In case anybody is not clear about this.

"The Sun is far larger and more massive than anything we’ve experienced in our lives. If you were to take the entire planet Earth and line up a series of them across the Sun’s diameter, it would take 109 Earths to make it all the way across. If you were to take all the mass contained within planet Earth, you’d have to accumulate more than 300,000 of them to equal the mass of our Sun.

All told, there are some 10⁵⁷ particles making up the Sun, with right around 10% of those particles present in the fusion region that defines the Sun’s core. Inside the core, here’s what’s happening:

Individual protons reach tremendous speeds, up to ~500 km/s in the Sun’s central core, where temperatures reach up to 15 million K.

These fast-moving particles are so numerous that each proton experiences billions of collisions each second.

And only a tiny fraction of these collisions need to create deuterium — just 1 in 10²⁸ — in a fusion reaction to produce the needed energy."

When science was still scientific:

"The sun’s rays are the ultimate source of almost every motion which takes place on the surface of the earth. By its heat are produced all winds … By their vivifying action vegetables are elaborated from inorganic matter, and become, in their turn, the support of animals and of man, and the sources of those great deposits of dynamical efficiency which are laid up for human use in our coal strata."

John Herschel, A Treatise on Astronomy, 1833

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1688766556983926785

ITALY: ABBRUZZO:

50% decrease in births compared to pre-2021. Committee for the defence of minors.

In Abruzzo region since 2021 there is also an increase in #myocarditis and deaths in the 0-14 age group

The Ombudsman for childhood and adolescence blames alcohol, drugs, smoking.

The Minors Defense Committee: this is alarming data, investigate. It is unacceptable that the death of children from heart attacks is blamed on natural causes!

@MPastorelli

https://t.iss.one/mpastorelli/1919

"THE SCIENCE"?

There is no such thing as "science", there are only experiments.

A scientist is simply someone who conducts experiments.

Upon analysis of the experiment, you and I have as much right as the scientist to draw conclusions on the experiment.

A scientist does not have any monopoly on truth, nor on the conclusions drawn from the experiment.

In reality, in the contemporary published journals conclusions are there to please funding bodies and more often than not contradict the experiment.

Therefore a "layman" with no funding is more likely to reach a more scientific conclusion than a funded scientist.

@RobinMG

"The Science"

THOSE EVIL FOSSIL FUEL GIANTS ARE PAYING YOU TO SAY CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL! OH WAIT!

'Green Economy Overtaking Fossil Fuel Industry - FTSE Russel Report' (2018)

"Presently, the "green economy" is worth as much as the fossil fuel sector with 6% of the global stock market, roughly $4 trillion USD, coming from the clean energy, energy efficiency, water, waste and pollution services.

If the "sustainable economy" maintains its current course, it could represent as much as 10% of the global market value by 2030, assuming around $90 USD trillion in green investment have been made by then."

https://unfccc.int/news/green-economy-overtaking-fossil-fuel-industry-ftse-russel-report

They called it "mild" myocarditis..

Heart Scarring Observed in Children Months After COVID-19 Vaccination: Study

"Some children who experienced heart inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination had scarring on their hearts months later, a new long-term study found.

Researchers followed a group of 40 patients aged 12 to 18 for up to one year after the children were diagnosed with myocarditis, or heart inflammation, following vaccination with one of the messenger RNA vaccines from Pfizer or Moderna. They performed a series of tests, including echocardiograms.
Cardiac MRIs were performed on 39 of the 40 patients. Abnormal results came in for 26 of those who were imaged, including 19 who had late gadolinium enhancement, or signs of scarring.

