☑️ | Just like not all Pakistanis are pro-American or praise the United States, and that doesn’t give anyone the right to kill or drag them, similarly, the same logic applies to the Druze community. There are nearly 300,000 Druze, and if a few of their political leaders roam with israelis or collaborate with zionist figures like Netanyahu, it doesn’t make the entire community enemies. Abusing or insulting an entire people simply because they are not of your sect, or because some of their elites made disgraceful alliances, is unjust and ignorant.
By the same flawed logic, should all Sunnis be hated or targeted just because some of their so-called leadership is directly complicit in genocide? Of course not. Collective blame is unjust, ignorant, and dangerous—no matter who it targets.
There are hundreds of thousands of Druze who have nothing to do with the betrayal of figures like Hikmat al-Hijri. What can and should be discussed is the failure of their internal leadership, leadership that not only aligns with israel but in some cases encourages service in the IOF. That is indeed a moral crisis and political disaster. But ground realities must be understood deeply before making sweeping generalizations. Many of us understand the Syrian terrain and dynamics better than any outsider, be they Bangladeshi, Indian, or Pakistani.
We stand with the Syrian population that does not play the buy-and-sell game with their homeland. We stand with those who resist occupation, regardless of their sect. Many Druze have fought alongside resistance factions against israel, if you don’t know that, it doesn’t give you the license to erase their sacrifices or slander them all.
If this is the logic you follow, then by that standard, all Indians are pro-israel and all Pakistanis are pro-America, and if they are, does that make every citizen a legitimate target or a part of the zionist machine? This mindset is reckless. Either ground yourself in facts and principles, or stay away.
🔹@enemywatch
By the same flawed logic, should all Sunnis be hated or targeted just because some of their so-called leadership is directly complicit in genocide? Of course not. Collective blame is unjust, ignorant, and dangerous—no matter who it targets.
There are hundreds of thousands of Druze who have nothing to do with the betrayal of figures like Hikmat al-Hijri. What can and should be discussed is the failure of their internal leadership, leadership that not only aligns with israel but in some cases encourages service in the IOF. That is indeed a moral crisis and political disaster. But ground realities must be understood deeply before making sweeping generalizations. Many of us understand the Syrian terrain and dynamics better than any outsider, be they Bangladeshi, Indian, or Pakistani.
We stand with the Syrian population that does not play the buy-and-sell game with their homeland. We stand with those who resist occupation, regardless of their sect. Many Druze have fought alongside resistance factions against israel, if you don’t know that, it doesn’t give you the license to erase their sacrifices or slander them all.
If this is the logic you follow, then by that standard, all Indians are pro-israel and all Pakistanis are pro-America, and if they are, does that make every citizen a legitimate target or a part of the zionist machine? This mindset is reckless. Either ground yourself in facts and principles, or stay away.
🔹@enemywatch
💯31🤝2
✅ | The situation along the Iraq and Lebanon-Syria borders is not entirely normal, but it’s not escalating out of control either. Movements are actively being monitored. There are currently unconfirmed reports of clashes between HTS and tribal fighters of Lebanese side (which OSINTS calls Hezbollah backed- etc., which is a false attribution).
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤14👍6😱1
Enemy Watch — Official
☑️ | Just like not all Pakistanis are pro-American or praise the United States, and that doesn’t give anyone the right to kill or drag them, similarly, the same logic applies to the Druze community. There are nearly 300,000 Druze, and if a few of their political…
✅ | Our stance is the same as that of our Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah (r). He stated clearly on multiple occasions—in 2014, 2016, and again in 2021—that while the fall of Suwayda or a full-scale lashing of the Druze population might seem justified due to the betrayal of some of their top figures who aligned with the israelis, such actions would ultimately serve the interests of israel and no one else.
In 2021, he explicitly rejected any form of collective blame toward the Druze population following the killing of resistance fighters. He called on “everyone not to hold the people of Shwaya and the Druze sect responsible for the assault on the resistance fighters.” He added, “It was not the people of Shwaya who attacked the fighters, and we appreciate everyone who stands by the resistance.”
