Also consider evidence of cases being deleted is being uncovered:
VAERS have said they have a considerable back log of data yet to be input. This may be the reason we have seen huge increases in fatalities over just periods of one or two days.
In addition because these injections are still in a trial period we are told that many US adverse reactions are reported directly to the pharmaceutical companies
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
More data on reports from VAERS can also be found here: https://ammtwitter.wordpress.com/
These high numbers and deaths are just usual?
Billions of doses of the Tetanus jab have been administered since its introduction in 1968, 36 deaths and less than 15k adverse events recorded since then from this jab. See Tess Lawrie comments on this about 45 mins in https://ebmcsquared.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/Yellow+Card+Report_June+21.mp4
Swine flu vaccine killed somewhere between 25 and 53 people and injured 4000 in the US, after 45 million injections were administered before this vaccination programme was pulled with many suing the government for compensation from injuries caused.
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/175/11/1129/140385 )
(https://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/swine.flu.1976/index.html ).
See some of the history in here: https://newsvoice.se/2021/05/the-swine-flu-of-1976-cbs-news-60-minutes-with-mike-wallace/
For further context on the number of deaths being reported see numbers reported in prior years on this and the following posts: https://t.iss.one/robinmg/11593
All numbers in all geographies are under reported
Governments everywhere have historically noted that many cases of adverse reactions never get reported and that the true numbers are 10 to 100 times more. Here is some evidence to support this:
UK – MHRA – evidence of under reporting
See around 28 mins in on UKC https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-24th-may-2021
https://web.archive.org/web/20190724002340/https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/yellow-card-please-help-to-reverse-the-decline-in-reporting-of-suspected-adverse-drug-reactions
https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/yellow-card-please-help-to-reverse-the-decline-in-reporting-of-suspected-adverse-drug-reactions
US - VAERS: evidence of under reporting:
.https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/05/18/vaers-data-proves-that-covid-19-vaccines-are-1000-times-more-deadly-than-the-disastrous-swine-flu-vaccine/
.https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/01/only-one-percent-of-vaccine-reactions-reported-to-vaers/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3x0rQT_eSw
See vaccine deaths PDF on this link: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/CDC-2021-0089-0024?fbclid=IwAR2sw0b3V1oKFhbwYNoBGTyyGg6fllOxmvJkLqEGGxc9ztIjh2TaKLtDoN8
Harvard Pilgrim study showing only 1% of adverse events are reported too: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
Further evidence on under reporting
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/en/vaccines/vaccine-death-report.pdf
UK, US and EU Numbers – For further details and analysis along with the tables above see: https://johnplatinumgoss.com/covid-19-vaccination-statistics/
VAERS have said they have a considerable back log of data yet to be input. This may be the reason we have seen huge increases in fatalities over just periods of one or two days.
In addition because these injections are still in a trial period we are told that many US adverse reactions are reported directly to the pharmaceutical companies
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
More data on reports from VAERS can also be found here: https://ammtwitter.wordpress.com/
These high numbers and deaths are just usual?
Billions of doses of the Tetanus jab have been administered since its introduction in 1968, 36 deaths and less than 15k adverse events recorded since then from this jab. See Tess Lawrie comments on this about 45 mins in https://ebmcsquared.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/Yellow+Card+Report_June+21.mp4
Swine flu vaccine killed somewhere between 25 and 53 people and injured 4000 in the US, after 45 million injections were administered before this vaccination programme was pulled with many suing the government for compensation from injuries caused.
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/175/11/1129/140385 )
(https://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/30/swine.flu.1976/index.html ).
