25% of U.S adult Twitter users account for 97% of all U.S Tweets

How special effects were done before

🗣 AnonymousConservative writes:

I was actually watching pbs years ago, and they were doing a special on the Roman Empire. It showed the statues of its leaders, and the early statues were all muscular bearded men, standing directly and boldly facing you. It then showed statues of the leaders at the end of the Empire, and they were all scrawny and effeminate, and they were posing facing to the side, with their head turned to face the sculptor, hunched over, almost as if plotting. It was quite striking. Now today, we see this:

They did exactly the same trick with pizzagate

It is now clear that our once-highly-respected popularizer of the latest scientific research, Scientific American, is hopelessly misnamed.

Clearly, any “Managing Editor” of such a magazine should be devoted to science and, thus, to placing the pursuit of the empirical truth above all of other considerations. However, a recent ad for this very position tells us that Scientific American is committed to “diversity, equity, inclusion and social justice in our workplace and our journalism.”

In other words, the magazine will misreport, or fail to report, scientific discoveries if they in any way question, or even if they fail to directly promote, Woke dogmas.

Clearly, with this policy, America’s oldest continuously-published magazine is not only failing its science-enthusiast readers, but it is failing anybody who is not a Woke ideologue.

https://vdare.com/articles/wokeness-and-women-have-ruined-scientific-american

Coverage of any war by the media the second a western country is remotely involved

When a libtard cites a news article in an argument I like to say, "Hey! I remember them. This is the channel that told me Iraq has WMDs!"

Destroy credibility.

The Tavistock Ethos: it is easier to change peoples underlying assumptions about the world than it is to change the world

Example:
It is easier to have Western people accept Fat Positivity distributed via psyop propaganda than it is to address the underlying causes of the Obesity Epidemic and the economic changes that would have to be made to fix it.

When they don't want you to comment on a story they are writing about you

Just pulled up an article about the mass killing in Texas—the article does not even mention the shooter's name, much less show a picture of him. Can you guess why?

I learned his name—Salvador Ramos—from Telegram channels before I saw it in any news article or report.

The first article I saw even made sure to remind the reader of the Buffalo killing, in case you forgot about the "massive threat" from "white supremacists" since you last heard about it 30 seconds prior:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/biden-to-address-nation-on-horrific-texas-school-shooting/ar-AAXFYuP

Coulter's Law never fails.