EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Table shows a summary of all reported issues by health system following the Covid-19 injections as input by the EMA
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows a summary of all reported issues by health system following the Covid-19 injections as input by the EMA
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows the percentage of injuries within the EU Adverse events database that are classified as “serious” or “non-serious”.
Also see Table in the post below: 72% of all Immune related issues are serious, 94% of all pregnancy issues are serious and 71% of all Cardiac issues are serious.
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Also see Table in the post below: 72% of all Immune related issues are serious, 94% of all pregnancy issues are serious and 71% of all Cardiac issues are serious.
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows the number of Injuries by health system within the EU adverse Reactions database as of 4th December 2021 as defined as “Serious” or “Non Serious” within that database
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows the percentage of Injuries by category within the EU adverse Reactions Database as of 4th December 2021 as defined as “Serious” within the EudraVigilance database
Data shows that 81% of all reported Moderna related Cardiac Issues have been serious, 66% of all reported AstraZeneca Blood Disorders have been serious and 86% of all Pfizer related Hepatobilary disorders have been serious
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Data shows that 81% of all reported Moderna related Cardiac Issues have been serious, 66% of all reported AstraZeneca Blood Disorders have been serious and 86% of all Pfizer related Hepatobilary disorders have been serious
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
USA to 26th November 2021 – 19,532 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 4.4 million injuries reported by over 927,000 people – Per VAERS database.
67% of all injection related deaths reported have been following the Pfizer injections, Pfizer accounts for approximately 58% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
67% of all injection related deaths reported have been following the Pfizer injections, Pfizer accounts for approximately 58% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
USA to 26th November 2021 – 19,532 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 4.4 million injuries reported by over 927,000 people – Per VAERS database.
7% of all injuries reported after the injections have been following the Janssen injections, Janssen accounts for under 4% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
7% of all injuries reported after the injections have been following the Janssen injections, Janssen accounts for under 4% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EU/USA /UK– 53,998 Covid-19 injection related deaths, plus almost 8.7 million injuries now reported by over 2.5 million people –to late November/ early December 2021.
Table shows the analysis of all deaths reported in EU, US and UK by injection manufacturer
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Link to the UK ADR’s by the MHRA:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows the analysis of all deaths reported in EU, US and UK by injection manufacturer
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Link to the UK ADR’s by the MHRA:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table above shows all the vaccine deaths per year per the US VAERS system from 1990 to 2021. It shows the true scale of the number of deaths reported after the Covid-19 injections compared to those reported from all other vaccinations administered in previous years.
Link to data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Link to data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Table above shows vaccine deaths per decade from 1990’s to 2020 per the US VAERS system. More than twice as many deaths from the Covid-19 injections reported in less than a year than deaths from all other vaccines combined over the last 32 years.
Link to data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Link to data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
In less than a year Covid-19 injection deaths alone are over 110 times more than all annual vaccine deaths reported by VAERS in the 1990’s and more than 48 times the annual combined deaths reported in the last decade from all vaccines administered to all groups.
Source of the data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Source of the data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Table shows the days after a Covid-19 injection before a death reported to VAERS occurred
40% of all US reported deaths from the Covid-19 injections occurred within 5 days of a Covid injection, 25% within just one day.
This is represented graphically in the post below
Source of the data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
40% of all US reported deaths from the Covid-19 injections occurred within 5 days of a Covid injection, 25% within just one day.
This is represented graphically in the post below
Source of the data: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Chart shows the number of days after a COVID-19 or Flu injection that a death is reported to US VAERS
Link to the graph and data: https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
Link to the graph and data: https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
US Covid-19 Injection Doses Administered to 4th December 2021
About 13% of the US population have now received a “booster” injection
Almost 85 million people or 30% of those who received a first dose injection have not yet received their second dose injection.
Link: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations
About 13% of the US population have now received a “booster” injection
Almost 85 million people or 30% of those who received a first dose injection have not yet received their second dose injection.
