Forwarded from Xhu ♔
All evident and secondary information proves Hitler was a non-Christian. He explicitly expresses disdain for St. Paul, corroborated by his peers such as Goebbels. Official NSDAP literature, refer to Der Schulungsbrief, criticises Paul as being foreign and subversive. They consider Israelites to be Old Testament Jews, Hitler himself calling Abraham the perverted progenitor of Jews. Hitler's Mentor, Dietrich Eckart, wrote a dialogue, Bolsevism from Moses to Lenin, which was later mirrored in an official NSDAP document titled 'Bolshevism in the Bible'.
It is a common theme, much like the disapproval of Paul and rejection of Yahweh for being a Jewish God, for the NSDAP and Hitler to disparage the Old Testament, such as Hitler sending compliments to an anti-Christian author or preaching the opposite of its teachings. The SS lays bare that the Christian religion as a whole is negative and undermines the Germanic race.
Neither the party nor the SS accepted any official religion. Christianity especially was intended to phase out, in many cases be forced out. Himmler in particular looked at the Church with disgust and acknowledged it to be foreign. The leading National Socialists refused the Christian religion, a religion which, in Hitler's words, helped corrode and collapse Rome.
The Catholic Church, Popes and all, not only confirmed all this, but outright condemned the National Socialist state for it. Adding to this, Catholics plotted against the NSDAP in several ways, going so far as to threaten the Führer's life. National Socialism is unabashedly Nietzschean, deeply anti-Semitic, rooted in Science and Nature, completely Race First, and therefore not Christian.
It is a common theme, much like the disapproval of Paul and rejection of Yahweh for being a Jewish God, for the NSDAP and Hitler to disparage the Old Testament, such as Hitler sending compliments to an anti-Christian author or preaching the opposite of its teachings. The SS lays bare that the Christian religion as a whole is negative and undermines the Germanic race.
Neither the party nor the SS accepted any official religion. Christianity especially was intended to phase out, in many cases be forced out. Himmler in particular looked at the Church with disgust and acknowledged it to be foreign. The leading National Socialists refused the Christian religion, a religion which, in Hitler's words, helped corrode and collapse Rome.
The Catholic Church, Popes and all, not only confirmed all this, but outright condemned the National Socialist state for it. Adding to this, Catholics plotted against the NSDAP in several ways, going so far as to threaten the Führer's life. National Socialism is unabashedly Nietzschean, deeply anti-Semitic, rooted in Science and Nature, completely Race First, and therefore not Christian.
⚡11💯2
"An article by an author using the pen-name ‘Spengler’ on the Christian web-journal called First Things sheds some light on this. The article, ‘Christian, Muslim, Jew’, highlights the writings of a Jewish rabbi called Franz Rosenzweig. While Rosenzweig died in 1929, the author says that his philosophy was especially popular in the post-WWII era. Spengler describes World War II as a war between Abrahamism and ‘neopaganism’, saying that ‘after neopaganism nearly conquered Europe, Rosenzweig’s contention that Christianity requires the presence of the Jews found great resonance.’ He continues
Pagans, Rosenzweig explained, have only the fragile and ultimately futile effort to preserve their physical continuity through blood and soil. Their hope for immortality takes the form of a perpetual fight for physical existence, which one day they must lose. Rosenzweig’s sociology of religion thus offers unique insights into the origin and nature of civilizational conflict when he argues that a pagan people, ever sentient of the fragility of their existence, are always prepared to fight to the death.
Much has been said over the years about paganism continuing to live on in the hearts and minds of ethnic Europeans. Rosenzweig’s view is that the presence of Jews in the West is a sort of paternalistic role which stops Europeans from reverting to paganism, with Gnostic Christianity being a form of Christianity that merges indigenous spiritual worldview with Abrahamic scripture. Spengler says that Rosenzweig ‘began a new kind of dialogue between Judaism and Christianity when he argued that the two faiths complement each other: Christianity to propagate revelation to the world, and Judaism to “convert the inner pagan” inside each Christian.’ He later continues, ‘Rosenzweig’s most influential claim holds that the Jew “converts the inner pagan” inside the Christian, such that the living presence of the Jewish people creates a counterweight to the Gnostic impulses in Christianity.’
