🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah:

They say: weapons no longer deter or frighten Israel.

Fine. But they are a means of defence, and as such, they repel aggression and disrupt its goals. Saying they no longer deter is an admission from you that they once did. So why did you conspire in the past and consider them a problem?

Netanyahu says he wants to “liberate” Gaza from Hamas.

A time may come when the Arab false witnesses will say that “Netanyahu” was a hero, having denied the famine and the genocide.

Right now, they are aligning with him and asking Hamas to throw away its weapons — so imagine what they will say in the future.

Some of them make you feel that Israel’s war is their war.

Watch their behaviour…

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Lebanon's Resistance Bloc MP Raad:

- "israel" has achieved tactical gains in the files it opened, but it has not achieved a stable strategy.

- The state (Lebanon), with its own forces, can extend its authority, but it cannot confront the enemy.

- The decision to confiscate weapons is an improvised one and dictated foreignly, not a sovereign decision, and its legality has been stripped from it.

- The state can begin reconstruction despite the debts, but no authority cares to take this responsibility.

- The hasty and dangerous decision by Nawaf exposes sovereignty and exposes Lebanon to Israel for tampering with its internal stability.

- The resistance's weapons are what protected Lebanon from 1982 to 2025. They liberated and triumphed, created a deterrent balance, and thwarted the enemy's expansionist project.

- The goal of this decision may be to make the problem internal rather than Lebanese-Israeli.

- There may be new technologies that the enemy had, however, saying that this weapon has not protected Lebanon is distortion of the truth.

- The Americans and Israelis insist on a timetable for implementing what they imposed on the Lebanese government.

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

—MP Raad:

- Handing over weapons is suicide, and we do not intend to commit suicide.

- Saying to surrender your weapon means you are saying to surrender your honor.

- A guarantee was requested to implement the provisions contained in the American paper, but the guarantees were not provided.

- The weapons are legal, but it might be you [Nawaf] who isn't legitimate. For thirty-three years, governments have been saying it's legal, and now it's not?"

- Any money spent on reconstruction after the surrender of weapons is spurious and rejected, and we do not need the help of those who contribute to the shedding of our blood."

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇾🇪 | Yemeni Armed Forces:

The drone air force of the Yemeni Armed Forces executed three qualitative military operations, targeting three israeli enemy positions with three drones.

• The first targeted Lod Airport in the Jaffa area.

• The second and third targeted two vital enemy sites in Beersheba and Ashkelon in occupied Palestine.

By the grace of Allah, the operations successfully achieved their objectives.

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Head of the Marada Movement, Sleiman Frangieh:

We warn against sedition and being drawn into empty promises that may prove destructive.

The monopolization of weapons in the hands of the state is a national demand, but rushing into it conceals danger, especially as some ambassadors operate with specific agendas where their countries’ interests intersect with those of israel.

The region is going through a difficult and dangerous phase. The project that entered our region since 2010 beginning in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya, and reaching Syria came under the banners of freedom, democracy, and overthrowing dictatorships.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇶 | The Popular Mobilization Forces [Hashd al-Shaabi] in Babil carried out a security operation on the Pilgrims’ Road, resulting in the arrest of a number of violators, including deviant elements, impersonators, and harassers of the pilgrims.

🔹@enemywatch

🌟 | “They hope to calm the sea.”

— Haj Mohammad Raad (H)

🔹@enemywatch

❎ | Currently, a treacherous plan is underway in Trump’s office. The Zangezur corridor project is taking shape and gaining momentum. Pashinyan is selling the corridor along with Aliyev. This is bad news for Iran, and Pezeshkian is probably numb on this side.

🔹@enemywatch

🏴‍☠️ | President Donald J. Trump, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan sign peace and economic agreements at the White House, creating the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity in South Caucasus.

🔹@enemywatch

❎ | "A Mini David Corridor"

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | Armenia has leased land in the southern part of the country to the United States for 99 years to establish a NATO corridor to the Caspian Sea, effectively severing its border with Iran for trade purposes. As a result, Armenia no longer shares a direct border with Iran. US troops are expected to be deployed in Armenia within the next 48 hours.

This development signals a potential threat to Iran, as in the coming days it could pave the way for an invasion or attacks on Iran’s border cities. It also leaves Iran in direct contact with US forces. The Americans may fabricate premeditated incidents to justify strikes against Iranian targets and could also fund and direct their local proxies within Iran.

Currently, Iran is led by a government whose ability to manage such crises is questioned by many. However, the critical question remains: Is Iran aware and prepared for this? The answer is yes; Iran has long been aware of these moves, and the armed forces have prepared strategic plans accordingly. Imam Khamenei is fully aware of the growing issue and has given his consent to a proper agenda, as evidenced in his speeches and official reports. Nonetheless, this situation represents a dangerous bottleneck.

The main trigger for escalation could be a renewed wave of israeli and American aggression against Iran, combined with the direct threat of an assassination attempt on Imam Khamenei; an act that would ignite a full-scale regional war. In such a scenario, there would be only one viable option: to confront and destroy the enemies with equal or greater force, without sparing any human presence.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷 | Iran’s Master Painter Ustad Mahmoud Farshchian (1930 – 2025) Passes Away:

Iran’s master painter and miniaturist, Ustad Mahmoud Farshchian, has passed away. He was renowned for his celebrated depiction of the Ashura evening, portraying the return of Imam Husayn’s (A) steed to the tents of the Prophet’s (S) holy household with the Imam’s blood on its forehead.

