in public policy were made. Physicist Gerald O. Barney was the study director.
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29478
👍39🤡29🤬17❤6🤨6
https://genius.com/Tears-for-fears-everybody-wants-to-rule-the-world-lyrics
Song of my youthful era.
In innocence, I hummed along with it a hundred times.
A tip to look at the lyrics, from an acquaintance who told me “They knew”. I’ve no idea if they did.
But the lyrics made me go “hmmm”.
Best wishes
Mike
Song of my youthful era.
In innocence, I hummed along with it a hundred times.
A tip to look at the lyrics, from an acquaintance who told me “They knew”. I’ve no idea if they did.
But the lyrics made me go “hmmm”.
Best wishes
Mike
Genius
Tears for Fears – Everybody Wants to Rule the World
Tears For Fears' biggest chart hit, peaking at #2 in their home country of Britain and topping the charts in the US, Canada and New Zealand. Although a massive hit, “Everybody
❤124👍48🤔8🔥1👌1
Robbie Robertson and Sixto Rodriguez both die as this happens..
@RobinMG
Powerful sun storm knocks out radio transmissions across North America | Space
https://www.space.com/x-class-solar-flare-radio-blackout-august-2023
@RobinMG
Powerful sun storm knocks out radio transmissions across North America | Space
https://www.space.com/x-class-solar-flare-radio-blackout-august-2023
Space.com
Powerful sun storm knocks out radio transmissions across North America
The sun unleashed its second X-flare in less than three days — and we should brace for more such activity.
🤔47👍17❤13😢3
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
American Cancer Society Annual Report on Cancer is out.
11.5% Excess
Matches the BLS PPI Chart on Cancer Treatment Expenditures
11.3% Excess
How many of these consilient charts do I have to develop?
@EthicalSkeptic
11.5% Excess
Matches the BLS PPI Chart on Cancer Treatment Expenditures
11.3% Excess
How many of these consilient charts do I have to develop?
@EthicalSkeptic
🔥66👍24🤔7❤6😢6⚡5🙏3
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Pandemic Aftermath Week 29 Update
Cancers turned the seasonal corner early - back to 7-sigma excess.
If you were going to spin a fraudulent 'cancer has not increased' claim, then 12 weeks ago was the time to do it. Too late now.
MMWR and Wonder data agree at 4.2% excess.
@EthicalSkeptic
Cancers turned the seasonal corner early - back to 7-sigma excess.
If you were going to spin a fraudulent 'cancer has not increased' claim, then 12 weeks ago was the time to do it. Too late now.
MMWR and Wonder data agree at 4.2% excess.
@EthicalSkeptic
🔥49👍15❤3
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Cancer has established a novel growth rate (.60%), post vaccine inflection, triple the old one.
This is DESPITE a heavy depletion in the candidate pool for these deaths AND curation of cancer UCoD deaths by the CDC.
Cancer is a hard ship to turn. But once turned...
@EthicalSkeptic
This is DESPITE a heavy depletion in the candidate pool for these deaths AND curation of cancer UCoD deaths by the CDC.
Cancer is a hard ship to turn. But once turned...
@EthicalSkeptic
🤯42👍13❤6🔥3🙏3
Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection | Zenodo
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genome evolution as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homologous recombinations. Furthermore, the study of 35 recombinant isolates of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2, confirmed that Omicron variants were already present in 2020. The analysis we have shown here is that the Omicron variants are formed by an entirely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology, and knowing the way how the SARS-CoV-2 variants were formed prompts a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic."
https://zenodo.org/record/8216373
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genome evolution as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homologous recombinations. Furthermore, the study of 35 recombinant isolates of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2, confirmed that Omicron variants were already present in 2020. The analysis we have shown here is that the Omicron variants are formed by an entirely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology, and knowing the way how the SARS-CoV-2 variants were formed prompts a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic."
https://zenodo.org/record/8216373
Zenodo
Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection
Over the past three years, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has repeatedly experienced pandemics, generating various mutated variants ranging from Alpha to Omicron. In this study, we aimed to clarify the evolutionary processes…
👍43🔥15❤4👏1🤯1
I Am A Bat Virus Maximalist
I believe there was not one but many different viruses that were all called SARSCoV2 variants.