Rosenzweig’s worldview clearly saw Judaism and Christianity working together in unity against a ‘blood and soil’ worldview. Paganism is essentially ancestor worship and nature veneration, literally blood and soil. And, according to Rosenzweig, without the guiding hand of Judaism, Europeans would fall back into this belief system. Spengler explains, ‘Rosenzweig argues that pagan society cannot foster authentic human individuality but dissolves the individual into an extension of race or state.’ This explains quite well how closely paganism is tied to ethnicity, whereas Christianity, guided by Judaism, is supposed to function as a universalizing force transcending racial boundaries. He continues on:
In pagan society, where God remains unrevealed, the individual exists only as an organ of the collective of state or race. The pagan’s sense of immortality therefore depends solely on the perpetuation of his race, and his most sacred act is to sacrifice himself in war to postpone the inevitable day when his race will go down in defeat.
Pagans, Rosenzweig explained, have only the fragile and ultimately futile effort to preserve their physical continuity through blood and soil. Their hope for immortality takes the form of a perpetual fight for physical existence, which one day they must lose. Rosenzweig’s sociology of religion thus offers unique insights into the origin and nature of civilizational conflict when he argues that a pagan people, ever sentient of the fragility of their existence, are always prepared to fight to the death.
Much has been said over the years about paganism continuing to live on in the hearts and minds of ethnic Europeans. Rosenzweig’s view is that the presence of Jews in the West is a sort of paternalistic role which stops Europeans from reverting to paganism, with Gnostic Christianity being a form of Christianity that merges indigenous spiritual worldview with Abrahamic scripture. Spengler says that Rosenzweig ‘began a new kind of dialogue between Judaism and Christianity when he argued that the two faiths complement each other: Christianity to propagate revelation to the world, and Judaism to “convert the inner pagan” inside each Christian.’ He later continues, ‘Rosenzweig’s most influential claim holds that the Jew “converts the inner pagan” inside the Christian, such that the living presence of the Jewish people creates a counterweight to the Gnostic impulses in Christianity.’
Rosenzweig’s worldview clearly saw Judaism and Christianity working together in unity against a ‘blood and soil’ worldview. Paganism is essentially ancestor worship and nature veneration, literally blood and soil. And, according to Rosenzweig, without the guiding hand of Judaism, Europeans would fall back into this belief system. Spengler explains, ‘Rosenzweig argues that pagan society cannot foster authentic human individuality but dissolves the individual into an extension of race or state.’ This explains quite well how closely paganism is tied to ethnicity, whereas Christianity, guided by Judaism, is supposed to function as a universalizing force transcending racial boundaries. He continues on:
In pagan society, where God remains unrevealed, the individual exists only as an organ of the collective of state or race. The pagan’s sense of immortality therefore depends solely on the perpetuation of his race, and his most sacred act is to sacrifice himself in war to postpone the inevitable day when his race will go down in defeat.
🔥4🤔2
I would say that this Jewish rabbi’s views on paganism are accurate. And his discussion illuminates precisely why Christianity was used as the ideological tool to subdue disparate tribes into submission under an expanding empire with globalist aims. Indeed, if one begins to dig through old dictionaries for the definition of the word ‘ethnic’, what one finds is that before WWII, it had been used interchangeably with ‘heathen’ and ‘pagan’. The word ‘ethnos’ itself has origins in ancient Greek wherein it was used to describe a collective group of creatures that are alike to one another. In the earliest usage, ethnos could be used interchangeably with words like hive, pack, flocker, it was also used to describe groups of people who were alike, such as a tribe or a race. The New Testament verse Romans 10:2 supports Rabbi Rosenzweig’s point of view: ‘For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.’ Add to this that the word used by Saul-turned-Paul of Tarsus in the original Greek New Testament which has been translated into English as ‘pagan’ was originally ‘ethnikos’. It is quite clear that Rosenzweig was correct: Christianity had a directive to remove barriers between ethnicities while paganism was synonymous with ethnic identity. Therefore, liberal hippy-dippy pagans pushing no borders are practicing the wrong religion!" Carolyn Emerick, More than Meets the Eye: The Death and Resurrection of European Animism
👍9
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rabbis openly admitting Christianity is a jewish deception to convert gentiles to their god.
