Difficult to have any words to add. Dr Zelenko and I were allies on twitter before we were both booted off, and were in contact on that platform from early 2020 sharing information and tweets to send out to our readership.

Once here on Telegram, we kept sharing our posts with each other from 2021 until very recently.

I will miss him, as I am sure you will do as well, and believe his spiritual take on what is going on is a fundamental guiding light for the fight ahead of us. I was honoured to have been a brother in arms to Zev, and I look forward to the gifts he left for us, which are still being unravelled and shown to us in their full power and beauty.

Thank you Zev. ❤

Robin

I’m genuinely sorry to read this, though not surprised, as he had been very ill in recent times.
RIP, Zev. We will miss your battling & plain speaking.
Mike

https://americasfrontlinenews.com/post/dr-vladimir-zev-zelenko-passes-away

BMJ investigation

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?

"While historical drug disasters like sulfanilamide and thalidomide raised the stature of regulatory agencies, Light argues regulators now need their own watchdog and is calling for a drug and vaccine safety board, independent of the drug regulator, with the authority, staffing, and funds to investigate incidents of patient harm. “Countries have independent safety boards for airlines and their passengers. Why not for drugs and patients too?” says Light."

https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538.full

Have you heard of the Bayh-Dole Act?

Bayh-Dole Act is the
ROOT OF THE ROT
that has been cast over the medical world.

Fauci recently revealed to Sen.Rand Paul that under the Bayh-Dole Act a US govt employee can:
- hold patents,
- enforce the application of those patents and
- personally profit from them - without ever having to disclose anything about those patents and profits, not even to the IRS tax authorities.

Video 6minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/ROOT-OF-THE-ROT:f

Fauci is laughing in everyone's face, (literally and with invincible impunity) all the way to the Bank.

Has Russia wised up to the Pharma scams?:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/21048

Pursue Health Holistically.
Resist Tyranny.

More on the Philosophical Failure of Modern Medicine here:
https://t.iss.one/FreedomTirade/394

https://apnews.com/5fdebc1723c63b49bb8ecc27f5b0c6ec

A few days ago, SCOTUS determined that New York could not apply restrictions on who may own a gun which they can carry around.

This ruling has impact on the gun laws of several other states.

How many people have read the Second Amendment to the US Constitution? I had. On arriving in the US late last year, I bought a copy. It’s really short. Here’s what the Second Amendment says:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”.

It’s not long & arguably it’s not complicated. It isn’t caveated. It does not say “...unless there’s a pandemic”. It doesn’t restrict the kind of Arms which may be owned.

Some people argue that this amendment is out of date & was included so that people could hunt. No. It’s in here because the founders anticipated that the federal government might become tyrannical. This is the bulwark.

We’ll see.

Best wishes
Mike

We are still living through both the failures and the successes of the societal changes of the 1960s. What our generation achieves in these few years will determine the next 50 years of our children's lives. This is what is really important now about our actions.

Robin

🎙 President of Russia Vladimir Putin answered questions from media representatives following visit to Turkmenistan

❓The NATO summit has begun with the war-mongering rhetoric. Russia has been declared a “direct threat” to the security of the Alliance. How would you assess these statements?

💬 President Putin: As regards their preparations for some actions against us since 2014, this information is not new to us. They have long been looking for an external enemy, for a threat that would rally their allies. I am referring above all to the United States.

This is fresh proof of what we have been saying all along: that NATO is a relic of the past, of the Cold War era.

They always replied that NATO had changed, that it had become more of a political alliance, but at the same time they were looking for an opportunity to give it a new lease on life as a military organisation. Well, this is exactly what they are doing now. There is nothing new in this for us.

⚡️🇬🇧 On June 30, UK Ambassador to Russia Deborah Bronnert was summoned to the Foreign Ministry. She received a strong protest in response to the overtly inappropriate statements by UK leaders as regards Russia, its leader, government officials and the Russian people.

The ambassador was given a memo on the unacceptability of insulting rhetoric by representatives of the UK’s institutions of authority.

