Forwarded from NS Heathenry
𝐇𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐉𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲
"How many such tragedies - completed or unfinished - have taken place on this earth, we cannot clarify beyond doubt. In many cases we can only guess that our eternal enemy, the Jew, had a bloody hand in some cloak or through one of its organizations. [..] We see how the funeral pyres on which, after countless tens of thousands, the mangled and torn bodies of the mothers and girls of our people burned to ashes in the witch trials."
— Heinrich Himmler
Source: Die Schutzstaffel als antibolschewistische Kampforganisation (1937) p.5
@NSHeathenry
"How many such tragedies - completed or unfinished - have taken place on this earth, we cannot clarify beyond doubt. In many cases we can only guess that our eternal enemy, the Jew, had a bloody hand in some cloak or through one of its organizations. [..] We see how the funeral pyres on which, after countless tens of thousands, the mangled and torn bodies of the mothers and girls of our people burned to ashes in the witch trials."
— Heinrich Himmler
Source: Die Schutzstaffel als antibolschewistische Kampforganisation (1937) p.5
@NSHeathenry
⚡25😢2
Forwarded from Gnostic Intel
“There are two totally different orders of mythology. There is the mythology that relates you to your nature and to the natural world, of which you're a part. Then, there is the mythology that is strictly sociological, linking you to a particular society. You are not simply a natural human being; you are a member of a particular group…
Now, the biblical tradition is a socially oriented mythology. Nature is condemned. In the nineteenth century, scholars thought of mythology and ritual as an attempt to control nature. But that is magic, not mythology or religion. Nature religions are not attempts to control nature but to help you put yourself in accord with it. However, when nature is thought of as evil, you don't put yourself in accord with it; you control it, or try to, and hence the tension, the anxiety, the cutting down of forests, and the annihilation of native people. This perspective accentuates the separation from nature.”
―Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth
Image: The Druids by Julia Tar
Now, the biblical tradition is a socially oriented mythology. Nature is condemned. In the nineteenth century, scholars thought of mythology and ritual as an attempt to control nature. But that is magic, not mythology or religion. Nature religions are not attempts to control nature but to help you put yourself in accord with it. However, when nature is thought of as evil, you don't put yourself in accord with it; you control it, or try to, and hence the tension, the anxiety, the cutting down of forests, and the annihilation of native people. This perspective accentuates the separation from nature.”
―Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth
Image: The Druids by Julia Tar
🔥16💯3
Forwarded from Gnostic Intel
“With his fabricated “Jesus” and his fabricated “afterlife,” Paul drained all value from this world, the real world. It turned believers into weak and subservient sheep, ones whose lives are oriented around the manufactured sayings of a marginal rabbi and of prayer to Jehovah, the invisible God of the Jews. It took a few hundred years, but when enough people fell for the hoax, it helped to bring down the Roman Empire. And when people—lots of people—still believe it after two thousand years, it cannot but degrade society, weighing us down, blocking us from attaining that which we are capable of, that which was only hinted at in the greatness of Athens and Rome.”
― David Skrbina, The Jesus Hoax: How St. Paul’s Cabal Fooled the World for Two Thousand Years
Image: Saint Paul by Barolomeo Montagna
― David Skrbina, The Jesus Hoax: How St. Paul’s Cabal Fooled the World for Two Thousand Years
Image: Saint Paul by Barolomeo Montagna
💯33⚡4👍2🔥2
Forwarded from Christianity, the mental illness
Nearly all ante-Nicene Church Fathers were pacifists who advocated desertion from the Roman army, claiming Christians cannot be soldiers. Pagans called this out and Christians replied with an insane and nonsensical answer, obvious traitorous behavior.
It wasn’t until Christians infiltrated high offices and under the reign of Theodosius II did opposite occur, now only Christian’s can become soldiers.
This was no different to modern day communist subversion, infiltration and antifa tactics.
https://x.com/1stbornson1/status/1842358220108751247?t=xEPY186k0rLG82kyT-yPAw&s=19
It wasn’t until Christians infiltrated high offices and under the reign of Theodosius II did opposite occur, now only Christian’s can become soldiers.