Link: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations
EU
Pfizer Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Pfizer Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Pfizer Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Pfizer Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EU
AstraZeneca Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the AstraZeneca Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
AstraZeneca Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the AstraZeneca Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EU
Moderna Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Moderna Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Moderna Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Moderna Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EU
Janssen Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Janssen Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Janssen Only - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for the Janssen Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EU
All Covid-19 Manufacturers - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for all manufacturers of the Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
All Covid-19 Manufacturers - Per Eudravigilance
Table Above shows EU latest adverse reactions and fatalities reported to and disclosed by EUdravigilance to 4th December 2021 for all manufacturers of the Covid-19 injections
EU to 4th December 2021 – 32,652 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 3 million injuries, reported by over 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Link to data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Account from a friend..
"It’s a spiritual war after all, above all else perhaps
This happened last night at a dinner event. As written.
Last night I was at a dinner. Around a table with 6 people I’d never met. Half way in a woman who I had been chatting with used the word philanthropy. I asked her what kind of philanthropy she meant as the word has taken on new meaning in the modern era. She asked me what I meant. Before I answered the thought raced through me - “is this going to end the civil conversation to this point we’ve been having? (it was that kind of evening). I decided to let rip, gently, I like a little civil conversational unrest; “Well you got the Bill Gates ‘philanthropy’ which is just about as philanthropic as taking a machine gun and spraying a crowd with bullets”.
I’ve seldom seen a face and behaviour change so radically. She downed a glass of red and let rip… “how dare you? That poor man who woke up one morning and was rich, almost by accident. Do you even know what his foundation has done? He’s the victim, people have no idea… blah blah blah.” She poured another glass of red and downed it, carried on on her save Bill monologuing and then started attacking me.
Sitting between us was a barrister. She couldn’t work out what was going on. The sudden level of aggression was startling. She tried to mediate, but didn’t have much of a clue about Bill’s vaccine connection - A barrister, practising in chambers, highly ‘educated’, and she didn’t have much of a clue. How does that happen? So I’m there shielding bullets from Bill Gate’s PR woman while trying to explain, without sounding like a Qanon conspiracist, how Bill may not be quite as charitable as one thinks - it’s a tough one to execute quickly not really knowing who you are talking to (next time I’ll try the Jimmy Saville route without making unnecessary and unreasonable comparisons - stick to charity and status, and the smoke screen).
I did my best to explain to the barrister but all the eyes were telling me that there were cuckoos about and I had disturbed the nest. The woman carried on channelling Bill, necking wine and now her head was rolling. She started the finger pointing and the hand gestures. “What do you know about Philanthropy, poor Bill”. I asked her if she was on Bill’s payroll. She didn’t hear me. “How can you suggest a man like that isn’t philanthropic, what he has done…
did you know… you know NOTHING… blah blah blah”. Now she was eating chocolates that were scattered about the table, hunting them, scooping them up like a bird of prey. I told her the wine and the chocolates were giving her a sugar rush and going to her head; I had to go there, there was no turning back. The barrister stepped in again. I was disappointed. Let’s see where this goes, lots of info to be had. But the woman was now in such a frenzy the barrister looked like she was about to put her wig and ask the judge for a recess. The woman continued “I am sick, I am sick of people, demonising poor Bill. I mean especially when they don’t know him intimately…”. Maybe this woman is having an affair with Bill? Maybe she’s just about to win the jackpot… it was getting absurd.
A few other diners from the other tables were curious, bees around the honey or flies around the shit - take your pick. Eventually the woman having finished the chocolates and necked another glass, stood up, put her coat on and left. The questions started. Now a few more guests were asking about Bill. Luckily one or two knew, and one anti bubbler came rushing to my defence. Guests scattered about as the evening died down; I thought of the woman: minutes before Billgate she had scribbled her email address down on a napkin for me because she wanted to come to one of the house concerts I put on. Seconds before Billgate she was telling me about her life in New York and her brilliant kid who plays Flamenco guitar, and then that word turned up, the uninvited guest - ‘Philanthropy’.
"It’s a spiritual war after all, above all else perhaps
This happened last night at a dinner event. As written.