See some of the history in here: https://newsvoice.se/2021/05/the-swine-flu-of-1976-cbs-news-60-minutes-with-mike-wallace/
For further context on the number of deaths being reported see numbers reported in prior years on this and the following posts: https://t.iss.one/robinmg/11593
All numbers in all geographies are under reported
Governments everywhere have historically noted that many cases of adverse reactions never get reported and that the true numbers are 10 to 100 times more. Here is some evidence to support this:
UK – MHRA – evidence of under reporting
See around 28 mins in on UKC https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-24th-may-2021
https://web.archive.org/web/20190724002340/https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/yellow-card-please-help-to-reverse-the-decline-in-reporting-of-suspected-adverse-drug-reactions
https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/yellow-card-please-help-to-reverse-the-decline-in-reporting-of-suspected-adverse-drug-reactions
US - VAERS: evidence of under reporting:
.https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/05/18/vaers-data-proves-that-covid-19-vaccines-are-1000-times-more-deadly-than-the-disastrous-swine-flu-vaccine/
.https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/01/only-one-percent-of-vaccine-reactions-reported-to-vaers/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3x0rQT_eSw
See vaccine deaths PDF on this link: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/CDC-2021-0089-0024?fbclid=IwAR2sw0b3V1oKFhbwYNoBGTyyGg6fllOxmvJkLqEGGxc9ztIjh2TaKLtDoN8
Harvard Pilgrim study showing only 1% of adverse events are reported too: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system
Further evidence on under reporting
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/en/vaccines/vaccine-death-report.pdf
UK, US and EU Numbers – For further details and analysis along with the tables above see: https://johnplatinumgoss.com/covid-19-vaccination-statistics/
OpenVAERS
Red Boxes Page - OpenVAERS
Table above shows a summary of injuries and fatalities within the EU adverse Reactions Database as of 20th November 2021 by manufacturer, age and sex
EU to 20th November 2021 – 31,014 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 2.9 million injuries, reported by almost 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EU to 20th November 2021 – 31,014 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 2.9 million injuries, reported by almost 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EU to 20th November 2021 – 31,014 Covid-19 injection deaths and almost 2.9 million injuries, reported by almost 1.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.
Table shows a summary of all reported issues by health system following the Covid-19 injections as input by the EMA
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows a summary of all reported issues by health system following the Covid-19 injections as input by the EMA
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows the percentage of injuries within the EU Adverse events database that are classified as “serious” or “non-serious”.
Also see Table in the post below: 74% of all Immune related issues are serious, 94% of all pregnancy issues are serious and 71% of all Cardiac issues are serious.
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Also see Table in the post below: 74% of all Immune related issues are serious, 94% of all pregnancy issues are serious and 71% of all Cardiac issues are serious.
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows the number of Injuries by health system within the EU adverse Reactions database as of 20th November 2021 as defined as “Serious” or “Non Serious” within that database
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Table shows the percentage of Injuries by category within the EU adverse Reactions Database as of 20th November 2021 as defined as “Serious” within the EudraVigilance database
Data shows that 81% of all reported Moderna related Cardiac Issues have been serious, 66% of all reported AstraZeneca Blood Disorders have been serious and 86% of all Pfizer related Hepatobilary disorders have been serious
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Data shows that 81% of all reported Moderna related Cardiac Issues have been serious, 66% of all reported AstraZeneca Blood Disorders have been serious and 86% of all Pfizer related Hepatobilary disorders have been serious
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
USA to 12th November 2021 – 18,853 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 4.2 million injuries reported by over 894,000 people – Per VAERS database.
67% of all injection related deaths reported have been following the Pfizer injections, Pfizer accounts for approximately 58% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
67% of all injection related deaths reported have been following the Pfizer injections, Pfizer accounts for approximately 58% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
USA to 12th November 2021 – 18,853 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 4.2 million injuries reported by over 894,000 people – Per VAERS database.
7% of all injuries reported after the injections have been following the Janssen injections, Janssen accounts for under 4% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
7% of all injuries reported after the injections have been following the Janssen injections, Janssen accounts for under 4% of all injections administered in the US (excluding third doses/ boosters).
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EU/USA /UK– 51,651 Covid-19 injection related deaths, plus over 8.3 million injuries now reported by over 2.4 million people –to November 2021.
Table shows the analysis of all deaths reported in EU, US and UK by injection manufacturer
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Link to the UK ADR’s by the MHRA:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows the analysis of all deaths reported in EU, US and UK by injection manufacturer
Link to US ADR Data : https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries. Link to the database: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/
Link to the UK ADR’s by the MHRA:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
VIENNA, AUSTRIA 🇦🇹
What this means of course is that Austrians have completely ignored the "lockdown for the unvaccinated". It is all a bluff: the government can't enforce it. All people need to do is not comply.
https://youtu.be/8Af-G0ms3bI
What this means of course is that Austrians have completely ignored the "lockdown for the unvaccinated". It is all a bluff: the government can't enforce it. All people need to do is not comply.
https://youtu.be/8Af-G0ms3bI
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ROME, ITALY 🇮🇹
LONDON, UK 🇬🇧
'No Vax Passports!' London protest erupts as thousands flood Oxford Street in Covid fury
"A PROTEST against vaccine passports has erupted on London's Oxford Street as a huge crowd of demonstrators chants "No Vax Passports!"