Before falling into the traps and deceptions of Turkitards, takfiritards, or newly emerged “pro-resistance” Gen Z impostor analysts, first understand the groups, layers, and power dynamics at play in the region. Not every loud voice or meme-fed account represents knowledge, sincerity, or real resistance understanding.
We call on the free Druze of Syria to raise their voices against the betrayal and puppetry of their leadership under israeli influence. It is time to confront this reality with dignity and seek a solution rooted in resistance, not submission.
🔹@enemywatch
In 2021, he explicitly rejected any form of collective blame toward the Druze population following the killing of resistance fighters. He called on “everyone not to hold the people of Shwaya and the Druze sect responsible for the assault on the resistance fighters.” He added, “It was not the people of Shwaya who attacked the fighters, and we appreciate everyone who stands by the resistance.”
Before falling into the traps and deceptions of Turkitards, takfiritards, or newly emerged “pro-resistance” Gen Z impostor analysts, first understand the groups, layers, and power dynamics at play in the region. Not every loud voice or meme-fed account represents knowledge, sincerity, or real resistance understanding.
We call on the free Druze of Syria to raise their voices against the betrayal and puppetry of their leadership under israeli influence. It is time to confront this reality with dignity and seek a solution rooted in resistance, not submission.
🔹@enemywatch
🔥17💯8🤝3
Enemy Watch — Official
❓| You remember Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya? He is dying slowly in the concentration cells, beaten daily. 🔹@enemywatch
✅ | We’ve heard that Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya (H) asked his lawyer:
“Does anyone remember me?”
Yes, Habibi — we remember you.
And we are still fighting for you.
You are not forgotten.
#FreeHussamAbuSafiya
🔹@enemywatch
+
“Does anyone remember me?”
Yes, Habibi — we remember you.
And we are still fighting for you.
You are not forgotten.
#FreeHussamAbuSafiya
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤27😭11💯2
Enemy Watch — Official
+ 🟩 Report: Recent Operations in Gaza: (-27 July): 🔹 Al-Qassam Brigades: • Targeted a Zionist “Namer” armored personnel carrier near Street 5 in northern Khan Yunis using a Yassin-105 shell, with a soldier visibly on top. • Conducted sustained mortar…
+
🟩 Report: Recent Operations in Gaza: (-28 July):
🔹Al-Quds Brigades operations:
1. Shelled with 107mm rockets a command and control headquarters and a gathering of Zionist enemy soldiers and officers east of Jabalia, northern sector.
2. In coordination with Ansar Battalions, shelled with 60mm mortar rounds a gathering of enemy soldiers near Al-Muntar Hill, east of Al-Shujaiya neighborhood, Gaza City.
3. Together with Ansar Battalions, shelled a gathering of enemy soldiers in the Shuja’iyya neighborhood, Gaza, with mortar rounds.
4. Bombarded, in coordination with Ansar Battalions, using 60mm mortar shells, a gathering of Zionist enemy soldiers surrounding Al-Mantar Hill, east of Shuja’iyya, Gaza City.
🔹@enemywatch
+
🟩 Report: Recent Operations in Gaza: (-28 July):
🔹Al-Quds Brigades operations:
1. Shelled with 107mm rockets a command and control headquarters and a gathering of Zionist enemy soldiers and officers east of Jabalia, northern sector.
2. In coordination with Ansar Battalions, shelled with 60mm mortar rounds a gathering of enemy soldiers near Al-Muntar Hill, east of Al-Shujaiya neighborhood, Gaza City.
3. Together with Ansar Battalions, shelled a gathering of enemy soldiers in the Shuja’iyya neighborhood, Gaza, with mortar rounds.
