Why This New Virus Testing Makes No Sense

If we were to have routinely tested everyone for spike proteins or other coronavirus target genes before 2020, we would have found them in approximately one third of what we call winter colds or flus if not higher. This is likely to be what is happening now: tests include gene targets shared with other common coronaviruses, and may result in positives to other coronaviruses too in certain circumstances. Further to this, most often infection is caused by more viruses at the same time, meaning someone can test positive to SARSCoV2 yet be coinfected with and have symptoms of any influenza virus instead at the same exact time. 

For coronavirus infections, it was found that in approximately one case out of two there was a co-infection from at least another pathogen at the same time as the coronavirus infection. How can you determine whether the symptoms are due to the coronavirus or the other pathogen?

So testing for a single virus without testing for the hundreds of others someone could be co-infected with makes no sense.

Robin

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/12/22/why-this-new-virus-testing-makes-no-sense/

"That first SARS event gave rise to a ‘very problematic’ April 2003 patent filing by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It was for the entire SARS gene sequence, and for a series of derivative patents covering means of detection, including the PCR test [widely used today purportedly to diagnose cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection].

‘The reason why that is a problem is that if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100 per cent of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection. Meaning, you have the entire scientific and message control.’"

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/twenty-year-genetic-trail-behind-covids-creation-3/

S-protein shedding from jabbed individuals and testing positive. Please note that the:

Thermo Fisher TagPath COVID-19 Combo Kit

Uses the S-protein as a genet target: recently jabbed individuals are likely to test positive to the S gene, as are their close contacts.
https://blog.microbiologics.com/sars-c0v-2-tests-their-targets/

"The kit used by the Glasgow and Milton Keynes lighthouse laboratories is the

ThermoFisher TaqPath RT-PCR

which tests for the presence of three target genes from SARS-COV-2"

So what happens next? They reduce the target genes from 3 to 1!

BINGO!

THE JABBED AND THEIR CONTACTS SHOULD TEST POSITIVE TO 1/3 GENES!

"In correspondence with Mr Nicholas Lewis about single gene testing, in February 2021, the ONS confirmed that they do indeed call single gene targets as positives in their Covid-19 Infection Survey and also confirmed that the samples are processed by UK lighthouse laboratories"

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208/rr-3

Put to the test: use of rapid testing technologies for covid-19

"As early as April 2020, the UK lighthouse laboratories were testing for single genes and discounted the S gene as early as mid-May [10], months before the discovery of the new variant B1.1.7. Indeed, in Table 1 of [10] 18% of tests were positive on one gene only.

Furthermore, in a Public Health England report on variants [2] published 8 January 2021, it states the goal of using one gene was explicitly to approximate the growth of the new B1.1.7 variant:

“There has recently been an increase in the percentage of positive cases where only the ORF1ab- and N-genes were found and a decrease in the percentage of cases with all three genes. We can use this information to approximate the growth of the new variant.”

Section 10 of this ONS Covid-19 Infection Survey report [11] on 8 January 2021 confirms that one gene is sufficient for a positive result.

Obviously, there is a higher risk of encountering false positives when testing for single genes alone, because of the possibility of cross-reactivity with other human coronaviruses (HCOVs) as well as prevalent bacteria or reagent contamination. The potential for cross reactivity has already been confirmed by the German Instand laboratory report from April 2020 [12] (note that Prof. Drosten, co-author of Corman et al [2] is a cooperating partner listed in this report). The report describes the systematic blind testing of positive and negative samples anonymously sent to 463 laboratories from 36 countries and evaluated for the presence of a variety of genes associated with SARS-COV-2.

They reported significant cross reactivity and resultant false positives for OC43, and HCoV 229E (a common cold virus) as well as for SARS-COV-2 negative samples, not containing any competing pathogen.

Likewise, 70 Dutch laboratories were surveyed in November 2020, by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [13], with 76 diagnostic workflows reported as using only one target gene to diagnose the presence of SARS-COV-2 (46% of all workflows).

Without diagnostic validation it is not clear what can be concluded from a positive PCR test resulting from a single target gene call, especially if there was no confirmatory testing.