Last night I was at a dinner. Around a table with 6 people I’d never met. Half way in a woman who I had been chatting with used the word philanthropy. I asked her what kind of philanthropy she meant as the word has taken on new meaning in the modern era. She asked me what I meant. Before I answered the thought raced through me - “is this going to end the civil conversation to this point we’ve been having? (it was that kind of evening). I decided to let rip, gently, I like a little civil conversational unrest; “Well you got the Bill Gates ‘philanthropy’ which is just about as philanthropic as taking a machine gun and spraying a crowd with bullets”.
I’ve seldom seen a face and behaviour change so radically. She downed a glass of red and let rip… “how dare you? That poor man who woke up one morning and was rich, almost by accident. Do you even know what his foundation has done? He’s the victim, people have no idea… blah blah blah.” She poured another glass of red and downed it, carried on on her save Bill monologuing and then started attacking me.
Sitting between us was a barrister. She couldn’t work out what was going on. The sudden level of aggression was startling. She tried to mediate, but didn’t have much of a clue about Bill’s vaccine connection - A barrister, practising in chambers, highly ‘educated’, and she didn’t have much of a clue. How does that happen? So I’m there shielding bullets from Bill Gate’s PR woman while trying to explain, without sounding like a Qanon conspiracist, how Bill may not be quite as charitable as one thinks - it’s a tough one to execute quickly not really knowing who you are talking to (next time I’ll try the Jimmy Saville route without making unnecessary and unreasonable comparisons - stick to charity and status, and the smoke screen).
I did my best to explain to the barrister but all the eyes were telling me that there were cuckoos about and I had disturbed the nest. The woman carried on channelling Bill, necking wine and now her head was rolling. She started the finger pointing and the hand gestures. “What do you know about Philanthropy, poor Bill”. I asked her if she was on Bill’s payroll. She didn’t hear me. “How can you suggest a man like that isn’t philanthropic, what he has done…
did you know… you know NOTHING… blah blah blah”. Now she was eating chocolates that were scattered about the table, hunting them, scooping them up like a bird of prey. I told her the wine and the chocolates were giving her a sugar rush and going to her head; I had to go there, there was no turning back. The barrister stepped in again. I was disappointed. Let’s see where this goes, lots of info to be had. But the woman was now in such a frenzy the barrister looked like she was about to put her wig and ask the judge for a recess. The woman continued “I am sick, I am sick of people, demonising poor Bill. I mean especially when they don’t know him intimately…”. Maybe this woman is having an affair with Bill? Maybe she’s just about to win the jackpot… it was getting absurd.
A few other diners from the other tables were curious, bees around the honey or flies around the shit - take your pick. Eventually the woman having finished the chocolates and necked another glass, stood up, put her coat on and left. The questions started. Now a few more guests were asking about Bill. Luckily one or two knew, and one anti bubbler came rushing to my defence. Guests scattered about as the evening died down; I thought of the woman: minutes before Billgate she had scribbled her email address down on a napkin for me because she wanted to come to one of the house concerts I put on. Seconds before Billgate she was telling me about her life in New York and her brilliant kid who plays Flamenco guitar, and then that word turned up, the uninvited guest - ‘Philanthropy’.
Truth is I don’t know much about Bill; I don’t know how far this goes with Bill. I don’t know anything about Microsoft other than my Word software is long out of date. But what I do know concerns me.
Why is a gadget man, a numbers and coding man so interested in ‘Global Health’? Why? Add that to the fact that true altruism is sadly an anomaly and surely that must at least inspire the enquiry. Most people can just about manage looking out for their loved ones and that can be complex as we know; true charity, selflessness is not uncommon but it is rare. That’s why they invented Jesus!
Kafka noticing this widespread deficit in humanity appx 100 hundred years ago wrote - “You can hold yourself back from the sufferings of the world, that is something you are free to do and it accords with your nature, but perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could avoid.” Isn’t he talking about the majority of us? A majority that dare I say includes the likes of Bill Gates. At the very least BG belongs to that group. He doesn’t have any of the signs of an empath, an altruist. At the very least, with the most modest amount of ‘conspiratorial’ fervour one can concur that Bill Gates is not a realist, he is not a philanthropist and he is definitely no doctor.