4. Bombarded, in coordination with Ansar Battalions, using 60mm mortar shells, a gathering of Zionist enemy soldiers surrounding Al-Mantar Hill, east of Shuja’iyya, Gaza City.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤23👍2🔥2💯2🤝1
Forwarded from Basira Press
Has there honestly been a single positive thing that Pezeshkian has done since taking office? Our dear readers know we always like to be fair and avoid extremism, but we try to be realistic and honest.
— His general approach of weakness emboldened the enemy — perhaps why they felt brave enough to assassinate Ismail Haniyeh (ra) and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (ra), as well as to collapse Syria by activating the HTS insurgency (Pezeshkian caused the delay of Operation TP2)
— Inflation went to record highs at record speeds
— Appointed one of the worst bloodsucking wealthy fatcat oligarchs of the country, Abdolnasser Hemmati, to lead the Finance Ministry, which shows the hypocrisy of reformists' claims to care about peoples' economic problems, when they want to make the Iranian economy even more neoliberal and dollarized than it already is, rather than turn to Islamic economic wisdom which is neither capitalist nor communist, but rather has the best of both without the drawbacks of both, in that it allows for open trade and incentivizing innovation, while outlawing usury, hoarding, artificial scarcity, corruption, and other factors which allow a wealthy few to concentrate wealth and resources into fewer and fewer hands, all without total state control of production and state-sanctioned atheism
— Daily electricity cuts
— Allowed a pro-LGBT sociologist into the transition team for the Ministry of Family
— Did not do much for investment into domestic infrastructure and production, contrary to Martyr Raisi (ra) who was constantly traveling around the country to inaugurate a new infrastructure project or the opening/re-opening of a factory
— Placed all the country's economic hopes in these talks with the US, romanticizing them as the solution to the country's problems and that Trump was about "peace" (only Netanyahu stood in the way, apparently), and that sanctions would be lifted soon, only for those talks to have been a diplomatic ruse for the US and "israel" to plan an imposed war of aggression on the country which would assassinate top generals, important scientists, and bury children under the rubble
— Wasted the opportunity of the Tucker Carlson interview, stated that Trump has the power to spread peace across West Asia
— Hugged Azerbaijani President Aliev in Baku even after it was revealed that "israeli" attacks were launched from Azerbaijani territory
— Continues to push the delusion that Netanyahu is the only problem, rather than the entirety of the Zionist regime's system and also the American empire
— Weakened relations with China, Russia, and other important regional and neighboring countries in order to gain favor with the US
To be fair, the one positive thing was that during the negotiations, very little was up for debate, unlike under Rouhani where they were willing to sell many more things, such as Iran's military capabilities. Only the percentage of enrichment was up for debate, which was very little for Iran to give up, while Iran was asking for the US to basically give up its entire sanctions scheme, which is a lot for the US' side. However, this is more likely due to the pressure from the Leader that this small area was the only thing that was up for discussion in the talks with the US, and that it should be indirect rather than direct.
Martyr Raisi also engaged in indirect talks, but he placed little importance on them due to having a realistic understanding of the situation, and placed more importance on domestic development and strengthening international relations with the rest of the world. He also engaged in those talks from a standpoint of strength, not weakness, and understanding that the enemy is deceptive.
Anything good from this administration, like the lifting of certain restrictions on car imports, treaty with Russia, and other policies were ones that came from the Raisi administration but had not taken effect until after his martyrdom.