The patients with abnormal results returned for follow-up cardiac MRIs at least five months after the initial tests and 15, or 58 percent, had residual late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The one patient without an initial scan also had mild late gadolinium enhancement when scanned during a follow-up visit."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/some-vaccinated-children-have-heart-scars-after-myocarditis-long-term-study-5446348

THE SUN'S POLES ARE ABOUT TO FLIP: THIS MEANS WE ARE REACHING A MAXIMUM IN SOLAR ACTIVITY:

"An active Sun was expected and these events are indications that the current Solar Cycle 25 is reaching its peak in activity, known as Solar Maximum. The Sun typically follows 11-year cycles bookended by periods of Maximum (high activity) and Minimum (low activity). When this cycle reaches Maximum, the Sun will begin to “quiet down” and decrease in activity as it transitions to Solar Minimum over the next decade"

https://nso.edu/blog/polar-magnetic-field-reversal/

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1688835210639446016

https://winteroakextra.files.wordpress.com/2023/07/shining-light-2.m4a

A very enlightening lecture (30 min) on the many, deep linkages between the modern green movement, LGBTQ+ movement and raw capitalism.

“Don’t believe the hype” is often the best advice, including here.

Turn off your television sets.

Best wishes
Mike

UK MP Andrew Bridgen: 1 in 35 chance of heart damage following 3 shots of the Moderna vaccine - Swiss Study.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ejhf.2978?download=true

“CARDIAC INVOLVEMENT FOLLOWING MRNA ‘VACCINATION’ IS APPROXIMATELY 3% ACCORDING TO A RECENT SWISS STUDY (NOT 0.001% AS CLAIMED BY THE CDC)."

This is very different from myocarditis following viral infection.

"Although myocarditis can be caused by COVID-19, the myocarditis developed by a healthy young person post-infection is “extremely mild.”

According to Dr. Milhoan, myocarditis caused by the COVID-19 vaccine differs from viral myocarditis because an infection of the heart isn’t causing the damage. It’s being damaged by the “spike protein that’s cardiotoxic to the heart,” which causes inflammation in the three main vessels of the heart and has a different process.

“There’s a difference between the body encountering a virus naturally that causes myocarditis and actively giving the body something we know causes harm,” he said.

A 2023 study published in Circulation showed mRNA vaccine-induced immune responses did not differ between those who developed myocarditis and those who did not, but “free spike antigen was detected in the blood of adolescents and young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into its potential underlying cause.”

In other words, the study found that spike protein was detected in the blood of individuals with post-vaccine myocarditis but was not found in vaccinated control subjects with no myocarditis.

Dr. Askins said autopsies have shown spike protein from vaccination in the myocardium of patients who died following COVID-19 vaccination and should be required in all cases where the cause of death is “unknown,” in cases of “sudden adult death syndrome,” or where a sudden death leaves “doctors baffled.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/myocarditis-caused-by-covid-19-vaccine-spike-protein-is-not-detected-by-typical-cardiac-tests-5428438

Matt Hancock loses press complaint over being called ‘corrupt’ and ‘failed health secretary’

"Ex-Health Secretary loses bid to have paper apologise over article called him ‘corrupt’"

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/matt-hancock-ipso-sunday-mirror-covid-ppe-b1097425.html

“The publication had set out the basis for this description – that the complainant had contravened social distancing guidelines while a member of the government that had created them, and that he had failed to declare that a family firm in which he held shares won an NHS contract.”

It added: “The Committee also noted that the term “corrupt” had no set and specific meaning that relates to a precise behaviour.”

☣ ☣ UK MILITARY LAB GROWING NEW COVID VARIANTS:

UK, Porton Down: Ministry of Defence's Defence Science and Technology Laboratory:

"And they are still monitoring new Covid variants by growing them in the laboratory, exposing them to antibodies taken from blood samples and seeing if new variants are still able to infect."

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-66396585

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1688931647130161152

https://youtu.be/xNAjywkFRx8

This is just astonishing. The Privvy Counsel writes to the Canadian government telling them to deliberately skew reporting of c19 “vaccine” serious adverse events so as not to damage public confidence and to keep people showing up to get injected.
Also, it claimed that “censoring true information about risks” was necessary.
Conspiracy realism again. There was & is a conspiracy. Nothing theoretical about it.
Best wishes
Mike

