Permaculture farmers like Richard Perkins get it.

In this video, from 11 min 30 sec to 15 min 30 sec Richard drops so many gold nuggets.

He explains what weeds are, and what the role of 'pathogens' and 'diseases' are. Not only that but he describes how what happens in nature also reflects precisely what happens inside us!

The natural patterns we observe in nature are true of all ecosystems, including the human body.

The soil of the earth is akin to the soil of the human body (i.e. bodily fluids), a concept which was discussed at length in the medical literature just 100 years ago.

When the soil is disrupted in nature, the weeds grow to return the system back to balance. When we disrupt the soil of the human body (with toxicity, deficiency, trauma) the weeds grow to return the system to balance.

Practical examples like this are a great way of better understanding terrain theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u79tiVcj8bY

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

What does health mean to you? How do we define it?

Some say the definition of health is the absence of disease. However, this definition is almost meaningless when disease is often defined as the absence of health. How can health and disease be the absence of one another, when neither has been properly defined? This task is complicated further when one considers what dis-ease actually is (the body in an active state of healing or returning to homeostasis).

Health has been defined in some textbooks as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”. The historian Robert Hughes claimed this definition was “more realistic for a bovine than a human state of existence”.

It’s almost impossible to stipulate specific parameters (like vital signs), lab numbers etc. when trying to define health because no two people are alike. So how do we objectively quantify whether someone is healthy or not? Ask the person! The individual is the only one who knows whether they are healthy, not some clinician parading around in a white coat.

How does an individual know if they are healthy? They “feel” it.

When asked about their state of health, people say things like “I feel great”, or “I’m not feeling very well”, or “I feel sick”. There are some people who don’t look healthy from the outside, yet say they “feel fine”. Whereas others who look healthy may complain they are always “feeling unwell”.

Do the parameters that claim to indicate good health or disease really matter when the person “feels” healthy? How many people have gone to their doctor saying they feel healthy, only to be told they are in fact, sick? Conversely, how many people who feel sick have been told, “there’s nothing wrong”?

Could health be a feeling? Does connecting to that feeling then put the body into a state of equilibrium which stimulates the innate healing response? Is the feeling the key determining factor? Is our physical state a reflection of what we feel? Could simply connecting to what being healthy “feels like” be the most potent medicine?

People have been conditioned not to trust their instincts and their intuition. They hand their power over to the white coat with the prescription pad. People are under the illusion that only the clinician has the power to heal them, when the fact of the matter is, only the person can heal themselves.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

New book coming very soon! Stay tuned for more info.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

I will be going live with Toni Wheel to talk about viruses on Thursday, 12 noon EST. Feel free to come and listen.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

https://m.youtube.com/live/ALBIlSTjojQ?feature=share

Doctors used to know that signs & symptoms are not the disease, but are the body's healing response.

Believing that signs & symptoms are the problem, is simply confused thinking.

High cholesterol doesn't cause atherosclerosis.
High blood pressure doesn't cause heart disease.
The immune system doesn't cause autoimmune disease.
Low serotonin doesn't cause depression.
Elevated insulin doesn't cause diabetes.
Amyloid plaques don't cause Alzheimer's disease.
Elevated triglycerides don't cause metabolic syndrome.
Dysbiosis and SIBO doesn't cause gastrointestinal disease.
Elevated oestrogen doesn't cause PCOS.
Adipose tissue doesn't cause obesity.
Inflammation doesn't cause disease.

All of these things are signs and symptoms - the body's attempt to correct an imbalance caused by an aggravating factor.

Aggravating factors are toxins & poisons sprayed on food, dumped into the water supply, & released into the air. These are the things making you sick.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Put a bunch of maggots on some healthy skin and nothing happens. However, if they find their way into an open wound full of devitalised tissue, they will debride it with incredible efficiency, leaving the healthy tissue untouched. No one thinks maggots caused the wound.