— His general approach of weakness emboldened the enemy — perhaps why they felt brave enough to assassinate Ismail Haniyeh (ra) and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (ra), as well as to collapse Syria by activating the HTS insurgency (Pezeshkian caused the delay of Operation TP2)
— Inflation went to record highs at record speeds
— Appointed one of the worst bloodsucking wealthy fatcat oligarchs of the country, Abdolnasser Hemmati, to lead the Finance Ministry, which shows the hypocrisy of reformists' claims to care about peoples' economic problems, when they want to make the Iranian economy even more neoliberal and dollarized than it already is, rather than turn to Islamic economic wisdom which is neither capitalist nor communist, but rather has the best of both without the drawbacks of both, in that it allows for open trade and incentivizing innovation, while outlawing usury, hoarding, artificial scarcity, corruption, and other factors which allow a wealthy few to concentrate wealth and resources into fewer and fewer hands, all without total state control of production and state-sanctioned atheism
— Daily electricity cuts
— Allowed a pro-LGBT sociologist into the transition team for the Ministry of Family
— Did not do much for investment into domestic infrastructure and production, contrary to Martyr Raisi (ra) who was constantly traveling around the country to inaugurate a new infrastructure project or the opening/re-opening of a factory
— Placed all the country's economic hopes in these talks with the US, romanticizing them as the solution to the country's problems and that Trump was about "peace" (only Netanyahu stood in the way, apparently), and that sanctions would be lifted soon, only for those talks to have been a diplomatic ruse for the US and "israel" to plan an imposed war of aggression on the country which would assassinate top generals, important scientists, and bury children under the rubble
— Wasted the opportunity of the Tucker Carlson interview, stated that Trump has the power to spread peace across West Asia
— Hugged Azerbaijani President Aliev in Baku even after it was revealed that "israeli" attacks were launched from Azerbaijani territory
— Continues to push the delusion that Netanyahu is the only problem, rather than the entirety of the Zionist regime's system and also the American empire
— Weakened relations with China, Russia, and other important regional and neighboring countries in order to gain favor with the US
To be fair, the one positive thing was that during the negotiations, very little was up for debate, unlike under Rouhani where they were willing to sell many more things, such as Iran's military capabilities. Only the percentage of enrichment was up for debate, which was very little for Iran to give up, while Iran was asking for the US to basically give up its entire sanctions scheme, which is a lot for the US' side. However, this is more likely due to the pressure from the Leader that this small area was the only thing that was up for discussion in the talks with the US, and that it should be indirect rather than direct.
Martyr Raisi also engaged in indirect talks, but he placed little importance on them due to having a realistic understanding of the situation, and placed more importance on domestic development and strengthening international relations with the rest of the world. He also engaged in those talks from a standpoint of strength, not weakness, and understanding that the enemy is deceptive.
Anything good from this administration, like the lifting of certain restrictions on car imports, treaty with Russia, and other policies were ones that came from the Raisi administration but had not taken effect until after his martyrdom.
💯17❤3👍3🤝1
🇾🇪 | ETERNITY C Crew Confirms Vessel Was Headed to Umm al-Rashrash; Yemeni Navy Releases Rescue Footage:
The Yemeni military Media published footage and interviews on Monday with the crew of the ETERNITY C vessel, which was recently sunk by the Yemeni Armed Forces in the Red Sea after allegedly violating the naval embargo on Israeli-occupied ports.
Crew testimonies confirm that the ship’s true destination was Umm al-Rashrash port (Eilat), despite listing Jeddah, Saudi Arabia as a supply stop to mask the voyage. The vessel had departed from Berbera, Somalia, in violation of the Yemeni-imposed navigation ban on all maritime routes toward Israeli ports.
According to the released interviews, several crew members revealed that the ship’s captain failed to inform them about the official warning issued by the Yemeni Naval Forces. They stated that the captain disregarded multiple calls over international maritime channel 16, including a direct order to halt or face targeting.
In the released footage, rescued crew members issued public appeals to maritime companies, urging them not to trade with or transport goods to Israeli entity ports. They warned of the “real risk of meeting the same fate” as ETERNITY C and advised against disabling vessel tracking and identification devices while navigating the Red Sea region. One crew member issued an apology to the Palestinian people:
“We apologize that our ship was heading to israel.”
The footage also documents a two-day search and rescue operation carried out by Yemeni Naval Forces, which led to the successful retrieval of 11 crew members at sea, including two injured individuals who received medical treatment. One deceased crew member was recovered from aboard the vessel before it sank and transferred to a hospital morgue.
