Forget the '90s for a moment, think of how different in just 2010 America was from how it is now. We were whiter, fag marriage wasn't the law of the land, no Obamacare (yet), no infinityjeets, and you had actual free speech on emerging social media. Everything, especially homes, were also much cheaper in the aftermath of the '08 economic collapse. We were battered economically but people held out hope for some semblance of the American dream in an anemic recovery. Is it the ideal vision of America we should return to? Hell no. Absolutely not. But it's worth reflecting on how different in just 2010, within the blink of an eye historically, things were. We were basically an entirely different country just 16 years ago.

Everyone will be equally poor and enslaved. So, like, Communism.

You'd better believe you won't be able to say a wrongthink when the government has complete and utter control over if you can even eat.

@AltSkull48

A part of me is all for AI/robots replacing humans in the workforce, because technology is supposed to replace human labor; but we have to figure out a way to maintain control over our ability to acquire/purchase the things we want. The problem with ideas like universal basic income is that it gives the government (or the techbro system) absolute control over what we’re allowed to purchase.

Boomers.exe

This picture also encapsulates how most boomers raised their children. “You’re a struggling adolescent? Not my problem!”

It now makes sense to me why so many boomers love negroes, Indians, jews and all other varieties of nons over their own race — the race of their children. They are spiritually nons-White.

Zionist Jews (so the vast majority of them) think the prospect of them having to live in Israel with equal rights with all Arabs in their occupied territories constitutes genocide. Not killing the Jews there, not ethnically cleansing them, just the reality of Israeli Jews having equal political power man-to-man with every Arab living there, and therefore constituting less than 50% of the body politic. That on its own is genocide. That is the true reason why they freak out over the slogan 'from the river to the sea'. They themselves know it doesn't mean 'kill every Israeli', despite what they pretend otherwise. But for them, white people being a minority in America and Europe is necessary progress in the name of racial equality. Pretty much every group on this planet wants hardcore ethnic-racial nationalism for their own while depriving everyone else, or at least white people, of it. White nationalists are the only group of people I've heard stressing that all groups should have the same right to a homeland, yet Zionist Jews, non-Zionist Jews and almost everyone else views them as Satan.

The power of language, it’s something we cannot afford to ignore. Language sets the frame for every argument, every philosophy and every story.

Truer words have never been spoken

The next time a shitlibs tell me, in so many different ways, that only the military and police should be allowed to have assault rifles — in other words, they think the government should have an absolute monopoly on military firepower — I want to respond by saying, “if that’s the case, we might as well live under a fascist government that can kill any and all dissidents on a whim, unopposed; because that’s what gun control inevitably leads to. That’s certainly what it facilitates.” I imagine upon hearing this, the average shitlib would just short circuit.

>mouse eats indian street food
>dies
foolish animal

Good Morning Folks!!!

Canada First really means Israel First and India a close second. https://t.iss.one/wiretapmedianews/273

Wow, Canada has their own version of MAGA.

YES

Gene Simmons says he doesn’t work on cars
> That’s what gentiles are for

🇺🇸 A #Texas mother let a toddler drive an electric toy car onto a busy street as cars sped past.

Woman was caught standing behind her toddler, who was driving a ride-on car in the middle of a busy four-lane street... what would you do in that situation?

Follow us -> LiveLeak

I’ve seen this incident being shared and talked about, because the White home owner charged for murder despite defending his property from an obvious home invasion by 7 fully grown negroes.

I’m not a lawyer, but I think It’s important to point out the legal mistake the White man made here, so that you don’t make the same mistake should you find yourself in a similar situation. The Castle Doctrine (a law in most states authorizing home defense with lethal force) only applies when you are inside your home and the burglar/trespasser is also inside or breaking into your home. What’s important to understand: you can’t legally exit your home to shoot a fleeing trespasser. No judge is going to look at that as home defense or anything that falls under the castle doctrine.

https://t.iss.one/leaklive/32881

I’m not saying the White man did anything wrong from a moral standpoint — obviously not! But from a legal standpoint, his use of force was outside of the scope of self defense and even home defense. You can clearly see the defendant, the White guy, outside of the house shooting the “teens” as they flee.