Many of the reported positive results may be inconclusive, negative or from people who suffered past infection for SARS-COV-2. Even with diagnostic validation of the single target gene call, the UK lighthouse laboratories appear not to be in strict conformance with the WHO emergency use assessment and the manufacturer instructions for use.

Given this it is clear the ONS and the UK lighthouse laboratories needs to publicly clarify their use of, and justify the reasons for, deviating from these standards."

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208/rr-3

Graph shows: Common (green tick), occasional (orange circle) and never (red cross) symptoms of the common cold, hay fever and Covid
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10969823/Are-sniffles-caused-hay-fever-cold-Covid.html

What do you think of this chart?

I am not sure about the accuracy, yet probably makes much more sense than the "Covid tests".. 🤡

And where has the flu gone!? 🤷‍♂️

Robin

"Modelers aren't scientists. Evidence-based conclusions cannot be drawn from made-up parameters that support one's own belief."

— Simon @Goddek

P.S.
Thanks, @abirballan1, for this wonderful illustration.

‼️WE ARE STAGING A PROTEST TO SAVE ERIC LEVY‼️

Eric is a Hero and Living Legend; at 94 years old he is a protester who is NOT TOO SICK TO SAVE (as so deemed by the NHS) and is receiving ‘end of life care’ (which means no care at all!) at UCL Hospital Euston Square.

Eric has spent all his life protesting for freedom for Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Iran and Julian Assange (to name a few!) and he is now fighting for his life.

Please come to support Eric and help fight for a man who has dedicated his life to fight for Freedom and Peace for all.

FRIDAY 1ST JULY FROM 12 NOON
Stay all day or come between 3pm & 5pm, and from 7pm so we can demand the NHS #LetEricLive

Bring a placard/sign with the following:

Free Eric Levy
No End Of Life For Eric
94yr old Protester Wants To Live
Let Eric Live
Eric Captive at UCL
Don’t Kill Eric Levy
We Love Eric
Palestine Loves Eric
Julian Assange Loves Eric

#LetEricLive

Why Are US Hospitals Sending Sensitive Data to Facebook?

"Data is the new oil. Every second, a person creates roughly 1.7 MB of data. Not surprisingly, there is a concerted effort from Big Tech companies to mine data flows and drain us dry

One such company is Meta, more commonly known as Facebook, a company known for violating users’ rights repeatedly, without remorse

According to a recent Markup report, a tracking tool installed on dozens of hospitals’ websites 'has been collecting patients’ sensitive health information—including details about their medical conditions, prescriptions, and doctor’s appointments. Rather alarmingly, this sensitive info has been sent to the data gurus in Silicon Valley

Last year, as you might recall, Facebook changed its name. Different name, same problems. The change was merely aesthetic—more marketing savvy than a change of actual substance. In reality, Meta appears to be no less trustworthy now than it was prior to the name change…"

👉 Read more: The Epoch Times / Archive

Drug Cartel: Biden Admin Agrees to Pay Pfizer 56% More for Their COVID Shots

The pharma giant is already shattering profit records, and is expected to generate well over $100 billion in 2022 revenue.

"Pfizer is already swimming in record profits, but that hasn’t stopped the drug company from gouging the American taxpayer for every last dollar.

On Wednesday, the Biden Administration signed off on a new vaccine supply deal with Pfizer for $3.2 billion for 105 million COVID injections, but that’s only for the first batch of mRNA shots. The contract will generate well over $9 billion for Pfizer, as this latest purchase agreement tops off at 300 million doses. Compared to previous settlements with Pfizer, this public-private no-bid arrangement will come at a much higher cost to the U.S. taxpayer.

The Biden Administration has justified the deal by claiming that it needs to restock supply to prepare for seasonal spikes. The data does not support such a claim…"

👉 Read more: The Dossier

Valerie Borek, Policy Analyst for Stand for Health Freedom did an incredible job at the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting on Tuesday expressing deep concern over the FDA's conflicts of interest and mishandling of the vaccine roll-outs, on behalf of the over half a million Americans who are advocates of informed consent and no medical mandates! Please share this far and wide, and remember to stay abreast of the latest SHF actions and updates here: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/

US: The vaccination effort in those under age 5 years began with something less than a bang

"Data are available only for the first 2 weekdays after the final approval on Saturday, June 18, but they show that just 1,245 children aged 4 years and younger received the COVID vaccine on June 20 and June 21."