A military spokesperson stated that ETERNITY C was targeted only after repeated warnings were ignored by the vessel’s captain. The ship was operated by COSMO SHIPMANAGEMENT SA, a company reportedly linked to multiple violations of the maritime embargo. Among other violations, the company operated:
• HSL NIKE, which conducted four shipments to occupied Haifa from Turkish and Egyptian ports between March and July 2025.
• FAITH, which reportedly made two such shipments in recent months.
The Yemeni Armed Forces reaffirmed that all vessels dealing with israeli ports or operated by companies violating the embargo will be targeted. The spokesperson reiterated:
“Maritime navigation remains safe for all ships except those heading to occupied Palestinian ports or operated by companies that have violated the embargo decision.”
The statement concluded with a call to all shipowners, operators, and the broader maritime community to comply with the embargo, warning that non-compliance endangers not just vessels and crews but also the regional marine environment. All vessels are advised to keep their communication identifiers active and to maintain contact with Yemeni Naval Forces via international channel 16 or email.
🔹@enemywatch
The Yemeni military Media published footage and interviews on Monday with the crew of the ETERNITY C vessel, which was recently sunk by the Yemeni Armed Forces in the Red Sea after allegedly violating the naval embargo on Israeli-occupied ports.
Crew testimonies confirm that the ship’s true destination was Umm al-Rashrash port (Eilat), despite listing Jeddah, Saudi Arabia as a supply stop to mask the voyage. The vessel had departed from Berbera, Somalia, in violation of the Yemeni-imposed navigation ban on all maritime routes toward Israeli ports.
According to the released interviews, several crew members revealed that the ship’s captain failed to inform them about the official warning issued by the Yemeni Naval Forces. They stated that the captain disregarded multiple calls over international maritime channel 16, including a direct order to halt or face targeting.
In the released footage, rescued crew members issued public appeals to maritime companies, urging them not to trade with or transport goods to Israeli entity ports. They warned of the “real risk of meeting the same fate” as ETERNITY C and advised against disabling vessel tracking and identification devices while navigating the Red Sea region. One crew member issued an apology to the Palestinian people:
“We apologize that our ship was heading to israel.”
The footage also documents a two-day search and rescue operation carried out by Yemeni Naval Forces, which led to the successful retrieval of 11 crew members at sea, including two injured individuals who received medical treatment. One deceased crew member was recovered from aboard the vessel before it sank and transferred to a hospital morgue.
A military spokesperson stated that ETERNITY C was targeted only after repeated warnings were ignored by the vessel’s captain. The ship was operated by COSMO SHIPMANAGEMENT SA, a company reportedly linked to multiple violations of the maritime embargo. Among other violations, the company operated:
• HSL NIKE, which conducted four shipments to occupied Haifa from Turkish and Egyptian ports between March and July 2025.
• FAITH, which reportedly made two such shipments in recent months.
The Yemeni Armed Forces reaffirmed that all vessels dealing with israeli ports or operated by companies violating the embargo will be targeted. The spokesperson reiterated:
“Maritime navigation remains safe for all ships except those heading to occupied Palestinian ports or operated by companies that have violated the embargo decision.”
The statement concluded with a call to all shipowners, operators, and the broader maritime community to comply with the embargo, warning that non-compliance endangers not just vessels and crews but also the regional marine environment. All vessels are advised to keep their communication identifiers active and to maintain contact with Yemeni Naval Forces via international channel 16 or email.
🔹@enemywatch
❤21👍4🔥3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷 | Iranian forces have released footage showcasing their successful operation in tracking and neutralizing Mossad operatives inside the country. In the video, Iranian commandos can be seen using advanced technology and specialized equipment to locate and reach enemy targets with precision. The operations also targeted Balochi terrorists from the Jaish al-Adl terrorist group, leading to their elimination and the confiscation of their equipment.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤34🤝4
🇮🇷 | The modest home of IRGC's Martyr Sayyid Hassan Ghasemi Mousavi (r) in the southernmost part of Tehran:
A martyr who dedicated his entire life to serving Islam and beloved Iran, and ultimately sacrificed his pure life in defense of the sanctities of Islam and our dear homeland, attaining the lofty rank of martyrdom in an attack by the Zionist regime.
