CHALLENGE
function createCounter() {
let count = 0;
return {
increment: () => ++count,
decrement: () => --count,
get: () => count
};
}
const counter1 = createCounter();
const counter2 = createCounter();
counter1.increment();
counter1.increment();
counter2.increment();
console.log(counter1.get(), counter2.get());
const { increment, get } = counter1;
increment();
console.log(get());
π4β€2π₯1
CHALLENGE
const promise1 = Promise.resolve('first');
const promise2 = new Promise(resolve => {
resolve('second');
});
const promise3 = Promise.resolve().then(() => 'third');
async function test() {
console.log('start');
const result1 = await promise1;
console.log(result1);
const result2 = await promise2;
console.log(result2);
const result3 = await promise3;
console.log(result3);
console.log('end');
}
test();
β€2
What is the output?
Anonymous Quiz
19%
start first end second third
33%
start end first second third
40%
start first second third end
8%
first second third start end
π₯4π€1
Is there a difference between the previous code (red) and the new one (green) ?
Actually, there is 35second differenceπ
The previous code was, on every loop, creating a new object, always deallocating and reallocating memory, while the second example creates one object (a cache) and save each item into it.
Eduard KrivΓ‘nek
Actually, there is 35second difference
The previous code was, on every loop, creating a new object, always deallocating and reallocating memory, while the second example creates one object (a cache) and save each item into it.
Eduard KrivΓ‘nek
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π7π₯4β€1