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/976320

❗ Despite claims that the Government of #Georgia is “in full control” of the biological laboratory and in charge of its funding, the research conducted thereat is actually supervised and bankrolled by the #US Department of Defence and its affiliates. https://is.gd/LSGSmc

Do mask mandates work? Bay Area COVID data from June says no.

"In early June, during an uptick in COVID-19 cases, Alameda County was the only Bay Area county to bring back an indoor mask mandate.

At the time, county Health Officer Dr. Nicholas Moss said, “Putting our masks back on gives us the best opportunity to limit the impact of a prolonged wave on our communities.”

But regional case data provides no discernible evidence that the rule, which was lifted June 25, succeeded at that goal."

https://www.sfgate.com/coronavirus/article/bay-area-mask-mandate-results-17271294.php

Mass hypnosis: why can’t people see through the COVID deception?

"Despite the statistics and mathematical models dramatically overrating the risk of the virus, and the obvious side effects of the vaccine, many are not capable of seeing it. The most salient characteristic of this psychological trend is that it makes people radically blind to everything that goes against the narrative in which they believe."

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/mass-hypnosis-why-cant-people-see-through-the-covid-deception/

Please share on all enemy platforms.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CfeMThGNfwf/

The Great Reset In Action: Ending Freedom Of The Press, Speech, & Expression

"Governments, corporations, and elites have always been fearful of the power of a free press, because it is capable of exposing their lies, destroying their carefully crafted images, and undermining their authority. In recent years, alternative journalism has been growing and more people are relying on social media platforms as sources of news and information. In response, the corporate state, digital conglomerates, and the mainstream media have been increasingly supportive of the silencing and censoring of alternative media outlets and voices that challenge the official narrative on most issues.

At the recent World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, 'Australian eSafety commissioner' Julie Inman Grant stated that 'freedom of speech is not the same thing as a free for all'…"

👉 Read more: The Mises Institute / ZeroHedge

There are a number of people who write to me, warning that the testing paradigms used widely are unreliable & often poorly understood.

I also receive communications from people who accuse me of bad faith, since “the rate of false positives is always vanishingly small” (so they tell me).

There are people in both camps whose publication record accords with their claims to be experienced in the use of PCR.

Setting aside the specific nuances of PCR, I have enough experience of mass testing for anything to be certain that it’s very bad practise not to include blinded, known negatives right through the chain of custody (in the labs undertaking “covid19 testing”). There are no publications from “mass testing” factories on this point.

I say “so show me”. I don’t want arguments in defense when obtaining empirical evidence should be routine & certainly could be done to put rest to any criticism. Yet such results have never appeared. It’s astonishing that nobody appears ever to have done so.

I’m uninclined to engage in discussions about PCR testing while the absence of negative controls remains unremarked, or justified in grounds that the test is so flawless that such controls are superfluous. The latter argument I find particularly irksome because it relies on statements & not relevant data.

I should point out that it’s irrelevant to my conclusion that the authorities have lied to us & continues to do so about all aspects of the situation, in ways that places your health & even life at risk, WITHOUT referring to testing & WITHOUT referring to the existence or otherwise of the alleged virus.

Those in the “no viruses” camp or in the “PCR is near flawless” camp, save your breath for someone else.

Neither argument makes a blind bit of difference to the unequivocal reality that the authorities have lied to us all for well over two years. And they’re lying to frighten you, hoping that you’ll accept massive & ineffective interventions in normal life & better that you’ll roll up your sleeve and permit injections with gene-based agents.

Best wishes,
Mike

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208

Life Insurance CEO Reveals Deaths Are Up 40% Among Working People

"Lincoln National is a fairly large life insurance company that’s so old that when it was started, the founders actually asked Abraham Lincoln’s son whether it was okay to use his father’s likeness in their company branding.

He agreed, and over the past 117 years, Lincoln National has grown to be the fifth-largest life insurance company in America. However, things aren’t so hot right now for the life insurance business—evidenced by the fact that in 2021, Lincoln National reported a 163 percent increase in death benefits that were paid out under their group life insurance policies…"

👉 Watch on EpochTV