🔹@enemywatch
A martyr who dedicated his entire life to serving Islam and beloved Iran, and ultimately sacrificed his pure life in defense of the sanctities of Islam and our dear homeland, attaining the lofty rank of martyrdom in an attack by the Zionist regime.
🔹@enemywatch
😭33❤12
🇮🇷 | Iranian Ministry of Intelligence:
• Six major arms shipments en route to Kurdistan Province, along with the supply line for weapons and equipment belonging to armed cells and the military structure of the terrorist groups based in the Kurdistan Region, were successfully targeted and struck.
• During the ongoing war, 23 assassination attempts against Iranian officials were successfully thwarted, in addition to 13 earlier attempts that were also foiled before the escalation.
🔹@enemywatch
• Six major arms shipments en route to Kurdistan Province, along with the supply line for weapons and equipment belonging to armed cells and the military structure of the terrorist groups based in the Kurdistan Region, were successfully targeted and struck.
• During the ongoing war, 23 assassination attempts against Iranian officials were successfully thwarted, in addition to 13 earlier attempts that were also foiled before the escalation.
🔹@enemywatch
❤22🤝3👍2
Forwarded from Vanessa Beeley
Jolani is not happy that Washington betrayed him through Reuters? Director of Press Relations at the Ministry of Information
Mohammed Al-Saleh
Over the past three months, the Ministry of Information has placed significant emphasis on revitalizing the work of the Directorate of External Media in line with the unprecedented interest shown by foreign media outlets in covering Syria. This stems from our conviction that all media platforms should be present on the ground and that their work should be facilitated in ways that help break away from the sectarian frameworks that have colored their coverage throughout the years of the revolution.
Our efforts have not been limited to easing their entry, issuing the necessary permits, and ensuring their safety. We have also engaged in daily dialogue with them regarding various issues relating to journalism and the political situation in Syria. For instance, the Minister of Information conducted more than 50 separate sessions with journalists, researchers, and media outlets to explain the complexities of the Syrian situation and provide material needed for their work. Our goal was never to impose a government narrative, but rather to contribute to the creation of constructive and responsible journalism that plays a positive role during Syria’s difficult transitional phase—even if that role is critical.
This approach succeeded with many journalists and outlets whose reports helped convey an authentic understanding of Syria. However, it failed with certain major institutions that approached the Syrian experience with arrogance and a superiority complex, aiming to confirm their pre-existing assumptions about what is happening.
One prominent example involved an international agency that contacted us regarding an investigation into economic activity in the new phase and the influential forces shaping it. We responded positively, welcomed them at the Ministry, and promised to reply once they sent us the findings. Indeed, their report arrived, written in a tone that can only be described as definitive, based on what they called “facts” that in our view are indistinguishable from social media content. In order to present a clearer picture, we agreed to send a detailed response within two weeks, given that the topic requires data and testimony from various official entities.
However, the agency insisted on receiving our response before the Syrian-Saudi Investment Forum, seemingly intending to publish the report concurrently to disrupt it. They refused to postpone their publication, despite the author claiming to have spent seven months researching the report. If the agency had truly sought to clarify the situation, it would have considered both our response and its timing. Unfortunately, it’s evident that political motives outweighed adherence to professional ethics.
This pattern repeated with their coastal report. They requested our feedback on findings but didn’t wait for the coastal investigation committee, ignored its observations, and omitted the committee head’s response. They were intent on publishing prior to President Trump signing the executive order to lift sanctions.
They even published a report claiming that the Syrian government had misunderstood messages from the Baku meeting and subsequently launched a military campaign on Suwayda—a dismal piece, considering the government explicitly denied both the meeting and the allegations. The agency never responded to any of the Ministry’s remarks, which were methodological rather than political. It’s clear that the agency, which had previously been lenient with the Assad regime and, perhaps due to staff backgrounds, avoided reporting on Hezbollah or Iraqi militias, is now leading a sustained campaign against the new Syrian government.