❗️ In a civilised society, it is customary to apologise for such statements.

Read in full

❗On June 30, the Embassy has forwarded a Note Verbale to the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office due to the insulting statements made by the UK leadership on Russia, Russian people, the President of Russian and other Russian officials.

#Russia #UK

Do you support this yes or no?

Let's make this a mega thread!

Bolsonaro is a real advocate for freedom and science.

In this interview with Tucker Carlson, Bolsonaro brings up several valid points that are worth mentioning:

▪️ Mainstream media have instilled fear amongst the population and opposed preventive treatment methods. (Remark: The vaccination campaign in Brazil was beyond the good taste. Every commercial break consisted of several vaccine propaganda clips addressing adults and children.)

▪️ State Governors misused the situation to oppress the general public and force an experimental vaccine upon them. (Remark: Many states still communicate that wearing masks prevents the spread of viruses. Heretics!)

▪️ The Brazilian (woke) supreme court opposed the rights of bodily integrity, physical autonomy and self-determination. (Remark: It is also co-responsible for the strict entrance regulations for tourists.)

▪️ Big Pharma has too much power and undermines the democratic structures of many countries. (Remark: Pfizer has been accused of holding Brazil ‘to ransom’ over vaccine contract demands.)

▪️ Early treatments (i.e. Ivermectin etc.) could have saved many lives. (Remark: The data shows that he was right from the beginning. Early treatment with Ivermectin is highly efficient; however, the media and Lula supporters still claim that Ivermectin killed more people than it saved. A blatant lie!)

Contrary to Bolsonaro, his challenger Lula is highly autocratic. Lula called Bolsonaro's approach a 'genocide', and if it had been up to him, everybody in Brazil who rejected the vaccine would have lost their civil rights.

Unfortunately, Brazil is still in a state of fear due to the most prominent media network, "Globo". Many people are still wearing masks while sitting alone in the car or going for a walk. I hope that the truth concerning the vaccines and the political corruption will come to light before the general elections this year so Lula can be avoided.

All the best from Brazil 🇧🇷,
Dr. Simon

👉🏻 @Goddek | Minds | Bastyon | Gettr

Looks like 1% of the. Israeli population per day were testing positive during the largest peak.
In separate “studies”, it appears that the “positivity”, the fraction of the PCR tests that were positive, was in the high-20% range. I find those numbers as unrealistic. Something is wrong, people. You can tell this isn’t correct if you only consider that a sizeable minority of the population had immunity to whatever infectious gent was responsible. Additionally. most people who encounter the alleged pathogen either developed no, or mild symptoms & we subsequently knot made ill again. I’m accepting that c19 “vaccinated” people can & do get reinfected & display signs of clinical illness.
In a setting like this. I find it unfeasible that the positivity could remain at or above 20% for more than a few occasions before there are too few susceptible hosts to keep such assets in that state position.
You’re not yet required to believe any particular thing. What do you think?
Best wishes,
Mike

Ps: I’m not criticizing Paul or Geert. I am challenging the public health bodies responsible for these high positivity values to show that this isn’t in any way a consequence of the potential unreliability of their testing protocols.

Why This New Virus Testing Makes No Sense

If we were to have routinely tested everyone for spike proteins or other coronavirus target genes before 2020, we would have found them in approximately one third of what we call winter colds or flus if not higher. This is likely to be what is happening now: tests include gene targets shared with other common coronaviruses, and may result in positives to other coronaviruses too in certain circumstances. Further to this, most often infection is caused by more viruses at the same time, meaning someone can test positive to SARSCoV2 yet be coinfected with and have symptoms of any influenza virus instead at the same exact time. 

For coronavirus infections, it was found that in approximately one case out of two there was a co-infection from at least another pathogen at the same time as the coronavirus infection. How can you determine whether the symptoms are due to the coronavirus or the other pathogen?

So testing for a single virus without testing for the hundreds of others someone could be co-infected with makes no sense.