Mother nature has equipped the human body with its own in built maggots. Bacteria! Yes, bacteria are much the same as maggots, only smaller. Bacteria are saprophytic meaning they only consume dead and dying tissue. They do not damage healthy tissue, nor do they cause disease.

The tissue becomes damaged, devitalised, and diseased first. Then the bacteria native to our own bodies proliferate to clean up the mess.

Stop blaming your body's waste disposal system as the cause of the rubbish.

Justice for germs!

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Our homes are far more toxic today than they ever have been. There are over 300 harmful chemicals used in building materials. This is a far cry from homes built several decades ago which were made from more natural material.

Mother nature is self-correcting. When there are synthetic, toxic chemicals in a home, mother nature gets to work to clean up the mess.

How does it clean up the mess? With mould and various other micro-organisms.

It's not the mould making people sick, its the toxic chemicals.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Imagine a builder claiming to build eco-friendly homes. He prides himself on using natural materials because synthetic building materials not only harm humans, but destroy the environment. He also claims to stand for sustainability and conservation. Yet when you build your home with him, he uses the same synthetic materials as all the other builders. The only difference is that his materials are disguised as natural by including words like 'green' and 'sustainable'. This is the epitome of hypocrisy.

This is the same with most natural medicine practitioners. They claim to provide 'natural' and 'alternative' treatments, yet they do nothing of the sort. They prescribe toxic supplements made from petrochemicals. They request expensive and unnecessary 'functional tests'. Their treatments are against nature (ie. anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-parasitic etc). They have confused the bodies natural healing response as the disease, and they have forgotten that the body has an innate capacity to heal itself. They disguise these practices by using words like 'natural', 'holistic', 'functional', 'integrative' etc.

They are essentially just another arm of medicine / big-pharma.

How do I know this? Because I spent 10 years teaching what I thought was natural medicine to students in colleges and universities. Only in the last few years did I realise the error of my ways and resigned from my position as a senior lecturer. I could no longer ethically teach students a curriculum comprised of utter non-sense, especially when they are spending upwards of $60k and four years of their time, under the impression they are learning about natural healing practices.

The entire field of natural medicine is a far-cry from what it once was. Our forefathers would be turning in their graves to see what it has become.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley.com

This video has been shared on this page before, but it's time to share it again.

What is really being consumed when we put some food into our mouths? Are we slowly poisoning ourselves and the environment to death?

What happens when we move our diet towards a more organic based one? Whilst there are still chemicals sprayed on organic crops, there are many farmers who opt for a 'spray free' approach, who don't use any harmful chemicals at all.

We may never be able to completely eliminate pesticide consumption, however we should strive to minimise our exposure wherever possible.

https://youtu.be/UPirDWfxfKc?feature=shared

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

People aren’t healthy because of their ‘good gut bacteria’, or sick because of their ‘bad gut bacteria’. The gut microbiome is a direct consequence of inputs (i.e., food, water, drugs, exercise, alcohol, etc). If you drink soft-drink and eat chips all day, the bacteria that are optimised for digesting these foods will proliferate. People incorrectly label these bacteria as ‘bad’. Likewise, if you eat fresh organic produce, the bacteria optimised for digesting these foods will thrive. People incorrectly label these bacteria as ‘good’. It's not the 'good bacteria' making you healthy, it's the fresh organic produce. Nor is it the 'bad bacteria' making you sick, it's the soft-drink and chips.

It's high time we shifted our perspective on the microbiome.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Virologists use cell cultures to prove the presence of a virus. Many different things are added to the cell culture including animal cells, the bodily fluids taken from sick people, antibiotics, and fetal calf serum. When the animal cells die, they claim it was due to the presence of a virus. On one hand they claim that the addition of things like antibiotics does not have any negative impact on the cell culture. On the other hand, they claim the use of antibiotics may void the scientific validity of a cell culture experiment.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

John Cooper (from The John Cooper Show) and I had a great conversation on all things nutrition related. We dug our teeth into vitamin supplements, nutritional deficiencies, the optimal human diet and more.