The same applies to a renowned news channel that insists on sectarian coverage—possibly influenced by its reporting staff. While they loudly tout media freedom, they ignore the recurring scandals that have plagued their coverage of events such as Gaza, Iraq, and others.
Mohammed Al-Saleh
Over the past three months, the Ministry of Information has placed significant emphasis on revitalizing the work of the Directorate of External Media in line with the unprecedented interest shown by foreign media outlets in covering Syria. This stems from our conviction that all media platforms should be present on the ground and that their work should be facilitated in ways that help break away from the sectarian frameworks that have colored their coverage throughout the years of the revolution.
Our efforts have not been limited to easing their entry, issuing the necessary permits, and ensuring their safety. We have also engaged in daily dialogue with them regarding various issues relating to journalism and the political situation in Syria. For instance, the Minister of Information conducted more than 50 separate sessions with journalists, researchers, and media outlets to explain the complexities of the Syrian situation and provide material needed for their work. Our goal was never to impose a government narrative, but rather to contribute to the creation of constructive and responsible journalism that plays a positive role during Syria’s difficult transitional phase—even if that role is critical.
This approach succeeded with many journalists and outlets whose reports helped convey an authentic understanding of Syria. However, it failed with certain major institutions that approached the Syrian experience with arrogance and a superiority complex, aiming to confirm their pre-existing assumptions about what is happening.
One prominent example involved an international agency that contacted us regarding an investigation into economic activity in the new phase and the influential forces shaping it. We responded positively, welcomed them at the Ministry, and promised to reply once they sent us the findings. Indeed, their report arrived, written in a tone that can only be described as definitive, based on what they called “facts” that in our view are indistinguishable from social media content. In order to present a clearer picture, we agreed to send a detailed response within two weeks, given that the topic requires data and testimony from various official entities.
However, the agency insisted on receiving our response before the Syrian-Saudi Investment Forum, seemingly intending to publish the report concurrently to disrupt it. They refused to postpone their publication, despite the author claiming to have spent seven months researching the report. If the agency had truly sought to clarify the situation, it would have considered both our response and its timing. Unfortunately, it’s evident that political motives outweighed adherence to professional ethics.
This pattern repeated with their coastal report. They requested our feedback on findings but didn’t wait for the coastal investigation committee, ignored its observations, and omitted the committee head’s response. They were intent on publishing prior to President Trump signing the executive order to lift sanctions.
They even published a report claiming that the Syrian government had misunderstood messages from the Baku meeting and subsequently launched a military campaign on Suwayda—a dismal piece, considering the government explicitly denied both the meeting and the allegations. The agency never responded to any of the Ministry’s remarks, which were methodological rather than political. It’s clear that the agency, which had previously been lenient with the Assad regime and, perhaps due to staff backgrounds, avoided reporting on Hezbollah or Iraqi militias, is now leading a sustained campaign against the new Syrian government.
The same applies to a renowned news channel that insists on sectarian coverage—possibly influenced by its reporting staff. While they loudly tout media freedom, they ignore the recurring scandals that have plagued their coverage of events such as Gaza, Iraq, and others.
❤3🙏1
🇮🇷 | Imam Khamenei (H) delivered a speech today morning:
The commemoration ceremony for the martyrs of the recent imposed war was held this morning, Tuesday, at Imam Khomeini Hussainiyah, with the presence of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, the esteemed families of the martyrs, a group of senior civil and military officials, and the general public. Imam Khamenei delivered a brief speech during a part of the ceremony. Details ahead:
🔹@enemywatch
The commemoration ceremony for the martyrs of the recent imposed war was held this morning, Tuesday, at Imam Khomeini Hussainiyah, with the presence of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, the esteemed families of the martyrs, a group of senior civil and military officials, and the general public. Imam Khamenei delivered a brief speech during a part of the ceremony. Details ahead:
🔹@enemywatch
❤24