No living White person today is 100% from a single proto-European group: not 100% Indo European, not 100% Western Hunter Gatherer, nor 100% Neolithic Farmer.

That means, within race, they’ve been mixing with other European groups for 10,000+ years. The modern European ethnic groups of Europe are all a product of mixing with other European ethnicities at some point in the past.

https://t.iss.one/hapaperspective/15285

Witold Dworski calls on Central and Eastern European states to develop a sovereign nuclear deterrent.

https://radicaldose.com/nuclear-weapons-as-the-guarantor-of-sovereignty/

Radical Dose

Skully shares some of his hard-won wisdom on how to find and keep women.

https://radicaldose.com/skullys-guide-to-women-and-dating-part-1/

Radical Dose

The other problem with purity spiraling over ethnicity is not only that it comes at the expense of race, but this movement opens itself to greater ridicule (and rightfully so) from the majority of White people.

“You hate Americans because they’re euro-mutts? lol, my dad is half Irish and half French. You’re retarded, gtfo.”

https://t.iss.one/hapaperspective/15285

It's like a lime and an orange seem completely different. Until there's an apple on the table. Then you realize how the lime and orange are more similar to each other than an apple.

Suddenly it's like oh the peel on the orange and lime is similar. They are both citrus fruits. They both are naturally separated into slices on the inside, and so on.

Limes and oranges share the same genus: Citrus. Apples have a completely different genus: Malus.

Euros can complain about racial identification but their complaints don't make it not true. It is a biological fact.

There are two distinct blackpills and half the arguments around this are caused by people not realizing that.

Blackpill has generally always meant the realization that "there is no political solution", the final redpill, so to speak.

It's more recently become conflated with being a "doomer" or having no hope whatsoever, probably mainly by people not realizing that "no political solution" does not mean "no solution".

"What is disturbing is the number of times this man has been arrested and released. He has continued to offend and his behavior has escalated to a rape in a very public area in our town," DeBoard continued. 

-
Fairfax County proudly doesn't cooperate with federal immigration officials.


I swear if people don't snap out of it I'm going to start victim blaming. Get real folks.

In the current state of the world, arguing about the purity of some ethnic groups over others within the white race looks about the same as arguing about the whiteness of the teeth of a person whose body is afflicted with gangrene.

The most frightening ramification of the politicization of academia is the pervasive distrust of all science and all history.

Liberals are actually right that the plague of conspiracy theories festering online are a blight on truth and objective reality. But its a problem of their own making.

If we cannot trust the intellectual elites to be objective truth seekers, which is the entire basis of claims to scientific truth, then every yahoo online is just as reliable an "expert" as the left-wing political activists masquerading as professors.

There has been an accelerating left-wing polarization in academia over the last century. The most unreliable information is the most recent, developed during the "woke" era. The further back in time we go, (especially prior to the 1960s) the more we can trust the dispassionate objective analysis of Western intellectual traditions.

When some leftoid shitlib says we should return our land to the injuns, this isn't a bad response. "Very well then, all Scandies owe land and gold to all persons of Anglo descent."

I've seen Dissident Rightoids, whom you'd think are pro-White, actually argue that Whites should return all of America to the Injuns. Really. That's where the anti-American sentiment that pervades this "movement" has led to.

“Indigenous” is nothing more than a political term, it has no basis in reality anywhere. No one alive today can objectively claim to be “indigenous.”

This term will never be useful to white nationalism, it cannot be co-opted from its anti-white origin.

This whole argument that “this is our land because we’re indigenous” is mostly a modern kumbaya-hippie-leftoid concept. Sure, our ancestors may have recognized that they had lived somewhere for many generations, and such an understanding may have been part of their claim to a particular land, but it wasn’t made from this position of weakness, of “you must return this land to us, you meanies! We are indigenous, you owe it to us!” I think people in the past were more realistic about how might makes right — your land is ultimately just what you take and defend from other groups.

Eddie Gerard uses facts to demonstrate that the demographics of nonwhite populations are in far worse shape than the demographics of white people.

https://radicaldose.com/the-demographic-death-of-the-third-world/

Radical Dose

When your military has racial foreigners serving in it, it shouldn’t be shocking that they aren’t loyal soldiers. But if you needed proof, here it is!

It’s definitely a moronic position. I’ve especially seen European nationalist types saying things that signal this, because they don’t fully believe European diaspora nations were truly founded by Europeans. Somehow the local tribal people were crucial to their creation, which is absolutely ludicrous. With very rare exceptions, it was wholly white people that built all these nations and with the intention they were to be their lands. https://t.iss.one/hapaperspective/15299