This was no different to modern day communist subversion, infiltration and antifa tactics.
https://x.com/1stbornson1/status/1842358220108751247?t=xEPY186k0rLG82kyT-yPAw&s=19
🔥20💯4
Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
“Your pagan ancestors converted to Christianity” they scream, but what is meant here by “Christianity”? The propaganda used to entice the Germanic peoples bore little resemblance to what we now consider to be Christianity. Remember that the majority of people even in 1500 were illiterate, let alone in 700 when the English were being converted. So people never understood the religion directly from the Bible, only indirectly via poems, miracle plays, religious art and sermons etc.
Here are some of the ways that Christian mythology was presented to our ancestors:
-Norse poem from 10th century says Jesus is at Urðarbrunnr “the well of fate” beneath the world tree in Heathen myth.
-Saxon gospel Heliand 830 AD says Jesus always addresses his disciples from the water’s edge, like Odin whose speaker’s chair is at the well of memory.
-English Dream of the Rood poem says Jesus is a ġeong hæleð "young warrior" and the cross is a conscious sacred tree which can speak.
-Anglo-Saxon gospels use the word “thegn” referring to a military attendant of a Germanic lord, to refer to God’s angels and to Christ’s disciples. The word has specific class associations from the military social hierarchy of the comitatus of Heathendom.
-They kept the Heathen word for the underworld “Hell” and continued to believe it was a place full of snakes (Judith poem) as in Heathen myth.
-Jesus went down to Hell and rescued all the noble pagans and took them to heaven (Harrowing of hell) so that Germanic people could still dwell in the afterlife with their noble pagan ancestors even after converting.
-The Jews in the Old English version of Exodus are depicted like Anglo-Saxons and Moses is said to defeat the enemy race by means of battle.
-That the god Sceaf was the son of the biblical Noah (Noah fathered Teutonic gods!)
This is just bait and switch. Our ancestors never converted to what people now call Christianity.
Here are some of the ways that Christian mythology was presented to our ancestors:
-Norse poem from 10th century says Jesus is at Urðarbrunnr “the well of fate” beneath the world tree in Heathen myth.
-Saxon gospel Heliand 830 AD says Jesus always addresses his disciples from the water’s edge, like Odin whose speaker’s chair is at the well of memory.
-English Dream of the Rood poem says Jesus is a ġeong hæleð "young warrior" and the cross is a conscious sacred tree which can speak.
-Anglo-Saxon gospels use the word “thegn” referring to a military attendant of a Germanic lord, to refer to God’s angels and to Christ’s disciples. The word has specific class associations from the military social hierarchy of the comitatus of Heathendom.
-They kept the Heathen word for the underworld “Hell” and continued to believe it was a place full of snakes (Judith poem) as in Heathen myth.
-Jesus went down to Hell and rescued all the noble pagans and took them to heaven (Harrowing of hell) so that Germanic people could still dwell in the afterlife with their noble pagan ancestors even after converting.
-The Jews in the Old English version of Exodus are depicted like Anglo-Saxons and Moses is said to defeat the enemy race by means of battle.
-That the god Sceaf was the son of the biblical Noah (Noah fathered Teutonic gods!)
This is just bait and switch. Our ancestors never converted to what people now call Christianity.
⚡41💯10🔥4👍2🤣1
Forwarded from christian bad 8
Christians be like: "Haha! Trumps such a jew puppet!!!"
**puts on jewish slave marker(cross)**
**puts on jewish slave marker(cross)**
🔥43💯12🤔3👎2
Are Judeo-Christian Values Killing Europeans? w/ Pox Populi https://odysee.com/@thegermanpointer:9/Are-Judeo-Christian-Values-Killing-Europeans-1-of-3:e
Odysee
Explore a whole universe of videos on Odysee from regular people just like you!
🔥15💯4👏1
Monotheism leads to Atheistic Materialism
Meanwhile, what has become of man’s relationship to nature? Monotheism sucks all the mystery out of nature and injects it into God, who is the “explanation” for nature. While polytheism, through the worship of many gods, affirms the life and mystery of the world in all its complexity, monotheism declares the world to be a mere artifact, the product of God’s making, and thus about as living and mysterious as a thumbtack. The transition from polytheism to monotheism is the “de-godding” of the different aspects of the world.
