UK – HARM TO CHILDREN – COVID-19 INJECTIONS
The MHRA is now reporting in its weekly update report on the number of children being injured by the Covid-19 injections.
All 3 of the UK injection brands have now been administered to children.
It is not clear if these cases of harm are included in the overall adverse events and deaths reported for the UK by the MHRA. We have raised an FOI request to establish the correct position.
In their latest write up the MHRA report that to the 8th December 2,344 reports have been raised about harm to children, no information has been given as to whether any of these reports also include cases where a child has died following a Covid-19 injections.
This is the relevant extract from the MHRA report:
“The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population and a review of these reports does not raise any additional safety topics specific to this age group”
Link to data: MHRA
The MHRA is now reporting in its weekly update report on the number of children being injured by the Covid-19 injections.
All 3 of the UK injection brands have now been administered to children.
It is not clear if these cases of harm are included in the overall adverse events and deaths reported for the UK by the MHRA. We have raised an FOI request to establish the correct position.
In their latest write up the MHRA report that to the 8th December 2,344 reports have been raised about harm to children, no information has been given as to whether any of these reports also include cases where a child has died following a Covid-19 injections.
This is the relevant extract from the MHRA report:
“The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population and a review of these reports does not raise any additional safety topics specific to this age group”
Link to data: MHRA
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
👍1
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy. The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war. They are not isolated or sporadic events but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
Apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.
M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.
Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy. The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war. They are not isolated or sporadic events but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
Apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.
M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND MEDICAL SCIENCE
In 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. But, as several articles in this anniversary issue of the BMJ make clear, the records of these trials have also left us with a legacy we still shrink from confronting.
The international military tribunal convened on 20 November 1945. With allied judges presiding, it brought accusations of war crimes against 24 defendants, including Goring, von Ribbentrop, Hess, and Speer. Twelve were found guilty and sentenced to death, seven were found guilty and sentenced to variable terms of imprisonment, and three were acquitted. Two others, Krupp and Ley, did not go through the trial: Krupp sustained injuries in a car accident just before the proceedings, and Ley committed suicide before the trial began.
The medical trial followed on immediately, running from 25 October 1946 to 20 August 1947. Twenty three German physicians and scientists were accused of inflicting a range of vile and lethal procedures on vulnerable populations and inmates of concentration camps between 1933 and 1945. Witnesses from hospitals and camps throughout Germany and eastern Europe were brought to Nuremberg or deposed at other sites...
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1413.full
In 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. But, as several articles in this anniversary issue of the BMJ make clear, the records of these trials have also left us with a legacy we still shrink from confronting.
The international military tribunal convened on 20 November 1945. With allied judges presiding, it brought accusations of war crimes against 24 defendants, including Goring, von Ribbentrop, Hess, and Speer. Twelve were found guilty and sentenced to death, seven were found guilty and sentenced to variable terms of imprisonment, and three were acquitted. Two others, Krupp and Ley, did not go through the trial: Krupp sustained injuries in a car accident just before the proceedings, and Ley committed suicide before the trial began.
The medical trial followed on immediately, running from 25 October 1946 to 20 August 1947. Twenty three German physicians and scientists were accused of inflicting a range of vile and lethal procedures on vulnerable populations and inmates of concentration camps between 1933 and 1945. Witnesses from hospitals and camps throughout Germany and eastern Europe were brought to Nuremberg or deposed at other sites...
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1413.full
Legal Letter to Chair of MHRA, Gross Negligence.pdf
239.4 KB
Attached is a legal letter sent today (17th December 2021) by PJH LAW to Stephen Lightfoot Chair of the MHRA
On behalf of the : Claimants: Dr Sam White, Andrew Doyle and Debbie Webb:
Summary of statements of evidence prepared for an Injunction Application.
Re: Request for Undertakings for breaches of legal obligations and breaches of duties of care.
“Your failure to investigate known concerns amounts to gross negligence in office, and renders you and the executive board liable for serious misconduct in office, mal or misfeasance in public office and, or, rendering all the office holders potentially liable for corporate manslaughter in that you have been wilfully blind to the known harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. You have taken no action."
Please Share with doctors, police, church leaders, schools, MP's, Councillors and everyone you can!
Let them know action is being taken against those supporting this
On behalf of the : Claimants: Dr Sam White, Andrew Doyle and Debbie Webb:
Summary of statements of evidence prepared for an Injunction Application.
Re: Request for Undertakings for breaches of legal obligations and breaches of duties of care.
“Your failure to investigate known concerns amounts to gross negligence in office, and renders you and the executive board liable for serious misconduct in office, mal or misfeasance in public office and, or, rendering all the office holders potentially liable for corporate manslaughter in that you have been wilfully blind to the known harms of the SARS-CoV-2 injections. You have taken no action."