Adam Curtis the documentary filmmaker said a few years back whilst war in Syria was raging (and who knows what the hell it’s like there now) : “The most charitable thing someone here could do today is head to Aleppo, help those who need help, come back and not tell anyone what they had done to help”. And here we all are around the world (and at dinner tables) talking about Bill’s philanthropy. He tells us so we know, so we talk about it, so we admire him and his efforts to save millions of people. He doesn’t incentivise philanthropy, he dictates it… so we know. He needs us to know that he is the king of philanthropy.
Now watch this (again if you have already)."
(From a channel subscriber).
https://youtu.be/LNAwUxZ5nfw
Why is a gadget man, a numbers and coding man so interested in ‘Global Health’? Why? Add that to the fact that true altruism is sadly an anomaly and surely that must at least inspire the enquiry. Most people can just about manage looking out for their loved ones and that can be complex as we know; true charity, selflessness is not uncommon but it is rare. That’s why they invented Jesus!
Kafka noticing this widespread deficit in humanity appx 100 hundred years ago wrote - “You can hold yourself back from the sufferings of the world, that is something you are free to do and it accords with your nature, but perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could avoid.” Isn’t he talking about the majority of us? A majority that dare I say includes the likes of Bill Gates. At the very least BG belongs to that group. He doesn’t have any of the signs of an empath, an altruist. At the very least, with the most modest amount of ‘conspiratorial’ fervour one can concur that Bill Gates is not a realist, he is not a philanthropist and he is definitely no doctor.
Adam Curtis the documentary filmmaker said a few years back whilst war in Syria was raging (and who knows what the hell it’s like there now) : “The most charitable thing someone here could do today is head to Aleppo, help those who need help, come back and not tell anyone what they had done to help”. And here we all are around the world (and at dinner tables) talking about Bill’s philanthropy. He tells us so we know, so we talk about it, so we admire him and his efforts to save millions of people. He doesn’t incentivise philanthropy, he dictates it… so we know. He needs us to know that he is the king of philanthropy.
Now watch this (again if you have already)."
(From a channel subscriber).
https://youtu.be/LNAwUxZ5nfw
YouTube
WATCH: Bill Gates says meetings with Jeffrey Epstein were 'a mistake'
In a Sept. 21 interview with the PBS NewsHour's Judy Woodruff, philanthropist Bill Gates addressed his meetings with Jeffrey Epstein a decade ago, after Epstein had already been convicted of sex crimes. Gates said Epstein had promoted himself as having relationships…
The Gates Foundation, Ebola, and Global Health Imperialism - Levich - 2015 - American Journal of Economics and Sociology - Wiley Online Library
"Bill Gates publicly called for the creation of a worldwide, militarized, supranational authority capable of responding decisively to outbreaks of infectious disease—an authority governed by Western powers and targeting the underdeveloped world. This article examines the media-generated panic surrounding Ebola alongside the response and underlying motives of foundations, governments, and other institutions. It describes the evolution and goals of GHG, in particular its opposition to traditional notions of Westphalian sovereignty. It proposes a different concept—“global health imperialism”—as a more useful framework for understanding the current conditions and likely future of international healthcare."
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12110
"Bill Gates publicly called for the creation of a worldwide, militarized, supranational authority capable of responding decisively to outbreaks of infectious disease—an authority governed by Western powers and targeting the underdeveloped world. This article examines the media-generated panic surrounding Ebola alongside the response and underlying motives of foundations, governments, and other institutions. It describes the evolution and goals of GHG, in particular its opposition to traditional notions of Westphalian sovereignty. It proposes a different concept—“global health imperialism”—as a more useful framework for understanding the current conditions and likely future of international healthcare."
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12110
Wiley Online Library
The Gates Foundation, Ebola, and Global Health Imperialism
Powerful institutions of Western capital, notably the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, viewed the African Ebola outbreak of 2014–2015 as an opportunity to advance an ambitious global agenda. Building...