I really enjoyed speaking with John and I hope you enjoy listening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJCavS2z8-s

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

A Farewell To Virology - Part TWO of a three part series with Spacebusters.

"A Farewell to Virology" is a 29,000 word essay debunking virus theory and virology, written by Dr Mark Bailey, MBChB, PGDipMSM, MHeaLSc. It has yet to be contested and the purpose of this film is to explain why.

This film version walks the layperson through the paper and scientific evidence in an easy, simple and understandable way, so that they may better understand and be able to easily explain to others the great hoax of the last few centuries and certainly last three years, that fictional particles called "viruses" exist, cause illness and are reasons to lock down and destroy societies and economies and cause lifelong disease and misery through needless and useless vaccination programs. They don't.

👉👉 To watch it now, go HERE.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Part 1 of 2.

In 2007, scientists took the so-called pathogenic bacteria Clostridium perfringens (which is claimed to cause food poisoning) and grew it on three separate growth mediums; (1) Brain Heart Infusion, (2) Cooked Meat Medium, (3) Tryptone Glucose Yeast. The scientists then filtered the growth medium fluid (to remove the bacteria), and exposed it to healthy rodents. Growth medium (1) was highly lethal to the rodents, (2) was less lethal, and (3) was not lethal at all. The results of this experiment show that the metabolic waste produced by bacteria are entirely dependent upon the environment they are living in. In other words, the thing that determined whether the rodents would die was not the presence of the bacteria, but the food they were metabolizing.

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17402614/

Read part 2 below.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Part 2 of 2.

In the human body, the role of bacteria is to decompose dead and dying tissue. Their job is to clean house. If the tissue they are decomposing is toxic, then their metabolic waste products will also be toxic. Think of bacteria like a waste disposal and clean up crew. Imagine one day a truck carrying barrels of water overturned on the highway. The clean-up crew arrived to clean up the mess, putting the debris into waste bags (metabolic waste). When some of the general public came in contact with the waste bags, nothing happened to them.

A week later, another truck turned over on the highway carrying barrels of toxic sludge containing petrochemicals and heavy metals. Once again, the clean up crew arrived, putting the debris into waste bags. When some of the general public came in contact with these bags, they became sick. No one would blame the clean up crew as the cause of the problem. They were just there doing a job in response to the spill after it happened. This is the exact same thing as bacteria. They don’t cause the problem, they are the consequence, or response to the problem.

It's time for us to re-think our relationship with germs.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

H. pylori has never been demonstrated to cause gastric ulcers in any controlled scientific experiment. So why do we believe that it is the cause of this condition?

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-019-9702-2

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

The things they don't tell you about H. pylori.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

Ever heard of phosgene? That's the gas used to kill soldiers on the battle field in World War I. Despite being outlawed as a chemical warfare agent, its use by the pharmaceutical industry is alive and well.

People have absolutely no idea what is going into the pills they are taking.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

The concept of vitamins is entirely a man made construct. There are no controlled experiments published anywhere in the literature demonstrating their existence in nature. No one has ever directly observed a 'vitamin' in food because the only place they exist is in the bottom of a test tube after a witches brew of toxic chemicals has been mixed together.

There are no such thing as vitamin deficiency diseases, only toxicity diseases. These toxicity diseases arise from the incomplete metabolism of food after it has been adulterated (i.e., processed & refined). The subsequent build up of intermediate metabolites produced in the body as a consequence of ingesting adulterated food, manifests as a toxicity disease.

I have reluctantly arrived at this conclusion after more than a decade teaching undergraduate nutrition at various universities and colleges around Australia.

The entire field of nutrition desperately requires a course correction.

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley

So much to unlearn and re-learn.

The answers to the questions we seek are already out there, if we have the humility to cast aside our preconceived ideas and take the time to dig deeper.

It's time to start questioning 'vitamin deficiency diseases'.

Source

Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley