✅ | Egypt, which usually proposes the American plans under its own name, has added a clause stating that a return to ceasefire requires the full disarmament of Hamas and the Palestinian resistance. When you see European powers coming out with papers and statements emphasizing the urgent need for a ceasefire in Gaza due to the dire humanitarian situation, you must understand how they are playing their game—a game of image-driven pressure. And this is exactly what resistance means: to endure this painful and immense pressure. Hamas has rejected these proposals.

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | When so-called Muslim regimes actively participate in or support the most inhuman pressure policies—aligning themselves with those who are starving an entire nation—you have to ask: what is the moral standing of these nations, and what is the state of their regimes and officials? Leading ulama in the Arab region have utterly failed in their responsibilities, and it is now clearer than ever why certain hadiths warned about such figures, labeling them as criminals in religious disguise. The fatwa factories, tied closely to the state, remained silent or complicit. Grand muftis across many Islamic countries issued fatwas that aligned more with political interests than with the principles of justice. No armed or sensible religious authority responded in meaningful way to these fatawas which is indeed troubling. This is a collective shame and a staggering failure. Believe it or not, there will come a day when you will have to answer to your Prophet (S) for what you stood by—and what you stood against.

🔹@enemywatch

🟢 Breaking | Sami Abu Zuhri, Head of Hamas’ Political Bureau Abroad:

- Surrender is not an option for Hamas. We will not accept the breaking of our people's will and will use every means of pressure against the occupation.

- For the first time, Israel is demanding the disarmament of the resistance as a precondition for phase two of negotiations. This is non-negotiable.

🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 Breaking: U.S. aggression hits Yemen with 15 airstrikes across multiple districts.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷:🎨: Report | Iran's Mr. Hassan Rouhulameen, the renowned painter, describes his painting of Hazrat Hamza (A) to Imam Khamenei (H) on the occasion of the anniversary of the Battle of Uhud and the martyrdom of Sayyid al-Shuhada Hamza ibn Abd al-Mutallib (A):

Hassan Rouhulameen says:

“I painted this work during the same days that Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah and Sayyid Safi al-Din were martyred. It was a bitter time we lived through. I displayed the painting to Imam Khamenei during one of his meetings.

In that meeting, I told Imam Khamenei that I began this work with the intention of portraying one of the heroes and legends of Islamic history: Hazrat Hamza (A). Alongside Hazrat Abu Talib (A), he was among the closest and most significant supporters of the Messenger of Allah, especially during the difficult years in the Valley of Abu Talib (A). He was a firm pillar of the call to Islam and the resistance against the disbelievers and polytheists. His stature and greatness are so profound that it’s narrated that Sayyidah Fatima (S), after the incident that led to her martyrdom while defending the rights of Amir al-Mu’minin Imam Ali (A), went to the grave of Hazrat Hamza (A) and said:

‘Dear uncle, if you were here, this would not have happened to us, and no one would have dared to treat us this way.’ I began this piece with that mindset.

Later, when I heard the Leader emphasize the importance of reflecting on the lessons and insights from the martyrdom of Hazrat Hamza (A), I was truly happy. It confirmed that I had chosen the right path at the right time.

For the scene I depicted, I chose the moment of Hazrat Hamza (A) hunting a lion.

In an unspoken tradition, Orientalist painters often illustrate lion hunts. More importantly, I wanted to reflect the greatness of this figure, as the power to hunt a lion symbolizes strength, valor, and warrior spirit. I was also careful not to depict any violence or bloodshed—no wounds, arrows, or anything harming the animal.”

The painting published with the statement of Imam Khamenei (H) which says:

“From the very first moment that Hazrat Hamza was martyred, the Prophet (S) intended to make him a role model. When the Prophet gave him the title ‘Sayyid al-Shuhada’ (Master of the Martyrs)… that was an act of role-modeling—not just for that time, but for all of history and for all Muslims.”

🔸@enemywatch

🥀 | The number of testimonies from the massacres in Syria—carried out by Erdogan’s terrorists—and from Gaza is so overwhelming that it’s impossible to post them all. And yet, skipping them or ignoring them feels like a betrayal. It’s not just hard—it’s heartbreaking. There’s a deep, suffocating pain that comes with reading each account. It brings emotional breakdown, grief, and rage. After 19 months, it’s truly heartbreaking. It feels like it should have been enough by now—enough pain, enough loss, enough horror to demand control, to end it. But it hasn’t stopped. And watching it continue, helplessly, tears you apart from the inside.


🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 Breaking: 10 martyrs killed in U.S. airstrikes on Hodeidah, Yemen:

Ten Yemeni martyrs were confirmed killed following U.S. airstrikes on Hodeidah, as Washington intensifies its terror aggression across western Yemen.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | As expected, the Oman talks are merely one of many responsibilities carried out by the Foreign Ministry and, on their own, appear to lack real strategic weight. There is little indication that they will result in any concrete implementation. Trusting the United States—particularly in light of its continued hostility and threats, such as Trump’s recent rhetoric—remains both naïve and dangerous. These negotiations hold no inherent value when the opposing party has repeatedly acted in bad faith.

Imam’s remarks make the state position abundantly clear: “The Oman negotiations are just one among dozens of tasks handled by the Foreign Ministry. We should not tie the country’s issues to negotiations.” This line alone dismantles any illusion that these talks are central to Iran’s broader national agenda. Imam explicitly warns against both overconfidence and defeatism, recognizing that the process may have some tactical use, but emphasizing that the country’s trajectory should not be dependent on it.

Furthermore, his statement that “we are very distrustful of the other side—but confident in our own capabilities” reflects a key doctrinal stance: Iran’s strength lies in self-reliance, not in diplomatic engagement with historically untrustworthy counterparts. These talks, then, are not endorsed as a strategic breakthrough but acknowledged as a procedural move—useful perhaps in rhetoric, but ultimately peripheral.

It is critical to recognize that this is not a pivot, nor a reconciliation strategy—it is damage control at best, optics at most. The regime’s posture remains defensive, pragmatic, and rooted in skepticism. To portray these talks as a sign of shifting policy would be a fundamental misreading of both the tone and intent of Iran’s leadership.

So Enjoy!

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 Breaking: Imam Khamenei (H):

Do not tie the country’s affairs to these negotiations.

Let us not repeat the mistake we made with the JCPOA.

During the JCPOA era, we conditioned the country—linking everything to the progress of the negotiations.

When investors see that a country’s future is dependent on negotiations, they refrain from investing.

The Iran–US talks are proceeding in a good and professional manner, and our red lines are well defined. There will be no repeat of the JCPOA experience.

I advise officials to remain committed to this path. The negotiations may yield results—or they may not. But the country’s affairs must not be dependent on these talks. Trust in the capabilities of our nation. Don’t place all your eggs in one basket—pursue other national objectives in parallel.

If the talks succeed, good. If not, we move forward regardless. National progress must continue, and we must not become distracted or paralyzed by the negotiations.


🔹@enemywatch