Monotheists therefore progressively cede the complexity of creation to the natural scientist. And what happens to their God as a result of this? The natural scientist need make no reference to God in any of his investigations of nature. The entire material world is (so he supposes) understandable by science on its own terms. Eventually, scientists and others realize that this is the case and God essentially becomes a deus otiosus. God becomes a dispensable “hypothesis” that does no work in explaining the world. The scientist then steps in to take God’s place.
The scientist recognizes that the world exhibits an intelligible order, but without God to underwrite creation, the natures of things no longer seem so “fixed.” John Locke founded his doctrine of individual rights (life, liberty, and property) on the idea that man’s nature is created by God. Remove belief in God and the status of man’s nature—and his rights—becomes highly questionable. Less than two hundred years later the followers of Marx (e.g. Trotsky) explicitly declared their intention to change human nature through “scientific socialism.” The result to the supposed “rights” of men is well-known.
Thus, in the absence of God (or the gods) the scientists come to believe that they can radically, infinitely alter what they study. Since there is no God, there is no reason to believe in the soul, or in any non-physical reality. Human beings are therefore simply a highly complex form of meat, which can be studied and manipulated using the same methods we use to study and manipulate other meat.
Since there is no non-physical reality, there are no objective or eternal ideals. Truth is “posited” by human beings.[9] This must mean, then, that moral idealism is a delusion. Men who exhibit the quality Plato called “spiritedness,” men who are ready to fight for ideals, are simply sick or deluded. This position was explicitly put forward in the twentieth century by the so-called Frankfurt School of sociology.[10] Modern “humanism”—modern science and psychology—considers a person “normal” if his concerns do not rise above the level of what Plato called “appetite”: concern with the satisfaction of desires and the maintenance or attainment of security and comfort. Hence the almost complete disappearance of terms like “honor,” “nobility,” and “self-sacrifice” from modern discourse.[11]
Here again, we see Will manifested: the closing off to anything “higher” than the self and the setting up of personal desire-fulfillment as the end of existence. But human beings cannot live entirely without ideals, and so a new ideal is created: the achievement of a society in which everyone’s desires are satisfied, in which physical security, comfort and health are perfectly realized. Having cut themselves off from any higher aspiration, scientists rush to place themselves in the service of this ideal.
And so, to come back to the beginning, what is the ultimate result of monotheism? Atheism, the violation of nature, the destruction of ideals, the destruction of morals, the barbarization of men, the eradication of human dignity, and the general debasement of human life (what is called “materialism”).
Summoning the Gods , Chapter "Knowing the Gods", Collin Cleary
[deus otiosus is the belief in a creator God who has entirely withdrawn from governing the universe after creating it or is no longer involved in its daily operation.]
Meanwhile, what has become of man’s relationship to nature? Monotheism sucks all the mystery out of nature and injects it into God, who is the “explanation” for nature. While polytheism, through the worship of many gods, affirms the life and mystery of the world in all its complexity, monotheism declares the world to be a mere artifact, the product of God’s making, and thus about as living and mysterious as a thumbtack. The transition from polytheism to monotheism is the “de-godding” of the different aspects of the world.
Monotheists therefore progressively cede the complexity of creation to the natural scientist. And what happens to their God as a result of this? The natural scientist need make no reference to God in any of his investigations of nature. The entire material world is (so he supposes) understandable by science on its own terms. Eventually, scientists and others realize that this is the case and God essentially becomes a deus otiosus. God becomes a dispensable “hypothesis” that does no work in explaining the world. The scientist then steps in to take God’s place.
The scientist recognizes that the world exhibits an intelligible order, but without God to underwrite creation, the natures of things no longer seem so “fixed.” John Locke founded his doctrine of individual rights (life, liberty, and property) on the idea that man’s nature is created by God. Remove belief in God and the status of man’s nature—and his rights—becomes highly questionable. Less than two hundred years later the followers of Marx (e.g. Trotsky) explicitly declared their intention to change human nature through “scientific socialism.” The result to the supposed “rights” of men is well-known.
Thus, in the absence of God (or the gods) the scientists come to believe that they can radically, infinitely alter what they study. Since there is no God, there is no reason to believe in the soul, or in any non-physical reality. Human beings are therefore simply a highly complex form of meat, which can be studied and manipulated using the same methods we use to study and manipulate other meat.
