UK
Table shows the percentage of people (adults and children) with a first dose and those with a second dose in each of the four nations and also within the UK
77% (last week 76%) of the population (adults and children) have received a first dose of a Covid-19 injection and 70% (last week 70%) have received a second dose.
Over 4.5 million people have received a first dose but have not yet received a second dose (per the MHRA).
A total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to Population estimates: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2019estimates
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows the percentage of people (adults and children) with a first dose and those with a second dose in each of the four nations and also within the UK
77% (last week 76%) of the population (adults and children) have received a first dose of a Covid-19 injection and 70% (last week 70%) have received a second dose.
Over 4.5 million people have received a first dose but have not yet received a second dose (per the MHRA).
A total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to Population estimates: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2019estimates
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
Table shows the percentage of people (adults and children) with either no dose or no second dose of a Covid-19 injection in each of the four nations
30% of the UK population (adults and children) has either not received any dose or no second dose of a Covid-19 injection (per MHRA).
Over 4.5 million people have received a first dose but have not yet received a second dose and over 15.6 million have received no dose at all. MHRA suggests 163,172 doses were administered to those with no previous dose and only 45,403 doses to those who had not yet had their second dose.
A total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows the percentage of people (adults and children) with either no dose or no second dose of a Covid-19 injection in each of the four nations
30% of the UK population (adults and children) has either not received any dose or no second dose of a Covid-19 injection (per MHRA).
Over 4.5 million people have received a first dose but have not yet received a second dose and over 15.6 million have received no dose at all. MHRA suggests 163,172 doses were administered to those with no previous dose and only 45,403 doses to those who had not yet had their second dose.
A total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
Table shows the number of ADR (cases of injury or death) cases by nation following the Covid-19 injections reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 as released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021.
Each person (report/ case) reports on average over 3 injuries.
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows the number of ADR (cases of injury or death) cases by nation following the Covid-19 injections reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 as released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021.
Each person (report/ case) reports on average over 3 injuries.
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
Table shows details provided by the MHRA of the total first and second doses now administered in the UK
Overall per the MHRA 91% (last week 91%) of all of those who had a first dose injection have now also had the second injection.
Note: the govt provides rounded number for doses administered by manufacturer but specific numbers on those administered in total in both the UK and in each of the four nations
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows details provided by the MHRA of the total first and second doses now administered in the UK
Overall per the MHRA 91% (last week 91%) of all of those who had a first dose injection have now also had the second injection.
Note: the govt provides rounded number for doses administered by manufacturer but specific numbers on those administered in total in both the UK and in each of the four nations
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
PFIZER ONLY
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for just the Pfizer injections
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to the data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
PFIZER ONLY
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for just the Pfizer injections
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to the data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
ASTRAZENECA ONLY
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for just the AstraZeneca Covid-19 injections
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
ASTRAZENECA ONLY
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for just the AstraZeneca Covid-19 injections
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
MODERNA ONLY
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for just the Moderna injections
Moderna injections account for 3% of all UK injections administered but 5.5% of all adverse reports
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Note: The sub totals on the MHRA Moderna report did not add up this week, the report would therefore appear to have been manually manipulated in some way, such calculation issues are common. This is the reason why the table shows a negative number.
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
MODERNA ONLY
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for just the Moderna injections
Moderna injections account for 3% of all UK injections administered but 5.5% of all adverse reports
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Note: The sub totals on the MHRA Moderna report did not add up this week, the report would therefore appear to have been manually manipulated in some way, such calculation issues are common. This is the reason why the table shows a negative number.
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK
ALL INJECTION MANUFACTURERS - UK
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for all Covid-19 injections
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
ALL INJECTION MANUFACTURERS - UK
Table above shows UK latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by the MHRA to 8th December 2021 (released by the MHRA on 16th December 2021) for all Covid-19 injections
For all manufacturers combined a total of 1,852 deaths now reported by the MHRA along with over 1.3 million injuries suffered by almost 405,000 people (an average of 3.3 injuries per person) following the experimental Covid-19 injections
Link to data: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
UK – HARM TO CHILDREN – COVID-19 INJECTIONS
The MHRA is now reporting in its weekly update report on the number of children being injured by the Covid-19 injections.