Robin

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/12/22/why-this-new-virus-testing-makes-no-sense/

"That first SARS event gave rise to a ‘very problematic’ April 2003 patent filing by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It was for the entire SARS gene sequence, and for a series of derivative patents covering means of detection, including the PCR test [widely used today purportedly to diagnose cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection].

‘The reason why that is a problem is that if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100 per cent of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection. Meaning, you have the entire scientific and message control.’"

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/twenty-year-genetic-trail-behind-covids-creation-3/

S-protein shedding from jabbed individuals and testing positive. Please note that the:

Thermo Fisher TagPath COVID-19 Combo Kit

Uses the S-protein as a genet target: recently jabbed individuals are likely to test positive to the S gene, as are their close contacts.
https://blog.microbiologics.com/sars-c0v-2-tests-their-targets/

"The kit used by the Glasgow and Milton Keynes lighthouse laboratories is the

ThermoFisher TaqPath RT-PCR

which tests for the presence of three target genes from SARS-COV-2"

So what happens next? They reduce the target genes from 3 to 1!

BINGO!

THE JABBED AND THEIR CONTACTS SHOULD TEST POSITIVE TO 1/3 GENES!

"In correspondence with Mr Nicholas Lewis about single gene testing, in February 2021, the ONS confirmed that they do indeed call single gene targets as positives in their Covid-19 Infection Survey and also confirmed that the samples are processed by UK lighthouse laboratories"

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208/rr-3

Put to the test: use of rapid testing technologies for covid-19

"As early as April 2020, the UK lighthouse laboratories were testing for single genes and discounted the S gene as early as mid-May [10], months before the discovery of the new variant B1.1.7. Indeed, in Table 1 of [10] 18% of tests were positive on one gene only.

Furthermore, in a Public Health England report on variants [2] published 8 January 2021, it states the goal of using one gene was explicitly to approximate the growth of the new B1.1.7 variant:

“There has recently been an increase in the percentage of positive cases where only the ORF1ab- and N-genes were found and a decrease in the percentage of cases with all three genes. We can use this information to approximate the growth of the new variant.”

Section 10 of this ONS Covid-19 Infection Survey report [11] on 8 January 2021 confirms that one gene is sufficient for a positive result.

Obviously, there is a higher risk of encountering false positives when testing for single genes alone, because of the possibility of cross-reactivity with other human coronaviruses (HCOVs) as well as prevalent bacteria or reagent contamination. The potential for cross reactivity has already been confirmed by the German Instand laboratory report from April 2020 [12] (note that Prof. Drosten, co-author of Corman et al [2] is a cooperating partner listed in this report). The report describes the systematic blind testing of positive and negative samples anonymously sent to 463 laboratories from 36 countries and evaluated for the presence of a variety of genes associated with SARS-COV-2.

They reported significant cross reactivity and resultant false positives for OC43, and HCoV 229E (a common cold virus) as well as for SARS-COV-2 negative samples, not containing any competing pathogen.

Likewise, 70 Dutch laboratories were surveyed in November 2020, by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [13], with 76 diagnostic workflows reported as using only one target gene to diagnose the presence of SARS-COV-2 (46% of all workflows).

Without diagnostic validation it is not clear what can be concluded from a positive PCR test resulting from a single target gene call, especially if there was no confirmatory testing.

Many of the reported positive results may be inconclusive, negative or from people who suffered past infection for SARS-COV-2. Even with diagnostic validation of the single target gene call, the UK lighthouse laboratories appear not to be in strict conformance with the WHO emergency use assessment and the manufacturer instructions for use.

Given this it is clear the ONS and the UK lighthouse laboratories needs to publicly clarify their use of, and justify the reasons for, deviating from these standards."

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208/rr-3

Graph shows: Common (green tick), occasional (orange circle) and never (red cross) symptoms of the common cold, hay fever and Covid
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10969823/Are-sniffles-caused-hay-fever-cold-Covid.html

What do you think of this chart?

I am not sure about the accuracy, yet probably makes much more sense than the "Covid tests".. 🤡

And where has the flu gone!? 🤷‍♂️

Robin