Since there is no non-physical reality, there are no objective or eternal ideals. Truth is “posited” by human beings.[9] This must mean, then, that moral idealism is a delusion. Men who exhibit the quality Plato called “spiritedness,” men who are ready to fight for ideals, are simply sick or deluded. This position was explicitly put forward in the twentieth century by the so-called Frankfurt School of sociology.[10] Modern “humanism”—modern science and psychology—considers a person “normal” if his concerns do not rise above the level of what Plato called “appetite”: concern with the satisfaction of desires and the maintenance or attainment of security and comfort. Hence the almost complete disappearance of terms like “honor,” “nobility,” and “self-sacrifice” from modern discourse.[11]
Here again, we see Will manifested: the closing off to anything “higher” than the self and the setting up of personal desire-fulfillment as the end of existence. But human beings cannot live entirely without ideals, and so a new ideal is created: the achievement of a society in which everyone’s desires are satisfied, in which physical security, comfort and health are perfectly realized. Having cut themselves off from any higher aspiration, scientists rush to place themselves in the service of this ideal.
And so, to come back to the beginning, what is the ultimate result of monotheism? Atheism, the violation of nature, the destruction of ideals, the destruction of morals, the barbarization of men, the eradication of human dignity, and the general debasement of human life (what is called “materialism”).
Summoning the Gods , Chapter "Knowing the Gods", Collin Cleary
[deus otiosus is the belief in a creator God who has entirely withdrawn from governing the universe after creating it or is no longer involved in its daily operation.]
🔥17👍3💯3
JesusMindControl
Are Judeo-Christian Values Killing Europeans? w/ Pox Populi https://odysee.com/@thegermanpointer:9/Are-Judeo-Christian-Values-Killing-Europeans-1-of-3:e
Are Judeo-Christian Values Killing Europeans? w/ Pox Populi Parts 2 & 3
https://odysee.com/@thegermanpointer:9/Are-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN-Values-Killing-Europeans-2-of-3:f
https://odysee.com/@thegermanpointer:9/Are-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN-Values-Killing-Europeans-3-of-3:f
https://odysee.com/@thegermanpointer:9/Are-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN-Values-Killing-Europeans-2-of-3:f
https://odysee.com/@thegermanpointer:9/Are-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN-Values-Killing-Europeans-3-of-3:f
Odysee
Are JUDEO-CHRISTIAN Values Killing Europeans? (2 of 3) | w/ Pox Populi
Pox Populi (Substack) https://poxpopuli.substack.com/
🔥31👍2💯2
In Rome, Christians were the ones violating the law, yet are taught today they were "persecuted victims".
In Caesarea, a judge dared to rule against a Christian bishop. He compounded his crime in the eyes of the Church by then declaring that everyone, whether they were Christian or not, should yield to the rule of law. He came to regret it. A mob of Christians, “like a hive roused by smoke,” surged around, “torch in hand, amid showers of stones, with cudgels ready, all ran and shouted together in their united zeal.” It was an effective technique. As one gloating Christian recorded: “What then was the conduct of this haughty and daring judge? He begged for mercy in a pitiable state of distress, cringing before them to an unparalleled extent.” This, the chronicler concluded with satisfaction, “was the doing of the God of Saints, Who works and changes all things for the best.”36
It did not seem to be “for the best” to many non-Christians. Elite writers expressed their disgust at the disorder. As the philosopher Celsus had observed so many years before, one should not defile the laws because if everyone did so it would be impossible for the law to function at all. The sort of intimidation that zealous Christians indulged in was not, another writer protested, the way that crime and punishment should work in the Roman Empire. “Nobody draws his sword against the murderer and puts it to his throat, employing force in place of the forms of law,” said the orator Libanius. Instead, in a civilized society, “the place of swords is taken by impeachments and processes, civil and criminal.” The Christians, he wrote with disdain, seemed to have no time for that: “these people here were the only ones ever to judge the cases of those whom they accuse and, having passed judgement, themselves to play the hangman’s part.”37
Ch "Merciful Savagery", The Darkening Age, Catherine Nixey
