Table above shows vaccine deaths per decade from 1990’s to 2020 per the US VAERS system. More than twice as many deaths from the Covid-19 injections reported in less than a year than deaths from all other vaccines combined over the last 32 years.

Link to data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data

In less than a year Covid-19 injection deaths alone are over 110 times more than all annual vaccine deaths reported by VAERS in the 1990’s and more than 48 times the annual combined deaths reported in the last decade from all vaccines administered to all groups.

Source of the data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data

Table shows the days after a Covid-19 injection before a death reported to VAERS occurred

40% of all US reported deaths from the Covid-19 injections occurred within 5 days of a Covid injection, 25% within just one day.

This is represented graphically in the post below


Source of the data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data

Chart shows the number of days after a COVID-19 or Flu injection that a death is reported to US VAERS


Link to the graph and data: https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality

US Covid-19 Injection Doses Administered to 4th December 2021

About 13% of the US population have now received a “booster” injection

Almost 85 million people or 30% of those who received a first dose injection have not yet received their second dose injection.


Link: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations

EU

Pfizer Only - Per Eudravigilance

Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Pfizer Covid-19 injections

EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.

Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/

EU

AstraZeneca Only - Per Eudravigilance

Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the AstraZeneca Covid-19 injections

EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.

Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/

EU

Moderna Only - Per Eudravigilance

Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Moderna Covid-19 injections

EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.

Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/

EU

Janssen Only - Per Eudravigilance

Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Janssen Covid-19 injections

EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.

Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/

EU

All Covid-19 Manufacturers - Per Eudravigilance

Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for all manufacturers of the Covid-19 injections

EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.

Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/

Account from a friend..

"It’s a spiritual war after all, above all else perhaps

This happened last night at a dinner event. As written.

Last night I was at a dinner. Around a table with 6 people I’d never met. Half way in a woman who I had been chatting with used the word philanthropy. I asked her what kind of philanthropy she meant as the word has taken on new meaning in the modern era. She asked me what I meant. Before I answered the thought raced through me - “is this going to end the civil conversation to this point we’ve been having? (it was that kind of evening). I decided to let rip, gently, I like a little civil conversational unrest; “Well you got the Bill Gates ‘philanthropy’ which is just about as philanthropic as taking a machine gun and spraying a crowd with bullets”.

I’ve seldom seen a face and behaviour change so radically. She downed a glass of red and let rip… “how dare you? That poor man who woke up one morning and was rich, almost by accident. Do you even know what his foundation has done? He’s the victim, people have no idea… blah blah blah.” She poured another glass of red and downed it, carried on on her save Bill monologuing and then started attacking me.

Sitting between us was a barrister. She couldn’t work out what was going on. The sudden level of aggression was startling. She tried to mediate, but didn’t have much of a clue about Bill’s vaccine connection - A barrister, practising in chambers, highly ‘educated’, and she didn’t have much of a clue. How does that happen? So I’m there shielding bullets from Bill Gate’s PR woman while trying to explain, without sounding like a Qanon conspiracist, how Bill may not be quite as charitable as one thinks - it’s a tough one to execute quickly not really knowing who you are talking to (next time I’ll try the Jimmy Saville route without making unnecessary and unreasonable comparisons - stick to charity and status, and the smoke screen).

I did my best to explain to the barrister but all the eyes were telling me that there were cuckoos about and I had disturbed the nest. The woman carried on channelling Bill, necking wine and now her head was rolling. She started the finger pointing and the hand gestures. “What do you know about Philanthropy, poor Bill”. I asked her if she was on Bill’s payroll. She didn’t hear me. “How can you suggest a man like that isn’t philanthropic, what he has done…
did you know… you know NOTHING… blah blah blah”. Now she was eating chocolates that were scattered about the table, hunting them, scooping them up like a bird of prey. I told her the wine and the chocolates were giving her a sugar rush and going to her head; I had to go there, there was no turning back. The barrister stepped in again. I was disappointed. Let’s see where this goes, lots of info to be had. But the woman was now in such a frenzy the barrister looked like she was about to put her wig and ask the judge for a recess. The woman continued “I am sick, I am sick of people, demonising poor Bill. I mean especially when they don’t know him intimately…”. Maybe this woman is having an affair with Bill? Maybe she’s just about to win the jackpot… it was getting absurd.

A few other diners from the other tables were curious, bees around the honey or flies around the shit - take your pick. Eventually the woman having finished the chocolates and necked another glass, stood up, put her coat on and left. The questions started. Now a few more guests were asking about Bill. Luckily one or two knew, and one anti bubbler came rushing to my defence. Guests scattered about as the evening died down; I thought of the woman: minutes before Billgate she had scribbled her email address down on a napkin for me because she wanted to come to one of the house concerts I put on. Seconds before Billgate she was telling me about her life in New York and her brilliant kid who plays Flamenco guitar, and then that word turned up, the uninvited guest - ‘Philanthropy’.

Truth is I don’t know much about Bill; I don’t know how far this goes with Bill. I don’t know anything about Microsoft other than my Word software is long out of date. But what I do know concerns me.
Why is a gadget man, a numbers and coding man so interested in ‘Global Health’? Why? Add that to the fact that true altruism is sadly an anomaly and surely that must at least inspire the enquiry. Most people can just about manage looking out for their loved ones and that can be complex as we know; true charity, selflessness is not uncommon but it is rare. That’s why they invented Jesus!