Farshchian’s artistic legacy also includes the intricate design of the Zarih (the latticed enclosure placed over the tomb), roof, door, and cellar of the shrine of Imam Husayn (A) in Karbala, as well as the shrine of the 8th Shiite Imam, Ali ibn Musa al-Reza (A) in Mashhad. He also served as a member of the committee overseeing the construction of these sacred sites.

Born on January 24, 1930, in Isfahan, Farshchian mastered painting, miniature, and sculpture from a young age. His works have been exhibited in prestigious museums and galleries worldwide, cementing his place as one of Iran’s greatest artistic figures.

In recent days, Farshchian suffered a fall, which led to a partial coma. Though initially conscious, his condition deteriorated, and he passed away today. He will be buried in the holy shrine of Imam Ali Reza (A) in Mashhad.

Al-Fatiha!

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | Early on, was waiting, searching, and trying hard to find a single genuine tweet, post, or statement from within Lebanon or even from outside, beyond the Arab Zionist lobby, that criticizes the Americans, Europeans, or Saudis for not interfering in Lebanon’s internal issues. For their silence in the face of dismemberment and threats against those who simply want to live in peace.

Why is there such deafening silence? Why do these same voices only open their filthy mouths against Iran? Where are those self-proclaimed champions who used to shout that “Iran is the root of all problems,” claiming that if Iran were gone, everything else would be fine?

The truth is crystal clear: because Iran isn’t the problem, Lebanon and the region are drowning in chaos and decay. Those loud voices, once framed as the voices of oppressed masses or peacemakers, have been revealed for what they really are — mouthpieces of mercenaries and paid puppets.

The so-called “Islamic world,” no matter what banner it claims, is a pitiful, hypocritical, lying, and degenerate mess. A level of moral and political bankruptcy so deep that no one can compete with it, not even the europeans!

They pretend to care about peace, yet they fuel conflict. They claim to stand against oppression, yet they sell their people to foreign powers without a second thought. Their silence and double standards speak louder than any words ever could.

Lebanon is being carved up by foreign hands. The only ones raising their voice in resistance and truth are those branded as enemies by the global powers and their local collaborators.

If you want to see who truly cares for Lebanon and its people, look past the noise. Look to those who refuse to surrender, who expose the lies, and who stand firmly against the forces of occupation and subjugation, no matter the cost.

Hell to Arab's hypocrites!

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | Shias, regardless of their tendency: whether revolutionary pan-Islamic (the school of Imam Khomeini), politically nonsectarian aligned with Najaf, sectarian but leaning toward unity, extremist sectarian groups (including some South Asian parties), or any other faction are the direct target of internal Muslim community divisions as well as Global Zionism. These divisions are fueled and sustained by well-funded, organized groups on both sides, using online propaganda and material to keep sectarian fires burning and ground battles ongoing.

The Shia worldwide have become the primary target of global Zionism because they resist the Israeli entity and Talmudic hegemonies without fear or delay. Yet, the question remains: will Muslims truly support them?

This hostility is not limited to military confrontation but extends to a sophisticated campaign of social, political, and ideological marginalization. What we observe is not merely geopolitical maneuvering but a systematic effort to fracture Muslim solidarity through sectarianism, which has been exploited and amplified by external powers.

The global Zionist project, in tandem with Western interests, operates by dividing Muslim communities along sectarian lines, thus weakening any unified opposition to their hegemony. The targeting of Shias is no accident; it is a calculated strategy to undermine one of the few groups actively resisting Israeli and Western imperial ambitions.

Yet this division is not only externally imposed but also socially constructed and reinforced internally. Social identity insight into why solidarity among Muslim sects remains limited despite facing common adversaries. Deeply ingrained sectarian identities, shaped over centuries through religious, cultural, and political narratives, create an “us versus them” mentality. This social categorization fosters suspicion and alienation, which external forces have exploited to deepen sectarian cleavages.

The daily lived experience of these communities further illustrates how symbolic interactionism plays a role in sustaining exclusion. Media portrayals, educational curricula, and public discourse have historically framed Shias as the “other” ritualistic, heretical, or politically radical, thus reinforcing stereotypes that legitimize discrimination and violence. These negative images are internalized and reproduced through social interactions, perpetuating the marginalization of Shia populations within broader Muslim societies.

The dominant non-Shia narrative, supported by political institutions and external actors, has consistently painted Shias as deviant or dangerous, masking the political interests behind such portrayals.

Currently, Shias in Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, and Syria find themselves at the frontline of a brutal campaign that combines physical violence with social and ideological warfare. Their resistance challenges the geopolitical status quo, making them targets for an intensified war that is as much about controlling narratives and identities as it is about territorial dominance.

The question that emerges for the broader Muslim world is whether it can transcend these constructed sectarian divides to recognize the shared nature of this struggle. The silence or outright hostility from many Muslim communities toward the plight of Shias reflects how deeply these social barriers run. Without addressing these internal divisions, the Muslim world risks perpetuating a cycle of fragmentation that benefits imperial and Zionist agendas.

Today, Shias in Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, and Syria face a direct assault from American terror and political pandemics. The crucial question: where are the Muslims? Do they stand with them, or abandon them as they did with Gaza? One must seriously consider: who truly protects those who have fought so fiercely to protect them!

🔹@enemywatch