Credit KnowMoreNews and seethroughit2
Credit KnowMoreNews and seethroughit2
💯18👍3🤣1
"Joseph was a Jew who was sold into slavery in Egypt. His reputation as an interpreter of dreams reached the ear of the Pharaoh, who was duly impressed—so much so that he made Joseph the second most powerful man in the land: “You shall be over my house, and all my people shall order themselves as you command… Behold, I have set you over all the land of Egypt” (Gen 41:40). In anticipation of a coming seven-year famine, Joseph built up a huge surplus of grain. The famine hit, and for two years there was enough grain, and enough money in the land for the people to buy it.
But Joseph had a plan. As the grain was being purchased, he “gathered up all the money… and brought the money into the Pharaoh’s house” (47:14). In effect, he took the currency out of circulation. In due time, “the money was all spent,” and the people began to starve. Joseph then held all the cards. In the third year, he agreed to accept livestock in exchange for grain. By the fourth year, the people had neither money nor animals to give—only themselves and the land on which they lived. “Buy us and our land for food,” they said (47:19). And he did. First he acquired all the land. “As for the people, he made slaves of them from one end of Egypt to the other”—and thus the people were sold into slavery, in their own country. Granted, Joseph did all this on behalf of the Pharaoh, but it was, after all, his plan; to the masses, he was the Jewish face of exploitation. And Joseph himself clearly profited. There was assuredly no starvation for his clan, as they were allowed to live in the “land of Goshen,” the best and most fertile part of Egypt. After bankrupting and enslaving the Egyptian people, Joseph lived quite happily—so the story goes—to the ripe old age of 110.[5]"
Thomas Dalton, The Jewish Hand in The World Wars
But Joseph had a plan. As the grain was being purchased, he “gathered up all the money… and brought the money into the Pharaoh’s house” (47:14). In effect, he took the currency out of circulation. In due time, “the money was all spent,” and the people began to starve. Joseph then held all the cards. In the third year, he agreed to accept livestock in exchange for grain. By the fourth year, the people had neither money nor animals to give—only themselves and the land on which they lived. “Buy us and our land for food,” they said (47:19). And he did. First he acquired all the land. “As for the people, he made slaves of them from one end of Egypt to the other”—and thus the people were sold into slavery, in their own country. Granted, Joseph did all this on behalf of the Pharaoh, but it was, after all, his plan; to the masses, he was the Jewish face of exploitation. And Joseph himself clearly profited. There was assuredly no starvation for his clan, as they were allowed to live in the “land of Goshen,” the best and most fertile part of Egypt. After bankrupting and enslaving the Egyptian people, Joseph lived quite happily—so the story goes—to the ripe old age of 110.[5]"
Thomas Dalton, The Jewish Hand in The World Wars
👍10🤬1🤨1
Christians destroyed all other religious texts but protected Judaism
On The Historicity of Jesus, Chapter 8, Richard Carrier
"Of course, it could be claimed that there were indeed many such mentions but none were preserved. And that may even be true (in the case of Jewish and Neronian literature, it almost has to be true). It’s certainly true for countless other people, fads and events in the Roman Empire. But none of those people, fads or events had a massive Church devoted to preserving records of its resurrected God, which then became almost solely responsible for preserving all literature whatever. This is why we have a hundred times more faith literature from Christians about Christianity (even just from the first to fourth centuries) than we do from any other faith group of the period. Only Judaism comes anywhere near a (very) distant second, and that only because Christians also avidly preserved a lot of Judaica, and because apart from Christianity, Judaism is the only religious community to continuously survive from the Roman Empire to the present."