Please Share with doctors, police, church leaders, schools, MP's, Councillors and everyone you can!
Let them know action is being taken against those supporting this
Forwarded from freedomtirade
When the programming slips, for just a second....
Odysee video 4minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/Doctor-Evil:9
This is not about your health,
it is about
BONUS BONUS
and the
NUREMBERG CODE VIOLATIONS
of
DOCTOR EVIL
Pursue HEALTH.... Resist TYRANNY
Odysee video 4minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/Doctor-Evil:9
This is not about your health,
it is about
BONUS BONUS
and the
NUREMBERG CODE VIOLATIONS
of
DOCTOR EVIL
Pursue HEALTH.... Resist TYRANNY
UNESCO (👉United Nations Educational, 👉Scientific and Cultural Organisation) is the United Nations body responsible for coordinating international cooperation in education, 👉science, culture, and communication. Its goal is to help prevent war by building the defenses of peace in the minds of men and women.
UK National Commission for UNESCO
Founded in 1946 by the UK government and established under Article VII of UNESCO’s Constitution, 👉we are a vital part of UNESCO’s unique global network of 190+ national cooperating bodies known as National Commissions. We work to support the UK government’s Permanent Delegation to UNESCO and to strengthen the ties between the UK’s educational, academic, scientific, cultural, creative, and artistic communities and UNESCO’s global programmes and policies.
If you have a specific question or would like to talk to a member of our team, please fill out the form below and a member of the UK National Commission for UNESCO team will get back to you as soon as possible.
https://unesco.org.uk/contact/
Let's ask them a few questions as to why they have not released any statements as to the UK Parliament's and UK businesses and UK medical staff violations of Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights?
👉https://t.iss.one/robinmg/12496
My formal request to the UK National Commission for UNESCO to hold the UK Parliament and businesses to account:
t.iss.one/robinmg/12896
UK National Commission for UNESCO
Founded in 1946 by the UK government and established under Article VII of UNESCO’s Constitution, 👉we are a vital part of UNESCO’s unique global network of 190+ national cooperating bodies known as National Commissions. We work to support the UK government’s Permanent Delegation to UNESCO and to strengthen the ties between the UK’s educational, academic, scientific, cultural, creative, and artistic communities and UNESCO’s global programmes and policies.
If you have a specific question or would like to talk to a member of our team, please fill out the form below and a member of the UK National Commission for UNESCO team will get back to you as soon as possible.
https://unesco.org.uk/contact/
Let's ask them a few questions as to why they have not released any statements as to the UK Parliament's and UK businesses and UK medical staff violations of Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights?
👉https://t.iss.one/robinmg/12496
My formal request to the UK National Commission for UNESCO to hold the UK Parliament and businesses to account:
t.iss.one/robinmg/12896
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
UNESCO UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005.
Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information.…
Article 6:
1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information.…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Norman Fenton is Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London and a Director of Agena, a company that specialises in risk management for critical systems. A mathematician by training with current focus on critical decision-making and, in particular, on quantifying uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge (Bayesian networks). The approach can be summarized as 'smart data rather than big data'. Applications include law and forensics (expert witness in major criminal and civil cases), health, security, software reliability, transport safety and reliability, finance, and football prediction.
CV: https://www.normanfenton.com/full-cv
CV: https://www.normanfenton.com/full-cv
I have now submitted a formal request to the UK national commission for UNESCO take the UK Parliament and UK businesses to account for violations of the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights.
If I do not receive a response I will release my request to the public and encourage them to seek answers.
Robin Monotti Graziadei
Previous post:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/12893
If I do not receive a response I will release my request to the public and encourage them to seek answers.
Robin Monotti Graziadei
Previous post:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/12893
❤1
Forwarded from 💜 LOVE not fear
"Rock Media Bashing Eric Clapton's New Song Even Before It's Released"
https://youtu.be/pwqxjzneQm4
https://youtu.be/pwqxjzneQm4
YouTube
Rock Media Bashing Eric Clapton's New Song Even Before It's Released
You can't write songs with people who don't agree with us.
You can't talk about wonderful lockdowns and mandates in a negative way.
You can't appeal to folks who've stopped listening to us.
You can't talk about wonderful lockdowns and mandates in a negative way.
You can't appeal to folks who've stopped listening to us.
This looks interesting & I’m very appreciative that others are forensically examining this wretched “test”.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UqP6LjdfFyhv/
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UqP6LjdfFyhv/
Bitchute
New Documentary on The PCR Test Deception is Banned on YouTube - Share this Film with Skeptics
Film producer Rai Gbrym reached out to me last week about a new documentary he had just produced that exposes the fraud of the PCR test.
He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so that…
He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so that…