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1524445/London-protests-latest-Oxford-Street-vaccine-passport-lockdown-UK-Covid-updates
'No Vax Passports!' London protest erupts as thousands flood Oxford Street in Covid fury
"A PROTEST against vaccine passports has erupted on London's Oxford Street as a huge crowd of demonstrators chants "No Vax Passports!"
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1524445/London-protests-latest-Oxford-Street-vaccine-passport-lockdown-UK-Covid-updates
Express.co.uk
'No Vax Passports!' London protest erupts as thousands flood Oxford St
A PROTEST against vaccine passports has erupted on London's Oxford Street as a huge crowd of demonstrators chants "No Vax Passports!"
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ZAGREB, CROATIA 🇭🇷
People are chanting "We are not giving you our children!"
People are chanting "We are not giving you our children!"
Forwarded from Lidia Sanderson
Our government have put this poll out in which it asks should the unvaccinated be locked down but more horrifyingly should vaccination become mandatory in the UK.
Please go through the questionnaire. When it tells you you can't carry on after answering the 1st question...just carry on and answer them all.
At least we will know the true % of people against this madness, as it gives you the answers in real time, even though the poll results will be lied about "officially" no doubt.
https://www.yougov.chat/channels/daily-chat-uk/16360?fbclid=IwAR0ihm0RO0e6fXNyvrEL1lwuBKCh19YTu4ToksXrSxkYWNqt5QDsPnu3zN4
Please go through the questionnaire. When it tells you you can't carry on after answering the 1st question...just carry on and answer them all.
At least we will know the true % of people against this madness, as it gives you the answers in real time, even though the poll results will be lied about "officially" no doubt.
https://www.yougov.chat/channels/daily-chat-uk/16360?fbclid=IwAR0ihm0RO0e6fXNyvrEL1lwuBKCh19YTu4ToksXrSxkYWNqt5QDsPnu3zN4
YouGov Chat
Do you support or oppose a lockdown for the unvaccinated?
As Covid-19 cases surge across Europe, what measures do you think the UK should introduce?
COVID-19: stigmatising the unvaccinated is not justified
"Historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatising parts of the population for their skin colour or religion. I call on high-level officials and scientists to stop the inappropriate stigmatisation of unvaccinated people, who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and to put extra effort into bringing society together."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02243-1/fulltext
"Historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatising parts of the population for their skin colour or religion. I call on high-level officials and scientists to stop the inappropriate stigmatisation of unvaccinated people, who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and to put extra effort into bringing society together."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02243-1/fulltext
The Lancet
COVID-19: stigmatising the unvaccinated is not justified
In the USA and Germany, high-level officials have used the term pandemic of the unvaccinated,
suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology
of COVID-19. Officials’ use of this phrase might have encouraged one scientist…
suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology
of COVID-19. Officials’ use of this phrase might have encouraged one scientist…
Israel appears to be in serious trouble. Oddly, there’s evidently open discussion on TV.
The professor is asked if he has a clear position on boosters.
He replies it’s not anywhere found in Pfizer’s clinical dossiers.
That there’s no good scientific rationale for a 3rd dose or for mass vaccination of the population.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eosnwyX7qNUT/
The professor is asked if he has a clear position on boosters.
He replies it’s not anywhere found in Pfizer’s clinical dossiers.
That there’s no good scientific rationale for a 3rd dose or for mass vaccination of the population.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eosnwyX7qNUT/
BitChute
Press secretary for Israeli PM: Vaccinated people now dying, and going to hospital very sick
Well, here it is. Israel should have known better.
"On Tuesday evening, Health Canada posted to Twitter that it would take “months” for them to review Pfizer’s submission concerning vaccines for children, ages five to 11.
This came the same day that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control approved the roll-out for that same vaccine in that same age group. Social media being what it is, some people hit the roof, lashing out at Health Canada for that statement.
They wanted the vaccine approved that very second, not a couple of months down the road.
Health Canada later deleted that post and added a clarification, stating: “That was incorrect. The review will take weeks, not months.”
But those who were upset by the first statement shouldn’t mistake this clarification for an endorsement of the view that all kids need to get the vaccine and need to get it as soon as possible.
That’s not what the experts are saying. It’s not even what Pfizer and the U.S. bodies that approved the vaccine are saying.
It’s a much more nuanced discussion. Yet, these nuances haven’t been filtering down to Canadian parents as much as they should be.
While the FDA advisory committee voted 17-0 (with one abstaining) last week to move ahead with the Pfizer kids’ vaccine, there were caveats. The big one was that the committee asked multiple times about being able to instead vote on initially just approving it for high-risk kids.