On The Historicity of Jesus, Chapter 8, Richard Carrier
👍16🔥3😢2
'Nietzsche held out particular scorn for the three cardinal virtues of Christianity: faith, hope, and love (Paul, in 1 Cor 13:13). Faith is fundamentally opposed to truth, because one simply ‘believes’ for no rational reason, or worse, in spite of reason; “if faith is quite generally needed above all, then reason, knowledge, and inquiry must be discredited: the way to truth become the forbidden way” (The Antichrist sec. 23). Faith is a “form of sickness, and all straight, honest, scientific paths to knowledge must be rejected by the church as forbidden paths. Even doubt is a sin. … ‘Faith’ means not wanting to know what is true” (sec. 52). It engenders dependency, because one is not allowed to think critically, or for oneself; the believer becomes dependent on the priest, who in turn gains power over the believer. Hence “every kind of faith is itself an expression of self-abnegation, of self-alienation” (sec. 54).
Hope, Nietzsche reminds us, was the one evil that did not escape Pandora’s box. It strikes the modern reader as odd to think of hope as an evil, but in the hand of the Christian it becomes merely “a hope for the beyond” — an unfulfillable (or at least unverifiable) promise of a blessed afterlife. As such, Christian hope is meaningless; worse still, a tool for manipulation, “precisely because of its ability to keep the unfortunate in continual suspense” (sec. 23). To repeatedly promise with no ability to deliver — this is the function of the priest.
Love is the most striking of the three, born as it is, paradoxically, out of Jewish hatred and revenge. Rather than teaching the non-Jews to hate the Romans — for which there was no real basis — Paul and his fellow Jews used ‘God’s love’ to seduce the masses. This necessitated, first of all, a certain conception of God: “To make love possible, God must be a person,” not merely some abstract metaphysical entity. To truly personalize God, he must come to Earth in human form — hence Jesus. ‘Jesus’ (of the Pauline persuasion) now serves a specific purpose: to allow us to ‘love God’ more easily. Once we are in love, we both tolerate more, and are ripe for manipulation. “Love is the state in which man sees things most decidedly as they are not. … In love man endures more, man bears everything” (ibid). So once the masses are drawn to the Jewish Messiah by love, they accept what he says unquestioningly, and are willing to submit to trials and hardship — a perfect combination for the Jewish priest. Accept the Jews, those chosen people of God; don’t resist the Jews; love thy neighbor, the Jew (Rom 13:9) — this is the message:
Because the goal was to convert and mobilize every available person, Jesus (God) must love all people equally. Paul thereby negated one of the most ancient realities of human society — the hierarchy of rank among individuals — with his doctrine of a God that gives his blessing to all. He also negated the existence and importance of ethnic and national differences and conflicts among different ethnic and national interests: All people are essentially the same in the eyes of God. All men have an immortal soul that can be saved, and thus are inherently equal [...]
There could scarcely be a more pernicious lie than this, he argues. If no one is worse than anyone else, then no one is better — no one can get better. This is counter to the whole thrust of life and evolution, which is toward the greater, the higher, the more refined, the nobler.'
Nietzsche and the Origins of Christianity, Thomas Dalton
Nietzsche and the Origins of Christianity Pt 1
Nietzsche and the Origins of Christianity Pt 2
Hope, Nietzsche reminds us, was the one evil that did not escape Pandora’s box. It strikes the modern reader as odd to think of hope as an evil, but in the hand of the Christian it becomes merely “a hope for the beyond” — an unfulfillable (or at least unverifiable) promise of a blessed afterlife. As such, Christian hope is meaningless; worse still, a tool for manipulation, “precisely because of its ability to keep the unfortunate in continual suspense” (sec. 23). To repeatedly promise with no ability to deliver — this is the function of the priest.