Kafka noticing this widespread deficit in humanity appx 100 hundred years ago wrote - “You can hold yourself back from the sufferings of the world, that is something you are free to do and it accords with your nature, but perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could avoid.” Isn’t he talking about the majority of us? A majority that dare I say includes the likes of Bill Gates. At the very least BG belongs to that group. He doesn’t have any of the signs of an empath, an altruist. At the very least, with the most modest amount of ‘conspiratorial’ fervour one can concur that Bill Gates is not a realist, he is not a philanthropist and he is definitely no doctor.

Adam Curtis the documentary filmmaker said a few years back whilst war in Syria was raging (and who knows what the hell it’s like there now) : “The most charitable thing someone here could do today is head to Aleppo, help those who need help, come back and not tell anyone what they had done to help”. And here we all are around the world (and at dinner tables) talking about Bill’s philanthropy. He tells us so we know, so we talk about it, so we admire him and his efforts to save millions of people. He doesn’t incentivise philanthropy, he dictates it… so we know. He needs us to know that he is the king of philanthropy.
Now watch this (again if you have already)."

(From a channel subscriber).

https://youtu.be/LNAwUxZ5nfw

The Gates Foundation, Ebola, and Global Health Imperialism - Levich - 2015 - American Journal of Economics and Sociology - Wiley Online Library

"Bill Gates publicly called for the creation of a worldwide, militarized, supranational authority capable of responding decisively to outbreaks of infectious disease—an authority governed by Western powers and targeting the underdeveloped world. This article examines the media-generated panic surrounding Ebola alongside the response and underlying motives of foundations, governments, and other institutions. It describes the evolution and goals of GHG, in particular its opposition to traditional notions of Westphalian sovereignty. It proposes a different concept—“global health imperialism”—as a more useful framework for understanding the current conditions and likely future of international healthcare."

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12110

"For Bill Gates, who became the world’s richest human being through notoriously anti-competitive business practices (Gavil and First, 2014), the public health field offered a global laboratory for further experimentation with disruptive strategies.

Vaccines and the pharma business

BMGF’s style of disruption is nowhere more evident than in the area of vaccines, Bill Gates’s particular focus and historically the central business of his foundation. When Seth Berkeley, CEO of the Gates-controlled vaccine consortium GAVI, advised a conference of pharmaceutical entrepreneurs that ‘GAVI is a disruptive instrument’, he was not merely mouthing a management shibboleth. He was describing, in a rare moment of frankness, the true business of the Gates Foundation. Today, traditional systems of vaccine procurement and distribution are rapidly giving way to vast public–private supply chains, steered and substantially funded by the Gates Foundation in collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry (Gates, 2013).
The symbiosis between the world’s most powerful charitable enterprise and Big Pharma, infamous for its cynicism and criminality, arises from the particular requirements of pharmaceutical capital. Despite annual revenues approaching US$1 trillion, the industry has been unable to reverse a declining rate of profit and finds itself in a perpetual state of crisis. The search for exploitable new molecules is becoming increasingly frantic and expensive (Roy, 2012). Advertising costs, meanwhile, are skyrocketing as the industry attempts to wring revenue from wary and financially strapped customers (Dobrow, 2015)."

Routledge Handbook on the Politics of Global Health
https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315297255-20

"Unfortunately this is my job"=
"I am only following orders"

Australia: Covid Camp Where Walking Across A Yellow Line 'Un-Masked' Could Give You A $5000 Fine

"The Fauci NIH approved experiments on hundreds of New York City orphans.  Government agencies and pharmaceutical companies used the orphans in deadly AIDS drug trials.

In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008.
They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used)."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/exclusive-forgotten-monument-dead-orphans-faucis-torturous-deadly-aids-testing-located-new-york-state-heart-breaking-photos/

ITALY 🇮🇹: Funeral of the Italian Constitution

This is just awful. The attending nurse said that, in her entire career, she’d never come across such a young child with these pathologies, absent a physical trauma.
I hope someone is looking over her.
Mike

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/7-year-old-girl-has-stroke-and-brain-hemorrhage-7-days-after-pfizer-covid-19-shot/

https://twitter.com/1fubar/status/1466959601639706630?s=28

A two minute recording of a New Zealand Doctor.
Vaccination isn’t helping anywhere.
Well, it wouldn’t, would it.
All you were told around a year ago was clinical trial fraud.
Without the fraudulent removal from the statistical analysis of the Pfizer vaccine, instead of 93% “efficacy” instead its 19% (nothing at all, just noise).
After a six month observation period, the trial data on deaths was published.
I expect you think there’d be fewer deaths in the Pfizer vaccine arm compared to the control?
No. It’s the other way around.

ALL CAUSES MORTALITY is greater in the Pfizer vaccine arm than the control arm.

It’s all there in the public evidence. Of course, they get away with lying about a dangerous & ineffective product because no one is even interested in holding them to account.

Best wishes
Mike

BIOPOLITICS READING LIST:

https://www.loam.ch/

WORDS WHICH NEED TO BE REPEATED AT ALL OCCASIONS FOR OUR COUNTER-HYPNOSIS TO WORK:

-HUMAN RIGHTS

-BODILY AUTONOMY

-INFORMED CONSENT

-PROPORTIONALITY

Suggested use: someone mentions a trigger word or phrase, like ban the unvaccinated, the greater good, etc. You ask a question, like,

"But what about human rights?"

They reply:

"Don't you know people are dying!!"

You reply:

"What about proportionality?"

They say:

"It's a deadly virus!!!"

You say:

"Oh but what about bodily autonomy?"

They say:

"It's for the greater good!!!"

You say:

"What about informed consent?"

And you just keep on repeating those words. This is not to win the argument, but to enact a counter-hypnosis.

Also see:
https://t.iss.one/robinmg/12322