They were all modified under Gain of Function experiments paid by you know who.
They are comparable to flu and have little incidence on excess mortality statistics. Although some of these early viruses in 2020 were more capable of leading severe symbiotic viral-bacterial infection than others, and presumably different ones were meant for different geographic locations, at least initially.
Viruses & bacteria are symbiotic, one exploits the other. Severe infections are almost always bacterial, that's why bacteriostatics, antibiotics, and also prebiotics & probiotics work to reduce them.
The word pandemic was hi-jacked, if this was a pandemic then we have been in a pandemic since the emergence of homo sapiens.
Otherwise, this was not a pandemic as excess mortality can be attributed to medical malpractice instead: unnecessary intubations, withdrawal of food, hydration, and treatment, lack of contact with family members, and overdoses of palliative drugs such as midazolam, morphine and others such as remdesivir, and now excess mortality can be attributed to vaccines.
@RobinMG
References:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/12/22/why-this-new-virus-testing-makes-no-sense/
I believe there was not one but many different viruses that were all called SARSCoV2 variants.
They were all modified under Gain of Function experiments paid by you know who.
They are comparable to flu and have little incidence on excess mortality statistics. Although some of these early viruses in 2020 were more capable of leading severe symbiotic viral-bacterial infection than others, and presumably different ones were meant for different geographic locations, at least initially.
Viruses & bacteria are symbiotic, one exploits the other. Severe infections are almost always bacterial, that's why bacteriostatics, antibiotics, and also prebiotics & probiotics work to reduce them.
The word pandemic was hi-jacked, if this was a pandemic then we have been in a pandemic since the emergence of homo sapiens.
Otherwise, this was not a pandemic as excess mortality can be attributed to medical malpractice instead: unnecessary intubations, withdrawal of food, hydration, and treatment, lack of contact with family members, and overdoses of palliative drugs such as midazolam, morphine and others such as remdesivir, and now excess mortality can be attributed to vaccines.
@RobinMG
References:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/12/22/why-this-new-virus-testing-makes-no-sense/
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection | Zenodo
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genome…
"As a result, we concluded that the formations of a part of Omicron isolates BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 were not the products of genome…
👍55❤16🤔9💯9🔥7
BAT VIRUS GOF MAXIMALISM
Horseshoe bat with Shi Zhengli and Wuhan colleague. Gain of function experiments in Wuhan have been going on for YEARS, labs inaugurated in 2015 then new Wuhan lab inaugurated by French politicians in 2017. It's just that 2020 was an election year so they called it/released a few more then.
They simply called different viruses "variants".
The "variants" were real viruses, yet they were not the products of natural selection, but gain of function experiments, therefore they could lead to new infections.
Covid was the name attributed to any coronavirus infection, some of which attributable to gain of function viruses, others not. In some cases, especially statistical, it was also influenza, but it was not only illness from influenza infection.
In fact, what we called influenza before 2020 was also coronavirus infections, GOF too, so it's the other way round too.
@RobinMG
NEW STUDY CONFIRMING PRE-EXISTENCE OF "VARIANTS":
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29495
Horseshoe bat with Shi Zhengli and Wuhan colleague. Gain of function experiments in Wuhan have been going on for YEARS, labs inaugurated in 2015 then new Wuhan lab inaugurated by French politicians in 2017. It's just that 2020 was an election year so they called it/released a few more then.
They simply called different viruses "variants".
The "variants" were real viruses, yet they were not the products of natural selection, but gain of function experiments, therefore they could lead to new infections.
Covid was the name attributed to any coronavirus infection, some of which attributable to gain of function viruses, others not. In some cases, especially statistical, it was also influenza, but it was not only illness from influenza infection.
In fact, what we called influenza before 2020 was also coronavirus infections, GOF too, so it's the other way round too.
@RobinMG
NEW STUDY CONFIRMING PRE-EXISTENCE OF "VARIANTS":
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29494
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29495
👍49❤10👀7🤬4🤯3