In Caesarea, a judge dared to rule against a Christian bishop. He compounded his crime in the eyes of the Church by then declaring that everyone, whether they were Christian or not, should yield to the rule of law. He came to regret it. A mob of Christians, “like a hive roused by smoke,” surged around, “torch in hand, amid showers of stones, with cudgels ready, all ran and shouted together in their united zeal.” It was an effective technique. As one gloating Christian recorded: “What then was the conduct of this haughty and daring judge? He begged for mercy in a pitiable state of distress, cringing before them to an unparalleled extent.” This, the chronicler concluded with satisfaction, “was the doing of the God of Saints, Who works and changes all things for the best.”36
It did not seem to be “for the best” to many non-Christians. Elite writers expressed their disgust at the disorder. As the philosopher Celsus had observed so many years before, one should not defile the laws because if everyone did so it would be impossible for the law to function at all. The sort of intimidation that zealous Christians indulged in was not, another writer protested, the way that crime and punishment should work in the Roman Empire. “Nobody draws his sword against the murderer and puts it to his throat, employing force in place of the forms of law,” said the orator Libanius. Instead, in a civilized society, “the place of swords is taken by impeachments and processes, civil and criminal.” The Christians, he wrote with disdain, seemed to have no time for that: “these people here were the only ones ever to judge the cases of those whom they accuse and, having passed judgement, themselves to play the hangman’s part.”37
Ch "Merciful Savagery", The Darkening Age, Catherine Nixey
👍39🤣3👎2😢2
The Crusades only happened due to pagan elements that Christians were unable to repress
The Northern Dawn, Stephen E. Flowers
Instead of directly confronting this opposing value system and attempting to radically transform it—an approach which almost certainly would have resulted in an immediate rejection of Christianity—the missionaries apparently sought to redefine the Germanic virtues of strength, courage, and loyalty in such a manner that would reduce the incompatibility with Christian values, while at the same time “inculturating” Christian values as far as possible to accommodate the Germanic ethos and world-view.
Historically, the whole idea of a “war for Christ” seems problematic. What is the origin of the Crusader ideology? At least one prominent theory holds that the Crusades represented an outgrowth of Germanic values then embedded in Christianity. Carl Erdmann writes: “The church was therefore confronted with a massive barrier of pagan ways, which for centuries were beyond its power to master.”54
The Northern Dawn, Stephen E. Flowers
👍26👏1🖕1
The Renaissance of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries was precisely that: a re-birth. “What it involved,” as Renan said, “was seeing antiquity face-to-face.” This rebirth was no journey backward or a simple resurgence of the “past,” but on the contrary the point of departure for a new spiritual adventure, a new adventure of the Faustian soul that was now triumphant because it had awakened to itself. Nor is neo-paganism today a regression either. On the contrary, it is the deliberate choice of a more authentic, harmonious, and powerful future—a choice that projects into the future, for new creations, the Eternal from which we come.
On Being a Pagan, Alain de Benoist
On Being a Pagan, Alain de Benoist
👍30⚡8🤣5🏆4❤🔥3
Christianity is controlled opposition, it’s time to stop beating around the bush on this topic https://fxtwitter.com/seethroughit2/status/1852255225878298790
FxTwitter
Seethroughitall (@seethroughit2)
Starting a new series called the "Enough Already" series
Episode 1: You worship a Jew Christians
"And by the way, salvation is of the Jews"
"I'm not Jewish, but the God I worship is"
"If the Christians didn't have the Jews, they wouldn't have God, 'cause…
Episode 1: You worship a Jew Christians
"And by the way, salvation is of the Jews"
"I'm not Jewish, but the God I worship is"
"If the Christians didn't have the Jews, they wouldn't have God, 'cause…
💯28👍3⚡2
Forwarded from Eichengeflüster
"Myth is not prehistory; it is timeless reality, which repeats itself in history. Our century's rediscovery of meaning in myth is a favorable sign. Even today a man is lead by strong powers far into the sea, far into the desert and their mask worlds. The journey will lose its menace once the divine power is recalled."
-Ernst Jünger, The Forest Passage
@oakwhispers
-Ernst Jünger, The Forest Passage
@oakwhispers
👍19🔥3
Jews fast every year for the "double agent" jews that started christianity https://fxtwitter.com/StonewallJack88/status/1852947915855036437
FxTwitter / FixupX
Stonewall Jackson (@StonewallJack88)
You hear that goys? It’s up to Shimon Peter, a jew who the jews have a secret fast day for, on who gets into heaven or not.
💯26🔥4👍1👏1🖕1