Love is the most striking of the three, born as it is, paradoxically, out of Jewish hatred and revenge. Rather than teaching the non-Jews to hate the Romans — for which there was no real basis — Paul and his fellow Jews used ‘God’s love’ to seduce the masses. This necessitated, first of all, a certain conception of God: “To make love possible, God must be a person,” not merely some abstract metaphysical entity. To truly personalize God, he must come to Earth in human form — hence Jesus. ‘Jesus’ (of the Pauline persuasion) now serves a specific purpose: to allow us to ‘love God’ more easily. Once we are in love, we both tolerate more, and are ripe for manipulation. “Love is the state in which man sees things most decidedly as they are not. … In love man endures more, man bears everything” (ibid). So once the masses are drawn to the Jewish Messiah by love, they accept what he says unquestioningly, and are willing to submit to trials and hardship — a perfect combination for the Jewish priest. Accept the Jews, those chosen people of God; don’t resist the Jews; love thy neighbor, the Jew (Rom 13:9) — this is the message:
The Christian…is distinguished by acting differently: by not resisting, either in words or in his heart, those who treat him ill; by making no distinction between foreigner and native, between Jew and non-Jew (‘the neighbor’ — really the coreligionist, the Jew); by not growing angry with anybody, by not despising anybody… (sec. 33)
Because the goal was to convert and mobilize every available person, Jesus (God) must love all people equally. Paul thereby negated one of the most ancient realities of human society — the hierarchy of rank among individuals — with his doctrine of a God that gives his blessing to all. He also negated the existence and importance of ethnic and national differences and conflicts among different ethnic and national interests: All people are essentially the same in the eyes of God. All men have an immortal soul that can be saved, and thus are inherently equal [...]
There could scarcely be a more pernicious lie than this, he argues. If no one is worse than anyone else, then no one is better — no one can get better. This is counter to the whole thrust of life and evolution, which is toward the greater, the higher, the more refined, the nobler.'
Nietzsche and the Origins of Christianity, Thomas Dalton
Nietzsche and the Origins of Christianity Pt 1
Nietzsche and the Origins of Christianity Pt 2
❤10👍3
Since Hitler based his ethical views on natural laws, especially evolutionary laws, this means that Christian ethics were not sacrosanct. Some elements of Christian morality might, in Hitler’s view, comport with the laws of nature and thus be valid. Other Christian commandments, however, needed to be discarded as relics of the benighted, prescientific past. According to Hitler, the ideas of Christianity contradicted Natural laws and thus contradicting his own ethics, which can only mean that Christianity is not something Hitler truly believed.
Another way that Hitler’s morality diverged from Christian norms was that he ignored/reinterpreted what Jesus called the most important commandment: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength.” Hitler did love nature, so perhaps in some sense he did love his own idea of God. However, Jesus was quoting from the Old Testament, where the Lord specified was Yahweh.
Why this is crucial is due to the fact that Hitler completely separated Jesus from the established Christianity, calling Christianity a falsification of the actual meaning of the teachings of Christ invented by Saint Paul. Which can only mean that Hitler had never actually thought of Jesus as divine within his own theological ideas.
Hitler certainly did not love Yahweh, whom he identified as the God of the Jews. Thus Hitler denied God the Father (Yahweh) to which Jesus called upon just like how he did with Abraham. Further, Hitler continually insisted that God was inscrutable and unknowable, unlike in Christianity, where one could cultivate a personal, loving relationship with Him. One cannot communicate with the impersonal kind of God that Hitler believed in.
In any case, Hitler never went out of his way to encourage people to love God and cultivate a relationship with Him, so whatever positions he took on other questions of ethics, he missed the central tenet of Christian morality. The centerpiece of Hitler’s ethics was not to love God but to follow the laws of nature, which he identified with God’s will.
Another way that Hitler’s morality diverged from Christian norms was that he ignored/reinterpreted what Jesus called the most important commandment: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength.” Hitler did love nature, so perhaps in some sense he did love his own idea of God. However, Jesus was quoting from the Old Testament, where the Lord specified was Yahweh.
Why this is crucial is due to the fact that Hitler completely separated Jesus from the established Christianity, calling Christianity a falsification of the actual meaning of the teachings of Christ invented by Saint Paul. Which can only mean that Hitler had never actually thought of Jesus as divine within his own theological ideas.
Hitler certainly did not love Yahweh, whom he identified as the God of the Jews. Thus Hitler denied God the Father (Yahweh) to which Jesus called upon just like how he did with Abraham. Further, Hitler continually insisted that God was inscrutable and unknowable, unlike in Christianity, where one could cultivate a personal, loving relationship with Him. One cannot communicate with the impersonal kind of God that Hitler believed in.