This open letter to Denis Rancourt was copied to me. If it’s indeed to be considered open, I take the position that you should be able to read it.
It’s obvious to everyone who has looked closely at what’s gone on that we’re in the middle of a huge & carefully planned crime.
I’m not going to spin my wheels over this. There’s ample evidence of a crime, whether or not there’s been a respiratory pandemic. Burning up energy on this isn’t just exhausting, it’s highly diversionary.
I see this as a simultaneous equation which has several solutions. There are no prizes in freedom from hoovering up arguing further about this.
I only hope that we spend an appropriate amount of time persuading our networks that the injections were toxic by intent.
I’ve no doubt about that. It implies deliberate mass murder. No one had rebutted that assertion.
Best wishes
Mike

Prof. Rancourt et al.,
I have read your paper and watched interviews in which you summarise what have become known
as 'no virus' and 'no pandemic' theories. While I see the benefits of focusing on 'all cause mortality'
data approach and can agree on many points detailed such as medical mistreatment, lockdown
harms, data manipulation and so on, I believe your case would be stronger if you were to research
and acknowledge key areas of evidence that have so far not been factored in to your analysis and
consequently make it incomplete. For example, real-world evidence from the reports of numerous
medical professionals worldwide who have examined and treated Covid patients, including
autopsies, along with a vast amount of credible medical papers on the unique genetic sequences,
properties and pathologies of Sars-Cov-2. My point is this evidence cannot simply be excluded.
For it may be correct that the spread of Sars-Cov-2 did not match the pattern of a typical respiratory
virus on national and global scales, and did not infect populations to the levels reported, but that
does not equate to an over-simplified 'no virus' conclusion. Please also consider the possibility for
two things to happen at the same time whereby for example coordinated releases in 'hot spot'
regions are planned to coincide with global pandemic exercises and emergency health measures etc.
Maybe attenuated and controlled epidemics combined with fear generating media propaganda
would strategically be preferable to manage than a larger scale pandemic? Many unknowns and
questions remain, and I would argue it is more accurate to openly admit there are unknown factors
without relying on assumptions and forming definite conclusions.

It's evident Sars-Cov-2 is not of natural origin, but is an artificially engineered virus of some type,
later found to cause a complex range of vascular disease pathologies rather than be considered as a
typical respiratory disease. Unfortunately, there seems to have been a huge disconnect between the
MDs with real-life experience of treating Covid patients and various MDs, PhDs and commentators
who simply have not. So, I think you need to contact MDs with advanced knowledge and
experience of treating Covid such as Dr. Peter McCullough or Dr. Pierre Kory for example that have
also developed early treatment protocols, and ask them for their reports and data, and perhaps also
their views about the 'no virus' theories. And do not forget the patients and bereaved either. Again,
that's not so say your analysis is without merit or insights, but without including this primary
evidence, your case is not conclusive. Authoritative public health sources caught manipulating data
are of course unreliable, but independent 'real-world' sources cannot be discarded as 'junk data'.
Therefore, I urge you reconsider your certainties, review the criticisms and questions I've put
forward and take necessary action by gathering reports and data from MDs with Covid experience.
Will you contact them directly to conduct further research and revise your analysis, or will you
continue to overlook these essential sources?

Please be fully aware that by promoting over-simplified claims in the media such as 'no virus' etc.,
and by going further to make bolder claims that 'no viruses' exist, the unintended consequences
noticeable are even more confusion within the wider public, and division amongst groups in the
'Medical Freedom Movement', largely due to the often aggressive stance and polarising arguments
of the 'no virus' camps. To the extent that it does seem as if these affects are actually 'intended'
consequences as part of an operation to destabilise and discredit the movement, and the gains made

to overcome Covid tyranny, possibly in attempts to 'control the narrative' again. Just observing the
sheer amount of hostile trolls/bots etc. indicates how much this narrative is being pushed online.
So, there is a crucial need to be vigilant as to how this divisive 'no virus' narrative is being hijacked
and deployed against undermining progress and shaping future responses. For has it occurred to you
that the usual suspects responsible actually benefit from the public being uninformed and ignorant
about the realities of Covid? And this leads to them being more vulnerable and less able to respond
should there be another incident, increasing risks of serious illness, hospitalisations and deaths..

Jonathan Hall

Continues here:

https://t.iss.one/robinmg/29473