But the FDA insisted they vote on approving it for all.
“It just seems to me that in some ways, we’re vaccinating children to protect the adults, and it should be the other way around,” said FDA committee member Dr. James Hildreth. “I do believe that children at highest risk do need to be vaccinated. But vaccinating all of the children … that seems a bit much for me.”
Not even Pfizer seems to be pushing for mass vaccination of all kids in the same way some voices on social media demand. In their briefing document to the FDA, Pfizer says “the benefits of the (kids’) vaccine are highly dependent on the incidence of COVID-19.”
Pfizer lays out one scenario — based on where transmission rates were at for June 2021 — where the vaccine actually creates more hospitalizations in kids due to heart issues than it would prevent hospitalizations due to COVID-19.
The challenge with talking about potential side effects in kids is that the number enrolled in Pfizer’s study is quite small. Only 1,518 kids received the shot (with 750 getting the placebo). And yet, what caused Ontario health officials to recommend against young males receiving Moderna was a 1 in 5,000 incidence rate of myocarditis.
It’s perhaps for these reasons and more that, according to Angus Reid Institute, only about half of Canadian parents are eager to see their little ones vaccinated soon after it becomes available. While Health Canada may not be months away from making a determination, that poll showed many parents plan to wait several months until giving it to their kids.
“We need to temper our enthusiasm until we have safety data from a larger group of children. The Pfizer study looked at just over 1,500 kids with a short follow-up period,” wrote Dr. Martha Fulford, a pediatric infectious diseases physician based out of Hamilton, in an email to the Toronto Sun.
“While it is reasonable to consider vaccinating some children early, such as very high-risk children, we need the safety data and longer-term effectiveness data before any generalized recommendation can be made.”
The issue of vaccinating kids is clearly much more complicated than the adult vaccine roll-out.
Let’s hope this gets the widespread acknowledgment it deserves."
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/furey-more-nuance-is-needed-around-the-kids-vaccine-discussion
This came the same day that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control approved the roll-out for that same vaccine in that same age group. Social media being what it is, some people hit the roof, lashing out at Health Canada for that statement.
They wanted the vaccine approved that very second, not a couple of months down the road.
Health Canada later deleted that post and added a clarification, stating: “That was incorrect. The review will take weeks, not months.”
But those who were upset by the first statement shouldn’t mistake this clarification for an endorsement of the view that all kids need to get the vaccine and need to get it as soon as possible.
That’s not what the experts are saying. It’s not even what Pfizer and the U.S. bodies that approved the vaccine are saying.
It’s a much more nuanced discussion. Yet, these nuances haven’t been filtering down to Canadian parents as much as they should be.
While the FDA advisory committee voted 17-0 (with one abstaining) last week to move ahead with the Pfizer kids’ vaccine, there were caveats. The big one was that the committee asked multiple times about being able to instead vote on initially just approving it for high-risk kids.
But the FDA insisted they vote on approving it for all.
“It just seems to me that in some ways, we’re vaccinating children to protect the adults, and it should be the other way around,” said FDA committee member Dr. James Hildreth. “I do believe that children at highest risk do need to be vaccinated. But vaccinating all of the children … that seems a bit much for me.”
Not even Pfizer seems to be pushing for mass vaccination of all kids in the same way some voices on social media demand. In their briefing document to the FDA, Pfizer says “the benefits of the (kids’) vaccine are highly dependent on the incidence of COVID-19.”
Pfizer lays out one scenario — based on where transmission rates were at for June 2021 — where the vaccine actually creates more hospitalizations in kids due to heart issues than it would prevent hospitalizations due to COVID-19.
The challenge with talking about potential side effects in kids is that the number enrolled in Pfizer’s study is quite small. Only 1,518 kids received the shot (with 750 getting the placebo). And yet, what caused Ontario health officials to recommend against young males receiving Moderna was a 1 in 5,000 incidence rate of myocarditis.
It’s perhaps for these reasons and more that, according to Angus Reid Institute, only about half of Canadian parents are eager to see their little ones vaccinated soon after it becomes available. While Health Canada may not be months away from making a determination, that poll showed many parents plan to wait several months until giving it to their kids.
“We need to temper our enthusiasm until we have safety data from a larger group of children. The Pfizer study looked at just over 1,500 kids with a short follow-up period,” wrote Dr. Martha Fulford, a pediatric infectious diseases physician based out of Hamilton, in an email to the Toronto Sun.
“While it is reasonable to consider vaccinating some children early, such as very high-risk children, we need the safety data and longer-term effectiveness data before any generalized recommendation can be made.”
