P(r)ettyposting 💖🎀🍉
Tw: graphic, mention of ra*e Just to be clear: banning safe abortions doesn't save lives, it just ruins the life of people who cannot have a child and, sometimes, it kills them. My grandgrandma used to tell me about her teenage years, when young people were…
Quoting the statement directly:
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precidents, including Griswold, Lawerence, and Obergefell."
A more informed person that me reports:
"Griswold v Connecticut defined federal protections for married couples rights to buy contraceptives. Griswold was extended in Eisenstadt v Baird to include unmarried couples. Furthermore, it was the backbone of the ruling in Carey v Population Services International, which provided federal protections for the right of contraceptives for individuals 16 years and older. Loving v Virginia, shortly after Griswold, used Griswold to create federal protections for interracial marriage.
Lawrence v Texas defined federal protections striking down sodomy laws, which were used in the past to discriminate against, and blatantly attack, trans people.
Obergefell v Hodges defines federal protections for same sex marriage.
The source I am reading from speculates that it will most likely be used against any 14th-amendment derived case in the united states.
Notably, one of the people on the US Supreme Court, who signed the ruling overturning Roe v Wade, is a black man married to a white woman."
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precidents, including Griswold, Lawerence, and Obergefell."
A more informed person that me reports:
"Griswold v Connecticut defined federal protections for married couples rights to buy contraceptives. Griswold was extended in Eisenstadt v Baird to include unmarried couples. Furthermore, it was the backbone of the ruling in Carey v Population Services International, which provided federal protections for the right of contraceptives for individuals 16 years and older. Loving v Virginia, shortly after Griswold, used Griswold to create federal protections for interracial marriage.
Lawrence v Texas defined federal protections striking down sodomy laws, which were used in the past to discriminate against, and blatantly attack, trans people.
Obergefell v Hodges defines federal protections for same sex marriage.
The source I am reading from speculates that it will most likely be used against any 14th-amendment derived case in the united states.
Notably, one of the people on the US Supreme Court, who signed the ruling overturning Roe v Wade, is a black man married to a white woman."
❤7
I get English and its use and everything, but it's not like a beautiful language.
Kinda like a penis, not great per sé but easy to use and there's not much other around
Kinda like a penis, not great per sé but easy to use and there's not much other around
😢14👏5😁5❤3💯1
Btw, I had a weird pride day and ended up not going to the parade but also I was super pretty and glittery and nsfw
🥰21
Also the only brain cells I have left have gone on strike, so a lot of sleeping, kinda some eating, little posting
❤13
I'll use this channel to communicate to all my chosen family and Internet friends you can freely breathe again: I found an insanely long horror podcast, so I won't bother everyone for suggestions for a fairly long time.
👍9
It's insane to me that a lot of people are like out there living their lives studying numbers
👍10😱4
Me staying hydrated and chilling while my self proclaimed enemies write boring paragraphs about me 💅
🔥12