اخبار و کتاب های ریاضی
پیام ارسالی: سلام و روز بخیر، گفتم شاید این مفید باشه. تا اونجایی که من خبر دارم در ریاضی خیلی کسی برای تعداد citation و H index اهمیت قائل نمیشه. مثلا وقتی برای موقعیت دانشگاهی اقدام میکنید بیشتر محتوای کارتون رو بررسی میکنن، و گاها جورنالهایی که در اونها…
The Culture of Research and Scholarship in Mathematics:
Rates of Publication Mathematics is often considered as part of the physical and natural science, but its publication practices differ from these other disciplines in several fundamental ways.
Mathematicians tend to publish at rates that are modest compared to some other sciences. The majority of mathematical research is published in refereed research on journals, rather than conference proceedings or books. Articles typically represent considerable advances on a mathematical question.
In addition, since mathematics research is usually not considered time-sensitive, time to publication is
typically much longer than in other STEM fields.
Even some of the best young mathematicians publish relatively few papers. A study of the 40 mathematicians winning Sloan Fellowships in 2005-2006 shows that 70% published an average of two
or fewer articles per year in the five years preceding their award [1].
Even more senior mathematicians
have modest publication rates. Of the 22 mathematicians receiving Guggenheim Fellowships from
2002-2006, half published an average of two or fewer articles per year in the five years preceding their
award. These two groups represent an exceptional group of highly recognized mathematicians.
Of the 274 publications by these Guggenheim Fellows, 75% were in refereed journals. Only three
publications were books. In fact, of all items covered by Mathematical Reviews in the years 2001-2005,
fully 80% were from refereed journals [2].
The information above about those who have won prestigious awards strongly supports the view that,
when judging the work of mathematicians, the key measure of value for a research program is the
quality of publications rather than the rate. While these facts are familiar to mathematicians, they are
often unfamiliar to scholars from different professional cultures.
[1] Analysis by AMS Committee on the Profession, 2014.
[2] Analysis of MathSciNet data by AMS staff, 2014.
@harmoniclib
Rates of Publication Mathematics is often considered as part of the physical and natural science, but its publication practices differ from these other disciplines in several fundamental ways.
Mathematicians tend to publish at rates that are modest compared to some other sciences. The majority of mathematical research is published in refereed research on journals, rather than conference proceedings or books. Articles typically represent considerable advances on a mathematical question.
In addition, since mathematics research is usually not considered time-sensitive, time to publication is
typically much longer than in other STEM fields.
Even some of the best young mathematicians publish relatively few papers. A study of the 40 mathematicians winning Sloan Fellowships in 2005-2006 shows that 70% published an average of two
or fewer articles per year in the five years preceding their award [1].
Even more senior mathematicians
have modest publication rates. Of the 22 mathematicians receiving Guggenheim Fellowships from
2002-2006, half published an average of two or fewer articles per year in the five years preceding their
award. These two groups represent an exceptional group of highly recognized mathematicians.
Of the 274 publications by these Guggenheim Fellows, 75% were in refereed journals. Only three
publications were books. In fact, of all items covered by Mathematical Reviews in the years 2001-2005,
fully 80% were from refereed journals [2].
The information above about those who have won prestigious awards strongly supports the view that,
when judging the work of mathematicians, the key measure of value for a research program is the
quality of publications rather than the rate. While these facts are familiar to mathematicians, they are
often unfamiliar to scholars from different professional cultures.
[1] Analysis by AMS Committee on the Profession, 2014.
[2] Analysis of MathSciNet data by AMS staff, 2014.
@harmoniclib
حمایت معنوی شما که همیشه همراه ماست، ولی حمایتهای مادی شما هم باعث دلگرمی ما میشود، دامنهی فعالیتهای این کانال را افزایش میدهد و قدرت عمل ما را بیشتر میکند.
👇👇👇
6219861980029192
مهدی میسمی بانک سامان
@harmoniclib
قدردان محبتتان هستیم.
👇👇👇
6219861980029192
مهدی میسمی بانک سامان
@harmoniclib
قدردان محبتتان هستیم.
Forwarded from مرزهای علم
گفتگو با دکتر بهرام مبشر
پیرامون عصر طلایی کیهانشناسی
👇👇👇
https://youtu.be/eMxnP_QyZB4?si=oY4F3oMZkeSvq2NK
@sciencefrontiers
پیرامون عصر طلایی کیهانشناسی
👇👇👇
https://youtu.be/eMxnP_QyZB4?si=oY4F3oMZkeSvq2NK
@sciencefrontiers
YouTube
در این شب ها - گفتگو با دکتر بهرام مبشر
در هشتاد و سومین شب در این شب ها، دکتر بهرام مبشر، کیهان شناس دانشگاه کالیفرنیا - ریور ساید، میهمان این ویدیو کست هستند.
با دکتر مبشر درباره اهمیت تلسکوپ فضایی هابل و جیمز وب، نسل های آینده رصدخانه های فضایی و همین طور سوال های مهم دنیای کیهان شناسی صحبت…
با دکتر مبشر درباره اهمیت تلسکوپ فضایی هابل و جیمز وب، نسل های آینده رصدخانه های فضایی و همین طور سوال های مهم دنیای کیهان شناسی صحبت…
مرزهای علم
گفتگو با دکتر بهرام مبشر پیرامون عصر طلایی کیهانشناسی 👇👇👇 https://youtu.be/eMxnP_QyZB4?si=oY4F3oMZkeSvq2NK @sciencefrontiers
یک صحبت بسیار زیبای دکتر مبشر:
هدف از علم و تحصیل کردن این نیست که شما شغلی پیدا بکنید و از اون درآمدی داشته باشید.
هدف این است که به جایی برسید که فکر شما دیگر دنبالهرو افکار دیگران نباشد. بلکه دیگران دنبالهرو افکار شما بشوند. به نوآوریهایی در دانش دست یابید که مختص شماست و قبل از شما کسی بدان نرسیده است.
@harmoniclib
هدف از علم و تحصیل کردن این نیست که شما شغلی پیدا بکنید و از اون درآمدی داشته باشید.
هدف این است که به جایی برسید که فکر شما دیگر دنبالهرو افکار دیگران نباشد. بلکه دیگران دنبالهرو افکار شما بشوند. به نوآوریهایی در دانش دست یابید که مختص شماست و قبل از شما کسی بدان نرسیده است.
@harmoniclib