The issue of vaccinating kids is clearly much more complicated than the adult vaccine roll-out.
Let’s hope this gets the widespread acknowledgment it deserves."
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/furey-more-nuance-is-needed-around-the-kids-vaccine-discussion
TORONTO SUN
FUREY: More nuance is needed around the kids' vaccine discussion
On Tuesday evening, Health Canada posted to Twitter that it would take “months” for them to review Pfizer’s submission concerning vaccines for children, ages five to 11.
pfizer-biontech-10-mcg-children-5-11-years-age.pdf
629.1 KB
"Canadian parents would be well-advised to read what the NACI release on kids’ vaccines actually says — it is far less of a ringing endorsement than many would have you believe."
[Anthony Furey, Toronto Star, Twitter]
Document: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS)
National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)
Recommendation on the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (10 mcg) in children 5-11 years of
age | Published: November 19, 2021
[Anthony Furey, Toronto Star, Twitter]
Document: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS)
National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)
Recommendation on the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (10 mcg) in children 5-11 years of
age | Published: November 19, 2021
Wide-ranging interview by the Brownstone Institute of my friend Dr Paul E Alexander.
Paul’s writings are THE most densely-referenced pieces which can be found.
Very good discussion on acquired immunity compared to vaccination in the context of SARS-CoV-2 & covid19.
Best wishes
Mike
https://m.theepochtimes.com/could-boosters-backfire-dr-paul-alexander-on-booster-shots-natural-immunity-and-the-failures-of-lockdowns-part-1_4115445.html
Paul’s writings are THE most densely-referenced pieces which can be found.
Very good discussion on acquired immunity compared to vaccination in the context of SARS-CoV-2 & covid19.
Best wishes
Mike
https://m.theepochtimes.com/could-boosters-backfire-dr-paul-alexander-on-booster-shots-natural-immunity-and-the-failures-of-lockdowns-part-1_4115445.html
www.theepochtimes.com
Could Boosters Backfire?—Dr. Paul Alexander on Booster Shots, Natural Immunity, and the Failures of Lockdowns
Dr. Paul Alexander: “We do not know how the immune system is going to react to so much boosting. Why? Because the vaccine developers did not study it.”
A surprise win in the 5th Circuit Court against Biden’s vaccination mandate to companies with >100 employees.
Best wishes
Mike
SALT LAKE CITY — The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ‘full stay’ (hold) on the OSHA vaccine mandate for private businesses employing 100 or more people. The order says workers must be vaccinated by January 4, or either submit to weekly testing or wear a mask.
In the ruling, the court wrote that the mandate threatens “…liberty interests of reluctant individual recipient put to a choice between their job(s) and their jab(s).”
“The 5th Circuit decision again validates our efforts to bring much-needed relief to Utah,” said Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes. “That relief is both to our citizens, wanting to make sensitive and personal health choices without risking their employment, and to our businesses facing draconian fines while already dealing with massive supply chain, workforce, and other challenges. This is another victory for liberty. And emboldens our commitment to fight until America is finally free of these unconstitutional mandates.”
AG Reyes continued: “We appreciate the support of our state and local leaders who understand and love the principles of American freedom as we do, and have joined with us to resist these astounding unconstitutional overreaches from D.C.”
The Fifth Circuit case will now be considered with similar appeals from other states, for consolidation into one lawsuit.
https://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/update-court-orders-stay-on-vaccine-mandate/
Best wishes
Mike
SALT LAKE CITY — The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ‘full stay’ (hold) on the OSHA vaccine mandate for private businesses employing 100 or more people. The order says workers must be vaccinated by January 4, or either submit to weekly testing or wear a mask.
In the ruling, the court wrote that the mandate threatens “…liberty interests of reluctant individual recipient put to a choice between their job(s) and their jab(s).”
“The 5th Circuit decision again validates our efforts to bring much-needed relief to Utah,” said Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes. “That relief is both to our citizens, wanting to make sensitive and personal health choices without risking their employment, and to our businesses facing draconian fines while already dealing with massive supply chain, workforce, and other challenges. This is another victory for liberty. And emboldens our commitment to fight until America is finally free of these unconstitutional mandates.”
AG Reyes continued: “We appreciate the support of our state and local leaders who understand and love the principles of American freedom as we do, and have joined with us to resist these astounding unconstitutional overreaches from D.C.”
The Fifth Circuit case will now be considered with similar appeals from other states, for consolidation into one lawsuit.
https://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/update-court-orders-stay-on-vaccine-mandate/