In any case, Hitler never went out of his way to encourage people to love God and cultivate a relationship with Him, so whatever positions he took on other questions of ethics, he missed the central tenet of Christian morality. The centerpiece of Hitler’s ethics was not to love God but to follow the laws of nature, which he identified with God’s will.
❤10
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
praxben from tiktok debunks the lie that National Socialism was "pro christian". These primary sources and many others can be found here: @NSHeathenry
Documents cited:
https://t.iss.one/NSHeathenry/490
https://t.iss.one/NSHeathenry/362
https://t.iss.one/NSHeathenry/632
Documents cited:
https://t.iss.one/NSHeathenry/490
https://t.iss.one/NSHeathenry/362
https://t.iss.one/NSHeathenry/632
👍6🔥5
Forwarded from Heathen Revival
²⁶ To charge interest and engage in usury is unknown [among the Germans], and the principle is better observed than if there had been actual prohibition. Land is taken up by a village as a whole, in quantity according to the number of the cultivators.
- Tacitus, Germania [Hospitality customs]
Devarim / דְּבָרִים 23:19 (Deuteronomy)
¹⁹ Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest. ²⁰ You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the Lord your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess.
Quite a stark contrast between gentile and jewish financial operations. Raising interest rates and even charging interest itself was very taboo in pre-christian times with an exception for the Hebrews. Even in their poetry do they brag about sucking the milk [the wealth] of the nations [goyim]:
"You shall suck the milk of the [Gentile] nations and shall suck the breast of kings" - bible
- Tacitus, Germania [Hospitality customs]
Devarim / דְּבָרִים 23:19 (Deuteronomy)
¹⁹ Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest, whether on money or food or anything else that may earn interest. ²⁰ You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the Lord your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess.
Quite a stark contrast between gentile and jewish financial operations. Raising interest rates and even charging interest itself was very taboo in pre-christian times with an exception for the Hebrews. Even in their poetry do they brag about sucking the milk [the wealth] of the nations [goyim]:
"You shall suck the milk of the [Gentile] nations and shall suck the breast of kings" - bible
👍6❤5
Alienation from Nature
'Christianity has distanced humanity from nature. As people came to perceive God as a singular supremacy detached from the physical world, they lost their reverence for nature. In Christian eyes, the physical world became the realm of the devil. A society that had once celebrated nature through seasonal festivals began to commemorate biblical events bearing no connection to the earth. Holidays lost much of their celebratory spirit and took on a tone of penance and sorrow. Time, once thought to be cyclical like the seasons, was now perceived to be linear. In their rejection of the cyclical nature of life, orthodox Christians came to focus more upon death than upon life.
Earthliness is synonymous with sinfulness throughout much of the Bible. For example, Colossians states:
Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: immorality, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming.
A similar message is also found in James: “This [bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts] is not such as comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual and devilish.”
Paul describes enemies of the cross of Christ as people “whose God is their belly... who mind earthly things.” The message is clear: the earth is ungodly.'
Ch 9,
The Dark Side of Christian History,
Helen Ellerbe
'Christianity has distanced humanity from nature. As people came to perceive God as a singular supremacy detached from the physical world, they lost their reverence for nature. In Christian eyes, the physical world became the realm of the devil. A society that had once celebrated nature through seasonal festivals began to commemorate biblical events bearing no connection to the earth. Holidays lost much of their celebratory spirit and took on a tone of penance and sorrow. Time, once thought to be cyclical like the seasons, was now perceived to be linear. In their rejection of the cyclical nature of life, orthodox Christians came to focus more upon death than upon life.
Earthliness is synonymous with sinfulness throughout much of the Bible. For example, Colossians states:
Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: immorality, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming.
A similar message is also found in James: “This [bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts] is not such as comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual and devilish.”
Paul describes enemies of the cross of Christ as people “whose God is their belly... who mind earthly things.” The message is clear: the earth is ungodly.'
Ch 9,
The Dark Side of Christian History,
Helen Ellerbe
👍16🔥8
Forwarded from ✡️ Christianity Exposed ✡️
Ethnikos & Katholikos
The word pagan is derived from the Latin pāgānus, meaning "rural" or "rustic". Initially, the word ethnikos was used in the Bible to refer to pagans, meaning those of the ethnic faith, and the word gentile derives from the Latin gentilis, meaning "clan" or "tribe". Catholic, however, derives from the Greek katholikos, meaning "universal", for we "are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal 3:28).
The purpose of Abrahamism is and always has been the universal worship of "the God of Israel" (Isa 45:3) and therefore the Jews—his "treasured possession" who were "chosen out of all the peoples" (Deut 7:6)—by proxy. Those who "will rule over many nations but none will rule over [them]" (Deut 15:6), who will be "the head, not the tail" (Deut 28:13), and who promote universalism—through Christianity and Islam—for everyone but themselves, for they are "a people dwelling alone, not reckoning itself among the nations". (Num 23:9)
@ChristianityExposed
The word pagan is derived from the Latin pāgānus, meaning "rural" or "rustic". Initially, the word ethnikos was used in the Bible to refer to pagans, meaning those of the ethnic faith, and the word gentile derives from the Latin gentilis, meaning "clan" or "tribe". Catholic, however, derives from the Greek katholikos, meaning "universal", for we "are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal 3:28).
The purpose of Abrahamism is and always has been the universal worship of "the God of Israel" (Isa 45:3) and therefore the Jews—his "treasured possession" who were "chosen out of all the peoples" (Deut 7:6)—by proxy. Those who "will rule over many nations but none will rule over [them]" (Deut 15:6), who will be "the head, not the tail" (Deut 28:13), and who promote universalism—through Christianity and Islam—for everyone but themselves, for they are "a people dwelling alone, not reckoning itself among the nations". (Num 23:9)
@ChristianityExposed
💯12👏3
Forwarded from Gnostic Intel
“The Sunday School narrative of a church of martyrs, of Christians huddled in catacombs out of fear, meeting in secret to avoid arrest, and mercilessly thrown to lions merely for their religious beliefs is a macabre fairy tale. When Christians appeared in Roman courtrooms, they were not tried as heretics, blasphemers, or even fools. Christians had a reputation for being socially reclusive, refusing to join the military, and refusing to swear oaths…
A close look at the evidence shows that Christians were never the victims of sustained, targeted persecution. Even the so-called great persecutions under the emperors Decius and Diocletian have been vastly exaggerated in our Christian sources. In general, when Christians were executed, it was for activities that were authentically politically and socially subversive.”
―Candida Moss, The Myth of Persecution
Image: The Christian Martyrs' Last Prayer by Jean-Léon Gérôme
A close look at the evidence shows that Christians were never the victims of sustained, targeted persecution. Even the so-called great persecutions under the emperors Decius and Diocletian have been vastly exaggerated in our Christian sources. In general, when Christians were executed, it was for activities that were authentically politically and socially subversive.”
―Candida Moss, The Myth of Persecution
Image: The Christian Martyrs' Last Prayer by Jean-Léon Gérôme
🔥14
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Insane Mizrachi praises Trump and says Europe deserves the muslim invasion:
https://x.com/seethroughit2/status/1825940461586158020
the Torah says everyone who blesses the Jewish nation is automatically blessed.
Even if he's[Trump's] wicked, even if he has personality issues, it's written,
Gashem says to Abraham, everyone will bless your children, automatically will be blessed by me.
And everyone will curse them or give them hard time, automatically will be cursed by me.
And you can see, you can see all these nations, all these anti-Semite nations.
They are all being destroyed as we speak, all the European anti-Semites.
Gashem sent them cancer to their countries, the Arabs, that's their cancer.
They're taking over their countries, they're occupying the streets, they intimidate them,
they destroy them, there's crime, they rob them, they violent, they block the streets,
and they force their culture on them, and they're taking away Paris, London, all these places.
You can see these riots in London for months already.
This is their punishments, they came and killed the Jews that were in Europe.
Gashem said, no problem, I'm going to give you something a lot better than the Jews that you killed.
I'm going to send you the children of Ishmael, you will have a taste.
We suffered from them for more than 2000 years, nothing is new, but the Europeans didn't suffer from them.
Gashem turned the Europeans to such fools that they blinded them,
that they brought the cancer into their body.
https://x.com/seethroughit2/status/1825940461586158020
🤬12💯5
Christianity the original DEI
From it's inception, Christianity was the the spread of universalism and "one-ness" to break down racial barriers.
Galatians 3:28
Corinthians 12:13
Acts 17:26
Catholic the first dominant form of Christianity, means "universal"
Christians embodied this message from the very beginning:
First Apology Ch XIV Justin Martyr 150 AD:
Epistle to Diognetus(130 AD), Chapter 5
Irenaeus of Lyons(130-202 AD), Against Heresies, Book 1, Chapter 10, Section 2,
John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, was a staunch abolitionist and used Christian doctrine to argue for racial equality and the abolition of slavery:
The Doctrine of Original Sin, referencing Acts 17:26
In 1957, Martin Luther King Jr. quoted Galatians 3:28 in a pamphlet opposing racial segregation in the United States and wrote,
Christians that deny history, ignore what the bible clearly states, invent nonsense like Christian Identity, will never get anywhere. Christianity must be recognized for the anti-ethnic poison that it was designed to be and tossed aside in order for Europeans to re-gain power.
From it's inception, Christianity was the the spread of universalism and "one-ness" to break down racial barriers.
"There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Galatians 3:28
"For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink."
Corinthians 12:13
"From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands."
Acts 17:26
Catholic the first dominant form of Christianity, means "universal"
Christians embodied this message from the very beginning:
“We used to hate and destroy one another and refused to associate with people of another race or country. Now, because of Christ, we live together with such people and pray for our enemies.”
First Apology Ch XIV Justin Martyr 150 AD:
"For the Christians are distinguished from other men neither by country, nor language, nor the customs which they observe. For they neither inhabit cities of their own, nor employ a peculiar form of speech, nor lead a life which is marked out by any singularity[...]
They dwell in their own countries, but simply as sojourners. As citizens, they share in all things with others, and yet endure all things as if foreigners. Every foreign land is to them as their native country, and every land of their birth as a land of strangers."
Epistle to Diognetus(130 AD), Chapter 5
"She[the Church] also believes these points [of doctrine] just as if she had but one soul, and one and the same heart, and she proclaims them, and teaches them, and hands them down, with perfect harmony, as if she possessed only one mouth. For, although the languages of the world are dissimilar, yet the import of the tradition is one and the same. For the Churches which have been planted in Germany do not believe or hand down anything different, nor do those in Spain, nor those in Gaul, nor those in the East, nor those in Egypt, nor those in Libya, nor those which have been established in the central regions of the world."
Irenaeus of Lyons(130-202 AD), Against Heresies, Book 1, Chapter 10, Section 2,
John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, was a staunch abolitionist and used Christian doctrine to argue for racial equality and the abolition of slavery:
"One God hath made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on the face of the earth."
The Doctrine of Original Sin, referencing Acts 17:26
In 1957, Martin Luther King Jr. quoted Galatians 3:28 in a pamphlet opposing racial segregation in the United States and wrote,
"Racial segregation is a blatant denial of the unity which we all have in Christ."
Christians that deny history, ignore what the bible clearly states, invent nonsense like Christian Identity, will never get anywhere. Christianity must be recognized for the anti-ethnic poison that it was designed to be and tossed aside in order for Europeans to re-gain power.
💯21✍1👍1👎1👏1
Forwarded from KMN Clips V2
👍5
Nice website that compares Christianity and Wokeism side by side, proving they are in fact based on the same Abrahamic angles of attack:
https://rentry.co/wokeianity
https://rentry.co/wokeianity
rentry.co
Christianity and Wokeism: Ideological brothers
Rather than detail many paragraphs of evidence, I've found the best method of fully articulating this point is through a direct comparison of the two religions in tabular format.
This list is presented with the more important, central arguments at the top…
This list is presented with the more important, central arguments at the top…
👍19🔥3👏1