All 3 of the UK injection brands have now been administered to children.
It is not clear if these cases of harm are included in the overall adverse events and deaths reported for the UK by the MHRA. We have raised an FOI request to establish the correct position.
In their latest write up the MHRA report that to the 8th December 2,344 reports have been raised about harm to children, no information has been given as to whether any of these reports also include cases where a child has died following a Covid-19 injections.
This is the relevant extract from the MHRA report:
“The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population and a review of these reports does not raise any additional safety topics specific to this age group”
Link to data: MHRA
The MHRA is now reporting in its weekly update report on the number of children being injured by the Covid-19 injections.
All 3 of the UK injection brands have now been administered to children.
It is not clear if these cases of harm are included in the overall adverse events and deaths reported for the UK by the MHRA. We have raised an FOI request to establish the correct position.
In their latest write up the MHRA report that to the 8th December 2,344 reports have been raised about harm to children, no information has been given as to whether any of these reports also include cases where a child has died following a Covid-19 injections.
This is the relevant extract from the MHRA report:
“The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population and a review of these reports does not raise any additional safety topics specific to this age group”
Link to data: MHRA
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
👍1
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Permissible Medical Experiments
All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy. The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war. They are not isolated or sporadic events but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
Apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.
M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.
Crimes against humanity are certain acts that are purposefully committed as part of a widespread or systematic policy, directed against civilians, in times of war or peace. They differ from war crimes because they are not isolated acts committed by individual soldiers but are acts committed in furtherance of a state or organizational policy. The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place at the Nuremberg trials. Initially being considered for legal use, widely in International Law, following the Holocaust a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Political groups or states that violate or incite violation of human rights norms, as found in the Declaration, are an expression of the political pathologies associated with crimes against humanity.
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war. They are not isolated or sporadic events but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
Apartheid was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.
M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND MEDICAL SCIENCE
In 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. But, as several articles in this anniversary issue of the BMJ make clear, the records of these trials have also left us with a legacy we still shrink from confronting.
The international military tribunal convened on 20 November 1945. With allied judges presiding, it brought accusations of war crimes against 24 defendants, including Goring, von Ribbentrop, Hess, and Speer. Twelve were found guilty and sentenced to death, seven were found guilty and sentenced to variable terms of imprisonment, and three were acquitted. Two others, Krupp and Ley, did not go through the trial: Krupp sustained injuries in a car accident just before the proceedings, and Ley committed suicide before the trial began.
The medical trial followed on immediately, running from 25 October 1946 to 20 August 1947. Twenty three German physicians and scientists were accused of inflicting a range of vile and lethal procedures on vulnerable populations and inmates of concentration camps between 1933 and 1945. Witnesses from hospitals and camps throughout Germany and eastern Europe were brought to Nuremberg or deposed at other sites...
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1413.full
In 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. But, as several articles in this anniversary issue of the BMJ make clear, the records of these trials have also left us with a legacy we still shrink from confronting.
The international military tribunal convened on 20 November 1945. With allied judges presiding, it brought accusations of war crimes against 24 defendants, including Goring, von Ribbentrop, Hess, and Speer. Twelve were found guilty and sentenced to death, seven were found guilty and sentenced to variable terms of imprisonment, and three were acquitted. Two others, Krupp and Ley, did not go through the trial: Krupp sustained injuries in a car accident just before the proceedings, and Ley committed suicide before the trial began.
The medical trial followed on immediately, running from 25 October 1946 to 20 August 1947. Twenty three German physicians and scientists were accused of inflicting a range of vile and lethal procedures on vulnerable populations and inmates of concentration camps between 1933 and 1945. Witnesses from hospitals and camps throughout Germany and eastern Europe were brought to Nuremberg or deposed at other sites...
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1413.full